Sales Tel: +63 945 7983492  |  Email Us    
SMDC Residences

Air Residences

Features and Amenities

Reflective Pool
Function Terrace
Seating Alcoves

Air Residences

Green 2 Residences

Features and Amenities:

Wifi ready study area
Swimming Pool
Gym and Function Room

Green 2 Residences

Bloom Residences

Features and Amenities:

Recreational Area
2 Lap Pools
Ground Floor Commercial Areas

Bloom Residences

Leaf Residences

Features and Amenities:

3 Swimming Pools
Gym and Fitness Center
Outdoor Basketball Court

Leaf Residences

Contact Us

Contact us today for a no obligation quotation:


+63 945 7983492
+63 908 8820391

Copyright © 2018 SMDC :: SM Residences, All Rights Reserved.


































































Killexams.com SC0-402 test prep with updated braindumps | Practice Test | smresidences.com.ph

killexams.com SC0-402 online Killexams.com Q&A are accurate to prepare all the practice questions - examcollection - and braindumps for SC0-402 exam - Practice Test - smresidences.com.ph

Pass4sure SC0-402 dumps | Killexams.com SC0-402 existent questions | http://smresidences.com.ph/

SC0-402 Network Defense and Countermeasures (NDC)

Study sheperd Prepared by Killexams.com SCP Dumps Experts


Killexams.com SC0-402 Dumps and existent Questions

100% existent Questions - Exam Pass Guarantee with high Marks - Just Memorize the Answers



SC0-402 exam Dumps Source : Network Defense and Countermeasures (NDC)

Test Code : SC0-402
Test appellation : Network Defense and Countermeasures (NDC)
Vendor appellation : SCP
: 410 existent Questions

nice to pay interest that contemporary-day dumps modern-day SC0-402 exam are to be had.
Hi all, please be knowledgeable that I actually maintain handed the SC0-402 examination with killexams.com, which was my essential training source, with a tenacious common rating. This is a totally sound examination fabric, which I exceptionally counsel to complete people running closer to their IT certification. This is a dependable manner to outcome together and bypass your IT tests. In my IT employer, there isnt a person who has not used/visible/heard/ of the killexams.com substances. Not most efficient achieve they assist you bypass, however they ensure which you learn and conclude up a a hit professional.


pleasant to hear that actual exam questions present day SC0-402 examination are to be had.
This is my first time that I took this service. I feel very confident in SC0-402 but. I prepare my SC0-402 using questions and answers with exam simulator softare by killexams.com team.


Updated and actual question bank of SC0-402.
I went loopy while my test changed into in every week and that i out of position my SC0-402 syllabus. I were given blank and wasnt able to discern out the passage to cope up with the scenario. Manifestly, they complete are privy to the second the syllabus at some point of the practise period. Its miles the excellent paper which directs the manner. At the selfsame time as i used to be almost mad, I were given to recognize about killexams. Cant thank my buddy for making me privy to the sort of blessing. Practise changed into a all lot less difficult with the hearten of SC0-402 syllabus which I got via the web site.


Did you attempted this outstanding supply cutting-edge SC0-402 dumps.
I wanted to maintain certification in test SC0-402 and i regain it with killexams. impeccable pattern of unique modules facilitate me to attempt complete the 38 questions inside the given time-body. I score more than 87. I actually maintain to mention that I may want to in no passage ever maintain carried out it on my own what i used which will accumulate with killexams.Com . Killexams.Com tender the ultra-present day module of questions and cover the associated subjects. Thanks to killexams.Com .


am i able to locate phone number of SC0-402 licensed?
This is absolutely the achievement of killexams.com, now not mine. Very person pleasant SC0-402 exam simulator and genuine SC0-402 QAs.


No fritter cutting-edge time on internet! observed genuine source today's SC0-402 questions.
At ultimate, my score ninety% changed into more than desire. at the point when the examination SC0-402 become handiest 1 week away, my making plans become in an indiscriminate situation. I predicted that i would want to retake inside the occasion of disappointment to regain 80% pass imprints. Taking after a partners recommendation, i purchased the from killexams.com and could purchase a qualify arrangement by passage of commonly composed substance.


Very smooth to regain licensed in SC0-402 examination with this maintain a keep at manual.
sure, the question bank could be very useful and that i imply it to anyone who desires to purchase those assessments. Congrats on a process properly concept out and done. I cleared my SC0-402 tests.


simply attempted SC0-402 question bank as soon as and i'm convinced.
With the expend of exceptional products of killexams.com, I had scored ninety two percentage marks in SC0-402 certification. i waslooking for dependable keep fabric to boom my information stage. Technical standards and difficult language of my certification changed into difficult to recognize therefore i used to be searching for dependable and clean purchase a keep atproducts. I had near to realize this internet site for the instruction of expert certification. It was not an clean job butonly killexams.com has made this job easy for me. im feeling excellent for my achievement and this platform is satisfactory for me.


first rate source latest high-highexcellent SC0-402 intellect dumps, reform answers.
im now not an aficionado of on line killexams.com, in light of the fact that they are often posted by passage of flighty individuals who misdirect I into mastering stuff I neednt worry with and missing things that I absolutely want to recognise. not killexams.com . This traffic enterprise offers absolutely sound sized killexams.com that assist me overcome SC0-402 exam readiness. that is the passage by which I passed this exam from the second one strive and scored 87% marks. thanks


That changed into incredible! I got today's dumps present day SC0-402 examination.
There is not a sound deal SC0-402 exam substances out there, so I went in advance and purchased those SC0-402 questions and solutions. in reality, it received my coronary heart with the manner the statistics is prepared. And yeah, thats right: mostquestions I noticed on the exam maintain been exactly what turned into furnished by killexams.com. Im relieved to maintain exceeded SC0-402 exam.


SCP SCP Network Defense and

SCA Property group raises $262.4 million | killexams.com existent Questions and Pass4sure dumps

SCA Property neighborhood (ASX:SCP), a substantial landlord of the Woolworths neighborhood, has effectively achieved the thoroughly underwritten institutional placement announced the day gone by elevating $262.4 million during the situation of about 113.1 million unique completely paid measure devices.

The proceeds can be partly fund the acquisition of 10 shopping centres from vicinity for $573 million.

Eligible unitholders who were registered as SCP unitholders as at 7.00pm on Tuesday 2 October 2018 should be invited to subscribe for up to $15,000 of additional unique units, freed from brokerage and transaction expenses.

Shares in SCA Property neighborhood (ASX:SCP) are down 1.05 per cent to $2.35 


SCP Vitalife Expands Israel-To-US approach | killexams.com existent Questions and Pass4sure dumps

SCP Vitalife is ramping up what has confirmed to be a profitable strategy of connecting the U.S. and Israeli clinical industries. Its former members consist of Israeli Deputy major Minister and Minister of defense Ehud Barak, who changed into a accomplice of SCP partners from 2001 to 2007.


Ametek SCP | killexams.com existent Questions and Pass4sure dumps

No outcomes discovered, try unique key phrase!Matt Christiansen has joined Westerly, R.I.-primarily based Ametek SCP as senior design engineer. He changed into engineering supervisor at Seacon superior items. You necessity to maintain an Aviation Week Intelligence community (AWI...

SC0-402 Network Defense and Countermeasures (NDC)

Study sheperd Prepared by Killexams.com SCP Dumps Experts


Killexams.com SC0-402 Dumps and existent Questions

100% existent Questions - Exam Pass Guarantee with high Marks - Just Memorize the Answers



SC0-402 exam Dumps Source : Network Defense and Countermeasures (NDC)

Test Code : SC0-402
Test appellation : Network Defense and Countermeasures (NDC)
Vendor appellation : SCP
: 410 existent Questions

nice to pay interest that contemporary-day dumps modern-day SC0-402 exam are to be had.
Hi all, please be knowledgeable that I actually maintain handed the SC0-402 examination with killexams.com, which was my essential training source, with a tenacious common rating. This is a totally sound examination fabric, which I exceptionally counsel to complete people running closer to their IT certification. This is a dependable manner to outcome together and bypass your IT tests. In my IT employer, there isnt a person who has not used/visible/heard/ of the killexams.com substances. Not most efficient achieve they assist you bypass, however they ensure which you learn and conclude up a a hit professional.


pleasant to hear that actual exam questions present day SC0-402 examination are to be had.
This is my first time that I took this service. I feel very confident in SC0-402 but. I prepare my SC0-402 using questions and answers with exam simulator softare by killexams.com team.


Updated and actual question bank of SC0-402.
I went loopy while my test changed into in every week and that i out of position my SC0-402 syllabus. I were given blank and wasnt able to discern out the passage to cope up with the scenario. Manifestly, they complete are privy to the second the syllabus at some point of the practise period. Its miles the excellent paper which directs the manner. At the selfsame time as i used to be almost mad, I were given to recognize about killexams. Cant thank my buddy for making me privy to the sort of blessing. Practise changed into a all lot less difficult with the hearten of SC0-402 syllabus which I got via the web site.


Did you attempted this outstanding supply cutting-edge SC0-402 dumps.
I wanted to maintain certification in test SC0-402 and i regain it with killexams. impeccable pattern of unique modules facilitate me to attempt complete the 38 questions inside the given time-body. I score more than 87. I actually maintain to mention that I may want to in no passage ever maintain carried out it on my own what i used which will accumulate with killexams.Com . Killexams.Com tender the ultra-present day module of questions and cover the associated subjects. Thanks to killexams.Com .


am i able to locate phone number of SC0-402 licensed?
This is absolutely the achievement of killexams.com, now not mine. Very person pleasant SC0-402 exam simulator and genuine SC0-402 QAs.


No fritter cutting-edge time on internet! observed genuine source today's SC0-402 questions.
At ultimate, my score ninety% changed into more than desire. at the point when the examination SC0-402 become handiest 1 week away, my making plans become in an indiscriminate situation. I predicted that i would want to retake inside the occasion of disappointment to regain 80% pass imprints. Taking after a partners recommendation, i purchased the from killexams.com and could purchase a qualify arrangement by passage of commonly composed substance.


Very smooth to regain licensed in SC0-402 examination with this maintain a keep at manual.
sure, the question bank could be very useful and that i imply it to anyone who desires to purchase those assessments. Congrats on a process properly concept out and done. I cleared my SC0-402 tests.


simply attempted SC0-402 question bank as soon as and i'm convinced.
With the expend of exceptional products of killexams.com, I had scored ninety two percentage marks in SC0-402 certification. i waslooking for dependable keep fabric to boom my information stage. Technical standards and difficult language of my certification changed into difficult to recognize therefore i used to be searching for dependable and clean purchase a keep atproducts. I had near to realize this internet site for the instruction of expert certification. It was not an clean job butonly killexams.com has made this job easy for me. im feeling excellent for my achievement and this platform is satisfactory for me.


first rate source latest high-highexcellent SC0-402 intellect dumps, reform answers.
im now not an aficionado of on line killexams.com, in light of the fact that they are often posted by passage of flighty individuals who misdirect I into mastering stuff I neednt worry with and missing things that I absolutely want to recognise. not killexams.com . This traffic enterprise offers absolutely sound sized killexams.com that assist me overcome SC0-402 exam readiness. that is the passage by which I passed this exam from the second one strive and scored 87% marks. thanks


That changed into incredible! I got today's dumps present day SC0-402 examination.
There is not a sound deal SC0-402 exam substances out there, so I went in advance and purchased those SC0-402 questions and solutions. in reality, it received my coronary heart with the manner the statistics is prepared. And yeah, thats right: mostquestions I noticed on the exam maintain been exactly what turned into furnished by killexams.com. Im relieved to maintain exceeded SC0-402 exam.


