Sales Tel: +63 945 7983492  |  Email Us    
SMDC Residences

Air Residences

Features and Amenities

Reflective Pool
Function Terrace
Seating Alcoves

Air Residences

Green 2 Residences

Features and Amenities:

Wifi ready study area
Swimming Pool
Gym and Function Room

Green 2 Residences

Bloom Residences

Features and Amenities:

Recreational Area
2 Lap Pools
Ground Floor Commercial Areas

Bloom Residences

Leaf Residences

Features and Amenities:

3 Swimming Pools
Gym and Fitness Center
Outdoor Basketball Court

Leaf Residences

Contact Us

Contact us today for a no obligation quotation:

+63 945 7983492
+63 908 8820391

Copyright © 2018 SMDC :: SM Residences, All Rights Reserved.

ST0-118 dumps with Real exam Questions and Practice Test -

Great Place to download 100% free ST0-118 braindumps, real exam questions and practice test with VCE exam simulator to ensure your 100% success in the ST0-118 -

Pass4sure ST0-118 dumps | ST0-118 real questions |

ST0-118 Symantec Enterprise Vault 10.0 for(R) Exchange Technical Assessment

Study Guide Prepared by Symantec Dumps Experts ST0-118 Dumps and Real Questions

100% Real Questions - Exam Pass Guarantee with High Marks - Just Memorize the Answers

ST0-118 exam Dumps Source : Symantec Enterprise Vault 10.0 for(R) Exchange Technical Assessment

Test Code : ST0-118
Test Name : Symantec Enterprise Vault 10.0 for(R) Exchange Technical Assessment
Vendor Name : Symantec
: 318 Real Questions

Are there authentic resources for ST0-118 study guides?
im very happy with the ST0-118 QAs, it helped me lot in exam center. i can certainly come for different Symantec certifications also.

need actual exam questions modern ST0-118 exam? download right here.
A few suitable guys cant convey an alteration to the worlds manner but they can pleasant let you know whether or not or no longer you have been the best man who knew a manner to do that and i want to be seemed in this international and make my very own mark and i have been so lame my whole manner but I understand now that I desired to get a skip in my ST0-118 and this may make me well-known perhaps and sure i am short of glory however passing my A+ test with became my morning and night time glory.

Shortest questions that works in real test environment.
im now ST0-118 licensed and it could not be viable without ST0-118 trying out engine. exam simulator has been tailored keeping in thoughts the necessities of the students which they confront at the time of taking ST0-118 exam. This trying out engine is very tons exam consciousness and each subject matter has been addressed in element simply to maintain apprised the scholars from each and each statistics. team is aware of that this is the manner to maintain college students confident and ever equipped for taking exam.

Benefits of ST0-118 certification.
For entire ST0-118 career certifications, there may be lots of facts available on line. Yet, I changed into hesitant to use ST0-118 free braindumps as people who put these things on line do now not feel any obligation and post deceptive data. So, I paid for the ST0-118 q and a and couldnt be happier. It is authentic that they provide you with real exam questions and answers, that is how it was for me. I passed the ST0-118 exam and didnt even strain about it lots. Very cool and reliable.

It was first experience but Great Experience!
ST0-118 is the hardest exam I have ever come across. I spent months studying for it, with all official resources and everything one could find - and failed it miserably. But I didnt give up! A few months later, I added to my preparation schedule and kept practicing on the exam simulator and the real exam questions they provide. I believe this is exactly what helped me pass the second time around! I wish I hadnt wasted the time and money on all this unnecessary stuff (their books arent bad in general, but I believe they dont give you the best exam preparation).

wherein am i able to locate ST0-118 trendy and updated dumps questions? Dumps web page helped me get get entry to to diverse exam training dump for ST0-118 exam. I was careworn that which one I need to choose, however your specimens helped me select the exceptional one. I purchased Dumps course, which fairly helped me see all the fundamental thoughts. I solved all questions in due time. I am pleased to have as my instruct. Much preferred

it's miles really extraordinary enjoy to have ST0-118 actual test questions.
Hearty way to team for the question & solution of ST0-118 exam. It provided brilliant option to my questions on ST0-118 I felt confident to stand the test. Observed many questions inside the exam paper a great deal likethe manual. I strongly experience that the manual remains valid. Respect the try with the aid of using your team individuals, The gadget of dealing topics in a very specific and uncommon manner is terrific. Wish you people create more such test publications in close to destiny for their comfort.

right place to find out ST0-118 today's dumps paper.
This exam preparation kit has proven itself to be absolutely worth the money as I passed the ST0-118 exam earlier this week with the score of 94%. All questions are valid, this is what they give you at the exam! I dont know how does it, but they have been keeping this up for years. My cousin used them for another IT exam years ago and says they were just as good back in the day. Very reliable and trustworthy.

actual test ST0-118 questions.
I cracked my ST0-118 exam on my first try with seventy two.Five% in just 2 days of training. Thank you to your treasured questions. I did the exam without any fear. Looking ahead to easy the ST0-118 exam in conjunction with your assist.

How much does it cost ST0-118 qustions bank with real dumps
The quality guidance i have ever skilled. I took many ST0-118 certification checks, however ST0-118 became out to be the perfect one way to I have currently determined this internet website and wish I knew approximately it a few years inside the past. May have stored me some of sleepless nights and gray hair! The ST0-118 exam isnt always an smooth one, specificallyits current version. But the ST0-118 Q and A consists of the trendy questions, each day updates, and people are with out a doubtright and legitimate questions. I am happy this is genuine purpose I got most of them all through my exam. I were given an great score and thank to making ST0-118 exam stress-free.

Symantec Symantec Enterprise Vault 10.0

updated business Vault Enhances Archiving in SharePoint, alternate, Clearwell eDiscovery Platform | Real Questions and Pass4sure dumps

updated enterprise Vault Enhances Archiving in SharePoint, trade, Clearwell eDiscovery Platform

elements enable archiving of additional SharePoint content, enhanced change reporting.

word: ESJ’s editors carefully opt for dealer-issued press releases about new or upgraded items and capabilities. we've edited and/or condensed this unlock to highlight key elements however make no claims as to the accuracy of the seller's statements.

Symantec has launched commercial enterprise Vault 10.0.2, containing big enhancements to Microsoft SharePoint archiving and adding Microsoft change archiving studies and better integration with the Clearwell eDiscovery Platform from Symantec.

New elements in commercial enterprise Vault 10.0.2 consist of:

  • Archive extra SharePoint content material: enterprise Vault 10.0.2 permits you to archive SharePoint content past doc libraries. Now firms can archive wikis, discussion boards, custom lists, “My websites,” and SharePoint social content material for elevated storage optimization, retention, and expiration of content in addition to eDiscovery readiness. as a result, users can improved manage complicated initiatives akin to migrations, versioning, and location consolidations and expiration with SharePoint archiving.
  • enhanced change reporting: business Vault 10.0.2 now presents more advantageous stories -- virtual Vault client Diagnostic and better Microsoft change archive reporting -- that provide up to date and proactive administration of your mail archiving.
  • Clearwell eDiscovery platform integration: business Vault 10.0.2 optimizes eDiscovery via integrating with the Clearwell eDiscovery Platform edition 7.1.2. This integration allows investigators to make use of Clearwell to go looking all kinds of assistance in enterprise Vault directly. moreover, they could seamlessly discover and follow legal holds across both archived and non-archived content material to in the reduction of time and fees linked to guide assortment.
  • additional enterprise Vault 10.0.2 aspects include certification of SQL Server 2012, file equipment archiving supported on windows 2008 R2 Core Server, and a file gadget archiving API.

    business consumers with a existing upkeep settlement can down load the replace from Symantec FileConnect. For extra product tips, talk over with enterprise-vault.

    DLT options broadcasts Symantec business Vault for Amazon web capabilities | Real Questions and Pass4sure dumps

    HERNDON, Va.--(business WIRE)--DLT options, a leading value-added reseller in government information technology (IT) hardware, application and services, nowadays introduced the launch of its new cloud-hosted, deepest e-mail archiving solution, Symantec commercial enterprise Vault for Amazon internet capabilities (AWS). Architected via DLT solutions, the solution brings together Symantec’s award-winning, business Vault and the FedRAMP Compliant Amazon web features (AWS) Cloud.

    Symantec commercial enterprise Vault, the business chief in archiving, allows executive businesses to successfully keep, effectively manipulate and simply discover and retrieve unstructured information as essential. A pilot software from DLT solutions is available for brand spanking new clients that are interested in enforcing the answer within their environments. With Symantec commercial enterprise Vault for AWS, public sector companies can leverage an on-demand, elastic, scalable, and completely-configured ambiance for archiving of their unstructured records and correspondence.

    DLT options is uniquely positioned to offer this answer by proposing consumers with conclusion-to-conclusion delivery and support for each Symantec and AWS options and capabilities.

    “Symantec enterprise Vault for AWS enables public sector companies to leverage a FedRAMP compliant cloud carrier provider to host their electronic mail archiving platform,” explained David Blankenhorn, vice chairman of engineering and chief cloud technologist at DLT solutions. “Managing e mail is among the vital aspects that every agency need to consider when laying out their advice governance foundation. An agency’s email administration strategy impacts stakeholders across the complete organization, from felony, FOIA, statistics management and IT, to the company’s independent inside investigators.”

    With Symantec business Vault for AWS, public sector consumers gain more advantageous handle over the management of electronic mail for statistics management, digital discovery, and Freedom of tips Act (FOIA) purposes, in addition to presenting the skill to all of a sudden respond to congressional inquiries.

