Sales Tel: +63 945 7983492  |  Email Us    
SMDC Residences

Air Residences

Features and Amenities

Reflective Pool
Function Terrace
Seating Alcoves

Air Residences

Green 2 Residences

Features and Amenities:

Wifi ready study area
Swimming Pool
Gym and Function Room

Green 2 Residences

Bloom Residences

Features and Amenities:

Recreational Area
2 Lap Pools
Ground Floor Commercial Areas

Bloom Residences

Leaf Residences

Features and Amenities:

3 Swimming Pools
Gym and Fitness Center
Outdoor Basketball Court

Leaf Residences

Contact Us

Contact us today for a no obligation quotation:


+63 945 7983492
+63 908 8820391

Copyright © 2018 SMDC :: SM Residences, All Rights Reserved.


































































P2050-007 dumps with Real exam Questions and Practice Test - smresidences.com.ph

Great Place to download 100% free P2050-007 braindumps, real exam questions and practice test with VCE exam simulator to ensure your 100% success in the P2050-007 - smresidences.com.ph

Pass4sure P2050-007 dumps | Killexams.com P2050-007 real questions | http://smresidences.com.ph/

P2050-007 IBM Optimization Technical Mastery Test v1

Study Guide Prepared by Killexams.com IBM Dumps Experts


Killexams.com P2050-007 Dumps and Real Questions

100% Real Questions - Exam Pass Guarantee with High Marks - Just Memorize the Answers



P2050-007 exam Dumps Source : IBM Optimization Technical Mastery Test v1

Test Code : P2050-007
Test Name : IBM Optimization Technical Mastery Test v1
Vendor Name : IBM
: 30 Real Questions

Where can I get help to prepare and pass P2050-007 exam?
i used to be trapped in the complex subjects handiest 12 earlier days the exam P2050-007. Whats greater it becomeextremely useful, as the quick solutions may be effortlessly remembered inside 10 days. I scored 91%, endeavoring all questions in due time. To store my planning, i was energetically looking down a few speedy reference. It aided me a top notch deal. by no means thought it can be so compelling! At that point, by means of one method or some other I came to consider killexams.com Dumps.


wherein should I searching for to get P2050-007 real test questions?
If you need to change your destiny and make sure that happiness is your destiny, you want to work hard. Working tough on my own isnt always sufficient to get to future, you want some direction a good way to lead you in the direction of the path. It have become destiny that i discovered this killexams.com in the direction of my exams as it lead me towards my fate. My future become getting right grades and this killexams.com and its teachers made it viable my coaching they so well that I couldnt in all likelihood fail with the aid of giving me the material for my P2050-007 exam.


consider it or no longer, simply try as soon as!
I used this dump to skip the P2050-007 exam in Romania and were given 98%, so this is a very good way to put togetherfor the exam. All questions I were given on the exam were exactly what killexams.com had provided on this brainsell off, which is extraordinary I notably recommend this to anyone in case you are going to take P2050-007 exam.


It is great to have P2050-007 actual test questions.
This is a gift from killexams.com for all the candidates to get latest study materials for P2050-007 exam. All the members of killexams.com are doing a great job and ensuring success of candidates in P2050-007 exams. I passed the P2050-007 exam just because I used killexams.com materials.


How long prep is needed to pass P2050-007 exam?
Very tremendous P2050-007 exam education questions answers, I handed P2050-007 exam this month. killexams.com could be very reliable. I didnt assume that braindumps have to get you this excessive, however now that i have passed my P2050-007 exam, I understand that killexams.com is greater than a sell off. killexams.com offers you what you need to pass your P2050-007 exam, and additionally lets in you test matters you may want. Yet, it offers you best what you really need to understand, saving it slow and electricity. i have passed P2050-007 exam and now recommend killexams.com to each person available.


put together P2050-007 Questions and answers in any other case Be organized to fail.
I passed P2050-007 exam. Way to Killexams. The exam will be very hard, and that i dont recognise how lengthy itd take me to prepare by myself. killexams.com questions are very smooth to memorize, and the fantastic part is that they are real and correct. So you essentially pass in expertise what youll see on your exam. So long as you skip this complicated exam and placed your P2050-007 certification to your resume.


real exam questions of P2050-007 exam! Awesome Source.
Some nicely men cant convey an alteration to the worlds manner but theyre capable of great permit you to know whether you have were given been the simplest man who knew a manner to do that and that i need to be regarded in this international and make my own mark and i have been so lame my entire way but I recognize now that I desired to get a pass in my P2050-007 and this may make me famous perhaps and yes i am brief of glory but passing my A+ test with killexams.com became my morning and night glory.


wherein have to I seek to get P2050-007 actual take a look at questions?
Terrific stuff for P2050-007 exam which has actually helped me pass. i have been dreaming about the P2050-007 profession for a while, but might also want to by no means make time to study and actually get licensed. As a whole lot as i was tired of books and publications, I couldnt make time and simply test. The ones P2050-007 made exam training definitely realistic. I even managed to test in my vehicle while the use of to work. The handy layout, and yes, the sorting out engine is as top because the net web page claims it is and the accurate P2050-007 questions have helped me get my dream certification.


those P2050-007 questions and solutions works within the real test.
I became approximately to surrender exam P2050-007 because I wasnt assured in whether or not I could pass or no longer. With just a week last I decided to exchange to killexams.com QA for my exam preparation. Never concept that the subjects that I had always run away from might be so much fun to observe; its clean and brief way of getting to the factors made my practise lot less complicated. All thanks to killexams.com QA, I never idea I could skip my exam but I did pass with flying shades.


Did you tried this wonderful supply present day actual test questions.
Fine one, it made the P2050-007 smooth for me. I used killexams.com and handed my P2050-007 exam.


IBM IBM Optimization Technical Mastery

IT Sourcing Market is Booming global | Accenture, IBM, Cisco techniques, CA technologies, HP, great systems, Synnex | killexams.com Real Questions and Pass4sure dumps

Feb 08, 2019 (Heraldkeeper by way of COMTEX) -- a new analysis doc is brought in HTF MI database of 200 pages, titled as ‘global IT Sourcing Market measurement examine, via services (utility construction, net development, application assist and administration, support Desk, Database construction and administration, Telecommunication), via end clients (executive, BFSI, Telecom, Others), and Regional Forecasts 2018-2025′ with certain evaluation, aggressive landscape, forecast and strategies. The examine covers geographic analysis that comprises areas like North the us, South the united states, Asia, Europe & Others and significant gamers/vendors equivalent to Accenture, IBM organisation, Cisco programs, CA technologies, HP employer, high-quality programs, Synnex employer, Dell applied sciences. The document will support you profit market insights, future traits and growth possibilities for forecast length of 2018 - 2025.