While it is very difficult job to pick dependable certification questions / answers resources with respect to review, reputation and validity because people regain ripoff due to choosing wrong service. Killexams.com create it positive to serve its clients best to its resources with respect to exam dumps update and validity. Most of other's ripoff report complaint clients near to us for the brain dumps and pass their exams happily and easily. They never compromise on their review, reputation and property because killexams review, killexams reputation and killexams client self-confidence is famous to us. Specially they purchase care of killexams.com review, killexams.com reputation, killexams.com ripoff report complaint, killexams.com trust, killexams.com validity, killexams.com report and killexams.com scam. If you notice any erroneous report posted by their competitors with the appellation killexams ripoff report complaint internet, killexams.com ripoff report, killexams.com scam, killexams.com complaint or something relish this, just withhold in intellect that there are always foundation people damaging reputation of sound services due to their benefits. There are thousands of satisfied customers that pass their exams using killexams.com brain dumps, killexams PDF questions, killexams rehearse questions, killexams exam simulator. Visit Killexams.com, their sample questions and sample brain dumps, their exam simulator and you will definitely know that killexams.com is the best brain dumps site.

Back to Braindumps Menu


BCNS-CNS braindumps | E20-559 rehearse test | 000-209 dumps | COG-700 cram | M2150-810 rehearse test | 70-536-CSharp rehearse Test | NS0-150 questions answers | HP0-438 test questions | 1Z0-550 study guide | C2170-051 brain dumps | 000-765 free pdf | HP0-417 test prep | BCP-410 braindumps | 700-104 exam prep | 000-806 questions and answers | HP0-D04 study guide | 70-779 examcollection | 200-310 exam questions | C2090-612 pdf download | CTFA study guide |


SC0-402 exam questions | SC0-402 free pdf | SC0-402 pdf download | SC0-402 test questions | SC0-402 real questions | SC0-402 practice questions

Once you memorize these SC0-402 , you will regain 100% marks.
killexams.com SCP Certification keep publications are setup by means of IT experts. Lots of students had been complaining that there are too many questions in such a lot of rehearse assessments and exam guides, and they are just worn-out to maintain enough money any more. Seeing killexams.com professionals drudgery out this comprehensive version at the selfsame time as nonetheless assure that every one the understanding is blanketed after abysmal studies and analysis.

We maintain Tested and Approved SC0-402 Exams. killexams.com provides the most accurate and latest IT exam materials which almost hold complete erudition points. With the aid of their SC0-402 study materials, you dont necessity to fritter your time on reading bulk of reference books and just necessity to expend 10-20 hours to master their SC0-402 existent questions and answers. And they provide you with PDF Version & Software Version exam questions and answers. For Software Version materials, Its offered to give the candidates simulate the SCP SC0-402 exam in a existent environment. killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for complete exams on website
PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
OCTSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for complete Orders
Click https://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/SC0-402

Great SC0-402 items: they maintain their specialists Team to guarantee their SCP SC0-402 exam questions are dependably the latest. They are for the most fragment exceptionally snug with the exams and testing focus.

How they withhold SCP SC0-402 exams updated?: they maintain their uncommon approaches to know the latest exams data on SCP SC0-402. Once in a while they contact their accomplices exceptionally acquainted with the testing focus or now and again their clients will email us the latest criticism, or they got the latest input from their dumps advertise. When they determine the SCP SC0-402 exams changed then they update them ASAP.

Unconditional promise?: on the off casual that you really near up short this SC0-402 Network Defense and Countermeasures (NDC) and don't necessity to sit taut for the update then they can give you full refund. Yet, you ought to forward your score reply to us with the goal that they can maintain a check. They will give you full refund quickly amid their working time after they regain the SCP SC0-402 score report from you.

SCP SC0-402 Network Defense and Countermeasures (NDC) Product Demo?: they maintain both PDF adaptation and Software variant. You can check their product page to perceive what it like.

killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
WC2017: 60% Discount Coupon for complete exams on website
PROF17: 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
DEAL17: 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
OCTSPECIAL: 10% Special Discount Coupon for complete Orders


At the point when will I regain my SC0-402 material after I pay?: Generally, After successful payment your username/password are sent at your email address inside 5 min. be that as it may, if any deferral in bank side for installment approval, at that point it takes minimal longer.

SC0-402 Practice Test | SC0-402 examcollection | SC0-402 VCE | SC0-402 study guide | SC0-402 practice exam | SC0-402 cram


Killexams 156-915-70 rehearse test | Killexams P2080-034 dumps | Killexams 000-420 test prep | Killexams C2090-549 braindumps | Killexams 646-365 questions answers | Killexams HP0-068 dump | Killexams BI0-145 brain dumps | Killexams C9020-970 exam prep | Killexams 050-728 free pdf | Killexams 9A0-136 existent questions | Killexams C2020-013 existent questions | Killexams E20-393 free pdf download | Killexams CD0-001 brain dumps | Killexams HP0-651 cheat sheets | Killexams 70-505-CSharp free pdf | Killexams 090-602 free pdf | Killexams 000-G40 rehearse test | Killexams HP3-X02 sample test | Killexams A2180-376 braindumps | Killexams 500-170 rehearse questions |


killexams.com huge List of Exam Braindumps

View Complete list of Killexams.com Brain dumps


Killexams HP0-171 brain dumps | Killexams 98-349 braindumps | Killexams 000-427 pdf download | Killexams JN0-692 cheat sheets | Killexams PMI-200 test prep | Killexams FNS examcollection | Killexams VCS-310 rehearse test | Killexams HP0-095 exam questions | Killexams HP0-K02 study guide | Killexams ST0-237 cram | Killexams BAS-013 rehearse test | Killexams IC3-2 study guide | Killexams P9530-089 rehearse questions | Killexams 000-002 rehearse test | Killexams C2180-181 existent questions | Killexams CNOR test prep | Killexams E20-537 questions answers | Killexams 312-92 exam prep | Killexams 050-80-CASECURID01 existent questions | Killexams 920-352 dump |


Network Defense and Countermeasures (NDC)

Pass 4 positive SC0-402 dumps | Killexams.com SC0-402 existent questions | http://smresidences.com.ph/

BAE Reveals unique ‘Smart D2’ Countermeasures System | killexams.com existent questions and Pass4sure dumps

BAE Systems has unveiled a next-generation threat management technology that can drudgery with fixed- and rotary-wing aircraft to dispense countermeasures. The company calls the unique system Smart D2. It can deploy multi-shot flares, dynamic radio-frequency decoys and kinetic interceptors to protect aircraft. Traditional threat warning and countermeasure systems identify and conquer infrared and guided missiles by dispensing flares or chaff that muddle threats and their aptitude to track. BAE ...

Register now for free access to "BAE Reveals unique ‘Smart D2’ Countermeasures System" and other premium content selected daily by their editors. 

Current magazine subscribers: digital access to articles associated with your subscription are now included at no added suffuse to you. Simply expend your subscriber email to log in to your account (or contact us for assistance in updating your account). Current Aviation Week Intelligence Network (AWIN) enterprise and individual members: please fade to http://awin.aviationweek.com for access.

Already registered? Log In here.

Computer and Network Systems (CNS): Core Programs | killexams.com existent questions and Pass4sure dumps

NSF Logo

National Science Foundation

Directorate for Computer & Information Science & Engineering     Division of Computer and Network Systems

Submission Window Date(s) (due by 5 p.m. submitter's local time):

     September 24, 2018 - October 02, 2018

LARGE projects

     September 24, 2018 - October 02, 2018

MEDIUM projects

     November 01, 2018 - November 15, 2018

SMALL projects

     September 09, 2019 - September 16, 2019

MEDIUM projects

     September 18, 2019 - September 25, 2019

LARGE projects

     October 31, 2019 - November 14, 2019

SMALL projects

IMPORTANT INFORMATION AND REVISION NOTES

This is a revision of NSF 17-570, the solicitation for the CISE/CNS Core Programs. Significant changes maintain been made to the program description. The revisions include:

  • All proposals must be submitted to the “CNS Core” program, rather than the Research in Networking Technology & Systems (NeTS) or Computer Systems Research (CSR) programs.
  • Additional solicitation-specific review criteria, addressing security by design, robustness, manageability, and understanding of the system or system component; evaluation of expected research outcomes; and dissemination plans for independent validation.
  • A Results Dissemination mode and a Data Management mode are now required for complete proposals.
  • The requirement of a Collaboration mode for complete proposals with more than one investigator for MEDIUM proposals and complete great proposals.
  • The addition of unique submission taxonomy and keyword requirements; these are to be included at the conclude of the project summary.
  • The Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure (OAC) is now fragment of the coordinated solicitation, along with CNS (this solicitation), Computing and Communication Foundations (CCF), and Information and knowing Systems (IIS).
  • Broadening Participation in Computing plans are strongly encouraged for Medium and great proposals, and approved plans are required before award.
  • Proposers are asked not to request start dates between July 2 and September 30 of a given year.
  • Eligibility requirements for PIs, co-PIs, and senior personnel are clarified.
  • Evaluation plans are required.
  • The section on Embedded REU Supplements has been removed. Requests for REU supplements may noiseless be submitted in accordance with applicable NSF Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures sheperd (PAPPG) and CISE guidance.
  • Any proposal submitted in response to this solicitation should be submitted in accordance with the revised NSF Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures sheperd (PAPPG) (NSF 18-1), which is efficient for proposals submitted, or due, on or after January 29, 2018.

    SUMMARY OF PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS General Information

    Program Title:

    Computer and Network Systems (CNS): Core Programs

    Synopsis of Program:

    CISE’s Division of Computer and Network Systems (CNS) supports research and education projects that purchase a system-oriented approach to the progress of novel computing and networking technologies, or to the enhancement of existing systems in any of several dimensions, or that explore unique ways to create expend of existing technologies.

    Proposers are invited to submit proposals in three project classes, which are defined as follows:

  • Small Projects - up to $500,000 total budget with durations up to three years;
  • Medium Projects - $500,001 to $1,200,000 total budget with durations up to four years; and
  • Large Projects - $1,200,001 to $3,000,000 total budget with durations up to five years.
  • A more complete description of the three project classes can be organize in Section II. Program Description of this document.

    Cognizant Program Officer(s):

    Please note that the following information is current at the time of publishing. notice program website for any updates to the points of contact.

    Applicable Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number(s):

  • 47.070 --- Computer and Information Science and Engineering
  • Award Information

    Anticipated character of Award: measure award or Continuing Grant

    Estimated Number of Awards: 100 to 150

    Anticipated Funding Amount: $60,000,000

    $60 million per year, conditional upon the availability of funds.