    Symantec enterprise Vault for AWS advantages encompass:

  • Integration with cloud based mostly electronic mail providers
  • Compliance with the national Archives and facts Administration’s (NARA) Capstone guidance for email data management and the office of management and funds Directive 12-18
  • comfy and authentic immutable email repository holding Blind Carbon copy (BCC)
  • One principal e-mail repository for company tips, FOIA professionals, and interior investigators to enhanced respond to congressional inquiries, FOIA requests, electronic discovery, and inside investigations
  • hosting on the FedRAMP compliant IaaS platform from AWS
  • Integration with downstream electronic discovery tools for superior analysis, evaluation, and creation
  • No further capital investment in infrastructure and a flexible pricing mannequin
  • DLT options, Symantec’s biggest federal partner, was these days named a Symantec Platinum associate with professional talents in Archiving, Endpoint safety and enterprise Backup & healing. furthermore, DLT solutions become named an AWS Premier Consulting associate closing December. DLT options is a platinum sponsor of the 2015 Symantec govt Symposium being held April 15, 2015 at the Walter E. Washington convention middle, Washington, D.C.

    if your corporation is drawn to collaborating in a Pilot application for new users, and would like to leverage their enterprise Vault for Amazon net capabilities offering, please contact the DLT options Symantec group at 888-223-7083 or email us at

    About Symantec enterprise Vault

    Symantec business Vault is part of Symantec’s suggestions administration portfolio in order to turn into part of a brand new, unbiased enterprise, Veritas applied sciences company, when the up to now announced separation is accomplished at the conclusion of calendar year 2015.

    About DLT options

    For greater than twenty years, DLT options has been the IT application and solutions company of option for federal, state, native executive and training shoppers. by using hand selecting its company companions including Amazon web capabilities, Autodesk, Google, NetApp, Oracle, Dell application, purple Hat, Solarwinds and Symantec, DLT fulfills its mission to be a price-brought reseller of handiest the most appropriate application and hardware items and capabilities, in addition to a premier issuer of technical help, through its many government contracts. The business focuses on carefully-chosen answer areas — Cloud Computing, information center Consolidation, Geospatial facts systems and desktop-Aided Design for Utilities and Manufacturing. For greater information or to region an order, contact DLT solutions at 800-262-4358; email; or consult with also, on LinkedIn and Twitter (@DLTSolutions).

    commercial enterprise Vault information archiving application involves cloud, social media | Real Questions and Pass4sure dumps

    LAS VEGAS -- Symantec Corp. nowadays added policy-primarily based safety as well as a hosted cloud providing and support for social media to its business Vault statistics archiving software.

    With enterprise Vault 10, Symantec switched to a knowledge classification module based on its coverage-based mostly facts loss prevention (DLP) expertise to assist shoppers stay away from statistics from leaking outside the firm. The records classification module is used to tag labeled facts and investigate how long to hold it throughout statistics archiving for tips governance, e mail storage management and email e-discovery.

    policy-primarily based security is in keeping with providing the identification of licensed users and granting distinctive levels of access for users.

    Symantec launched enterprise Vault 10 right through the 2nd day of its vision 2011 consumer conference. Symantec is a legacy protection vendor that got backup and storage management vendor Veritas application in 2005.due to the fact the acquisition, Symantec has introduced some security to its storage items however has in the main kept its storage and safety products separate.

    “here's an instance of Symantec doing integration between storage and security,” spoke of Sheila Childs, analysis director in Gartner’s Storage concepts and technologies neighborhood. “commercial enterprise Vault 10 has a data classification module in line with the records loss prevention code.”

    business Vault 10 supports facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn via integrated third-celebration items from Actiance, CommonDesk and Socialware. The product previously supported email, SharePoint and instant message archiving.

    facts archiving utility to the cloud

    As with the latest edition of its Backup Exec application launched Monday, Symantec has added a cloud element to commercial enterprise Vault. is a hosted public cloud providing with out a hardware, software or plug-ins to set up and maintain on the client site.

    Amit Walia, Symantec's vice chairman for product administration, noted the business is the usage of an o.e.m companion to archive the records and Symantec has put its enterprise brand on it. enterprise is a utility as a provider (SaaS) offering in which an agent is placed on a consumer’s server archive statistics via the cyber web.

    Symantec pointed out it will encrypt statistics in transit and at rest, and guarantees swift look for

    “Symantec essential a solution right here,” Gartner's Childs stated. “they're going to make loads of noise right here and it'll provide them a bigger presence during this market than they up to now had.”

    business is focused for small- to medium-sized corporations (SMBs) and can be utilized in remote workplaces for the midmarket. It could be in beta this summer and launch in the fall.

    While it is very hard task to choose reliable certification questions / answers resources with respect to review, reputation and validity because people get ripoff due to choosing wrong service. make it sure to serve its clients best to its resources with respect to exam dumps update and validity. Most of other's ripoff report complaint clients come to us for the brain dumps and pass their exams happily and easily. They never compromise on their review, reputation and quality because killexams review, killexams reputation and killexams client confidence is important to us. Specially they take care of review, reputation, ripoff report complaint, trust, validity, report and scam. If you see any false report posted by their competitors with the name killexams ripoff report complaint internet, ripoff report, scam, complaint or something like this, just keep in mind that there are always bad people damaging reputation of good services due to their benefits. There are thousands of satisfied customers that pass their exams using brain dumps, killexams PDF questions, killexams practice questions, killexams exam simulator. Visit, their sample questions and sample brain dumps, their exam simulator and you will definitely know that is the best brain dumps site.

    Back to Braindumps Menu

    HP3-C30 exam questions | 642-654 study guide | CPIM-BSP pdf download | 000-M13 dump | 1Z0-597 Practice test | P8010-005 test questions | HP0-M74 mock exam | 000-913 practice test | 00M-663 braindumps | QQ0-401 free pdf download | HP0-876 bootcamp | 1Z0-807 real questions | 1Z0-338 test prep | 000-990 VCE | 000-537 braindumps | 000-664 practice questions | S90-01A examcollection | SPS-201 practice exam | NS0-180 free pdf | HPE0-J76 brain dumps |

    Individuals utilized these Symantec dumps to get 100% marks
    We have Tested and Approved ST0-118 Exams. gives the most specific and most recent IT exam materials which nearly comprise all exam topics. With the database of their ST0-118 exam materials, you do not have to squander your opportunity on perusing time consuming reference books and surely need to burn thru 10-20 hours to ace their ST0-118 real questions and answers.

    We have Tested and Approved ST0-118 Exams. gives the most unique and latest IT exam materials which practically comprise all braindumps. With the guide of their ST0-118 exam materials, you do not need to spend big time on reference books and virtually need to burn through 10-20 hours to ace their ST0-118 real questions and answers. Whats greater, they supply you with PDF Version and Software Version exam questions and answers. For Software Version materials, Its presented to give the applicants mimic the Symantec ST0-118 exam in a real exam environment. Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
    WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for all assessments on website
    PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders extra than $69
    DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders extra than $ninety nine
    DECSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for All Orders

    The most ideal approach to get achievement in the Symantec ST0-118 exam is that you should accomplish solid preliminary materials. They ensure that is the greatest direct pathway closer to Implementing Symantec Symantec Enterprise Vault 10.0 for(R) Exchange Technical Assessment authentication. You can be successful with full self conviction. You can see free inquiries at sooner than you buy the ST0-118 exam items. Their mimicked evaluations are in two or three decision like the genuine exam design. The inquiries and answers made by the guaranteed specialists. They offer you with the appreciate of taking the genuine exam. 100% guarantee to breeze through the ST0-118 real test. Symantec Certification exam courses are setup by method for IT masters. Bunches of understudies have been grumbling that excessively numerous inquiries in such a considerable measure of activity tests and exam courses, and they're simply exhausted to discover the cash for any more prominent. Seeing experts instructional course this entire form in the meantime as in any case ensure that every one the data is incorporated after profound research and assessment. Everything is to make accommodation for competitors on their street to certification.

    We have Tested and Approved ST0-118 Exams. gives the most right and most recent IT exam materials which almost contain all data references. With the guide of their ST0-118 brain dumps, you don't need to squander your opportunity on examining greater part of reference books and basically need to burn through 10-20 hours to ace their ST0-118 real issues and replies. Furthermore, they furnish you with PDF Version and Software Version exam inquiries and answers. For Software Version materials, Its introduced to give the candidates recreate the Symantec ST0-118 exam in a genuine domain.

    We offer free supplant. Inside legitimacy length, if ST0-118 brain dumps that you have bought updated, they will illuminate you with the guide of email to down load best in class model of . if you don't pass your Symantec Symantec Enterprise Vault 10.0 for(R) Exchange Technical Assessment exam, They will give you full refund. You need to transport the verified imitation of your ST0-118 exam record card to us. Subsequent to affirming, they will quick give you FULL REFUND. Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
    WC2017: 60% Discount Coupon for all exams on website
    PROF17: 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
    DEAL17: 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
    DECSPECIAL: 10% Special Discount Coupon for All Orders

    On the off chance that you set up together for the Symantec ST0-118 exam the utilization of their experimenting with engine. It is easy to prevail for all certifications in the principal endeavor. You don't must adapt to all dumps or any free downpour/rapidshare all stuff. They offer free demo of each IT Certification Dumps. You can try out the interface, question decent and ease of use of their activity appraisals before settling on a choice to purchase.