Request a sample document @ https://www.htfmarketreport.com/sample-file/1623525-global-it-sourcing-market-measurement-analyze-by-capabilities

international IT Sourcing Market valued approximately USD xxx million in 2017 is expected to develop with a fit growth cost of more than xxx% over the forecast length 2018-2025. The IT Sourcing is setting up and increasing at a big pace. The assistance technology (IT) outsourcing is exactly observed the sub-contracting of selected functions or to pursue supplies outdoor an commercial enterprise for all or someone part of an IT feature which wouldn't have tons of technical talents. The brief-term suggestions or the more cost-effective prices on essential assignment are the leading reasons why agencies operating in the latest situation outsource work. The Outsourcing procedure allows staffing flexibility for an commercial enterprise along with permits them to usher in additional substances as and when required & additional unlock them when they're accomplished, hence pleasing the cyclic or seasonal demand. The IT outsourcing market is primarily driven owing to escalating should optimize company strategies, surging integration of software outsourcing and means optimization due to the fact the international state of affairs.

Get Customization within the record, Enquire Now @ https://www.htfmarketreport.com/enquiry-before-buy/1623525-world-it-sourcing-market-size-look at-by way of-functions

The leading market gamers certainly consist of-AccentureIBM CorporationCisco SystemsCA TechnologiesHP CorporationQuality SystemsSynnex CorporationDell technologies

The purpose of the look at is to define market sizes of distinctive segments & international locations in recent years and to forecast the values to the arriving eight years. The file is designed to incorporate both qualitative and quantitative points of the trade within each of the areas and international locations concerned within the examine. moreover, the record additionally caters the unique tips in regards to the crucial features akin to riding components & challenges so they can outline the future boom of the market. additionally, the file shall also contain available alternatives in micro markets for stakeholders to make investments together with the particular analysis of aggressive panorama and product choices of key avid gamers. The targeted segments and sub-segment of the market are defined beneath:

by using features:application DevelopmentWeb DevelopmentApplication aid and ManagementHelp DeskDatabase construction and ManagementTelecommunication

by using conclusion users:GovernmentBFSITelecomOthers

via regions:North AmericaEuropeAsia PacificLatin AmericaRest of the area

moreover, years considered for the analyze are as follows:

historic yr - 2015, 2016Base year - 2017Forecast period - 2018 to 2025

target audience of the global IT Sourcing Market in Market look at:Key Consulting businesses & AdvisorsLarge, medium-sized, and small enterprisesVenture capitalistsValue-delivered Resellers (VARs)Third-birthday celebration knowledge providersInvestment bankersInvestors

buy this file @ https://www.htfmarketreport.com/buy-now?format=1&report=1623525

desk OF CONTENTSChapter 1. world IT Sourcing Market Definition and Scope1.1. analysis Objective1.2. Market Definition1.three. Scope of The Study1.four. Years regarded for The Study1.5. currency Conversion Rates1.6. document LimitationChapter 2. analysis Methodology2.1. research Process2.1.1. data Mining2.1.2. Analysis2.1.three. Market Estimation2.1.four. Validation2.1.5. Publishing2.2. analysis AssumptionChapter three. executive Summary3.1. international & Segmental Market Estimates & Forecasts, 2015-2025 (USD Billion)three.2. Key TrendsChapter four. world IT Sourcing Market Dynamics4.1. boom Prospects4.1.1. Drivers4.1.2. Restraints4.1.3. Opportunities4.2. industry Analysis4.2.1. Porter's 5 drive Model4.2.2. PEST Analysis4.2.3. value Chain Analysis4.three. Analyst advice & ConclusionChapter 5. world IT Sourcing Market, by way of Services5.1. Market Snapshot5.2. Market efficiency – advantage Model5.three. international IT Sourcing Market, Sub segment Analysis5.3.1. utility Development5.3.1.1. Market estimates & forecasts, 2015-2025 (USD Billion)….persisted

View designated table of content material @ https://www.htfmarketreport.com/reviews/1623525-global-it-sourcing-market-measurement-analyze-via-functions

It’s vital you preserve your market talents up so far. when you've got a special set of gamers/producers in keeping with geography or needs regional or country segmented studies they can deliver customization as a result.


IBM: an extended Work-In-development | killexams.com Real Questions and Pass4sure dumps

No influence discovered, are trying new keyword!even so, looking from the technical charting standpoint ... the SVP and CFO of IBM, said in the earnings call that the business has been searching for to improve its "group of workers optimization productivity ...

IBM’s Plan to deliver machine gaining knowledge of Capabilities to data Scientists all over | killexams.com Real Questions and Pass4sure dumps

Hillary Hunter is an IBM Fellow.

Over at the IBM weblog, IBM Fellow Hillary Hunter writes that the enterprise anticipates that the realm’s volume of digital data will exceed 44 zettabytes, an surprising number. As firms start to understand the gigantic, untapped abilities of facts, they need to find a method to take advantage of it. Enter AI.

IBM has worked to build the industry’s most complete records science platform. built-in with NVIDIA GPUs and application designed above all for AI and probably the most data-intensive workloads, IBM has infused AI into offerings that consumers can entry despite their deployment mannequin. nowadays, they take the next step in that event in asserting the next evolution of their collaboration with NVIDIA. They plan to leverage their new data science toolkit, RAPIDS, across their portfolio in order that their clients can enhance the performance of laptop studying and statistics analytics.

Plans to advertise GPU-accelerated computing device discovering consist of:

  • IBM POWER9 with PowerAI: to leverage RAPIDS to extend the alternate options accessible to records scientists with new open source desktop discovering and analytics libraries. Accelerated workloads were confirmed to get a right away advantage from the unique engineering that NVIDIA and IBM have achieved around POWER9, including integration of NVIDIA NVLink and NVIDIA Tesla GPUs. PowerAI is IBM’s software layer, which optimizes how today’s records science and AI workloads run on these heterogeneous computing techniques. Their goal is for this improved performance trajectory for GPU-accelerated workloads on POWER9 to proceed with RAPIDS.
  • IBM Watson Studio and IBM Watson laptop getting to know: to take knowledge of the vigor of NVIDIA GPUs so that records scientists and AI developers can construct, deploy, and run quicker models than CPU-best deployments in their AI purposes in a multicloud ambiance with IBM Cloud deepest for data and IBM Cloud.
  • IBM Cloud: to clients who select machines geared up with GPUs as a way to practice accelerated laptop researching and analytics libraries in RAPIDS to their cloud applications and faucet into the merits of desktop gaining knowledge of.
  • IBM and NVIDIA’s shut collaboration through the years has helped leading agencies and groups all over the world handle one of the world’s biggest issues,” referred to Ian Buck, vice chairman and popular supervisor of Accelerated Computing at NVIDIA. “Now, with IBM taking talents of RAPIDS open-source libraries announced today by NVIDIA, GPU accelerated desktop researching is coming to facts scientists, assisting them analyze huge facts for insights quicker than ever possible earlier than. Recognizing the computing energy that AI would need, IBM changed into an early suggest of statistics-centric methods. This strategy led us to deliver the GPU-outfitted Summit system, the realm’s strongest supercomputer, and already researchers are seeing massive returns. previous within the 12 months, they established the talents for GPUs to accelerate machine learning once they confirmed how GPU-accelerated laptop getting to know on IBM power systems AC922 servers set a new speed list with a 46x improvement over previous consequences.

    on account of IBM’s dedication to bringing accelerated AI to users across the expertise spectrum, be they users of on-premises, public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud environments, the company is placed to bring RAPIDS to clients regardless of how they are looking to entry them.