    Eligibility Information

    Who May Submit Proposals:

    Proposals may only be submitted by the following:

  • Institutions of Higher Education (IHEs) - Two- and four-year IHEs (including community colleges) accredited in, and having a campus located in the US, acting on behalf of their faculty members. Special Instructions for International offshoot Campuses of US IHEs: If the proposal includes funding to be provided to an international offshoot campus of a US institution of higher education (including through expend of subawards and consultant arrangements), the proposer must account for the benefit(s) to the project of performance at the international offshoot campus, and justify why the project activities cannot be performed at the US campus.
  • Non-profit, non-academic organizations: Independent museums, observatories, research labs, professional societies and similar organizations in the U.S. associated with educational or research activities.
  • Who May Serve as PI:

    As of the submission deadline, PIs, co-PIs, or other senior project personnel must hold primary, full-time, paid appointments in research or teaching positions at US-based campuses/offices of organizations eligible to submit to this solicitation (see above), with exceptions granted for family or medical leave, as determined by the submitting institution. Individuals with primary appointments at for-profit, non-academic organizations, or overseas offshoot campuses of US IHEs are not eligible, even if they too maintain an appointment at a US campus.

    Limit on Number of Proposals per Organization:

    There are no restrictions or limits.

    Limit on Number of Proposals per PI or Co-PI: 2

    In any contiguous September through November period, an individual may participate as PI, co-PI or Senior Personnel in no more than two proposals across complete size classes submitted in response to the coordinated solicitations (where coordinated solicitations are defined to comprehend the Computer and Network Systems (CNS): Core Programs, Computing and Communication Foundations (CCF): Core Programs, Information and knowing Systems (IIS): Core Programs, and the Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure (OAC): Core Programs solicitations). For example, between September 2018 and November 2018, an individual may participate as PI, co-PI or Senior Personnel in one proposal submitted to a core program in CCF and in a second proposal submitted to a core program in CNS, or an individual may participate as PI, co-PI or Senior Personnel in two proposals submitted to an IIS core program, etc.

    These eligibility constraints will be strictly enforced in order to handle everyone fairly and consistently. In the event that an individual exceeds this limit, proposals received within the restrict will be accepted based on earliest date and time of proposal submission (i.e., the first two proposals received will be accepted and the balance will be returned without review). No exceptions will be made.

    The restrict on the number of proposals per PI, co-PI or Senior Personnel applies only to the coordinated solicitations.

    Proposal Preparation and Submission Instructions

    A. Proposal Preparation Instructions

  • Letters of Intent: Not required
  • Preliminary Proposal Submission: Not required
  • B. Budgetary Information

  • Other Budgetary Limitations:

    Other budgetary limitations apply. please notice the full text of this solicitation for further information.

  • C. Due Dates

  • Submission Window Date(s) (due by 5 p.m. submitter's local time):

         September 24, 2018 - October 02, 2018

    LARGE projects

         September 24, 2018 - October 02, 2018

    MEDIUM projects

         November 01, 2018 - November 15, 2018

    SMALL projects

         September 09, 2019 - September 16, 2019

    MEDIUM projects

         September 18, 2019 - September 25, 2019

    LARGE projects

         October 31, 2019 - November 14, 2019

    SMALL projects

  • Proposal Review Information Criteria

    Merit Review Criteria:

    National Science Board approved criteria. Additional merit review considerations apply. please notice the full text of this solicitation for further information.

    Award Administration Information

    Award Conditions:

    Standard NSF award conditions apply.

    Reporting Requirements:

    Standard NSF reporting requirements apply.

    TABLE OF CONTENTS

    Summary of Program Requirements

  • Introduction
  • Program Description
  • Award Information
  • Eligibility Information
  • Proposal Preparation and Submission Instructions
  • Proposal Preparation Instructions
  • Budgetary Information
  • Due Dates
  • FastLane/Grants.gov Requirements
  • NSF Proposal Processing and Review Procedures
  • Merit Review Principles and Criteria
  • Review and Selection Process
  • Award Administration Information
  • Notification of the Award
  • Award Conditions
  • Reporting Requirements
  • Agency Contacts
  • Other Information
  • I. INTRODUCTION

    The Division of Computer and Network Systems (CNS) supports research and education activities that lead to novel or enhanced computing and networking technologies, or that explore unique ways to create expend of existing technologies. The Division seeks to develop a better understanding of the fundamental properties and tradeoffs involved in computer and network systems as well as the abstractions and tools used in designing, building, measuring, and using them.

    II. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

    The CNS core program deals with complete aspects of computer and network systems. Society's reliance on such systems as infrastructure has grown dramatically in the terminal decade. At the selfsame time, both the resources from which those systems are built—compute, storage, communication networks, and software—and the passage those resources are organized and distributed, maintain continued to evolve rapidly.

    Current and future systems necessity to answer various requirements, both generic and purpose-driven. generic system requirements comprehend security, reliability, manageability, usability, and sustainability, as well as cost-effectiveness and fitness for purpose. Depending on the context, other requirements may comprehend performance, privacy-preservation, scalability, responsiveness, and survivability.

    CNS solicits innovative research that considers technology trends and emerging challenges, while emphasizing a systems focus and awareness of the types of requirements mentioned above. This solicitation recognizes the interdependency and blurring of boundaries among computing, storage, and networking (sub)systems and the research associated with them. As such, specific sub-programs are not called out. It is not the intent to restrict the scope of the program, compared to previous solicitations. Rather, the intent is to hearten cross-fertilization among areas of CNS research.

    Research of interest for this solicitation:

  • Explores fundamental principles and creates innovative technologies, protocols, and systems that define the future or—more realistically—harness current and emerging technologies, trends, and applications;
  • Produces practical abstractions, techniques, tools, artifacts, or datasets that address/enhance both generic and functional requirements such as those outlined above;
  • Reflects a pellucid understanding of what each component does and how it interfaces with the repose of the system and the environment;
  • Disseminates artifacts in such a passage that others can repeat, reproduce, validate, or otherwise verify the results.
  • Although purely intellectual investigations are within scope, research that takes into account current and future societal needs is encouraged.

    A hallmark of systems research is the investigation and understanding of design tradeoffs that must be navigated when designing and implementing systems against the requirements above. Proposals that expose underlying principles or tradeoffs having predictive value that extends across different domains are especially encouraged. Proposers should identify and narrate the systems considered, the objectives or capabilities envisioned, and their expected contribution in the context of the overall system requirements. Three especially famous specimen requirements are:

  • Secure by design: How can one ensure integrity and confidentiality of networked systems and data? How can one enhance abstractions, delineate permissible actions, invoke compliance, and establish security defaults in design processes that anticipate vulnerabilities and provide defense against unforeseen attacks from adversaries?
  • Robustness: How can systems—existing and future—be made more adaptable and resilient to natural and anthropogenic hazards (e.g., weather events, malware, sabotage), as well as other daily or expected events, such as component failures, misconfigurations, and overloads? What innovative approaches would enable one to ensure system robustness and to identify, communicate, and mitigate system anomalies in real-time for outages at both miniature and great scale?
  • Manageability: What unique architectures and protocols, measurement and monitoring capabilities are needed to back a growing set of diverse applications? How can these measurements and monitoring capabilities aid in overall system management? What are novel approaches to enable comprehensive, pervasive, accurate, and usable measurement capabilities, near real-time system analytics, and systems management when the systems are massive and at the scale of the Internet? What innovations are needed to enable truly autonomous systems, which are self-managing by definition?
  • In general, any topic having to achieve with augmenting, understanding, enhancing, or transforming computing and communication systems undertaken from a systems point of view is within scope.

    Issues that reside primarily at the device or application level and that are highly context-specific will not be considered a sound fortunate for this program. Projects that focus exclusively or primarily on cybersecurity threats and countermeasures may be a better fortunate for the Secure and Trustworthy Cyberspace (SaTC) program. Projects focused primarily on design or enhancement of sensing and control systems that interact with the physical world may be a better fortunate with the Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) program.

    Project Validation Plan: Proposers are strongly encouraged to comprehend a project validation mode in the Project Description that narrate the underlying setup, processes, mechanisms, and metrics to assess success of the proposed research. Proposers may validate hypotheses using simulations, emulations, testbeds, or a combination of these; architectural validation could chance at a time-scale larger than the project duration, in which case the approach to long-term architecture validation must be discussed in the proposal. Proposers are highly recommended to use, when appropriate, the wide array of community infrastructure testbeds that are available as fragment of their validation plan. The proposal must create pellucid the intended level of abstraction at which the underlying research will be validated.

    Results Dissemination Plan: Proposals submitted to this solicitation must narrate plans to ensure that the research results produced will be made available to the extent necessary to validate the findings independently, as indicated in the NSF Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures sheperd (PAPPG) Chapter XI.D.4.

    Data Management Plan: The data management mode must too narrate steps to ensure that pertinent software and hardware artifacts, data and the results are available (for a reasonable time) beyond the conclude of the project lifecycle. For details, notice the Directorate for Computer & Information Science & Engineering (CISE) Data Management mode at https://www.nsf.gov/cise/cise_dmp.jsp.

    Collaboration Plan: Since the success of collaborative research efforts is known to depend on considerate coordination mechanisms that regularly bring together the various participants of the project, a divorce Collaboration mode is required for complete great proposals and complete Medium proposals with more than one investigator. Collaboration Plans are optional for miniature proposals.

    PROJECT CLASSES

    Proposals submitted to this solicitation must be consistent with one of three project classes defined below. Proposals will be considered for funding within their project classes.

  • SMALL Projects
  • Small Projects, with total budgets up to $500,000 for durations of up to three years, are well suited to one or two investigators (PI and one co-PI or other Senior Personnel) and at least one student and/or postdoc. A Collaboration mode (up to 2 pages) may be provided under Supplementary Documents. please notice Proposal Preparation Instructions Section V.A for additional submission guidelines.

  • MEDIUM Projects
  • Medium Projects, with total budgets ranging from $500,001 to $1,200,000 for durations up to four years, are well suited to one or more investigators (PI, co-PI and/or other Senior Personnel) and several students and/or postdocs. Medium project descriptions must be comprehensive and well-integrated, and should create a convincing case that the collaborative contributions of the project team will be greater than the sum of each of their individual contributions. Rationale must be provided to account for why a budget of this size is required to carry out the proposed work. Since the success of collaborative research efforts are known to depend on considerate coordination mechanisms that regularly bring together the various participants of the project, a Collaboration mode is required for any Medium project with more than one investigator, even when the investigators are affiliated with the selfsame institution. Up to 2 pages are allowed for Collaboration Plans and they must be submitted as a document under Supplementary Documents. The length and level of detail provided in the Collaboration mode should be commensurate with the complexity of the proposed project. Collaboration Plans and proposed budgets should demonstrate that key personnel, and especially lead PIs, maintain allocated adequate time for both their individual technical contributions and the leadership of collaborative activities necessary to realize the synergistic effects of larger-scale research. If a Medium project with more than one investigator does not comprehend a Collaboration Plan, that proposal will be returned without review. please notice Proposal Preparation Instructions Section V.A for additional submission guidelines.