    ST0-118 | ST0-118 | ST0-118 | ST0-118 | ST0-118 | ST0-118

    Killexams 9A0-039 questions and answers | Killexams 9L0-420 dumps questions | Killexams 1Z0-495 braindumps | Killexams HP0-683 mock exam | Killexams 9L0-521 questions and answers | Killexams 1Z0-339 practice questions | Killexams IELTS free pdf download | Killexams VCS-273 test prep | Killexams CD0-001 study guide | Killexams ST0-12W free pdf | Killexams COG-605 examcollection | Killexams 1Z0-932 test prep | Killexams 4H0-100 practice test | Killexams HP3-L05 cheat sheets | Killexams HP2-B86 VCE | Killexams VCS-276 pdf download | Killexams C9560-503 dump | Killexams HP2-N48 test prep | Killexams 1Y0-456 Practice test | Killexams SC0-501 bootcamp | huge List of Exam Braindumps

    View Complete list of Brain dumps

    Killexams 201-450 pdf download | Killexams HP2-E56 questions and answers | Killexams HP0-831 cheat sheets | Killexams HP0-M31 dumps | Killexams 000-M88 exam prep | Killexams HD0-100 exam prep | Killexams HP2-Z21 real questions | Killexams 00M-617 real questions | Killexams 312-49 practice questions | Killexams 3M0-212 exam questions | Killexams HP0-662 dump | Killexams 70-761 braindumps | Killexams P2050-007 practice test | Killexams S90-01 dumps questions | Killexams 1Z0-970 practice questions | Killexams HP2-B113 cram | Killexams HP2-F01 questions and answers | Killexams 310-876 questions answers | Killexams C9530-410 test questions | Killexams HP2-K09 study guide |

    Symantec Enterprise Vault 10.0 for(R) Exchange Technical Assessment

    Pass 4 sure ST0-118 dumps | ST0-118 real questions |

    Sun Reports Surge of Customer Adoption for Sun Unified Storage Family, Saving Users Over $50 Million in Storage Costs To Date | real questions and Pass4sure dumps

    Sun Microsystems Inc. (NASDAQ:JAVA) today announced that hundreds of customers across a range of industries have purchased high-performance, eco-efficient Flash-enabled Sun(TM) Storage 7000 Systems to store more than 17 petabytes of total data, making it the fastest ramping new product in Sun's storage portfolio ever. Continuing to add innovation to its Open Storage portfolio and Open Network Systems strategy, Sun also announced hardware capacity enhancements to the Sun Unified Storage family and an upgrade to its Analytics software, which ships with the Sun Storage 7000 line and gives storage administrators unparalleled insight into their storage systems. For a demo of the enhanced Sun Unified Storage family or to download software, please go to

    "As the Open Storage revolution continues to gain traction with customers, partners and the channel, it's radically simplifying how customers approach storage management. The unparalleled observability these unified storage systems gives customers is fast making traditional storage solutions a thing of the past," says John Fowler, executive vice president, Systems Group, Sun Microsystems.

    As part of Sun's Open Network Systems approach, Sun's Unified Storage Systems bring speed, simplicity and savings to customers. New technology enhancements announced today include:

  • Sun Storage 7000 Software upgrade 2009.Q2 – Over 15 new features added to breakthrough analytics capabilities and Windows integration. Built upon industry standard components and open source software, new functionality can be deployed quickly to support ever growing customer environments.
  • Double the capacity of Sun Storage 7110 system, from two to four terabytes, making it one of the most dense in its class.
  • More than tripled the capacity of Sun Storage 7210 system to 142 terabytes; these new, high-efficient systems leverage solid state disk (SSD) Flash technology.
  • Faced with a challenging economic climate and rapid data growth, storage operators and administrators need a way to better manage costs and save time. Based on cost efficient industry standard components and a robust software stack that leverages the tested OpenSolarisTM operating system (OS), Solaris(TM) ZFS(TM), award-winning Solaris(TM) Dynamic Tracing (DTrace) and a community of independent software vendors (ISVs), the Sun Storage 7000 family can be installed and configured in under five minutes, uses three times less power and space and costs up to 75% less than traditional disk storage offerings. These systems also include the industry's most simple and comprehensive analytics environment and includes innovative new tools to help isolate and resolve issues to minimize the impact on daily operations.

    Customers, Partners and the Channel Drive Sales Surge of Unified Storage Family

    The Sun Storage 7000 Unified Storage System family delivers breakthrough performance while radically simplifying the way customers manage storage with unprecedented speed, scale and cost savings. More than 800 customers have adopted the Sun Unified Storage family in under five months, across a wide range of deployments, including VMware virtualization, Web MySQL(TM) database/rich media and media/entertainment, as well as high-performance computing, education, government, healthcare and telecommunications. Photo, video, music and social networking Web sites have also switched to the Sun Storage 7000 platform to reduce the costs associated with storing increasing amounts of rich media content. Sun's storage line has also proven to be an ideal platform for Solaris, Windows, and Linux consolidation projects - delivering lower cost per service with the utmost storage simplicity.

    "An increasing number of customers are realizing that the benefits of their server virtualization projects can also be applied to their storage environments,” said Parag Patel, vice president, alliances, VMware. "The new Sun Storage 7000 Unified Storage System can offer their customers a simplified approach to virtualized storage, with NFS and data management services that help customers do more with less while enabling greater efficiency, control and choice in their datacenters."

    EasySpeedy, Media Temple, Motionbox, Monash University, Canada's TV5, University of South Florida, and other customers are among the 800 strong that have switched to a Sun Unified Storage System for dramatic time and money savings. Highlighted customer testimonials below - learn about their experiences and savings at

  • "Motionbox offers something unique - a safe, friendly, private online resource for individuals and families to store and share video in vivid HD quality. This naturally demands that they engineer a well tuned, highly responsive storage environment, and they have built just that around the Sun Storage 7410. My team was immediately abuzz when the 7000 series hit the market last fall. This solution was the best deal on high-capacity storage that we’d ever seen. Most important, however, the 7000 series is equally adept at serving both high-traffic videos and the 'long tail' of user-generated content – all on a single unit. Because their 7410 cluster comes configured with sizeable amounts of read & write cache, it can effortlessly serve content and support lots of transcoding operations across a wide spectrum of video usage patterns and the full path of a video’s lifecycle. Sun unified storage gives us the flexibility to tune and configure multiple instances of the same device for throughput or capacity or whatever their needs may be. Thanks, too, to the Sun Startup Essentials program, where I got the opportunity to discuss in-depth with Sun engineers to validate the best storage architecture to meet their intense demands." - Chris Brown, VP Engineering, Motionbox. Inc.
  • "During their evaluation of the OpenStorage 7410, they found that the combination of read and write biased flash storage and disk outperformed systems with four to five times the number of spinning disks (and without any read write flash). They are still evaluating these units for use in a customer facing capacity, but they are definitely going to use these units in a data retention and data processing capacity. The expandability and the analytics capabilities offered by the Sun Storage 7410 units are very enticing to us, and may allow us to make some major changes to the architecture of their storage systems,” said Joshua Barratt, CTO, Media Temple.
  • "After testing and optimizing the Sun unified storage solution, they were surprised and impressed to discover that Sun's open solution was interoperable with their existing broadcast infrastructure. By prioritizing video applications, they were also able to use the solution with virtualization in their IT operation. They had considered a competitive NAS solution, but the cost was 25% greater and didn't give us the necessary throughput. Ultimately, the combination of exceptional value, capacity, tuning of applications and Sun's analytics led us to consolidate all data for both their IT and broadcast infrastructures on a Sun unified storage system," said Regis Harrison, director of production and technologies, TV5 Canada.
  • In addition, over 30 new independent software vendors and partners have certified applications for the Sun Unified Storage Systems, including VMware and Symantec. With new tools like the Hands on Lab, the channel has had a major impact in the dramatic sales growth for the Sun Unified Storage Systems.

    New Mid-Market Solution for Sun Storage 7000

    Sun also recently expanded its portfolio of mid-market solutions with the introduction of an Open Archive solution that pairs the Sun Storage 7110 and 7210 Unified Storage Systems and ultra-scalable Sun Fire(TM) X4140 and Sun Fire(TM) X4240 servers with industry-leading Symantec Enterprise Vault 8 software. The resulting Open Archive solution for mid-sized companies delivers tested and optimized storage and server configurations that make it easy for customers to very simply archive many different types of data, such as files/records, email, instant messaging and sharepoint content while ensuring data integrity. By using four times less power and half the footprint, the Sun and Symantec Open Archive Solution can significantly reduce storage costs, minimizing management complexity and increasing storage ROI. For more information on Sun's Open Archive solution visit

    Sun Eases Migration to Open Storage With Tools and Expertise

    New Sun Services for the Sun Storage 7000 Family include:

  • Implementation and Assessment Services -- Goes beyond standard setup and basic diagnostics of standard installation to provide select configuration and validation information. Provides the expertise to help ensure that systems are running at an optimal level right from the first installation.
  • Sun Unified Storage Data Migration Services -- Minimizes disruption and allows full feature functionality of new technology investments. Securely migrate data using MD5 hashing for file and security validation and speed time to ROI with Sun's deep technical expertise and tools.

    To learn more about Sun's Open Storage solutions, please see <>.


    Sun Microsystems develops the technologies that power the global marketplace. Guided by a singular vision -- "The Network Is The Computer(TM)" -- Sun drives network participation through shared innovation, community development and open source leadership. Sun can be found in more than 100 countries and on the Web at _

    Sun, Sun Microsystems, the Sun logo, Java, Solaris, Sun Fire, Sun StorageTek, MySQL, Solaris ZFS and The Network Is The Computer are trademarks or registered trademarks of Sun Microsystems, Inc. or its subsidiaries in the United States and other countries.

    SWM ANNOUNCES FOURTH QUARTER AND FULL YEAR 2017 RESULTS | real questions and Pass4sure dumps

    ALPHARETTA, GA, February 21, 2018 -- Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. ("SWM" or the "Company") (SWM) reported earnings results for the three month and full year periods ended December 31, 2017.

    Adjusted measures are reconciled to GAAP at the end of this release.  Financial measures are from continuing operations and per share data is on a diluted basis.  Financial and operational comparisons are versus the comparable prior year period.  Key definitions: Advanced Materials & Structures (AMS), Engineered Papers (EP), Low Ignition Propensity (LIP), Reconstituted Tobacco Leaf (RTL), and Heat-not-Burn (HnB)

    Dr. Jeff Kramer, Chief Executive Officer, commented, "In 2017, they achieved several significant milestones in SWM`s transformation into a growing and diversified specialty materials company.  Most notably, the synergistic Conwed acquisition increased AMS`s scale across both manufacturing and commercial functions.  AMS growth also drove total non-tobacco sales above 50% of their total, marking another significant step in their diversification plan.  Additionally, they made capacity investments in some of their fastest growing and most innovative products across both segments while successfully executing their AMS footprint optimization synergy plan.  During the fourth quarter their business performed generally as expected, resulting in full year Adjusted EPS of $3.18 and $90 million of free cash flow."