    Hillery Hunter is an IBM Fellow and CTO of Infrastructure in the IBM Hybrid Cloud company. just before this function, she served as Director of Accelerated Cognitive Infrastructure in IBM analysis, main a crew doing cross-stack (hardware through application) optimization of AI workloads, producing productivity breakthroughs of 40x and more suitable which were transferred into IBM product choices. Her technical pastimes have at all times been interdisciplinary, spanning from silicon expertise through device utility, and she has served in technical and management roles in memory technology, techniques for AI, and other areas. She is a member of the IBM Academy of technology.

    sign in for their insideHPC e-newsletter


    Whilst it is very hard task to choose reliable exam questions / answers resources regarding review, reputation and validity because people get ripoff due to choosing incorrect service. Killexams. com make it certain to provide its clients far better to their resources with respect to exam dumps update and validity. Most of other peoples ripoff report complaint clients come to us for the brain dumps and pass their exams enjoyably and easily. They never compromise on their review, reputation and quality because killexams review, killexams reputation and killexams client self confidence is important to all of us. Specially they manage killexams.com review, killexams.com reputation, killexams.com ripoff report complaint, killexams.com trust, killexams.com validity, killexams.com report and killexams.com scam. If perhaps you see any bogus report posted by their competitor with the name killexams ripoff report complaint internet, killexams.com ripoff report, killexams.com scam, killexams.com complaint or something like this, just keep in mind that there are always bad people damaging reputation of good services due to their benefits. There are a large number of satisfied customers that pass their exams using killexams.com brain dumps, killexams PDF questions, killexams practice questions, killexams exam simulator. Visit Killexams.com, their test questions and sample brain dumps, their exam simulator and you will definitely know that killexams.com is the best brain dumps site.

    Back to Braindumps Menu


    000-M04 Practice test | HH0-450 braindumps | HP0-633 practice test | HP0-Y52 dump | 000-M68 cram | PgMP free pdf | C2090-422 study guide | 4H0-533 practice questions | 642-241 VCE | ST0-192 study guide | 190-829 Practice Test | 200-401 dumps questions | 1Z0-880 test prep | 000-130 test prep | 000-934 practice exam | 000-N55 dumps | 000-R13 exam prep | HP2-Z16 free pdf download | 1Z0-064 questions answers | 000-783 brain dumps |


    Free Pass4sure P2050-007 question bank
    We have Tested and Approved P2050-007 Exams think about aides and brain dumps. killexams.com gives the correct and latest real questions with braindumps which basically contain all data that you have to pass the P2050-007 exam. With the guide of their P2050-007 exam materials, you dont need to misuse your chance on scrutinizing reference books however just need to consume 10-20 hours to retain their P2050-007 real questions and answers.

    IBM P2050-007 Exam has given another bearing to the IT business. It is currently required to certify as the stage which prompts a brighter future. Be that as it may, you have to put extraordinary exertion in IBM IBM Optimization Technical Mastery Test v1 exam, in light of the fact that there is no escape out of perusing. killexams.com have made your easy, now your exam planning for P2050-007 IBM Optimization Technical Mastery Test v1 isnt intense any longer. Click http://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/P2050-007 killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
    WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for all exams on website
    PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
    DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
    DECSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for All Orders
    As, the killexams.com is a solid and reliable stage who furnishes P2050-007 exam questions with 100% pass guarantee. You have to hone questions for at least one day at any rate to score well in the exam. Your real trip to success in P2050-007 exam, really begins with killexams.com exam questions that is the magnificent and checked wellspring of your focused on position.

    The first-class approach to get accomplishment inside the IBM P2050-007 exam is that you have to gather solid braindumps. They guarantee that killexams.com is the most extreme direct pathway toward affirming IBM IBM Optimization Technical Mastery Test v1 exam. You might be certain with full actuality. You can see free questions at killexams.com sooner than you purchase the P2050-007 exam contraptions. Their brain dumps are in various decision the same As the actual exam format. The questions and answers made through the certified experts. They think of the delight in of stepping through the actual exam. 100% guarantee to pass the P2050-007 actual check.

    killexams.com IBM Certification examine distributions are setup by utilizing IT authorities. Clusters of understudies have been whimpering that too much several questions in such colossal quantities of tutoring tests and study helpers, and they're of late exhausted to control the expense of any additional. Seeing killexams.com pros practice session this colossal shape while still certification that all the data is anchored after significant examinations and exam. Everything is to make relief for rivalry on their road to certification.

    We have Tested and Approved P2050-007 Exams. killexams.com offers the correct and latest IT exam materials which for all intents and purposes involve all data centers. With the guide of their P2050-007 brain dumps, you don't ought to waste your plausibility on scrutinizing real piece of reference books and essentially need to consume 10-20 hours to expert their P2050-007 actual questions and answers. Additionally, they supply you with PDF Version and Software Version exam questions and answers. For Software Version materials, Its introduced to give indistinguishable experience from the IBM P2050-007 exam in a real environment.

    We supply free updates. Inside authenticity term, if P2050-007 brain dumps that you have purchased updated, they will imply you by electronic mail to down load most current model of . if you don't pass your IBM IBM Optimization Technical Mastery Test v1 exam, They will give you finish discount. You need to send the verified propagation of your P2050-007 exam record card to us. Resulting to keeping up, they can quickly think of FULL REFUND.