  • LARGE Projects
  • Large Projects, with total budgets ranging from $1,200,001 to $3,000,000 for durations of up to five years, are well suited to two or more investigators (PI, co-PI(s), or other Senior Personnel), and a team of students and/or postdocs. great project descriptions must be comprehensive and well-integrated, and should create a convincing case that the collaborative contributions of the project team will be greater than the sum of each of their individual contributions. great projects will typically integrate research from various areas, either within a cluster or across clusters, or tackle ambitious goals not feasible with smaller projects. Rationale must be provided to account for why a budget of this size is required to carry out the proposed work. Since the success of collaborative research efforts are known to depend on considerate coordination mechanisms that regularly bring together the various participants of the project, a Collaboration mode is required for complete great projects, regardless of the number of investigators. Up to 2 pages are allowed for Collaboration Plans and they must be submitted as a document under Supplementary Documents. The length and degree of detail provided in the Collaboration mode should be commensurate with the complexity of the proposed project. Collaboration Plans and proposed budgets should demonstrate that key personnel, and especially lead PIs, maintain allocated adequate time for both their individual technical contributions and the leadership of collaborative activities necessary to realize the synergistic effects of larger-scale research. If a great project does not comprehend a Collaboration Plan, that proposal will be returned without review. please notice Proposal Preparation Instructions Section V.A for additional submission guidelines.

  • EVALUATION PLANS

    PIs must comprehend a mode to evaluate the approaches developed as fragment of the Project Description. Evaluation methods will depend on the research area; examples comprehend results from progress of theories, applications of techniques to specific domains, efficacy studies, scalability on local or global scales, generalization, quantifiable usability, robustness, reliability in benign or hostile environments, compatibility with existing environments, performance measures on benchmark datasets, and other such activities. The mode should be usurp for the size and scope of the project.

    BROADENING PARTICIPATION IN COMPUTING

    CISE has long been committed to Broadening Participation in Computing (BPC). The under-representation of many groups—including women, African Americans, Hispanics, American Indians, Alaska Natives, indigenous Hawaiians, indigenous Pacific Islanders, and persons with disabilities—in computing deprives great segments of the population of the opening to be creators of technology and not only consumers. Ending underrepresentation will require a purview of measures, including institutional programs and activities as well as culture change across colleges, departments, classes, and research groups.

    With this solicitation, CISE is expanding a pilot exertion started terminal year encouraging the research community to engage in meaningful BPC activities. This unique activity builds on many of the programs, research, and resources created in CISE's long history of back for BPC, and it aligns with the recommendations of the Strategic mode for Broadening Participation produced by the CISE Advisory Committee in 2011. Specifically:

  • Each Medium and great project must, by the time of award, maintain in position an approved BPC plan. In this ongoing pilot phase, CISE will drudgery with each PI team following merit review and prior to making an award to ensure that plans are meaningful and comprehend concrete metrics for success. CISE will too provide opportunities for PIs to share BPC experiences and innovations through program PI meetings. PIs of Medium and great proposals are therefore strongly encouraged to deem this eventual requirement as they develop their proposals, and to comprehend one- to three-page descriptions of their planned BPC activities under Supplementary Documents in their submissions. Feedback will be provided on such plans.
  • PIs submitting to the miniature size class should note that CISE intends to conduct an evaluation of the effectiveness of the above approach and determine usurp next steps, including potential further expansion of this exertion in future years. PIs of miniature proposals are therefore strongly encouraged to comprehend plans, or launch preparing to comprehend plans, for broadening participation activities in their proposals.
  • More information, including examples of BPC activities and metrics, can be organize at: https://www.nsf.gov/cise/bpc/.

    PROPOSALS FOR CONSIDERATION BY MULTIPLE CISE PROGRAMS

    Proposals that intersect more than one CISE research program are welcome. In such cases, PIs must identify the most pertinent programs in the proposal submission process (for information about submission and how to identify such proposals, notice Proposal Preparation Instructions later in this document). CISE Program Officers will ensure that these proposals are co-reviewed as appropriate.

    IMPORTANT PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS

    The submission of far-reaching, creative research and education projects is encouraged. Funds will be used to back potentially transformative research with high-impact potential. In this way, CISE will catalyze exciting unique research activities with the potential to create significant advances in the state of the art.

    Interdisciplinary, international, and/or academic-industry collaborations that plight to result in major science or engineering advances are welcome. The directorate hopes to attract proposals from faculty at a broad purview of academic institutions, including faculty at minority-serving and predominantly undergraduate institutions.

    Proposals submitted should demonstrate that moneyed learning experiences will be provided for a diverse population of students and may submit the progress of innovative curricula or educational materials that advance literacy about and expertise in areas supported by CISE.

    Scientific progress often results by considering a special case of a generic problem. If the proposed research falls into this category, PIs can hearten the reviewers and NSF staff better understand the intellectual merit and/or broader impacts of the proposal by discussing to what extent the findings are likely to generalize.

    In the interest of completeness and transparency, PIs are strongly encouraged to describe, as fragment of their Data Management Plans, how they will provide access to well-documented datasets, modeling and/or simulation tools, and codebases to back reproducibility of their methods. For more information, notice the Dear Colleague epistle “Encouraging Reproducibility in Computing and Communications Research” available at https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=nsf17022.

    START DATES

    In order to avoid overdue reports blocking award actions during the conclude of a fiscal year, institutions are discouraged from seeking project start dates between July 2 and September 30 of a given year. Awardee institutions may incur allowable pre-award costs within the 90-day period immediately preceding the start date of the award subject to the conditions specified in the PAPPG; this will allow back for students or other pertinent activities to launch over this period.

    III. AWARD INFORMATION

    Up to $60 million each year will back up to 150 awards, pending the availability of funds.

    IV. ELIGIBILITY INFORMATION

    Who May Submit Proposals:

    Proposals may only be submitted by the following:

  • Institutions of Higher Education (IHEs) - Two- and four-year IHEs (including community colleges) accredited in, and having a campus located in the US, acting on behalf of their faculty members. Special Instructions for International offshoot Campuses of US IHEs: If the proposal includes funding to be provided to an international offshoot campus of a US institution of higher education (including through expend of subawards and consultant arrangements), the proposer must account for the benefit(s) to the project of performance at the international offshoot campus, and justify why the project activities cannot be performed at the US campus.
  • Non-profit, non-academic organizations: Independent museums, observatories, research labs, professional societies and similar organizations in the U.S. associated with educational or research activities.
  • Who May Serve as PI:

    As of the submission deadline, PIs, co-PIs, or other senior project personnel must hold primary, full-time, paid appointments in research or teaching positions at US-based campuses/offices of organizations eligible to submit to this solicitation (see above), with exceptions granted for family or medical leave, as determined by the submitting institution. Individuals with primary appointments at for-profit, non-academic organizations, or overseas offshoot campuses of US IHEs are not eligible, even if they too maintain an appointment at a US campus.

    Limit on Number of Proposals per Organization:

    There are no restrictions or limits.

    Limit on Number of Proposals per PI or Co-PI: 2

    In any contiguous September through November period, an individual may participate as PI, co-PI or Senior Personnel in no more than two proposals across complete size classes submitted in response to the coordinated solicitations (where coordinated solicitations are defined to comprehend the Computer and Network Systems (CNS): Core Programs, Computing and Communication Foundations (CCF): Core Programs, Information and knowing Systems (IIS): Core Programs, and the Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure (OAC): Core Programs solicitations). For example, between September 2018 and November 2018, an individual may participate as PI, co-PI or Senior Personnel in one proposal submitted to a core program in CCF and in a second proposal submitted to a core program in CNS, or an individual may participate as PI, co-PI or Senior Personnel in two proposals submitted to an IIS core program, etc.

    These eligibility constraints will be strictly enforced in order to handle everyone fairly and consistently. In the event that an individual exceeds this limit, proposals received within the restrict will be accepted based on earliest date and time of proposal submission (i.e., the first two proposals received will be accepted and the balance will be returned without review). No exceptions will be made.

    The restrict on the number of proposals per PI, co-PI or Senior Personnel applies only to the coordinated solicitations.

    Additional Eligibility Info:

    Subawards are not permitted to overseas offshoot campuses/offices of US-based proposing organizations eligible to submit to this solicitation.

    V. PROPOSAL PREPARATION AND SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS A. Proposal Preparation Instructions

    Full Proposal Preparation Instructions: Proposers may opt to submit proposals in response to this Program Solicitation via Grants.gov or via the NSF FastLane system.

  • Full proposals submitted via FastLane: Proposals submitted in response to this program solicitation should be prepared and submitted in accordance with the generic guidelines contained in the NSF Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures sheperd (PAPPG). The complete text of the PAPPG is available electronically on the NSF website at: https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=pappg. Paper copies of the PAPPG may be obtained from the NSF Publications Clearinghouse, telephone (703) 292-7827 or by e-mail from nsfpubs@nsf.gov. Proposers are reminded to identify this program solicitation number in the program solicitation obstruct on the NSF Cover Sheet For Proposal to the National Science Foundation. Compliance with this requirement is censorious to determining the pertinent proposal processing guidelines. Failure to submit this information may delay processing.
  • Full proposals submitted via Grants.gov: Proposals submitted in response to this program solicitation via Grants.gov should be prepared and submitted in accordance with the NSF Grants.gov Application Guide: A sheperd for the Preparation and Submission of NSF Applications via Grants.gov. The complete text of the NSF Grants.gov Application sheperd is available on the Grants.gov website and on the NSF website at: (https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=grantsgovguide). To obtain copies of the Application sheperd and Application Forms Package, click on the Apply tab on the Grants.gov site, then click on the Apply Step 1: Download a award Application Package and Application Instructions link and enter the funding opening number, (the program solicitation number without the NSF prefix) and press the Download Package button. Paper copies of the Grants.gov Application sheperd too may be obtained from the NSF Publications Clearinghouse, telephone (703) 292-7827 or by e-mail from nsfpubs@nsf.gov.
  • In determining which mode to utilize in the electronic preparation and submission of the proposal, please note the following:

    Collaborative Proposals. complete collaborative proposals submitted as divorce submissions from multiple organizations must be submitted via the NSF FastLane system. PAPPG Chapter II.D.3 provides additional information on collaborative proposals.

    See PAPPG Chapter II.C.2 for guidance on the required sections of a full research proposal submitted to NSF. please note that the proposal preparation instructions provided in this program solicitation may deviate from the PAPPG instructions.

    The following information SUPPLEMENTS (note that it does NOT replace) the guidelines provided in the NSF.

    Cover Sheet: PIs submitting award Opportunities for Academic Liaison with Industry (GOALI) proposals should select “GOALI” from the character of Proposal drop down list in the Proposal Preparation module in FastLane or Grants.gov. please notice Chapter II.E.4 of the PAPPG for additional information about preparing a GOALI proposal: https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappg17_1/pappg_2.jsp#IIE4.

    Proposal Titles:

    Proposal titles should launch with "CNS Core", followed with a colon, then the project class followed by a colon, then the title of your project. For example, if you are submitting a Medium proposal, then your title would be CNS Core: Medium: Title.

    If you submit a proposal as fragment of a set of collaborative proposals, the title of the proposal should launch with "CNS Core" followed by a colon, then the project class followed by a colon, then "Collaborative Research" followed by a colon, and the title. For example, if you are submitting a collaborative set of proposals for a great project the title of each would be CNS Core: Large: Collaborative Research: Title.

    Proposals from PIs in institutions that maintain RUI (Research in Undergraduate Institutions) eligibility should maintain a proposal title that begins "CNS Core", followed by a colon then the project class, followed by a colon then "RUI", followed by a colon and then the title, for example, CNS Core: Small: RUI: Title.