    "AMS finished 2017 with 4% organic sales growth and solid margin expansion.  A double-digit increase in transportation films, the Conwed acquisition, and synergy realization all contributed to the segment`s strong financial performance, and they remain on track to deliver on their $10 million run-rate synergy target by year-end 2018.  Engineered Papers delivered as expected in 2017 providing strong cash flows as they worked to offset the anticipated headwinds in traditional RTL and LIP.   Heat-not-Burn continues to be a growing upside in their Recon product line although still a relatively small component of overall sales.  In addition, they have received a favorable decision in their LIP infringement litigation and are moving forward to assess several potential positive outcomes."

    Dr. Kramer concluded, "Our 2018 Adjusted EPS guidance of $3.30 to $3.45 reflects balanced organic growth across AMS end-markets and continued synergy execution, somewhat offset by tobacco industry pressures in EP.  They project total sales, operating profits, and free cash flow to increase, and expect to realize a net benefit from the recently enacted U.S. tax legislation.  From a strategic standpoint, they will continue to grow the AMS segment where they see sustainable long-term sales growth and margin expansion potential, as well as maintain flexibility to act on additional M&A opportunities.  Through this multi-year strategic transformation they have maintained a deep commitment to their customers to deliver exceptional value through collaborative product development partnerships, technical expertise across a variety of specialty materials, and operational excellence.  While their end-markets and technological capabilities may expand, it is those themes that will underscore SWM`s continued evolution towards a more growth-oriented enterprise."

    Advanced Materials & Structures segment sales were $99.2 million, up 52%, including the Conwed acquisition (Conwed sales were $35.1 million).  Organic sales decreased 2%, driven by the decline in surface protection film sales for transportation as customers adjusted year-end inventories following several quarters of strong orders; this offset improved filtration sales and strong growth in medical.  Conwed results remained in line with their expectations, driven by sales growth in the infrastructure and construction end-markets.  GAAP operating profit was $7.6 million, compared to an operating loss in the prior-year quarter; the operating loss was driven by a $20.7 million non-cash tradename impairment related to segment re-branding activities.  Adjusted operating profit was $13.3 million, up 33% due to the acquisition of Conwed and related synergies.  Adjusted operating profit margin contracted 200 basis points due primarily to the organic sales decline and associated negative mix effects.

    Engineered Papers segment sales were $136.5 million, up 2%, with favorable currency movements of $5.7 million, or 4%.  Overall volume decreased 1% due to the forecasted traditional RTL decline offsetting growth in cigarette and non-tobacco papers, while price/mix was neutral.  GAAP operating profit was $26.1 million, down 25%; adjusted operating profit was $29.7 million, down 16%, versus a strong prior-year quarter.  GAAP and adjusted operating profit margin declined 680 and 480 basis points, respectively.  Operating profit margin declines were primarily driven by lower traditional RTL volume, pricing concessions, higher pulp costs, lower third-party royalties, and reduced manufacturing efficiencies and overhead absorption.  These factors were partially offset by the HnB sales ramp-up, positive mix effects from LIP volume growth, and a $1.5 million benefit from favorable currency movements.

    Unallocated GAAP and adjusted expenses were both $13.6 million, down 7%, due primarily to lower consulting fees.  GAAP and adjusted Unallocated expenses were both 5.8% of total sales, down 160 basis points.

    Consolidated sales were $235.7 million, up 19%, and 1% on an organic basis.  The Conwed acquisition contributed $35.1 million of incremental sales.  GAAP operating profit was $20.1 million, up $13.9 million, and GAAP operating profit margin was 8.5%, up from 3.1%.  Prior-year GAAP operating profits were impacted by the $20.7 million non-cash tradename impairment.  Adjusted operating profit was $29.4 million, down 5%, and adjusted operating profit margin was 12.5%, down 310 basis points.  Adjusted EBITDA was $42.1 million, up 6%, and adjusted EBITDA margin was 17.9%, down 200 basis points.

    GAAP Loss was $27.3 million; this equated to a GAAP loss per share of $0.89.  Adjusted income was $19.5 million, down 19%; this equated to Adjusted EPS of $0.64.  Interest expense was $6.9 million, up $2.9 million due to the Conwed acquisition and related debt structure changes.  Other income was $0.5 million, versus a $0.1 million expense.  The Company`s income tax expense was $43.1 million, including $39.6 million of net tax expense due to the Tax Act (discussed below); absent the impact of the Tax Act, the Company`s tax rate would have been 25.6%.  In the prior-year quarter the Company had an income tax benefit of $12.5 million due to discrete one-time benefits and the impact of impairment expenses.  The Chinese JVs contributed $0.07 to GAAP EPS and Adjusted EPS, down $0.01. Net currency movements had a 3% positive impact on sales and a $1.7 million positive impact on operating profits; translation impact of net currency movements was positive $0.05 to both GAAP EPS and Adjusted EPS.   

    Impact of Tax Act: On December 22, 2017, the President signed into law the Tax Act, which amends the Internal Revenue Code to reduce tax rates and modify policies, credits, and deductions for individuals and businesses. For businesses, the Tax Act reduces the U.S. corporate tax rate from a maximum of 35% to 21%, but also eliminates or modifies certain previous deduction items.  The Tax Act took effect on January 1, 2018 and is expected to reduce the Company`s overall tax rate in 2018.  However, as a result of the Tax Act, in particular the transition to the new territorial tax system, the Company has incurred a deemed repatriation tax of $48.7 million, or $1.59 per share, on undistributed earnings of certain non-U.S. subsidiaries.  The Company also revalued its net deferred tax liability as a result of lower expected future tax rates, resulting in a 9.1 million, or $0.30 per share, tax benefit.  The netting of these non-cash one-time tax items resulted in a $39.6 million, or $1.29 per share, decrease to fourth quarter and full year 2017 GAAP Income.  These expenses are reflected in the Company`s financial statements as a component of fourth quarter income tax expense.

    Non-GAAP Adjustments reflect items included in GAAP operating profit, income, and EPS, but excluded from adjusted operating profit, income, and EPS (see non-GAAP reconciliation tables).  The most significant fourth quarter 2017 non-GAAP adjustment was the negative $1.29 per share impact of the Tax Act.  Additionally, purchase accounting expenses were $0.12 per share, up $0.06.  Purchase accounting expenses reflect the ongoing non-cash intangible asset amortization, as well as any non-cash one-time inventory step-up charges, associated with AMS acquisitions.  Restructuring and impairment expenses were $0.12 per share, due mainly to the impairment of an asset held for sale in the EP segment.  Total restructuring and impairment expenses were down $0.30, due primarily to the $0.39 tradename impairment related to re-branding activities in AMS during the prior-year quarter.

     Full Year 2017 Financial Results

    Advanced Materials & Structures segment sales were $433.2 million, up 54%, including the Conwed acquisition (Conwed sales were $141.3 million).  Organic sales increased 4%, led by double-digit growth in surface protection films for transportation as well as gains in industrial and medical sales; this growth was partially offset by softness in filtration sales.  Conwed results were generally in line with the Company`s expectations, driven by growth in the infrastructure and construction end-markets.  GAAP operating profit was $48.5 million, up $39.5 million, as prior-year results included the $20.7 million tradename impairment related to re-branding; adjusted operating profit was $75.8 million, up 78%.  GAAP and adjusted operating profit margins expanded 800 and 230 basis points, respectively.  Operating profit growth and margin expansion was driven by organic sales growth, favorable mix, and the Conwed acquisition (including synergies), which more than offset certain manufacturing inefficiencies and higher resin costs.

    Engineered Papers segment sales were $548.9 million, down 2%, mainly due to a 3% overall volume decline.  Price/mix was neutral and positive currency movements more than offset anticipated lower LIP royalties.  Lower traditional RTL and overall cigarette paper volumes were partially offset by growth of non-tobacco paper.  GAAP operating profit was $116.1 million, down 16%; adjusted operating profit was $121.4 million, down 15%.  GAAP and adjusted operating profit margin declined 350 and 330 basis points, respectively.  The decrease in RTL volume, pricing concessions, lower third-party royalties, and reduced manufacturing inefficiencies and overhead absorption impacted profitability.

    Unallocated GAAP expenses were $39.9 million, down 2%; adjusted Unallocated expenses were $39.8 million, also down 2%, due primarily to lower professional consulting fees. GAAP and adjusted Unallocated expenses were both 4.1% of total sales, down 80 and 70 basis points, respectively.

    Consolidated sales were $982.1 million, up 17%, but flat on an organic basis.  The Conwed acquisition contributed $141.3 million of incremental sales.  GAAP operating profit was $124.7 million, up 18%, and GAAP operating profit margin was 12.7%, up 10 basis points.  Prior-year operating profits included the $20.7 million non-cash tradename impairment.  Adjusted operating profit was $157.4 million, up 9%, and adjusted operating profit margin was 16.0%, down 110 basis points.  Adjusted EBITDA was $200.5 million, up 9%, and adjusted EBITDA margin was 20.4%, down 140 basis points. 

    GAAP Income was $34.4 million, down from $82.8 million; this equated to GAAP EPS of $1.12.  Adjusted income was $97.5 million, down 2%; this equated to Adjusted EPS of $3.18.  Interest expense was $26.9 million, up $10.3 million due to the Conwed acquisition and related debt structure changes.  Other income was $3.7 million, down $0.2 million, and included a $4.8 million pretax gain, or $0.11 per share, from an asset sale.  The Company`s income tax expense was $69.6 million, including a total of $39.6 million of net expenses as a result of the Tax Act; absent the impact of the Tax Act, the Company`s tax rate would have been 29.6%.   The Chinese JVs contributed $0.08 to GAAP EPS and Adjusted EPS, down from $0.16 due to challenging market conditions. Net currency movements had a 1% positive impact on sales and a $3.0 million positive impact on operating profits; translation impact of net currency movements was positive $0.04 to both GAAP EPS and Adjusted EPS.   