    In the occasion which you prepare for the IBM P2050-007 exam utilizing their testing programming program. It is whatever anyway intense to be triumphant for all certifications inside the most essential endeavor. You don't need to deal with all dumps or any free deluge/rapidshare all stuff. They give free demo of every IT Certification Dumps. You can view the interface, question superb and solace of their training evaluations sooner than you purchase.

    killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
    WC2017: 60% Discount Coupon for all exams on website
    PROF17: 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
    DEAL17: 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
    DECSPECIAL: 10% Special Discount Coupon for All Orders


    P2050-007 | P2050-007 | P2050-007 | P2050-007 | P2050-007 | P2050-007


    Killexams 000-370 dumps | Killexams 000-M229 dumps questions | Killexams A2090-730 study guide | Killexams 1Z0-134 bootcamp | Killexams 9L0-837 braindumps | Killexams 70-743 dump | Killexams 000-894 real questions | Killexams 190-802 practice exam | Killexams 310-301 braindumps | Killexams ANP-BC practice questions | Killexams 1Y0-371 study guide | Killexams 2D00056A test prep | Killexams C2090-320 real questions | Killexams HP0-M22 practice test | Killexams P3OF free pdf | Killexams HP0-255 braindumps | Killexams 1Z0-934 cram | Killexams HC-224 brain dumps | Killexams 190-702 exam prep | Killexams 000-038 VCE |


    killexams.com huge List of Exam Braindumps

    View Complete list of Killexams.com Brain dumps


    Killexams LOT-922 test questions | Killexams 000-M41 questions and answers | Killexams CPP practice test | Killexams 310-303 practice questions | Killexams 156-515 test prep | Killexams 650-177 practice exam | Killexams NS0-150 free pdf | Killexams Adwords-Display exam questions | Killexams HP0-Y15 free pdf | Killexams 1Z1-591 dumps | Killexams 00M-624 Practice test | Killexams 600-455 test prep | Killexams 920-240 study guide | Killexams 1Z0-449 Practice Test | Killexams 920-450 sample test | Killexams 70-523-CSharp pdf download | Killexams 000-175 practice test | Killexams A4040-124 real questions | Killexams 1Z0-597 VCE | Killexams 310-052 bootcamp |


    IBM Optimization Technical Mastery Test v1

    Pass 4 sure P2050-007 dumps | Killexams.com P2050-007 real questions | http://smresidences.com.ph/

    Unfriendly Skies: Predicting Flight Cancellations Using Weather Data, Part 2 | killexams.com real questions and Pass4sure dumps

    Ricardo Balduino and Tim Bohn

    Early Flight, Creative Commons Introduction

    As they described in Part 1 of this series, their objective is to help predict the probability of the cancellation of a flight between two of the ten U.S. airports most affected by weather conditions. They use historical flights data and historical weather data to make predictions for upcoming flights.

    Over the course of this four-part series, they use different platforms to help us with those predictions. Here in Part 2, they use the IBM SPSS Modeler and APIs from The Weather Company.

    Tools used in this use case solution

    IBM SPSS Modeler is designed to help discover patterns and trends in structured and unstructured data with an intuitive visual interface supported by advanced analytics. It provides a range of advanced algorithms and analysis techniques, including text analytics, entity analytics, decision management and optimization to deliver insights in near real-time. For this use case, they used SPSS Modeler 18.1 to create a visual representation of the solution, or in SPSS terms, a stream. That’s right — not one line of code was written in the making of this blog.

    We also used The Weather Company APIs to retrieve historical weather data for the ten airports over the year 2016. IBM SPSS Modeler supports calling the weather APIs from within a stream. That is accomplished by adding extensions to SPSS, available in the IBM SPSS Predictive Analytics resources page, a.k.a. Extensions Hub.

    A proposed solution

    In this blog, they propose one possible solution for this problem. It’s not meant to be the only or the best possible solution, or a production-level solution for that matter, but the discussion presented here covers the typical iterative process (described in the sections below) that helps us accumulate insights and refine the predictive model across iterations. They encourage the readers to try and come up with different solutions, and provide us with your feedback for future blogs.

    Business and data understanding

    The first step of the iterative process includes understanding and gathering the data needed to train and test their model later.

    Flights data — We gathered 2016 flights data from the US Bureau of Transportation Statistics website. The website allows us to export one month at a time, so they ended up with 12 csv (comma separated value) files. They used IBM SPSS Modeler to merge all the csv files into one set and to select the ten airports in their scope. Some data clean-up and formatting was done to validate dates and hours for each flight, as seen in Figure 1.

    Figure 1 — gathering and preparing flights data in IBM SPSS Modeler

    Weather data — From the Extensions Hub, they added the TWCHistoricalGridded extension to SPSS Modeler, which made the extension available as a node in the tool. That node took a csv file listing the 10 airports latitude and longitude coordinates as input, and generated the historical hourly data for the entire year of 2016, for each airport location, as seen in Figure 2.

    Figure 2 — gathering and preparing weather data in IBM SPSS Modeler

    Combined flights and weather data — To each flight in the first data set, they added two new columns: ORIGIN and DEST, containing the respective airport codes. Next, flight data and the weather data were merged together. Note: the “stars” or SPSS super nodes in Figure 3 are placeholders for the diagrams in Figures 1 and 2 above.

    Figure 3 — combining flights and weather data in IBM SPSS Modeler Data preparation, modeling, and evaluation

    We iteratively performed the following steps until the desired model qualities were reached:

    · Prepare data

    · Perform modeling

    · Evaluate the model

    · Repeat

    Figure 4 shows the first and second iterations of their process in IBM SPSS Modeler.

    Figure 4 — iterations: prepare data, run models, evaluate — and do it again First iteration

    To start preparing the data, they used the combined flights and weather data from the previous step and performed some data cleanup (e.g. took care of null values). In order to better train the model later on, they filtered out rows where flight cancellations were not related to weather conditions (e.g. cancellations due to technical issues, security issues, etc.)

    Figure 5 — imbalanced data found in their input data set

    This is an interesting use case, and often a hard one to solve, due to the imbalanced data it presents, as seen in Figure 5. By “imbalanced” they mean that there were far more non-cancelled flights in the historical data than cancelled ones. They will discuss how they dealt with imbalanced data in the following iteration.

    Next, they defined which features were required as inputs to the model (such as flight date, hour, day of the week, origin and destination airport codes, and weather conditions), and which one was the target to be generated by the model (i.e. predict the cancellation status). They then partitioned the data into training and testing sets, using an 85/15 ratio.

    The partitioned data was fed into an SPSS node called Auto Classifier. This node allowed us to run multiple models at once and preview their outputs, such as the area under the ROC curve, as seen in Figure 6.

    Figure 6 — models output provided by the Auto Classifier node

    That was a useful step in making an initial selection of a model for further refinement during subsequent iterations. They decided to use the Random Trees model since the initial analysis showed it has the best area under the curve as compared to the other models in the list.

    Second iteration

    During the second iteration, they addressed the skewedness of the original data. For that purpose, they chose one of the SPSS nodes called SMOTE (Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique). This node provides an advanced over-sampling algorithm that deals with imbalanced datasets, which helped their selected model work more effectively.

    Figure 7 — distribution of cancelled and non-cancelled flights after using SMOTE

    In Figure 7, they notice a more balanced distribution between cancelled and non-cancelled flights after running the data through SMOTE.