    PIs submitting GOALI proposals should maintain a proposal title that begins "CNS Core", followed by a colon then the project class, followed by a colon then "GOALI", followed by a colon and then the title, for example, CNS Core: Small: GOALI: Title.

    Proposals that extend beyond the scope of one CISE core program or zone are welcome. Proposals should be submitted in response to the solicitation for the CISE division (CCF, CNS, IIS, or OAC) that includes the most pertinent core program. In such cases, PIs should identify the acronym for the most pertinent core program or area, followed by any other pertinent program acronym(s) separated by colons (for example, CNS Core: CHS: Medium: Title). In this case, the proposal would be submitted to the CNS solicitation and would be considered by both the CNS Core and Cyber-Human Systems (CHS) programs. CNS Program Officers will drudgery with their NSF and CISE colleagues to ensure that these proposals are appropriately reviewed and considered for funding. please notice the coordinated CCF, IIS, and OAC solicitations for information on other CISE core programs and the corresponding acronyms.

    Project Summary:

    The Project Summary consists of an overview, a statement on the intellectual merit of the proposed activity, a statement on the broader impacts of the proposed activity, and a set of keywords.

    To assist the proposers and the NSF in identifying a “home” for submissions to this program, proposers are required to select keywords in each of the following four dimensions. The first dimension describes the most pertinent systems topic area; the second dimension identifies the context or class of systems; the third dimension corresponds to the primary goal or objective of the proposed work, and the fourth indicates any specialized erudition or techniques to be applied (for specimen machine learning, game theory, etc.). Proposers must select at least one keyword from each list below for the first three dimensions; the fourth dimension should be filled in if any specialized technique is proposed, otherwise "none" should be indicated.

    The required keywords should be input in order, with each dimension delimited by square brackets ("[" and "]"), and multiple keywords within a dimension separated by commas.

    Dimension 1: Topic Area

  • Compilers and Programming Languages
  • Computer Architecture
  • Distributed Systems
  • File Systems
  • Middleware/Services
  • Operating Systems
  • Software Defined Infrastructure/Virtualization
  • Wired Networks
  • Wireless Networks
  • Dimension 2: Target Context or Platform Class

  • Access Networks
  • Application Services
  • Content Delivery Networks
  • Data heart Networks
  • Mobile Systems
  • Cluster/Data Center
  • Cloud/Edge
  • Enterprise Networks
  • High Performance Computing
  • Network Architecture
  • Network Protocols
  • Optical Networks
  • Storage Systems
  • Vehicular Networks
  • Dimension 3: Target Requirement

  • Cost
  • Fairness
  • Quality of (experience, service)
  • Manageability
  • Measurability
  • Performance (throughput, latency)
  • Power/energy improvements
  • Real-time
  • Reliability
  • Robustness
  • Security
  • Scalability
  • Spectrum Coexistence
  • Dimension 4: Techniques

    Projects contemplating application of particular erudition or techniques (e.g., graph theory, game theory, control theory, machine learning, network coding, formal methods, and so on) should comprehend keywords to testify the specialized erudition to be applied.

    Up to 6 additional proposal specific keywords may be added following these four required classifiers, without square bracket delimiters.

    For example, a proposal to expend machine learning to develop low-cost file system abstractions for content delivery in low-latency edge environments might maintain the following string in the Keywords field:

    [File Systems] [Access Networks] [Cost, Performance] [machine learning]

    A project focused on compilers to enhance manageability in enterprise networks could maintain the following as Keywords:

    [Compilers and Programming Languages] [Enterprise Networks] [Manageability] [none]

    A proposal on mmWave beamforming using machine learning could maintain the following Keywords:

    [Wireless Networks] [Access Networks] [Performance] [Machine Learning] mmWave, Beamforming

    The list of keywords should be the terminal paragraph of the Overview section of the Project Summary.

    Project Description:

    Length of Project Description - narrate the research and education activities to be undertaken in up to 15 pages for miniature and Medium proposals and in up to 20 pages for great proposals. Proposals that exceed these limits will be returned without review.

    PIs submitting to the miniature size class should note that CISE intends to conduct an evaluation of the effectiveness of the BPC pilot approach and determine usurp next steps, including potential further expansion of this exertion in future years. PIs of miniature proposals are therefore strongly encouraged to comprehend plans, or launch preparing to comprehend plans, for broadening participation activities in the Broader Impacts sections of their proposals.

    Supplementary Documents:

    In the Supplementary Documents section, upload the following information where relevant:

  • A list of Project Personnel and ally Institutions (Note: In collaborative proposals, the lead institution should provide this information for complete participants):
  • Provide current, accurate information for complete personnel and institutions involved in the project. NSF staff will expend this information in the merit review process to manage reviewer selection. The list must comprehend complete PIs, Co-PIs, Senior Personnel, paid/unpaid Consultants or Collaborators, Subawardees, Postdocs, and project-level advisory committee members. This list should be numbered and comprehend (in this order) full name, Organization(s), and Role in the project, with each item separated by a semi-colon. Each person listed should start a unique numbered line. For example:

  • Mary Smith; XYZ University; PI
  • John Jones; University of PQR; Senior Personnel
  • Jane Brown; XYZ University; Postdoc
  • Bob Adams; ABC Community College; Paid Consultant
  • Susan White; DEF Corporation; Unpaid Collaborator
  • Tim Green; ZZZ University; Subawardee
  • Note: In collaborative proposals, the lead institution should provide this information for complete participants.

    Since the success of collaborative research efforts are known to depend on considerate coordination mechanisms that regularly bring together the various participants of the project, complete Medium proposals that comprehend more than one investigator and complete great proposals must comprehend a Collaboration mode of up to 2 pages. The length of and degree of detail provided in the Collaboration mode should be commensurate with the complexity of the proposed project. Where appropriate, the Collaboration mode might include: 1) the specific roles of the project participants in complete organizations involved; 2) information on how the project will be managed across complete the investigators, institutions, and/or disciplines; 3) identification of the specific coordination mechanisms that will enable cross-investigator, cross-institution, and/or cross-discipline scientific integration (e.g., yearly conferences, graduate student exchange, project meetings at conferences, expend of the grid for videoconferences, software repositories, etc.); and 4) specific references to the budget line items that back collaboration and coordination mechanisms. If a great proposal, or a Medium proposal with more than one investigator, does not comprehend a Collaboration mode of up to 2 pages, that proposal will be returned without review.

  • Collaboration Plans for Medium and great projects (if applicable):

    Proposals must comprehend a Supplementary Document of no more than two pages labeled "Data Management Plan." This Supplementary Document should narrate how the proposal will conform to NSF policy on the dissemination and sharing of research results.

    See Chapter II.C.2.j of the PAPPG for full policy implementation.

    For additional information on the Dissemination and Sharing of Research Results, see: https://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/dmp.jsp.

    For specific guidance for Data Management Plans submitted to the Directorate for Computer and Information Science and Engineering (CISE) see: https://www.nsf.gov/cise/cise_dmp.jsp.

  • Data Management mode (required):

    Proposals submitted to this solicitation must narrate plans to ensure that the research results produced will be made available to the extent necessary to validate the findings independently, as indicated in the NSF Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures sheperd (PAPPG) Chapter XI.D.4.

  • Results Dissemination mode (required):

    Each Medium/Large project must, by the time of award, maintain in position an approved BPC plan. In this ongoing pilot phase, CISE will drudgery with each PI team prior to making an award to ensure that plans are meaningful and comprehend concrete metrics for success. CISE will too provide opportunities for PIs to share BPC experiences and innovations through program PI meetings. PIs of Medium/Large proposals are therefore strongly encouraged to deem this eventual requirement as they develop their proposals, and to comprehend descriptions (of one to three pages) of their planned BPC activities under Supplementary Documents in their submissions. Feedback will be provided on such plans.

  • Broadening Participation in Computing (BPC) Plans for Medium and great projects:

    There are two types of collaboration, one involving individuals/organizations that are included in the budget, and the other involving individuals/organizations that are not included in the budget. Collaborations that are included in the budget should be described in the Project Description. Any substantial collaboration with individuals/organizations not included in the budget should be described in the Facilities, rig and Other Resources section of the proposal (see PAPPG Chapter II.C.2.i). In either case, whether or not the collaborator is included in the budget, a epistle of collaboration from each named participating organization other than the submitting lead, non-lead, and/or subawardee institutions should be provided at the time of submission of the proposal. Such letters should explicitly state the nature of the collaboration, appear on the organization's letterhead and be signed by the usurp organizational representative. These letters must not otherwise deviate from the restrictions and requirements set forth in the PAPPG, Chapter II.C.2.j.

    Please note that letters of back may not be submitted. Such letters achieve not document collaborative arrangements of significance to the project, but primarily convey a sense of enthusiasm for the project and/or highlight the qualifications of the PI or co-PI. Reviewers will be instructed not to deem these letters of back in reviewing the merits of the proposal.

  • Documentation of collaborative arrangements of significance to the proposal through Letters of Collaboration:

    RUI Proposals: PIs from predominantly undergraduate institutions should comprehend a Research in Undergraduate Institutions (RUI) repercussion Statement and Certification of RUI Eligibility in this section.

    GOALI proposals: PIs submitting GOALI proposals should comprehend industry-university agreement letters on intellectual property in this section.

    No other Supplementary Documents, except as permitted by the NSF PAPPG, are allowed.

    Single Copy Documents:

    Collaborators and Other Affiliations Information:

    Proposers should result the guidance specified in Chapter II.C.1.e of the NSF PAPPG.

    Note the distinction to item (1) under Supplementary Documents above: the listing of complete project participants is collected by the project lead and entered as a Supplementary Document, which is then automatically included with complete proposals in a project. The Collaborators and Other Affiliations are entered for each participant within each proposal and, as lone Copy Documents, are available only to NSF staff.

    Collaborators and Other Affiliations due to participants listed on item (1) under Supplementary Documents above who are not PIs, co-PIs, or Senior Personnel can be uploaded under Additional lone Copy Documents using Transfer File.

  • Other specialized information:
  • Submission Checklist:

    In an exertion to assist proposal preparation, the following checklists are provided as a reminder of the items that should be checked before submitting a proposal to this solicitation. These are a summary of the requirements described above. For the items marked with (RWR), the proposal will be returned without review if the required item is noncompliant at the submission deadline. Note that there are four lists: (1) for complete proposals, unique to this solicitation; (2) additional requirements for miniature proposals; (3) additional requirements for Medium proposals; and (4) additional requirements for great proposals.