    Non-GAAP Adjustments reflect items included in GAAP operating profit, income, and EPS, but excluded from adjusted operating profit, income, and EPS (see non-GAAP reconciliation tables).  The most significant 2017 non-GAAP adjustment was the $1.29 per share negative impact of the Tax Act.  Additionally, purchase accounting expenses were $0.56 per share, up $0.31.  These expenses capture the ongoing non-cash intangible asset amortization, as well as any non-cash one-time inventory step-up charges, associated with AMS acquisitions.  Restructuring and impairment expenses were $0.21 per share, due mainly to an asset impairment in the EP segment and synergy-related cost reductions in AMS.  Total restructuring and impairment expenses were down $0.30, due primarily to the $0.39 impact of the 2016 tradename impairment related re-branding activities in AMS.

    Cash Flow, Debt, & Dividend

    Full year 2017 cash provided by operating activities was $130.9 million, up $1.2 million.  The Company`s working capital-related cash outflows were $11.9 million, primarily resulting from inventory builds related to facility relocations and higher cash tax payments.  Capital spending and capitalized software totaled $40.7 million, up $10.1 million, due to the addition of Conwed and investments for growth and system optimization.  These projects included AMS footprint optimization synergies, capacity additions to support growth in transportation, filtration, and infrastructure end-markets, and the relocation of AMS` Chinese site into a new expanded facility.  Free cash flow was $90.2 million, down $8.9 million, due mostly to growth-related capital spending.  The Company paid dividends to shareholders totaling $51.9 million.

    Total debt was $684.2 million on December 31, 2017, versus $440.4 million at December 31, 2016.  Net debt was $577.3 million on December 31, 2017, versus $333.0 million at December 31, 2016 due mainly to the January 2017 closing of the Conwed acquisition and subsequent $43 million of net paydown throughout 2017.  Pursuant to the debt covenants and certain adjustments to foreign cash balances contained in the Company`s credit facility, the Company`s net debt to adjusted EBITDA was approximately 3.0x as of December 31, 2017.

    The Company announced that a quarterly cash dividend of $0.43 per share will be payable on March 23, 2018 to stockholders of record as of March 2, 2018.

    2018 Financial Outlook

    The Company issued annual guidance of $3.30 to $3.45 for 2018E Adjusted EPS.  This equates to $2.73 to $2.88 of GAAP EPS based on estimates of $0.04 per share of restructuring expenses and $0.53 per share of non-cash purchase accounting expenses related to AMS segment acquisitions that are excluded from Adjusted EPS.

    The Company expects 2018 capital expenditures and capitalized software spending of approximately $40 million.

    Conference Call

    SWM will hold a conference call to review fourth quarter 2017 results with investors and analysts at 10:00 a.m. Eastern time on Thursday, February 22, 2018. The earnings conference call will be simultaneously broadcast over the Internet at  To listen to the call, please go to the Company`s Web site at least 15 minutes prior to the call to register and to download and install any necessary audio software. For those unable to listen to the live broadcast, a replay will be available on the Company`s Web site shortly after the call.

    SWM will use a presentation in conjunction with its conference call.  The presentation can be found on the Company`s Web site in advance of the earnings conference call.  The presentation can also be accessed via the earnings conference call webcast.

    About SWM

    SWM is a leading global provider of highly engineered papers, films, nets, and non-wovens for a variety of applications and industries.  As experts in manufacturing materials made from fibers, resins, and polymers, they provide their customers critical components that enhance the performance of their end products.  The Advanced Materials & Structures segment focuses on resin-based rolled goods for the filtration, transportation, infrastructure & construction, medical, and industrial end-markets.  This segment was established in 2013 as part of a strategic transformation intended to diversify SWM`s historical concentration in the tobacco industry and reposition the Company for long-term growth.  The Company currently generates approximately half of its total sales outside the tobacco industry.  The Engineered Papers segment remains primarily focused on supplying major cigarette manufacturers with a variety of specialty papers.  SWM and its subsidiaries conduct business in over 90 countries and employ approximately 3,400 people worldwide.  For further information, please visit SWM`s Web site at

    Forward-Looking Statements

    This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and other federal securities laws that are subject to the safe harbor created by such laws and other legal protections.  Forward-looking statements include, without limitation, those regarding 2018 guidance and future performance, future market and EPS trends, future EPS contributions of their China JVs and RTL, AMS margins, sales and volume trends, Argotec financial results, growth prospects, capital spending, currency rates and trends and impact on EPS, 2018 momentum, future cash flows, the Tax Act, effective tax rates, 2018 LIP sales trends, future RTL volumes, LIP pricing and royalties, diversification efforts of their AMS segment, integration of and accretion from the Conwed acquisition, future results of legacy AMS operations, interest rate swap impacts, future growth of non-tobacco sales, benefits of AMS` new enterprise resource planning system, and other statements generally identified by words such as "believe," "expect," "intend," "guidance," "plan," "forecast," "potential," "anticipate," "confident," "project," "appear," "future," "should," "likely," "could," "may," "typically," "will," and similar words.  These statements are not guarantees of future performance and certain risks, uncertainties (some of which are beyond the Company`s control) and assumptions that may cause actual results to differ materially from their expectations as of the date of this release.   These risks include, among other things, those set forth in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors of their Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, which can be found at the SEC`s website, as well as the following factors:

  • Recent changes to U.S. federal income tax law, the overall impact and interpretation of which remain uncertain and could be adverse, in addition to the extent to which states may conform to the newly enacted federal tax law as well as the impact of the tax reform on holders of their common stock
  • Changes in sales or production volumes, pricing and/or manufacturing costs of reconstituted tobacco products, cigarette paper (including for lower ignition propensity cigarettes), filtration-related products due to changing customer demands (including any change by their customers in their tobacco and tobacco-related blends for their cigarettes, their target inventory levels and/or the overall demand for their products), new technologies such as e-cigarettes, inventory adjustments and rebalancings, competition or otherwise;
  • Changes in the Chinese economy, including relating to the demand for reconstituted tobacco, premium cigarettes and netting;
  • Risks associated with the implementation of their strategic growth initiatives, including diversification, and the Company`s understanding of, and entry into, new industries and technologies;
  • Changes in the source and intensity of competition in their commercial segments.  They operate in highly competitive markets in which alternative supplies and technologies may attract their customers away from their products.  In additional, their customers may, in some cases, produce for themselves the components that the Company sells to them for incorporation into their products, thus reducing or eliminating their purchases from us;
  • Our ability to attract and retain key personnel, due to their prior restructuring actions, the tobacco industry in which they operate or otherwise;
  • Weather conditions, including potential impacts, if any, from climate change, known and unknown, seasonality factors that affect the demand for virgin tobacco leaf and natural disasters or unusual weather events;
  • Increases in commodity prices and lack of availability of such commodities, including energy, wood pulp and resins, could impact the sales and profitability of their products;
  • Adverse changes in the oil, gas, and mining sectors impacting key AMS segment customers;
  • Increases in operating costs due to inflation or otherwise, such as labor expense, compensation and benefits costs, including costs related to the comprehensive health care reform law enacted in the US in 2010;
  • Employee retention and labor shortages;
  • Changes in employment, wage and hour laws and regulations in the U.S., France and elsewhere, including loi de Securisation de l`emploi, unionization rule and regulations by the National Labor Relations Board, equal pay initiatives, additional anti-discrimination rules or tests and different interpretations of exemptions from overtime laws;
  • Labor strikes, stoppages, disruptions or other disruptions at their facilities;
  • Existing and future governmental regulation and the enforcement thereof, for example relating to the tobacco industry, taxation and the environment (including the impact thereof on their Chinese joint ventures);
  • New reports as to the effect of smoking on human health or the environment;
  • Changes in general economic, financial and credit conditions in the U.S., Europe, China and elsewhere, including the impact thereof on currency exchange rates (including any weakening of the euro and Real) and on interest rates;
  • Changes in the manner in which they finance their debt and future capital needs, including potential acquisitions;
  • The success of, and costs associated with, their current or future restructuring initiatives, including the granting of any needed governmental approvals and the occurrence of work stoppages or other labor disruptions;
  • Changes in the discount rates, revenue growth, cash flow growth rates or other assumptions used by the Company in its assessment for impairment of assets and adverse economic conditions or other factors that would result in significant impairment charges;
  • The failure of one or more material suppliers, including energy, resin and pulp suppliers, to supply materials as needed to maintain their product plans and cost structure;
  • International conflicts and disputes such as those involving the Russian Federation and the Middle East, which restrict their ability to supply product in the affected regions due to the corresponding effects on demand, the application of international sanctions, or practical consequences on transportation, banking transactions, or other commercial activities in troubled regions;
  • The pace and extent of further international adoption of LIP cigarette standards and the nature of standards so adopted;
  • Risks associated with their 50%-owned, non-U.S. joint ventures relating to control and decision-making, compliance, accounting standards, transparency and customer relations, among others;
  • A failure in their risk management and/or currency or interest rate swaps and hedging programs, including the failures of any insurance company or counterparty;
  • The number, type, outcomes (by judgment or settlement) and costs of legal, tax, regulatory or administrative proceedings, litigation and/or amnesty programs, including those in Brazil;
  • The outcome and cost of LIP-related intellectual property infringement and validity litigation in Europe and the European Patent Office opposition proceedings;
  • Risks associated with acquisitions or other strategic transactions, including acquired liabilities and restrictions, retaining customers from businesses acquired, achieving any expected results or synergies from acquired businesses, complying with new regulatory frameworks, difficulties in integrating acquired businesses or implementing strategic transactions generally and risks associated with international acquisition transactions, including in countries where they do not currently have a material presence;
  • Risks associated with dispositions, including post-closing claims being made against us, disruption to their other businesses during a sale process or thereafter, credit risks associated with any buyer of such disposed assets and their ability to collect funds due from any such buyer;
  • Risks associated with their global asset realignment initiatives, including: changes in tax law, treaties, interpretations, or regulatory determinations; audits made by applicable regulatory authorities and/or their auditor; and their ability to operate their business in a manner consistent with the regulatory requirements for such realignment;
  • Increased taxation on tobacco-related products;
  • Costs and timing of implementation of any upgrades or changes to their information technology systems;
  • Failure by us to comply with any privacy or data security laws or to protect against theft of customer, employee and corporate sensitive information;
  • Changes in tax rates, the adoption of new U.S. or international tax legislation or exposure to additional tax liabilities;
  • Changes in construction and infrastructure spending and its impact on demand for certain products;
  • Potential loss of consumer awareness and demand for acquired companies` products if it is decided to rebrand those products under the Company`s legacy brand names; and
  • Other factors described elsewhere in this document and from time to time in documents that they file with the SEC.
  • All forward-looking statements made in this document are qualified by these cautionary statements.  These forward-looking statements are made only as of the date of this document, and they do not undertake any obligation, other than as may be required by law, to update or revise any forward-looking or cautionary statements to reflect changes in assumptions, the occurrence of events, unanticipated or otherwise, or changes in future operating results over time or otherwise.