    As mentioned earlier, they picked the Random Trees model for this sample solution. This SPSS node provides a model for tree-based classification and prediction that is built on Classification and Regression Tree methodology. Due to its characteristics, this model is much less prone to overfitting, which gives a higher likelihood of repeating the same test results when you use new data, that is, data that was not part of the original training and testing data sets. Another advantage of this method — in particular for their use case — is its ability to handle imbalanced data.

    Since in this use case they are dealing with classification analysis, they used two common ways to evaluate the performance of the model: confusion matrix and ROC curve. One of the outputs of running the Random Trees model in SPSS is the confusion matrix seen in Figure 8. The table shows the precision achieved by the model during training.

    Figure 8 — Confusion Matrix for cancelled vs. non-cancelled flights

    In this case, the model’s precision was about 95% for predicting cancelled flights (true positives), and about 94% for predicting non-cancelled flights (true negatives). That means, the model was correct most of the time, but also made wrong predictions about 4–5% of the time (false negatives and false positives).

    That was the precision given by the model using the training data set. This is also represented by the ROC curve on the left side of Figure 9. They can see, however, that the area under the curve for the training data set was better than the area under the curve for the testing data set (right side of Figure 9), which means that during testing, the model did not perform as well as during training (i.e. it presented a higher rate of errors, or higher rate of false negatives and false positives).

    Figure 9 — ROC curves for the training and testing data sets

    Nevertheless, they decided that the results were still good for the purposes of their discussion in this blog, and they stopped their iterations here. They encourage readers to further refine this model or even to use other models that could solve this use case.

    Deploying the model

    Finally, they deployed the model as a REST API that developers can call from their applications. For that, they created a “deployment branch” in the SPSS stream. Then, they used the IBM Watson Machine Learning service available on IBM Bluemix here. They imported the SPSS stream into the Bluemix service, which generated a scoring endpoint (or URL) that application developers can call. Developers can also call The Weather Company APIs directly from their application code to retrieve the forecast data for the next day, week, and so on, in order to pass the required data to the scoring endpoint and make the prediction.

    A typical scoring endpoint provided by the Watson Machine Learning service would look like the URL shown below.

    https://ibm-watson-ml.mybluemix.net/pm/v1/score/flights-cancellation?accesskey=<provided by WML service>

    By passing the expected JSON body that includes the required inputs for scoring (such as the future flight data and forecast weather data), the scoring endpoint above returns if a given flight is likely to be cancelled or not. This is seen in Figure 10, which shows a call being made to the scoring endpoint — and its response — using an HTTP requester tool available in a web browser.

    Figure 10 — actual request URL, JSON body, and response from scoring endpoint

    Notice in the JSON response above that the deployed model predicted this particular flight from Newark to Chicago would be 88.8% likely to be cancelled, based on forecast weather conditions.

    Conclusion

    IBM SPSS Modeler is a powerful tool that helped us visually create a solution for this use case without writing a single line of code. They were able to follow an iterative process that helped us understand and prepare the data, then model and evaluate the solution, to finally deploy the model as an API for consumption by application developers.

    Resources

    The IBM SPSS stream and data used as the basis for this blog are available on GitHub. There you can also find instructions on how to download IBM SPSS Modeler, get a key for The Weather Channel APIs, and much more.


    Week In Review: Design, Low Power | killexams.com real questions and Pass4sure dumps

    Royalty-free I3C; CFET parasitic variation modeling; Intel funds analog IP generation.

    The MIPI Alliance released MIPI I3C Basic v1.0, a subset of the MIPI I3C sensor interface specification that bundles 20 of the most commonly needed I3C features for developers and other standards organizations. The royalty-free specification includes backward compatibility with I2C, 12.5 MHz multi-drop bus that is over 12 times faster than I2C supports, in-band interrupts to allow slaves to notify masters of interrupts, dynamic address assignment, and standardized discovery.

    Efinix will expand its product offering, adding a 200K logic element FPGA to its lineup with the Triton T200. The T200 targets AI-driven products, and its architecture has enough LEs, DSP blocks, and on-chip RAM to deliver 1 TOPS for CNN at INT8 precision and 5 TOPS for BNN, according to Efinix CEO Sammy Cheung. The company also released samples of its Trion T20 FPGA.

    Faraday Technology released multi-protocol video interface IP on UMC 28nm HPC. The Multi-Protocol Video Interface IP solution supports both transmitter (TX) and receiver (RX). The transmitter allows for MIPI and CMOS-IO combo solutions for package cost reduction and flexibility, while the receiver combo PHY includes MIPI, LVDS, subLVDS, HiSPi, and CMOS-I/O to support a diversified range of interfaces to CMOS image sensors. Target applications include panel and sensor interfaces, projectors, MFP, DSC, surveillance, AR and VR, and AI.

    Analog tool and IP maker Movellus closed a second round of funding from Intel Capital. Movellus’ technology automatically generates analog IPs using digital implementation tools and standard cells. The company will use the funds to expand its customer base and to increase its portfolio of PLLs, DLLs and LDOs for use in semiconductor and system designs at advanced process nodes.

    Imec and Synopsys completed a comprehensive sub-3nm parasitic variation modeling and delay sensitivity study of complementary FET (CFET) architectures. The QuickCap NX 3D field solver was used by Synopsys R&D and imec research teams to model the parasitics for a variety of device architectures and to identify the most critical device dimensions and properties, which allowed for optimization of CFET devices for better power/performance trade-offs.

    Credo utilized Moortec’s Temperature Sensor and Voltage Monitor IP to optimize performance and increase reliability in its latest generation of SerDes chips. Moortec’s PVT sensors are utilized in all Credo standard products which are being deployed on system OEM linecards and 100G per lambda optical modules. Credo cited ease of integration and reduced time-to-market and project risk.

    Wave Computing selected Mentor’s Veloce Strato emulation platform for functional verification and validation of its latest Dataflow Processor Unit chip designs, which will be used in the company’s next-generation AI system. Wave cited capacity and scaling advantages, breadth of virtual use models, reliability, and determinism as behind the choice.

    MaxLinear adopted Cadence’s Quantus and Tempus timing signoff tools in developing the MxL935xx Telluride device, a 400Gbps PAM4 SoC using 16FF process technology. MaxLinear estimated they got 2X faster multi-corner extraction runtimes versus single-corner runs and 3X faster timing signoff flow.

    The European Processor Initiative selected Menta as its provider of eFPGA IP. The EPI, a collaboration of 23 partners including Atos, BMW, CEA, Infineon and ST, has the objective of co-designing, manufacturing and bringing to market a system that supports the high-performance computing requirements of exascale machines.

    Jesse Allen   (all posts)Jesse Allen is the Knowledge Center administrator and a senior editor at Semiconductor Engineering.