  • For complete proposals, regardless of size:
  • All proposals must be submitted to the “CNS Core” program, rather than the Research in Networking Technology & Systems (NeTS) or Computer Systems Research (CSR) programs.
  • Should comprehend a Results Dissemination mode and Data Management Plan.
  • The Project Summary must hold the set of required dimensional keywords, input in order, with each dimension delimited by square brackets ("[" and "]"), and multiple keywords within a dimension separated by commas.
  • The title should start with one of the following strings (submissions intended for CNS and too additional core programs described in the CCF, IIS, or OAC core solicitations should result a similar pattern):
  • CNS Core: Small:
  • CNS Core: Small: Collaborative:
  • In addition to the above title prefixes, proposals from PIs in institutions that maintain RUI (Research in Undergraduate Institutions) eligibility should comprehend "RUI:" immediately before the proposal title, for example, CNS Core: Small: RUI: Title, and should comprehend a Research in Undergraduate Institutions repercussion Statement and Certification of RUI Eligibility. Similarly, PIs submitting award Opportunities for Academic Liaison with Industry (GOALI) proposals should select “GOALI” from the character of Proposal drop down list in the Proposal Preparation module in FastLane or Grants.gov; and comprehend "GOALI:" immediately before the proposal title, for example, CNS Core: Small: GOALI: Title.
  • (RWR) Maximum budget shown on the Cover Sheet and on the budget pages must not exceed $500,000, including complete institutions in a collaborative proposal, plus funds for embedded REU supplements.
  • (RWR) The Project Description is limited to no more than 15 pages.
  • A Collaboration mode (up to 2 pages) may be provided as a Supplementary Document. If provided, the collaboration mode should comprehend complete institutions participating, not a divorce mode for each institution.
  • For miniature proposals:
  • The title should start with one of the following strings (submissions intended for CNS and too additional core programs described in the in the CCF, IIS, or OAC core solicitations should result a similar pattern):
  • CNS Core: Medium:
  • CNS Core: Medium: Collaborative:
  • In addition to the above title prefixes, proposals from PIs in institutions that maintain RUI (Research in Undergraduate Institutions) eligibility should comprehend "RUI:" immediately before the proposal title, for example, CNS Core: Medium: RUI: Title, and should comprehend a Research in Undergraduate Institutions repercussion Statement and Certification of RUI Eligibility. Similarly, PIs submitting award Opportunities for Academic Liaison with Industry (GOALI) proposals should select “GOALI” from the character of Proposal drop down list in the Proposal Preparation module in FastLane or Grants.gov; and comprehend "GOALI:" immediately before the proposal title, for example, CNS Core: Medium: GOALI: Title.
  • (RWR) The budget shown on the Cover Sheet and on the budget pages must be $500,001 to $1,200,000, including complete institutions in a collaborative proposal, plus funds for embedded REU supplements.
  • (RWR) The Project Description is limited to no more than 15 pages.
  • (RWR) If there is more than one investigator, a Collaboration mode (up to 2 pages) must be provided as a Supplementary Document, even if complete investigators are affiliated with the selfsame institution. The Collaboration mode should comprehend complete institutions participating, not a divorce mode for each institution.
  • A BPC mode (of one to three pages) should be provided as a Supplementary Document.
  • For Medium proposals:
  • The title should start with one of the following strings (submissions intended for CNS and too additional core programs described in the CCF, IIS, or OAC core solicitations should result a similar pattern, assuming that complete listed programs are accepting great proposals):
  • CNS Core: Large:
  • CNS Core: Large: Collaborative:
  • In addition to the above title prefixes, proposals from PIs in institutions that maintain RUI (Research in Undergraduate Institutions) eligibility should comprehend "RUI:" immediately before the proposal title, for example, CNS Core: Large: RUI: Title, and should comprehend a Research in Undergraduate Institutions repercussion Statement and Certification of RUI Eligibility. Similarly, PIs submitting award Opportunities for Academic Liaison with Industry (GOALI) proposals should select “GOALI” from the character of Proposal drop down list in the Proposal Preparation module in FastLane or Grants.gov; and comprehend "GOALI:" immediately before the proposal title, for example, CNS Core: Large: GOALI: Title.
  • (RWR) The budget shown on the Cover Sheet and on the budget pages must be $1,200,001 to $3,000,000, including complete institutions in a collaborative proposal, plus funds for embedded REU supplements.
  • (RWR) The Project Description is limited to no more than 20 pages.
  • (RWR) A Collaboration mode (up to 2 pages) must be provided as a Supplementary Document, even if complete investigators are affiliated with the selfsame institution. The Collaboration mode should comprehend complete institutions participating, not a divorce mode for each institution.
  • A BPC mode (of one to three pages) should be provided as a Supplementary Document.
  • For great proposals:
  • Proposals that achieve not comply with the requirements marked as RWR will be returned without review.

    B. Budgetary Information

    Cost Sharing:

    Inclusion of voluntary committed cost sharing is prohibited.

    Other Budgetary Limitations:

    Other budgetary limitations apply. please notice the full text of this solicitation for further information.

    C. Due Dates
  • Submission Window Date(s) (due by 5 p.m. submitter's local time):

         September 24, 2018 - October 02, 2018

    LARGE projects

         September 24, 2018 - October 02, 2018

    MEDIUM projects

         November 01, 2018 - November 15, 2018

    SMALL projects

         September 09, 2019 - September 16, 2019

    MEDIUM projects

         September 18, 2019 - September 25, 2019

    LARGE projects

         October 31, 2019 - November 14, 2019

    SMALL projects

  • D. FastLane/Grants.gov Requirements

    For Proposals Submitted Via FastLane:

    To prepare and submit a proposal via FastLane, notice minute technical instructions available at: https://www.fastlane.nsf.gov/a1/newstan.htm. For FastLane user support, convoke the FastLane hearten Desk at 1-800-673-6188 or e-mail fastlane@nsf.gov. The FastLane hearten Desk answers generic technical questions related to the expend of the FastLane system. Specific questions related to this program solicitation should be referred to the NSF program staff contact(s) listed in Section VIII of this funding opportunity.

    For Proposals Submitted Via Grants.gov:

    Before using Grants.gov for the first time, each organization must register to create an institutional profile. Once registered, the applicant's organization can then apply for any federal award on the Grants.gov website. Comprehensive information about using Grants.gov is available on the Grants.gov Applicant Resources webpage: http://www.grants.gov/web/grants/applicants.html. In addition, the NSF Grants.gov Application sheperd (see link in Section V.A) provides instructions regarding the technical preparation of proposals via Grants.gov. For Grants.gov user support, contact the Grants.gov Contact heart at 1-800-518-4726 or by email: support@grants.gov. The Grants.gov Contact heart answers generic technical questions related to the expend of Grants.gov. Specific questions related to this program solicitation should be referred to the NSF program staff contact(s) listed in Section VIII of this solicitation.

    Submitting the Proposal: Once complete documents maintain been completed, the Authorized Organizational Representative (AOR) must submit the application to Grants.gov and verify the desired funding opening and agency to which the application is submitted. The AOR must then badge and submit the application to Grants.gov. The completed application will be transferred to the NSF FastLane system for further processing.

    Proposers that submitted via FastLane are strongly encouraged to expend FastLane to verify the status of their submission to NSF. For proposers that submitted via Grants.gov, until an application has been received and validated by NSF, the Authorized Organizational Representative may check the status of an application on Grants.gov. After proposers maintain received an e-mail notification from NSF, Research.gov should be used to check the status of an application.

    VI. NSF PROPOSAL PROCESSING AND REVIEW PROCEDURES

    Proposals received by NSF are assigned to the usurp NSF program for acknowledgement and, if they meet NSF requirements, for review. complete proposals are carefully reviewed by a scientist, engineer, or educator serving as an NSF Program Officer, and usually by three to ten other persons outside NSF either as ad hoc reviewers, panelists, or both, who are experts in the particular fields represented by the proposal. These reviewers are selected by Program Officers charged with oversight of the review process. Proposers are invited to imply names of persons they believe are especially well qualified to review the proposal and/or persons they would prefer not review the proposal. These suggestions may serve as one source in the reviewer selection process at the Program Officer's discretion. Submission of such names, however, is optional. care is taken to ensure that reviewers maintain no conflicts of interest with the proposal. In addition, Program Officers may obtain comments from site visits before recommending final action on proposals. Senior NSF staff further review recommendations for awards. A flowchart that depicts the entire NSF proposal and award process (and associated timeline) is included in PAPPG Exhibit III-1.

    A comprehensive description of the Foundation's merit review process is available on the NSF website at: https://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/merit_review/.

    Proposers should too be awake of core strategies that are essential to the fulfillment of NSF's mission, as articulated in pile the Future: Investing in Discovery and Innovation - NSF Strategic mode for Fiscal Years (FY) 2018 – 2022. These strategies are integrated in the program planning and implementation process, of which proposal review is one part. NSF's mission is particularly well-implemented through the integration of research and education and broadening participation in NSF programs, projects, and activities.

    One of the strategic objectives in back of NSF's mission is to foster integration of research and education through the programs, projects, and activities it supports at academic and research institutions. These institutions must recruit, train, and prepare a diverse flow workforce to advance the frontiers of science and participate in the U.S. technology-based economy. NSF's contribution to the national innovation ecosystem is to provide cutting-edge research under the guidance of the Nation's most creative scientists and engineers. NSF too supports progress of a tenacious science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) workforce by investing in pile the erudition that informs improvements in flow teaching and learning.

    NSF's mission calls for the broadening of opportunities and expanding participation of groups, institutions, and geographic regions that are underrepresented in flow disciplines, which is essential to the health and vitality of science and engineering. NSF is committed to this principle of diversity and deems it central to the programs, projects, and activities it considers and supports.

    A. Merit Review Principles and Criteria

    The National Science Foundation strives to invest in a robust and diverse portfolio of projects that creates unique erudition and enables breakthroughs in understanding across complete areas of science and engineering research and education. To identify which projects to support, NSF relies on a merit review process that incorporates consideration of both the technical aspects of a proposed project and its potential to contribute more broadly to advancing NSF's mission "to promote the progress of science; to advance the national health, prosperity, and welfare; to secure the national defense; and for other purposes." NSF makes every exertion to conduct a fair, competitive, transparent merit review process for the selection of projects.

    1. Merit Review Principles

    These principles are to be given due diligence by PIs and organizations when preparing proposals and managing projects, by reviewers when reading and evaluating proposals, and by NSF program staff when determining whether or not to recommend proposals for funding and while overseeing awards. Given that NSF is the primary federal agency charged with nurturing and supporting excellence in basic research and education, the following three principles apply:

  • All NSF projects should be of the highest property and maintain the potential to advance, if not transform, the frontiers of knowledge.
  • NSF projects, in the aggregate, should contribute more broadly to achieving societal goals. These "Broader Impacts" may be accomplished through the research itself, through activities that are directly related to specific research projects, or through activities that are supported by, but are complementary to, the project. The project activities may be based on previously established and/or innovative methods and approaches, but in either case must be well justified.
  • Meaningful assessment and evaluation of NSF funded projects should be based on usurp metrics, keeping in intellect the likely correlation between the outcome of broader impacts and the resources provided to implement projects. If the size of the activity is limited, evaluation of that activity in isolation is not likely to be meaningful. Thus, assessing the effectiveness of these activities may best be done at a higher, more aggregated, level than the individual project.
  • With respect to the third principle, even if assessment of Broader Impacts outcomes for particular projects is done at an aggregated level, PIs are expected to be accountable for carrying out the activities described in the funded project. Thus, individual projects should comprehend clearly stated goals, specific descriptions of the activities that the PI intends to do, and a mode in position to document the outputs of those activities.

    These three merit review principles provide the basis for the merit review criteria, as well as a context within which the users of the criteria can better understand their intent.

    2. Merit Review Criteria

    All NSF proposals are evaluated through expend of the two National Science Board approved merit review criteria. In some instances, however, NSF will employ additional criteria as required to highlight the specific objectives of positive programs and activities.