    Comparisons of results for current and any prior periods are not intended to express any future trends or indications of future performance unless expressed as such, and should only be viewed as historical data.

    For additional factors and further discussion of these factors, please see SWM`s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2016 and other reports they file from time to time, which can be found at the SEC`s website The discussion of these risks is specifically incorporated by reference into this release. The financial results reported in this release are unaudited.

    Non-GAAP Financial Measures

    Certain financial measures and comments contained in this press release exclude restructuring expenses, certain purchase accounting adjustments related to AMS segment acquisitions, interest expense, income tax provision, capital spending, capitalized software, and depreciation and amortization.  This press release also provides certain information regarding the Company`s financial results excluding currency impacts.  This information estimates the impact of changes in foreign currency rates on the translation of the Company`s current financial results as compared to the applicable comparable period and is derived by translating the current local currency results into U.S. Dollars based upon the foreign currency exchange rates for the applicable comparable period.  Financial measures which exclude or include these items have not been determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) and are therefore "non-GAAP" financial measures. Reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most closely analogous measure determined in accordance with GAAP are included in the financial schedules attached to this release.

    The Company believes that the presentation of non-GAAP financial measures in addition to the related GAAP measures provides investors with greater transparency to the information used by the Company`s management in its financial and operational decision-making.  Management also believes that the non-GAAP financial measures provide additional insight for analysts and investors in evaluating the Company`s financial and operational performance in the same way that management evaluates the Company`s financial performance.  Management believes that providing this information enables investors to better understand the Company`s operating performance and financial condition.  These non-GAAP financial measures are not calculated or presented in accordance with, and are not intended to be considered in isolation or as alternatives or substitutes for, or superior to, financial measures prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP, and should be read only in conjunction with the Company`s financial measures prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP. The non-GAAP financial measures used in this release may be different from the measures used by other companies.

    (Tables to Follow)


    CONTACTAllison AdenCo-Chief Financial Officer+1-770-569-4277

    Andrew WamserCo-Chief Financial Officer+1-770-569-4271


    Mark ChekanowDirector of Investor Relations+1-770-569-4229

    Web site:


    Net Sales                         Three Months Ended December 31,   Year Ended December 31,   2017   2016   % Change   2017   2016   % Change AMS $ 99.2     $ 65.1     52.4 %   $ 433.2     $ 280.6     54.4 % EP 136.5     133.6     2.2 %   548.9     559.3     (1.9 )% Total Consolidated $ 235.7     $ 198.7     18.6 %   $ 982.1     $ 839.9     16.9 % Operating Profit (Loss)                   Three Months Ended December 31,   Year Ended December 31,           Return on Net Sales           Return on Net Sales   2017   2016   2017   2016   2017   2016   2017   2016 AMS $ 7.6     $ (13.8 )   7.7 %   (21.2 )%   $ 48.5     $ 9.0     11.2 %   3.2 % EP 26.1     34.6     19.1 %   25.9 %   116.1     138.0     21.2 %   24.7 % Unallocated (13.6 )   (14.6 )           (39.9 )   (40.9 )         Total Consolidated $ 20.1     $ 6.2     8.5 %   3.1 %   $ 124.7     $ 106.1     12.7 %   12.6 % Restructuring & Impairment Expenses and Purchase Accounting Adjustments           Three Months Ended December 31,   Year Ended December 31,   2017   2016   2017   2016 AMS - Restructuring & Impairment Expenses $ 0.3     $ 20.7     $ 2.7     $ 21.3   AMS - Purchase Accounting Adjustments 5.4     3.1     24.6     12.3   EP - Restructuring & Impairment Expenses 3.6     0.9     5.3     4.0   Unallocated -     -     0.1     0.3   Total Consolidated $ 9.3     $ 24.7     $ 32.7     $ 37.9   Adjusted Operating Profit (Loss) *                   Three Months Ended December 31,   Year Ended December 31,           Return on Net Sales           Return on Net Sales   2017   2016   2017   2016   2017   2016   2017   2016 AMS $ 13.3     $ 10.0     13.4 %   15.4 %   $ 75.8     $ 42.6     17.5 %   15.2 % EP 29.7     35.5     21.8 %   26.6 %   121.4     142.0     22.1 %   25.4 % Unallocated (13.6 )   (14.6 )           (39.8 )   (40.6 )         Total Consolidated $ 29.4     $ 30.9     12.5 %   15.6 %   $ 157.4     $ 144.0     16.0 %   17.1 %

    * Adjusted Operating Profit (Loss), a non-GAAP financial measure, is calculated by adding Restructuring & Impairment Expenses and Purchase Accounting Adjustments to Operating Profit.


      Three Months Ended December 31,   Year Ended December 31,   2017   2016   2017   2016 Operating profit $ 20.1     $ 6.2     $ 124.7     $ 106.1   Plus: Restructuring and impairment expense 3.9     21.6     8.1     25.6   Plus: Purchase accounting adjustments 5.4     3.1     24.6     12.3   Adjusted Operating Profit $ 29.4     $ 30.9     $ 157.4     $ 144.0                   Income/(Loss) $ (27.3 )   $ 17.0     $ 34.4     $ 82.8   Plus: Restructuring and impairment expense 3.9     21.6     8.1     25.6   Less: Tax impact of restructuring and impairment expense (0.2 )   (9.0 )   (1.4 )   (10.2 ) Plus: Purchase accounting adjustments 5.4     3.1     24.6     12.3   Less: Tax impact of purchase accounting adjustments (1.9 )   (1.1 )   (7.8 )   (4.5 ) Plus: Transitional tax adjustment 48.7     -     48.7     -   Less: Income tax valuation allowance & one-time tax expense (9.1 )   (7.4 )   (9.1 )   (6.5 ) Adjusted Income $ 19.5     $ 24.2     $ 97.5     $ 99.5                   Earnings (Loss) per share - diluted $ (0.89 )   $ 0.55     $ 1.12     $ 2.70   Plus: Restructuring and impairment expense 0.13     0.71     0.26     0.84   Less: Tax impact of restructuring and impairment expense (0.01 )   (0.29 )   (0.05 )   (0.33 ) Plus: Purchase accounting adjustments 0.18     0.10     0.81     0.40   Less: Tax impact of purchase accounting adjustments (0.06 )   (0.04 )   (0.25 )   (0.15 ) Plus: Transitional tax adjustment 1.59     -     1.59     -   Less: Income tax valuation allowance & one-time tax expense (0.30 )   (0.23 )   (0.30 )   (0.20 ) Adjusted Earnings Per Share - Diluted $ 0.64     $ 0.80     $ 3.18     $ 3.26                   Income/(Loss) $ (27.3 )   $ 17.0     $ 34.4     $ 82.8   Plus: Interest expense 6.9     4.0     26.9     16.6   Plus: Income tax (benefit) provision 43.1     (12.5 )   69.6     15.4   Plus: Depreciation & amortization 15.5     9.5     61.5     42.8   Plus: Restructuring and impairment expense 3.9     21.6     8.1     25.6   Adjusted EBITDA $ 42.1     $ 39.6     $ 200.5     $ 183.2                   Cash provided by operating activities $ 37.7     $ 46.6     $ 130.9     $ 129.7   Less: Capital spending (9.7 )   (10.3 )   (37.2 )   (27.8 ) Less: Capitalized software costs (0.9 )   (1.1 )   (3.5 )   (2.8 ) Free Cash Flow $ 27.1     $ 35.2     $ 90.2     $ 99.1                                             December 31, 2017   December 31, 2016                 Total Debt         $ 684.2     $ 440.4   Less: Cash         106.9     107.4   Net Debt         $ 577.3     $ 333.0  


    2018 Earnings Per Share Guidance - Diluted, from Continuing Operations   2018E 2018E EPS $2.73 - $2.88 Plus: Restructuring/Impairment expense 0.05   Less: Tax impact of restructuring/impairment expense (0.01 ) Plus: Purchase accounting expense 0.70   Less: Tax impact of purchase accounting expense (0.17 ) 2018E Adjusted EPS $3.30 - $3.45

    * Excluded from the above reconciliation are potential transaction costs associated with future acquisitions.