    Big data and the industrialization of neuroscience: A safe roadmap for understanding the brain? | killexams.com real questions and Pass4sure dumps

    Abstract

    New technologies in neuroscience generate reams of data at an exponentially increasing rate, spurring the design of very-large-scale data-mining initiatives. Several supranational ventures are contemplating the possibility of achieving, within the next decade(s), full simulation of the human brain.

    I question here the scientific and strategic underpinnings of the runaway enthusiasm for industrial-scale projects at the interface between “wet” (biology) and “hard” (physics, microelectronics and computer science) sciences. Rather than presenting the achievements and hopes fueled by big-data–driven strategies—already covered in depth in special issues of leading journals—I focus on three major issues: (i) Is the industrialization of neuroscience the soundest way to achieve substantial progress in knowledge about the brain? (ii) Do they have a safe “roadmap,” based on a scientific consensus? (iii) Do these large-scale approaches guarantee that they will reach a better understanding of the brain?

    This “opinion” paper emphasizes the contrast between the accelerating technological development and the relative lack of progress in conceptual and theoretical understanding in brain sciences. It underlines the risks of creating a scientific bubble driven by economic and political promises at the expense of more incremental approaches in fundamental research, based on a diversity of roadmaps and theory-driven hypotheses. I conclude that they need to identify current bottlenecks with appropriate accuracy and develop new interdisciplinary tools and strategies to tackle the complexity of brain and mind processes.

    Introduction

    This essay explores how the big-data revolution has started to have an impact on brain sciences and assesses the dangers of letting technology-driven—rather than concept-driven—strategies shape the future industrialization of neuroscience through the rapid emergence of very-large-scale data-mining initiatives. Among recent supranational ventures, the EPFL-IBM consortium “Blue Brain” (1), the European consortium “The Human Brain Project” (HBP) (2), the U.S. consortia BRAIN (3, 4) and “The Human Connectome” (5), and the privately owned Allen Institute (6) all flirt with the possibility of achieving, within the next decades, the full simulation of the human brain (Box 1). Although big-data initiatives have started an impressive thrust in brain research, I question here their impact on how the brain sciences are evolving and highlight the necessity of developing alternative scientific strategies.

    Box 1 “Big data” projects in brain sciences: Websites China:

    Brain Project: Basic neuroscience, brain diseases and brain-inspired computing in progress (147).

    After briefly reviewing the current advances and hopes that new technologies bring within range of modern brain research, I raise the possibility that, at the same time, scientific conduct is undergoing a radical societal change (section 1). I outline the risks generated by the big-data revolution in brain sciences, discussing various conceptual bottlenecks (sections 2 to 5). I illustrate practical and theoretical limitations that brute-force strategies may encounter in simulating the full brain (sections 6 and 7). I suggest safeguards that should be kept in mind in the new societal context dominated by “economics of promises” (section 8), and conclude with a list of positive recommendations.

    1. Big-data initiatives: A worldwide change of scientific strategy in brain studies?

    The prevailing consensus in neuroscience is that technology has revolutionized their approach in looking at brain structure and function in relation to behavior (7, 8), and in multiple ways:

    1) at the technical level: by extending the power of techniques of circuit identification beyond that already reached by genetic or viral approaches, enabling high-throughput optical manipulation of large–neural ensemble activity with single-cell and single-spike resolution in vivo (9–12);

    2) at the methodological level: by imposing new standards in experimentation and data acquisition in direct relation with behavior (13, 14);

    3) at the data production level: by compiling genomic, structural, and functional databases, the size of which (measured in petabytes) is orders of magnitude larger than that of a complete mammalian genome (15);

    4) at the level of analysis: by the application of methods of dimensionality reduction (16, 17) and of pattern-searching algorithms specialized for high-dimensional spaces (18), used previously in statistics, machine learning, and physics;

    5) at the modeling level: by the overwhelming development of optimization and Bayesian predictive methods (19, 20) and deep learning approaches (21), made possible by the countless dimension of the data reservoir.

    The impact of technical advances on brain research has become such that a major change in reference animal models used in neuroscience has occurred in less than 10 years: most state-of-the-art techniques favor the use of few experimental species [e.g., zebrafish, mouse, and marmoset among the vertebrates (22, 23)] and have already consigned to relative oblivion those used traditionally for functional electrophysiology and cognitive mapping (e.g., rat, cat, ferret, and macaque). Simultaneously, outstanding progress in noninvasive imaging techniques (24) such as diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and ultra high-field MRI, paired with sophisticated neuro-cognitive paradigms (25, 26) and multivariate analysis methods (27, 28), now reaches spatial-scale resolution and temporal precision ranges (25, 27) closer to those used in invasive physiology in nonhuman mammals (29), making cross-species comparison, including humans, feasible in the near future.

    Because bold scientific claims increase with technological prowess, the field has also raised its level of self-criticism. Despite major advances in optogenetic control of neural activity patterns (9, 11, 12), “interventionist” neuroscience is still required to show its efficiency in unraveling neural mechanisms causal to behavior (30). Methods must be developed to untangle multiple sources of shared or context-dependent correlations. At a more macroscopic level, localizationist interpretations in brain imaging recently came under scrutiny, both at the paradigmatic and preprocessing level, leading to more controlled definitions of reference or “null” statistics (31, 32). Still unsolved is the obvious difficulty of “putting all together” across scales, when comparing, for instance, neural responses and neurovascular coupling dynamics (33–37). These discrepancies need to be resolved, because they highlight the risks of betting on ill-chosen instrumentation-imposed observables.

    The major risks go well beyond technological misuses or misinterpretations. The present trend prefigures a radical societal change in scientific conduct, where new directions in science are launched by new tools rather than by new concepts (38). Many leading scientists and funding agencies now share the view that “progress in science depends on new techniques, new discoveries and new ideas, probably in that order” (39). The pressure has become such that, to receive funding and eventually publish high-impact papers, scientists are often required to use mouse-specific state-of-the-art techniques, irrespective of their adequacy. To some degree, wishful thinking has replaced the conceptual drive behind experiments, as if using the fanciest tools and exploiting the power of numbers could bring about some epiphany.

    Although industrialization in scientific methods and practice successfully prevailed in the human genome sequencing project [(40); but see (41, 42)], it is unlikely that a similar brute-force approach will guarantee major advances in understanding brain complexity. Conceptual guidance is required to make the best use of technological advances, regardless of their obvious benefits. “Technology is a useful servant but a dangerous master.” As pointed out by Florian Engert, “the essential ingredient that turns a useless map” or database “into an invaluable resource” remains “the experimental design employed to gather and analyze the underlying data, and ultimately the thought process, creativity, and ingenuity that went into this design” (43). At a more conceptual level, barrier-breaking innovation paradoxically stems more often from unpredictable “rupture” processes than industrialized approaches. In numerous cases, seminal findings in neuroscience were chance discoveries and daring interpretations. These go well beyond the technological limits of observations and, sometimes, provide the missing but consensual experimental evidence of prior conceptualization formulated centuries earlier. Better tools in hand are just not enough.