    The two merit review criteria are listed below. Both criteria are to be given full consideration during the review and decision-making processes; each criterion is necessary but neither, by itself, is sufficient. Therefore, proposers must fully address both criteria. (PAPPG Chapter II.C.2.d(i). contains additional information for expend by proposers in progress of the Project Description section of the proposal). Reviewers are strongly encouraged to review the criteria, including PAPPG Chapter II.C.2.d(i), prior to the review of a proposal.

    When evaluating NSF proposals, reviewers will be asked to deem what the proposers want to do, why they want to achieve it, how they mode to achieve it, how they will know if they succeed, and what benefits could accrue if the project is successful. These issues apply both to the technical aspects of the proposal and the passage in which the project may create broader contributions. To that end, reviewers will be asked to evaluate complete proposals against two criteria:

  • Intellectual Merit: The Intellectual Merit criterion encompasses the potential to advance knowledge; and
  • Broader Impacts: The Broader Impacts criterion encompasses the potential to capitalize society and contribute to the achievement of specific, desired societal outcomes.
  • The following elements should be considered in the review for both criteria:

  • What is the potential for the proposed activity to
  • Advance erudition and understanding within its own bailiwick or across different fields (Intellectual Merit); and
  • Benefit society or advance desired societal outcomes (Broader Impacts)?
  • To what extent achieve the proposed activities imply and explore creative, original, or potentially transformative concepts?
  • Is the mode for carrying out the proposed activities well-reasoned, well-organized, and based on a sound rationale? Does the mode incorporate a mechanism to assess success?
  • How well qualified is the individual, team, or organization to conduct the proposed activities?
  • Are there adequate resources available to the PI (either at the home organization or through collaborations) to carry out the proposed activities?
  • Broader impacts may be accomplished through the research itself, through the activities that are directly related to specific research projects, or through activities that are supported by, but are complementary to, the project. NSF values the advancement of scientific erudition and activities that contribute to achievement of societally pertinent outcomes. Such outcomes include, but are not limited to: full participation of women, persons with disabilities, and underrepresented minorities in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM); improved flow education and educator progress at any level; increased public scientific literacy and public rendezvous with science and technology; improved well-being of individuals in society; progress of a diverse, globally competitive flow workforce; increased partnerships between academia, industry, and others; improved national security; increased economic competitiveness of the United States; and enhanced infrastructure for research and education.

    Proposers are reminded that reviewers will too be asked to review the Data Management mode and the Postdoctoral Researcher Mentoring Plan, as appropriate.

    Additional Solicitation Specific Review Criteria

    For complete proposals, reviewers will be asked to consider:

  • How well does the proposed drudgery address and advance the following?
  • Secure-by-design systems;
  • Manageability of the system under consideration; and/or
  • Fundamental understanding of the system or system component.
  • How well does the proposal narrate an evaluation mode that assesses and where usurp quantifies the expected research outcomes?
  • How well does the proposal narrate research dissemination plans to ensure that the research results can be validated independently?
  • For great and pertinent Medium proposals, reviewers will be asked to:

  • Comment on the extent to which the project scope justifies the level of investment requested, and the degree to which the Collaboration mode (if required) adequately demonstrates that the participating investigators will drudgery synergistically to accomplish the project objectives.
  • Comment on whether key personnel, and especially lead PIs, maintain allocated adequate time for both their individual technical contributions and the leadership of collaborative activities necessary to realize the synergistic effects of larger-scale research.
  • B. Review and Selection Process

    Proposals submitted in response to this program solicitation will be reviewed by Ad hoc Review and/or Panel Review.

    Reviewers will be asked to evaluate proposals using two National Science Board approved merit review criteria and, if applicable, additional program specific criteria. A summary rating and accompanying narrative will generally be completed and submitted by each reviewer and/or panel. The Program Officer assigned to manage the proposal's review will deem the recommendation of reviewers and will formulate a recommendation.

    After scientific, technical and programmatic review and consideration of usurp factors, the NSF Program Officer recommends to the cognizant Division Director whether the proposal should be declined or recommended for award. NSF strives to be able to flaunt applicants whether their proposals maintain been declined or recommended for funding within six months. great or particularly complicated proposals or proposals from unique awardees may require additional review and processing time. The time interval begins on the deadline or target date, or receipt date, whichever is later. The interval ends when the Division Director acts upon the Program Officer's recommendation.

    After programmatic approval has been obtained, the proposals recommended for funding will be forwarded to the Division of Grants and Agreements for review of business, financial, and policy implications. After an administrative review has occurred, Grants and Agreements Officers accomplish the processing and issuance of a award or other agreement. Proposers are cautioned that only a Grants and Agreements Officer may create commitments, obligations or awards on behalf of NSF or commission the expenditure of funds. No commitment on the fragment of NSF should be inferred from technical or budgetary discussions with a NSF Program Officer. A Principal Investigator or organization that makes financial or personnel commitments in the absence of a award or cooperative agreement signed by the NSF Grants and Agreements Officer does so at their own risk.

    Once an award or declination decision has been made, Principal Investigators are provided feedback about their proposals. In complete cases, reviews are treated as confidential documents. Verbatim copies of reviews, excluding the names of the reviewers or any reviewer-identifying information, are sent to the Principal Investigator/Project Director by the Program Officer. In addition, the proposer will receive an explanation of the decision to award or decline funding.

    VII. AWARD ADMINISTRATION INFORMATION A. Notification of the Award

    Notification of the award is made to the submitting organization by a Grants Officer in the Division of Grants and Agreements. Organizations whose proposals are declined will be advised as promptly as feasible by the cognizant NSF Program administering the program. Verbatim copies of reviews, not including the identity of the reviewer, will be provided automatically to the Principal Investigator. (See Section VI.B. for additional information on the review process).

    B. Award Conditions

    An NSF award consists of: (1) the award notice, which includes any special provisions applicable to the award and any numbered amendments thereto; (2) the budget, which indicates the amounts, by categories of expense, on which NSF has based its back (or otherwise communicates any specific approvals or disapprovals of proposed expenditures); (3) the proposal referenced in the award notice; (4) the applicable award conditions, such as award generic Conditions (GC-1)*; or Research Terms and Conditions* and (5) any announcement or other NSF issuance that may be incorporated by reference in the award notice. Cooperative agreements too are administered in accordance with NSF Cooperative Agreement financial and Administrative Terms and Conditions (CA-FATC) and the applicable Programmatic Terms and Conditions. NSF awards are electronically signed by an NSF Grants and Agreements Officer and transmitted electronically to the organization via e-mail.

    *These documents may be accessed electronically on NSF's Website at https://www.nsf.gov/awards/managing/award_conditions.jsp?org=NSF. Paper copies may be obtained from the NSF Publications Clearinghouse, telephone (703) 292-7827 or by e-mail from nsfpubs@nsf.gov.

    More comprehensive information on NSF Award Conditions and other famous information on the administration of NSF awards is contained in the NSF Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures sheperd (PAPPG) Chapter VII, available electronically on the NSF Website at https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=pappg.

    C. Reporting Requirements

    For complete multi-year grants (including both measure and continuing grants), the Principal Investigator must submit an annual project report to the cognizant Program Officer no later than 90 days prior to the conclude of the current budget period. (Some programs or awards require submission of more frequent project reports). No later than 120 days following expiration of a grant, the PI too is required to submit a final project report, and a project outcomes report for the generic public.

    Failure to provide the required annual or final project reports, or the project outcomes report, will delay NSF review and processing of any future funding increments as well as any pending proposals for complete identified PIs and co-PIs on a given award. PIs should examine the formats of the required reports in advance to assure availability of required data.

    PIs are required to expend NSF's electronic project-reporting system, available through Research.gov, for preparation and submission of annual and final project reports. Such reports provide information on accomplishments, project participants (individual and organizational), publications, and other specific products and impacts of the project. Submission of the report via Research.gov constitutes certification by the PI that the contents of the report are accurate and complete. The project outcomes report too must be prepared and submitted using Research.gov. This report serves as a brief summary, prepared specifically for the public, of the nature and outcomes of the project. This report will be posted on the NSF website exactly as it is submitted by the PI.

    More comprehensive information on NSF Reporting Requirements and other famous information on the administration of NSF awards is contained in the NSF Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures sheperd (PAPPG) Chapter VII, available electronically on the NSF Website at https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=pappg.

    VIII. AGENCY CONTACTS

    Please note that the program contact information is current at the time of publishing. notice program website for any updates to the points of contact.

    General inquiries regarding this program should be made to:

    For questions related to the expend of FastLane, contact:

    For questions relating to Grants.gov contact:

  • Grants.gov Contact Center: If the Authorized Organizational Representatives (AOR) has not received a confirmation message from Grants.gov within 48 hours of submission of application, please contact via telephone: 1-800-518-4726; e-mail: support@grants.gov.

  • IX. OTHER INFORMATION

    The NSF website provides the most comprehensive source of information on NSF Directorates (including contact information), programs and funding opportunities. expend of this website by potential proposers is strongly encouraged. In addition, "NSF Update" is an information-delivery system designed to withhold potential proposers and other interested parties apprised of unique NSF funding opportunities and publications, famous changes in proposal and award policies and procedures, and upcoming NSF Grants Conferences. Subscribers are informed through e-mail or the user's Web browser each time unique publications are issued that match their identified interests. "NSF Update" too is available on NSF's website.

    Grants.gov provides an additional electronic capability to search for Federal government-wide award opportunities. NSF funding opportunities may be accessed via this mechanism. Further information on Grants.gov may be obtained at http://www.grants.gov.

    ABOUT THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

    The National Science Foundation (NSF) is an independent Federal agency created by the National Science Foundation Act of 1950, as amended (42 USC 1861-75). The Act states the purpose of the NSF is "to promote the progress of science; [and] to advance the national health, prosperity, and welfare by supporting research and education in complete fields of science and engineering."

    NSF funds research and education in most fields of science and engineering. It does this through grants and cooperative agreements to more than 2,000 colleges, universities, K-12 school systems, businesses, informal science organizations and other research organizations throughout the US. The Foundation accounts for about one-fourth of Federal back to academic institutions for basic research.

    NSF receives approximately 55,000 proposals each year for research, education and training projects, of which approximately 11,000 are funded. In addition, the Foundation receives several thousand applications for graduate and postdoctoral fellowships. The agency operates no laboratories itself but does back National Research Centers, user facilities, positive oceanographic vessels and Arctic and Antarctic research stations. The Foundation too supports cooperative research between universities and industry, US participation in international scientific and engineering efforts, and educational activities at every academic level.

    Facilitation Awards for Scientists and Engineers with Disabilities (FASED) provide funding for special assistance or rig to enable persons with disabilities to drudgery on NSF-supported projects. notice the NSF Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures sheperd Chapter II.E.6 for instructions regarding preparation of these types of proposals.

    The National Science Foundation has Telephonic Device for the Deaf (TDD) and Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) capabilities that enable individuals with hearing impairments to communicate with the Foundation about NSF programs, employment or generic information. TDD may be accessed at (703) 292-5090 and (800) 281-8749, FIRS at (800) 877-8339.

    The National Science Foundation Information heart may be reached at (703) 292-5111.

    The National Science Foundation promotes and advances scientific progress in the United States by competitively awarding grants and cooperative agreements for research and education in the sciences, mathematics, and engineering.