      Years Ended December 31,       2017   2016   % Change Net sales $ 982.1     $ 839.9     16.9 % Cost of products sold 699.8     583.2     20.0   Gross profit 282.3     256.7     10.0               Selling expense 33.3     25.3     31.6   Research expense 17.8     17.5     1.7   General expense 98.4     82.2     19.7   Total nonmanufacturing expenses 149.5     125.0     19.6               Restructuring and impairment expense 8.1     25.6     (68.4 ) Operating profit 124.7     106.1     17.5   Interest expense 26.9     16.6     62.0   Other income, net 3.7     3.9     (5.1 ) Income from continuing operations before income taxes and income from equity affiliates 101.5     93.4     8.7               Income tax provision 69.6     15.4     N.M. Income from equity affiliates, net of income taxes 2.5     4.8     (47.9 ) Income from continuing operations 34.4     82.8     (58.5 ) Income from discontinued operations 0.1     -     N.M. Net income $ 34.5     $ 82.8     (58.3 )%             Net income per share - basic:           Income per share from continuing operations $ 1.12     $ 2.71     (58.7 )% Income per share from discontinued  operations -     -     N.M. Net income per share - basic $ 1.12     $ 2.71     (58.7 )%             Net income per share - diluted:           Income per share from continuing operations $ 1.12     $ 2.70     (58.5 )% Income per share from discontinued operations -     -     N.M. Net income per share - diluted $ 1.12     $ 2.70     (58.5 )%             Cash dividends declared per share $ 1.69     $ 1.62                   Weighted average shares outstanding:                       Basic 30,407,100     30,310,900                   Diluted 30,549,300     30,463,400      

    N.M.- Not Meaningful


      Three Months Ended December 31,       2017   2016   % Change Net sales $ 235.7     $ 198.7     18.6 % Cost of products sold 168.9     135.5     24.6   Gross profit 66.8     63.2     5.7               Selling expense 8.7     6.5     33.8   Research expense 4.9     4.6     6.5   General expense 29.2     24.3     20.2   Total nonmanufacturing expenses 42.8     35.4     20.9               Restructuring and impairment expense 3.9     21.6     (81.9 ) Operating profit 20.1     6.2     N.M. Interest expense 6.9     4.0     72.5   Other income (loss), net 0.5     (0.1 )   N.M. Income from continuing operations before income taxes and income from equity affiliates 13.7     2.1     N.M.             Income tax provision (benefit) 43.1     (12.5 )   N.M. Income from equity affiliates, net of income taxes 2.1     2.4     (12.5 ) (Loss) income from continuing operations (27.3 )   17.0     N.M. Income from discontinued operations -     -     N.M. Net (loss) income $ (27.3 )   $ 17.0     N.M.             Net (loss) income per share - basic:           (Loss) income per share from continuing operations $ (0.90 )   $ 0.55     N.M. Income per share from discontinued   operations -     -     N.M. Net (loss) income per share - basic $ (0.90 )   $ 0.55     N.M.             Net (loss) income per share - diluted:           (Loss) income per share from continuing operations $ (0.89 )   $ 0.55     N.M. Income per share from discontinued operations -     -     N.M. Net (loss) income per share - diluted $ (0.89 )   $ 0.55     N.M.             Cash dividends declared per share $ 0.43     $ 0.42                   Weighted average shares outstanding:                       Basic 30,426,900     30,318,900                   Diluted 30,592,900     30,524,400      

    N.M.- Not Meaningful


      December 31, 2017   December 31, 2016 ASSETS       Cash and cash equivalents $ 106.9     $ 107.4   Accounts receivable, net 149.4     115.1   Inventories 155.2     119.4   Assets held for sale 12.8     17.3   Other current assets 8.8     5.1   Property, plant and equipment, net 361.9     307.4   Goodwill 341.3     229.5   Other noncurrent assets 406.2     272.5   Total Assets $ 1,542.5     $ 1,173.7           LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS` EQUITY       Current debt $ 5.1     $ 3.0   Other current liabilities 142.0     132.8   Long-term debt 679.1     437.4   Pension and other postretirement benefits 30.7     33.1   Deferred income tax liabilities 42.3     29.8   Long-term income tax payable 36.7     -   Other noncurrent liabilities 59.9     29.3   Stockholders` equity 546.7     508.3   Total Liabilities and Stockholders` Equity $ 1,542.5     $ 1,173.7  

    Note: In connection with the Company`s acquisition of Conwed Plastics, LLC during the first quarter of 2017, the Company recorded $106.2 million of Goodwill and $134.4 million of intangible assets (included in Other noncurrent assets), of which $127.3 million will be amortized over approximately 15 years, and an increase of $2.9 million to inventory to record it at purchase price fair value.


      Year Ended December 31,   2017   2016 Operations       Net income $ 34.5     $ 82.8   Less: Income from discontinued operations 0.1     -   Income from continuing operations 34.4     82.8   Non-cash items included in net income:       Depreciation and amortization 59.5     44.5   Impairment 4.6     21.3   Deferred income tax (provision) benefit 1.6     (13.5 ) Pension and other postretirement benefits 3.8     3.8   Stock-based compensation 7.1     5.8   Income from equity affiliates (2.5 )   (4.8 ) Gain on sale of intangible assets -     (1.8 ) Gain on sale of assets (4.9 )   -   Long-term income tax payable 36.7     -   Excess tax deficit of stock-based awards -     0.2   Cash dividends received from equity affiliates 1.8     3.0   Other items 0.7     (0.6 ) Net changes in operating working capital (11.9 )   (11.0 ) Net cash provided by operating activities of:        Continuing operations 130.9     129.7    Discontinued operations 0.1     -   Cash provided by operations 131.0     129.7           Investing       Capital spending (37.2 )   (27.8 ) Capitalized software costs (3.5 )   (2.8 ) Acquisitions, net of cash acquired (291.7 )   -   Proceeds from sale of assets 7.0     -   Other investing 6.9     8.2   Cash used in investing (318.5 )   (22.4 )         Financing       Cash dividends paid to SWM stockholders (51.9 )   (49.4 ) Changes in short-term debt 1.5     -   Proceeds from issuances of long-term debt 440.5     35.6   Payments on long-term debt (208.8 )   (171.0 ) Payments for debt issuance costs (0.6 )   -   Purchases of common stock (1.2 )   (0.7 ) Excess tax deficit of stock-based awards -     (0.2 ) Cash provided by (used in) financing 179.5     (185.7 )         Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents 7.5     (0.7 )         Decrease in cash and cash equivalents $ (0.5 )   $ (79.1 )

    This announcement is distributed by Nasdaq Corporate Solutions on behalf of Nasdaq Corporate Solutions clients.

    The issuer of this announcement warrants that they are solely responsible for the content, accuracy and originality of the information contained therein.Source: Schweitzer-Mauduit International Inc via GlobeNewswireHUG#2170802

    Krebs on Security | real questions and Pass4sure dumps

    An examination of the malware used in the Target breach suggests that the attackers may have had help from a poorly secured feature built into a widely-used IT management software product that was running on the retailer’s internal network.

    As I noted in  Jan. 15’s story — A First Look at the Target Intrusion, Malware — the attackers were able to infect Target’s point-of-sale registers with a malware strain that stole credit and debit card data. The intruders also set up a control server within Target’s internal network that served as a central repository for data hoovered up from all of the infected registers.

    According to sources, "ttcopscli3acs" is the name of the Windows share point used by the POS malware planted at Target stores; the username that the thieves used to log in remotely and download stolen card data was "Best1_user"; the password was "BackupU$r"

    “ttcopscli3acs” is the name of the Windows share used by the POS malware planted at Target stores; the username that malware used to upload stolen card data was “Best1_user”; the password was “BackupU$r”

    That analysis looked at a malware component used in Target breach that was uploaded to Symantec’s ThreatExpert scanning service on Dec. 18 but which was later deleted (a local PDF copy of it is here). The ThreatExpert writeup suggests that the malware was responsible for moving stolen data from the compromised cash registers to that shared central repository, which had the internal address of The “ttcopscli3acs” bit is the Windows domain name used on Target’s network. The user account “Best1_user” and password “BackupU$r” were used to log in to the shared drive (indicated by the “S:” under the “Resource Type” heading in the image above.

    That “Best1_user” account name seems an odd one for the attackers to have picked at random, but there is a better explanation: That username is the same one that gets installed with an IT management software suite called Performance Assurance for Microsoft Servers. This product, according to its maker — Houston, Texas base BMC Software — includes administrator-level user account called “Best1_user.”

    This knowledge base article (PDF) published by BMC explains the Best1_user account is installed by the software to do routine tasks. That article states that while the Best1_user account is essentially a “system” or “administrator” level account on the host machine, customers shouldn’t concern themselves with this account because “it is not a member of any group (not even the ‘users’ group) and therefore can’t be used to login to the system.”

    “The only privilege that the account is granted is the ability to run as a batch job,” the document states, indicating that it could be used to run programs if invoked from a command prompt. Here’s my favorite part:

    “Perform Technical Support does not have the password to this account and this password has not be released by Perform Development. Knowing the password to the account should not be important as you cannot log into the machine using this account. The password is known internally and used internally by the Perform agent to assume the identity of the “Best1_user” account.”

    I pinged BMC to find out if perhaps the password supplied in the Target malware (BackupU$r) is in fact the secret password for the Best1_user account. The company has so far remained silent on this question.

    This was the hunch put forward by the Counter Threat Unit (CTU) of Dell SecureWorks in an analysis that was privately released to some of the company’s clients this week.

    Relationships between compromised and attacker-controlled assets. Source: Dell Secureworks.

    Relationships between compromised and attacker-controlled assets. Source: Dell Secureworks.

    “Attackers exfiltrate data by creating a mount point for a remote file share and copying the data stored by the memory-scraping component to that share,” the SecureWorks paper notes. “In the previous listing showing the data’s move to an internal server, is the intermediate server selected by attackers, and CTU researchers believe the “ttcopscli3acs” string is the Windows domain name used on Target’s network. The Best1_user account appears to be associated with the Performance Assurance component of BMC Software’s Patrol product. According to BMC’s documentation, this account is normally restricted, but the attackers may have usurped control to facilitate lateral movement within the network.”

    According to SecureWorks, one component of the malware installed itself as a service called “BladeLogic,” a service name no doubt designed to mimic another BMC product called BMC BladeLogic Automation Suite. BMC spokeswoman Ann Duhon said that the attackers were simply invoking BMC’s trademark to make the malicious program appear legitimate to the casual observer, but it seems likely that at least some BMC software was running inside of Target’s network, and that the attackers were well aware of it.

    Update Jan. 30, 5:48 p.m.: BMC just issued the following statement:

    There have been several articles in the press speculating about the Target breach.  BMC Software has received no information from Target or the investigators regarding the breach. In some of those articles, BMC products were mentioned in two different ways.