    2. Bottlenecks in large-scale search studies: Big-data is not knowledge

    Provided adequate funding, “big” is easy to acquire and accumulate but hard to classify, interpret, and make sense of. The sea of biological data creates the illusion of knowing “more,” whereas they should rather acknowledge their profound underestimation of how “complex” the brain is. Big data in biology is not limited to acquisition of vast numbers of observables. It further requires selection criteria to evaluate their strategic value, and sophisticated handling to extract knowledge. Classically, in information science, one distinguishes four levels in the so-called DIKW pyramids (44), ranging from “data” to “information” to “knowledge” and “wisdom” (understanding). They are currently facing an overflow of data without definite strategies to convert it into knowledge and eventually reach a better comprehension of the living brain.

    “The search for a unified theory…remains at a rudimentary stage for the brain sciences.”

    The most common target in large-scale enterprises flourishing around brain sciences is the generation of biochemical or structural catalogs, most often “static,” taking the form of localizationist atlases in brain-imaging studies or structural inventories at the molecular, cellular, or network level. Of course, static “atlases” imply sophisticated visualization and are sold as tangible deliverables that can be easily understood in layman’s terms. Their use often leads to overinterpretation, when the brain is reduced to a charted globe divided into islands and continents (45–48). Many specialists are aware of the need of rescaling the applicability of instrumental methods and redefining the strict validity range of the conclusions derived from these atlases (49, 50).

    Only 20 to 30 years ago, neuroanatomical and neurophysiological information was relatively scarce while understanding mind-related processes seemed within reach. Nowadays, they are drowning in a flood of information. Paradoxically all sense of global understanding is in acute danger of getting washed away. Each overcoming of technological barriers opens a Pandora’s box by revealing hidden variables, mechanisms, and nonlinearities, adding new levels of complexity. By reaching the microscopic-scale resolution, advanced technologies have unveiled a new world of diversity and randomness, which was not apparent in pioneer functional studies using spike rate readout or mesoscopic imaging of reduced sensitivity (51–53). This contrast between meso- and microscale functional architectures attests to the necessity of putting more effort in understanding the “regularization” impact of emergence laws—operating in a bottom-up way—across successive levels of integration (see sections 3 and 7). Observations made in parallel with different instruments (sensitive to various spatiotemporal scales) should be combined to build realistic biophysical models to reconcile the loosely related observables across integration levels. In particular, one needs to extract better predictive tools to understand the neural basis of activation processes revealed by brain imaging and find ways of comparing quantitatively state-of-the-art morphological tracing with DTI. Only then could one envision a comprehensive and compressed multiscale functional and structural data repository.

    Another approach may be to seek advice from equivalent big-data enterprises in other disciplines such as astrophysics and elementary particle research. Both of these routinely generate petabytes of data. Although particle research does not necessarily conjure up the theoretical viewpoint that they are crucially missing, generations of physicists have been exploring the multiscale complexity of physical matter on the basis of ever-increasing big-data collections (see section 7). Presently, the major difference with brain science is that theorists in particle physics field are involved before—and not after—the hypothesis-driven data are collected. They actively participate in the definition of collective infrastructures and the design of one-of-a-kind equipment shared by the entire experimentalist collectivity. The recommendation made here is that biologists, who are new to this field, should learn from physicists. As such, the roadmap from data to knowledge could be mapped out in a much clearer fashion and the dead ends, where no one has a clear idea of what to do with all the data, would be far less likely.

    To summarize, the trend toward increased measurement sensitivity and more microscopic scales carries its own paradox: A digitized ersatz of lower dimensionality will never account for the multiscale complexity of the full brain. They should adapt their strategic planning so that conceptual efforts grow in a way that is commensurate with technological development—and not follow it, as is presently the case.

    3. Bottlenecks in multilevel analysis: The Marr-Poggio conundrum

    One of the advertised “blue sky” goals of big-data–driven initiatives is to establish the subcellular and cellular mechanisms causal to behavior through an exhaustive reductionist analysis. The best-known roadmap for dealing with brain complexity was formulated by David Marr some 35 years ago (54). One way to look at the proposed hierarchy of analysis levels (Fig. 1) is to progress from the global “functional and computational” level, through the intermediate “algorithmic” level down to the “substrate” or “implementation” level. The two higher levels, computational and algorithmic, can be considered as the most generic and abstract, independent of the biological trick used to implement them. Marr argued that whereas “algorithms and mechanisms are empirically more accessible, …the level of computational theory…is critically important from an information-processing point of view…[because]…the nature of the computations that underlie perception [and, by extension, cognition] depends more upon the computational problems that have to be solved than upon the particular hardware in which their solutions are implemented” (54). Marr was convinced that a purely reductionist strategy, decomposing the global process into its elementary subcomponents, was “genuinely dangerous.” Trying to understand the emergence of cognition from neuronal responses “is like trying to understand a bird’s flight by studying only feathers. It just cannot be done.’’ Marr’s main intuition was that it is much more difficult to infer from the neural implementation level what algorithm the brain is using (bottom-up) than to reach the algorithmic level from the study of the computational problem that it is trying to solve (top-down along the hierarchy). The bottom-up “emergence” process arising from the interaction of local low-level biological processes remains an open issue today. The way in which sensory neurophysiology has conferred to single-neuron firing the embodiment of high-level psychological properties that can only be sensibly ascribed to a whole behaving organism is a striking example of mereological fallacy (30, 55).

    Fig. 1 The hierarchy of analysis levels [inspired by David Marr (54)].

    The three levels of Marr’s hierarchy illustrated are (from top to bottom) function and computation at the higher level (3), algorithm at the intermediate level (2), and biophysical substrate at the lower level (1). Reductionist approaches progress from levels 3 to 1, whereas constructionism goes the opposite way, from 1 to 3. Two examples of the three-level analysis are given for two different biological processes: action potential (middle column) and synaptic plasticity (right column). The two upper levels of Marr’s hierarchy define the field of computational neuroscience (red inset), the scope of which is to identify generic computations and functions and their underlying algorithms, independently of the biophysical substrate of the process under study.

    Despite the wealth of produced data, constructionist approaches are thus likely to produce mimicry by a brain ersatz, because of the difficulties of reverse inference (in this case, inferring function and behavior from neural-level activation). This prediction was recently computationally explored, by designing arbitrary experiments on an artificial brain-like artifact, a single microprocessor, to see if popular data analysis methods from neuroscience could elucidate the way in which it processes information and controls behavior (in the present case, three classic videogames) (56). Although the processor’s algorithmic flowchart was known a priori, classical interventionist neuroscience methods failed to explain how the processor works, regardless of the amount of data (30).

    …bottom-up “emergence”…remains an open issue today.