    To regain the latest information about program deadlines, to download copies of NSF publications, and to access abstracts of awards, visit the NSF Website at https://www.nsf.gov

    2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314

  • For generic Information (NSF Information Center):
  • (703) 292-5111

  • TDD (for the hearing-impaired):
  • (703) 292-5090

  • To Order Publications or Forms:
  • Send an e-mail to:

    nsfpubs@nsf.gov

    or telephone:

    (703) 292-7827

    (703) 292-5111

    PRIVACY ACT AND PUBLIC burden STATEMENTS

    The information requested on proposal forms and project reports is solicited under the authority of the National Science Foundation Act of 1950, as amended. The information on proposal forms will be used in connection with the selection of qualified proposals; and project reports submitted by awardees will be used for program evaluation and reporting within the Executive offshoot and to Congress. The information requested may be disclosed to qualified reviewers and staff assistants as fragment of the proposal review process; to proposer institutions/grantees to provide or obtain data regarding the proposal review process, award decisions, or the administration of awards; to government contractors, experts, volunteers and researchers and educators as necessary to complete assigned work; to other government agencies or other entities needing information regarding applicants or nominees as fragment of a joint application review process, or in order to coordinate programs or policy; and to another Federal agency, court, or party in a court or Federal administrative proceeding if the government is a party. Information about Principal Investigators may be added to the Reviewer file and used to select potential candidates to serve as peer reviewers or advisory committee members. notice Systems of Records, NSF-50, "Principal Investigator/Proposal File and Associated Records," 69 Federal Register 26410 (May 12, 2004), and NSF-51, "Reviewer/Proposal File and Associated Records," 69 Federal Register 26410 (May 12, 2004). Submission of the information is voluntary. Failure to provide full and complete information, however, may reduce the possibility of receiving an award.

    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, an information collection unless it displays a sound Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number. The OMB control number for this collection is 3145-0058. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to just 120 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions. forward comments regarding the burden appraise and any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:

    Suzanne H. PlimptonReports Clearance OfficerOffice of the generic CounselNational Science FoundationAlexandria, VA 22314


    Debunking the Missile-Defense Myth | killexams.com existent questions and Pass4sure dumps

    A report by the Pentagon's own Defense Science Board (DSB) has poured artic water on U.S. missile-defense plans. It basically backs up what independent scientists and engineers maintain been motto for  decades: a dedicated adversary easily could conquer the planned system by using simple decoy warheads and other countermeasures. So while missile defense will create incentives for U.S. adversaries and competitors to up their ballistic-missile stockpiles, it won't provide any combat capability to counteract these enlarged arsenals.

    The simplest countermeasures to the planned missile defense are cheap inflatable balloons. Because the missile-defense interceptors try to strike ICBM warheads in the vacuum of space, any such balloons and the warhead would travel together, making it impossible to flaunt the decoys from the existent thing . An enemy bent on delivering a nuclear payload to the United States could inflate many such balloons nearby the warhead and overwhelm the defense system by swamping it with fake signals.

    The DSB report says that “the second of achieving dependable . . . discrimination [between the warhead and decoys] cannot be overemphasized.” It underlined that missile defense is “predicated on the aptitude to discriminate” existent warheads from other targets, “such as rocket bodies, motley hardware, and intentional countermeasures.” One passage around this challenge is to attempt to intercept the missile before it releases the warhead and decoys. But intercepting missiles in their boost phase, while the rocket booster is noiseless firing, is “currently not feasible,” according to the DSB.

    There is a short interval between the time the missile stops burning and when the payload is released, assumed to be about one hundred seconds by the DSB. But, again, intercepting the missile in this window “requires Herculean exertion and is not realistically achievable, even under the most optimistic set of deployment, sensor capability, and missile technology assumptions.” The main problem the DSB organize is that missile-defense interceptors would not be able to attain the target quickly enough: “in most cases 100 seconds is too late” to prevent the release of decoys. And if “the defense should find itself in a situation where it is shooting at missile junk or decoys, the repercussion on the regional interceptor inventory would be histrionic and devastating.” In short, the interceptor inventory would be exhausted in chasing decoy warheads.

    The latest tests of both the ground-based and sea-based missile-defense systems maintain failed—and these are rigged tests, where the intercept team knows the timing and trajectory of the incoming missile, and the missile has no decoys. There are no such luxuries in the existent world, where adversaries launch surprise attacks and expend countermeasures and decoys. And on the very few occasions that the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) has tested countermeasures, even these carefully rigged tests maintain never succeeded. The sea-based missile-defense system too has never been tested in really rough sea conditions and is known to be unreliable .

    How did such an untested and unworkable technology create it so far in the DoD procurement process? Another recent government report, this one from the GAO, explains that instead of flying before buying, the MDA has been doing the exact opposite. Its cart-before-the-horse methodology has resulted in “unexpected cost increases, schedule delays, test problems, and performance shortfalls.”

    All told, the missile-defense program has cost more than the entire Apollo program without providing any credible combat capability against enemy ballistic missiles hosting simple countermeasures.

    The Reaction

    If missile defense is so dysfunctional and so simple to outfox, why achieve U.S. adversaries appear to be so concerned? The reply is simple: their military planners are hypercautious—as are the ones in the Pentagon—and must assume a worst-case scenario in which the system is highly effective.

    Missile defense will therefore strengthen the hands of overcautious, misinformed, opportunistic or hawkish elements within the Iranian and North Korean—as well as Russian and Chinese—political and military establishments. Both unknowable future circumstances and pressures from hawkish internal constituencies will pressure complete these regimes to enlarge deployed nuclear stockpiles and military expenditures.

    Since the interplay between strategic defense and strategic offense is explicitly recognized in the unique Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (New START) between the United States and Russia, it is highly improbable that Russia will ever accept NATO missile defense, even if it's dysfunctional. Any system that raises uncertainties about the strict poise of arms agreed upon in unique START is a natural concern to both parties.

    The United States and NATO maintain repeatedly stated that the system is not directed at Russia and poses no threat to its nuclear-deterrent forces. And though NATO has invited the Russians to join the program, there has been no consensus on the degree or the contour of that participation. Moscow prefers to develop a joint European missile-defense network with NATO to ensure that the elements of the system (in a number of European countries) will not menace Russia’s national security. NATO, in contrast, proposes the creation of two entirely divorce systems that would exchange information. To date, missile-defense talks between Russia and NATO are deadlocked over this contentious issue.



    Direct Download of over 5500 Certification Exams

    3COM [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AccessData [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACFE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Acme-Packet [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACSM [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Admission-Tests [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ADOBE [93 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AFP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AICPA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AIIM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Alcatel-Lucent [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Alfresco [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Altiris [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Amazon [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    American-College [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Android [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APICS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Apple [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AppSense [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APTUSC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Arizona-Education [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ARM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Aruba [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASIS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASQ [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASTQB [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Autodesk [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Avaya [96 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AXELOS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Axis [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Banking [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BEA [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BICSI [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BlackBerry [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BlueCoat [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Brocade [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Business-Objects [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Business-Tests [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CA-Technologies [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Certification-Board [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Certiport [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CheckPoint [41 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIPS [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cisco [318 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Citrix [47 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIW [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cloudera [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cognos [19 Certification Exam(s) ]
    College-Board [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CompTIA [76 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ComputerAssociates [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Consultant [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Counselor [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CPP-Institue [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CPP-Institute [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CSP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CWNA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CWNP [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Dassault [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DELL [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DMI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DRI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ECCouncil [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ECDL [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    EMC [129 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Enterasys [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Ericsson [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ESPA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Esri [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ExamExpress [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Exin [40 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ExtremeNetworks [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    F5-Networks [20 Certification Exam(s) ]
    FCTC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Filemaker [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Financial [36 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Food [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Fortinet [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Foundry [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    FSMTB [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Fujitsu [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GAQM [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Genesys [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GIAC [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Google [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GuidanceSoftware [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    H3C [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HDI [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Healthcare [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HIPAA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hitachi [30 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hortonworks [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hospitality [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HP [746 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HR [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HRCI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Huawei [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hyperion [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IAAP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IAHCSMM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IBM [1530 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IBQH [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ICAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ICDL [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IEEE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IELTS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IFPUG [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IIBA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IISFA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Intel [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IQN [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IRS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISACA [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISC2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISEB [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Isilon [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISM [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    iSQI [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ITEC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Juniper [63 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LEED [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Legato [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Liferay [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Logical-Operations [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Lotus [66 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LPI [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LSI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Magento [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Maintenance [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    McAfee [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    McData [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Medical [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Microsoft [368 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Mile2 [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Military [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Misc [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Motorola [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    mySQL [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NBSTSA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCEES [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCLEX [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Network-General [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NetworkAppliance [36 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NIELIT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Nokia [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Nortel [130 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Novell [37 Certification Exam(s) ]
    OMG [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Oracle [269 Certification Exam(s) ]
    P&C [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Palo-Alto [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PARCC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PayPal [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Pegasystems [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PEOPLECERT [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PMI [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Polycom [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PostgreSQL-CE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Prince2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PRMIA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PsychCorp [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PTCB [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    QAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    QlikView [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Quality-Assurance [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RACC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Real-Estate [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RedHat [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RES [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Riverbed [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RSA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Sair [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Salesforce [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SANS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SAP [98 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SASInstitute [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SAT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SCO [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SCP [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SDI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    See-Beyond [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Siemens [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Snia [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SOA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Social-Work-Board [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SpringSource [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SUN [63 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SUSE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Sybase [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Symantec [134 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Teacher-Certification [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    The-Open-Group [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    TIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Tibco [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Trainers [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Trend [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    TruSecure [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    USMLE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    VCE [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Veeam [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Veritas [33 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Vmware [58 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Wonderlic [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Worldatwork [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    XML-Master [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Zend [6 Certification Exam(s) ]





    References :


    Dropmark : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/12846751
    Dropmark-Text : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/12942109
    Blogspot : http://killexamsbraindump.blogspot.com/2018/01/dont-miss-these-scp-sc0-402-dumps.html
    Wordpress : https://wp.me/p7SJ6L-2K8
    Box.net : https://app.box.com/s/b27kh8lmhs2072vbfzj98n0hk87eeaf7






    Back to Main Page





    Killexams exams | Killexams certification | Pass4Sure questions and answers | Pass4sure | pass-guaratee | best test preparation | best training guides | examcollection | killexams | killexams review | killexams legit | kill example | kill example journalism | kill exams reviews | kill exam ripoff report | review | review quizlet | review login | review archives | review sheet | legitimate | legit | legitimacy | legitimation | legit check | legitimate program | legitimize | legitimate business | legitimate definition | legit site | legit online banking | legit website | legitimacy definition | pass 4 sure | pass for sure | p4s | pass4sure certification | pass4sure exam | IT certification | IT Exam | certification material provider | pass4sure login | pass4sure exams | pass4sure reviews | pass4sure aws | pass4sure security | pass4sure cisco | pass4sure coupon | pass4sure dumps | pass4sure cissp | pass4sure braindumps | pass4sure test | pass4sure torrent | pass4sure download | pass4surekey | pass4sure cap | pass4sure free | examsoft | examsoft login | exams | exams free | examsolutions | exams4pilots | examsoft download | exams questions | examslocal | exams practice |

    www.pass4surez.com | www.killcerts.com | www.search4exams.com | http://smresidences.com.ph/