    The first was a mention of a “bladelogic.exe” reference in the attack.   The executable name “bladelogic.exe” does not exist in any piece of legitimate BMC software.  McAfee has issued a security advisory stating that: “The reference to “bladelogic” is a method of obfuscation.  The malware does not compromise, or integrate with, any BMC products in any way.

    The second reference was to a password that was possibly utilized as part of the attack, with the implication that it was a BMC password.  BMC has confirmed that the password mentioned in the press is not a BMC-generated password.

    At this point, there is nothing to suggest that BMC BladeLogic or BMC Performance Assurance has a security flaw or was compromised as part of this attack.

    Malware is a problem for all IT environments. BMC asks all of their customers to be diligent in ensuring that their environments are secure and protected.

    I parse their statement to mean that the “BackupU$r” password referenced in the Target malware is not their software’s secret password. But nothing in the statement seems to rule out the possibility that the attackers leveraged a domain user account installed by BMC software to help exfiltrate card data from Target’s network.

    Original story:

    According to a trusted source who uses mostly open-source data to keep tabs on the software and hardware used in various retail environments, BMC’s software is in use at many major retail and grocery chains across the country, including Kroger, Safeway, Home Depot, Sam’s Club and The Vons Companies, among many others.

    A copy of the SecureWorks report is here (PDF). It contains some fairly detailed analysis of this and other portions of the malware used in the Target intrusion. What it states up front that it does not have — and what they still have not heard from Target — is how the attackers broke in to begin with….


    The folks at Malcovery (full disclosure: Malcovery is an advertiser on this blog) have put together a compelling case that the avenue of compromise at Target stemmed from an SQL injection attack. Malcovery notes that techniques that may be similar to the Target breach were used by the Alberto Gonzalez gang, as illustrated in an indictment against Vladimir Drinkman, Aleksandr Kalinin, Roman Kotov, Mikhail Rytikov, Dmitriy Smilianet (see Hacker Ring Stole 160 Million Credit Cards for more information on these guys).

    As that report notes, Drinkman and his associates were co-conspirators of Albert Gonzalez (famous for the TJX breach), Damon Toey, and Vladislav Horohorin (BadB). Drinkman and his gang of Russian hackers were active from at least August 2005 through at least July 2012 and were charged with stealing data from NASDAQ, 7-Eleven, Carrefour, JCPenney, Hannaford Brothers, Heartland Payment Systems, Wet Seal, Commidea, Dexia Bank, JetBlue Airways, Dow Jones, an unspecified bank in Abu Dhabi, Euronet, Visa Jordan, Global Payment Systems, Diners Singapore (a regional branch of Diner’s Club), and Ingenicard.

    Malcovery’s CTO and co-founder Gary Warner writes:

    “In each of these cases, an SQL Injection attack resulted in malware being placed on the network and credit card or personal information being exfiltrated from the network. According to the indictment for the above, Gonzalez and Toey would travel to retail outlets and make observations about which Point of Sale terminal software was being used, afterwards, they would pass the information to the hacker crew who would penetrate the network, customize and load the malware, and exfiltrate the stolen data.”

    A copy of the Malcovery report can be downloaded here.


    An advertisement for "Eagle Claw," a base of more than 2 million card "dumps" stolen from Target.

    An advertisement for “Eagle Claw,” a base of more than 2 million card “dumps” stolen from Target.

    Meanwhile, the cybercrook known as Rescator and his merry band of thieves who are selling cards stolen in the Target breach continue to push huge new batches of stolen cards onto the market. In an update on Jan. 21, Rescator’s network of card shops released for sale another batch of two million cards apparently stolen from Target, a collection of cards which these crooks have dubbed “Eagle Claw.”

    Working with several banks anxious to know whether this batch of two million cards really was from Target (or else some other recent breach like Neiman Marcus), they were able to determine that all of the cards purchased from Eagle Claw were used at Target between Nov. 27 and Dec. 15. The method behind that research was identical to that used in my previous research on this topic.

    Incidentally, anyone who wants to understand the hierarchical pecking order of Rescator’s crew should check out this analysis by security researcher Krypt3ia, which examines the Lampeduza cybercrime forum of which Rescator is a leading member.

    Anyone hoping that this retail breach disclosure madness will end sometime soon should stop holding their breath: In a private industry notification dated January 17 (PDF), the FBI warned that the basic code used in the point-of-sale malware has been seen by the FBI in cases dating back to at least 2011, and that these attacks are likely to continue for some time to come.

    A frequency analysis of POS malware incidents assembled by Recorded Future.

    A frequency analysis of POS malware incidents assembled by Recorded Future.

    “The growing popularity of this type of malware, the accessibility of the malware on underground forums, the affordability of the software and the huge potential profits to be made from retail POS systems in the United States make this type of financially-motivated cyber crime attractive to a wide range of actors,” the FBI wrote. “We believe POS malware crime will continue to grow over the near term despite law enforcement and security firms’ actions to mitigate it.”


    Tags: Ann Duhon, BackupU$r, Best1_user, BladeLogic, BMC, Dell SecureWorks, Eagle Claw, fbi, gary warner, Krypt3ia, Lampeduza, malcovery, michaels breach, Neiman Marcus breach, rescator, sql injection, Symantec, target breach, target data breach, threatexpert

    Direct Download of over 5500 Certification Exams

    3COM [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AccessData [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACFE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Acme-Packet [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACSM [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Admission-Tests [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ADOBE [93 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AFP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AICPA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AIIM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Alcatel-Lucent [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Alfresco [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Altiris [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Amazon [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    American-College [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Android [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APICS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Apple [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AppSense [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APTUSC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Arizona-Education [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ARM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Aruba [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASIS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASQ [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASTQB [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Autodesk [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Avaya [96 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AXELOS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Axis [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Banking [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BEA [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BICSI [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BlackBerry [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BlueCoat [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Brocade [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Business-Objects [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Business-Tests [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CA-Technologies [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Certification-Board [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Certiport [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CheckPoint [41 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIPS [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cisco [318 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Citrix [48 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIW [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cloudera [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cognos [19 Certification Exam(s) ]
    College-Board [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CompTIA [76 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ComputerAssociates [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Consultant [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Counselor [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CPP-Institue [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CPP-Institute [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CSP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CWNA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CWNP [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Dassault [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DELL [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DMI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DRI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ECCouncil [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ECDL [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    EMC [129 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Enterasys [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Ericsson [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ESPA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Esri [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ExamExpress [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Exin [40 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ExtremeNetworks [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    F5-Networks [20 Certification Exam(s) ]
    FCTC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Filemaker [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Financial [36 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Food [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Fortinet [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Foundry [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    FSMTB [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Fujitsu [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GAQM [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Genesys [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GIAC [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Google [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GuidanceSoftware [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    H3C [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HDI [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Healthcare [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HIPAA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hitachi [30 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hortonworks [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hospitality [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HP [750 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HR [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HRCI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Huawei [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hyperion [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IAAP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IAHCSMM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IBM [1532 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IBQH [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ICAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ICDL [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IEEE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IELTS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IFPUG [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IIBA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IISFA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Intel [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IQN [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IRS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISACA [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISC2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISEB [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Isilon [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISM [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    iSQI [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ITEC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Juniper [64 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LEED [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Legato [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Liferay [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Logical-Operations [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Lotus [66 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LPI [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LSI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Magento [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Maintenance [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    McAfee [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    McData [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Medical [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Microsoft [374 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Mile2 [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Military [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Misc [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Motorola [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    mySQL [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NBSTSA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCEES [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCLEX [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Network-General [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NetworkAppliance [39 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NIELIT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Nokia [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Nortel [130 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Novell [37 Certification Exam(s) ]
    OMG [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Oracle [279 Certification Exam(s) ]
    P&C [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Palo-Alto [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PARCC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PayPal [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Pegasystems [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PEOPLECERT [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PMI [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Polycom [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PostgreSQL-CE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Prince2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PRMIA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PsychCorp [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PTCB [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    QAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    QlikView [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Quality-Assurance [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RACC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Real-Estate [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RedHat [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RES [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Riverbed [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RSA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Sair [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Salesforce [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SANS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SAP [98 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SASInstitute [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SAT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SCO [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SCP [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SDI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    See-Beyond [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Siemens [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Snia [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SOA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Social-Work-Board [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SpringSource [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SUN [63 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SUSE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Sybase [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Symantec [134 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Teacher-Certification [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    The-Open-Group [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    TIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Tibco [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Trainers [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Trend [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    TruSecure [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    USMLE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    VCE [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Veeam [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Veritas [33 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Vmware [58 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Wonderlic [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Worldatwork [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    XML-Master [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Zend [6 Certification Exam(s) ]

    References :

    Dropmark :
    Dropmark-Text :
    Blogspot :
    Wordpress :
    RSS Feed : :

    Back to Main Page

    Killexams exams | Killexams certification | Pass4Sure questions and answers | Pass4sure | pass-guaratee | best test preparation | best training guides | examcollection | killexams | killexams review | killexams legit | kill example | kill example journalism | kill exams reviews | kill exam ripoff report | review | review quizlet | review login | review archives | review sheet | legitimate | legit | legitimacy | legitimation | legit check | legitimate program | legitimize | legitimate business | legitimate definition | legit site | legit online banking | legit website | legitimacy definition | pass 4 sure | pass for sure | p4s | pass4sure certification | pass4sure exam | IT certification | IT Exam | certification material provider | pass4sure login | pass4sure exams | pass4sure reviews | pass4sure aws | pass4sure security | pass4sure cisco | pass4sure coupon | pass4sure dumps | pass4sure cissp | pass4sure braindumps | pass4sure test | pass4sure torrent | pass4sure download | pass4surekey | pass4sure cap | pass4sure free | examsoft | examsoft login | exams | exams free | examsolutions | exams4pilots | examsoft download | exams questions | examslocal | exams practice | | | |