    The critical point remains that causal-mechanistic explanations are qualitatively different from understanding how a combination of component modules performing the computations at a lower level produces emergent behavior at a higher level.

    The first difficulty arises because higher-level concepts are needed to understand the neural implementation level. So, even when causality is demonstrated, it makes sense only when all levels are considered together simultaneously: “Ion channels do not beat, heart cells do. Neural circuits do not feel pain, whole organisms do” (30). Some key studies illustrate the necessity of binding different levels in the experimental design itself—for instance, by linking the neural level with the theoretical context derived from preexisting behavioral knowledge. The supervised learning experiments engineered in single neurons recorded in visual cortex in vivo (57), for example, were conceived as the direct neural implementation (substrate level) of a hypothetical plasticity rule (58) (algorithmic level) derived from associative memory (59) and Ising (60) models (computational level).

    A second difficulty comes from Marr’s “multiple realizability” argument, which states that the same function can be achieved through any number of different substrates (30, 54, 61). The impossibility of mapping behavior or function in a unequivocal way on the parametric state of the synaptic or conductance ensemble (defining observed dynamics of the neural net under study) was reproduced in simulation models of Aplysia (62, 63) and vertebrate cerebellum (64). This conundrum reveals unexpected complexity whichever way the hierarchy is read, from the computation or macro level to the substrate or micro level, or the reverse.

    An additional hidden twist is that the biological substrate level may consist of nested sublevels, each operating at different biophysical scales. Tomaso Poggio emphasized how knowledge of the more elementary steps of information processing is required to account for the complexity of more global computations (65). The key issue is to determine the minimal stratification level needed to preserve the nonlinearities and self-organizing properties at higher integrative levels (66).

    Refined electrophysiological studies in the early visual system show clear cases where most spiking-net models—by not giving enough descriptive depth to the biophysical substrate—are too simplified to self-generate low-level feature specificity (orientation selectivity, contrast invariance., and so forth): (i) Rather than the simplified +/− algebra of McCulloch-Pitts neurons, synaptic biophysics in vivo suggests a much richer algebra that includes scaling and division of excitatory inputs by inhibitory ones, where a digital “zero” in the target neuron output could mean either absence of incoming signal (what spiking nets generally assume) or the division or “veto” of an excitatory input by a strong concomitant shunting inhibition (66, 67). (ii) Although orientation selectivity is a hallmark of mammalian cortical organization, this feature selectivity is, in most spiking models, forced in an ad hoc way, by prespecified wiring rules between thalamus and cortex. Only the orientation preference map appears to be treated as an emergent property resulting from horizontal connection plasticity (68). This oversimplification is challenged when viewed from the conductance level: Voltage-clamp measurements in vivo, even in layer 4, reveal an unexpected level of nonlinear interaction and diversity between excitatory and inhibitory conductances (67, 69–71), which, in V1 simple cells, are hardly detectable (72) or absent at the spiking level (73). The consequence is that the same functional receptive field type, “simple” or “complex,” may indeed be produced by multiple dynamic interaction patterns between excitation and inhibition (71, 74). This unexpected wiring diversity in the synaptic genesis of V1 receptive fields concurs with statistical predictions made by multilayered convolutional models (75). By oversimplifying synaptic integration biophysics and limiting simulations to the spike level, most computational models trivialize the emergence of “higher-order” properties through a purely feedforward cascade (76, 77) when the principal wiring feature of sensory neocortex is—by far—synaptic reverberation and amplification (66).

    In view of the weight presently given to spike-based feedforward processing and deep learning, the reexamination of conductance-based versus spike-based computing and the role given to synaptic reentry both sound essential. Bottlenecks in multiscale modeling are rarely addressed in depth, and, although it is agreed that nobody has the definitive solution, this remains a serious blow for “constructionist” models of the brain. Alternative viewpoints should be developed.

    4. Bottlenecks in reverse engineering: Lessons learned from the invertebrates

    One safe way to handle big-data sets in vertebrates is to avoid the pitfalls known from pioneering studies in paucineuronal networks. Comparative neuroscience offers multiple test studies: (i) small, genetically tractable animal models (78), such as Caenorhabditis elegans; (ii) functionally identified clusters of giant cells, in sensory-motor ganglions in Aplysia and crustaceans; and (iii) transparent zebrafish, making the online imaging of the whole connectome possible (79). This suggests access to “full brain” descriptions with the reconstruction of causal structuro-functional relations matching canonical neuronal states with species-specific behavioral repertoires (14, 80, 81).

    Yet, even with such elementary invariant-like systems, interindividual variability cannot be ignored. A counterintuitive finding in C. elegans is that there is no such thing as “simplicity” despite the reduced connectome (302 neurons, 6963 synapses, 890 gap junctions), even at the earliest stage of sensory processing. Averaging neuronal responses of a single olfactory cell is deceptive, because the activation of the same neuron, depending on the context, may lead to several possible behavioral outcomes (82). The main predictive signal of the response is the internal state of the functional assembly in which the cell participates, at the exact time when external inputs become processed. Similar state dependencies in neuronal processing have just started to be explored in vertebrates (83, 84).

    Partial understanding of the functional extent and multiscale impact of contextual processing has been obtained in classical studies in the lobster’s stomato-gastric ganglion (85). By releasing diffusible neuromodulators, specialized “orchestra conductor” neurons change the conductance repertoire of the other individual neurons and allow them to participate at distinct times in a diversity of functional subnetworks (“assembly reconfigurability”). This feature highlights the impossibility of separating intrinsic (conductance repertoire, genomic expression) from extrinsic (synapses) features. The diffusive nature of the modulatory process and its dependency on the internal mesoscopic state generated by the recurrent synaptic activity open a yet largely unexplored scale of complexity.

    A straightforward lesson from invertebrates is that a purely “Lego”-like reconstruction approach—based on the full reconstruction of the brain’s connectome and the gene expression, electrical, and morphological determinants profile of the major classes of its neural components (86, 87)—may be doomed from the start. Despite similar evidence in vertebrates, some doubt remains as to whether the versatility of the excitability pattern and the dependency of conductance repertoire expression on past brain states (and modulators) are taken at face value in classifications and nomenclatures of supposedly invariant identity determinants (88). Thus, the dynamic complexity revealed in simpler organisms provides a powerful warning against the use of purely bottom-up constructivist large-scale studies in higher organisms.

    5. Bottlenecks in evolutionary leaps: Anthropocentrism from “mouse” to “man”

    “Understanding the brain” is often read as understanding the “human” brain. This anthropomorphic bias reveals a loss of perspective regarding the essence of living systems: their diversity, their adaptability, and their dependence on evolutionary history. Losing track of this perspective is dangerous, because only broad comparisons offer the potential to distinguish general principles from unimportant implementation details. If paving the way toward “a general theory of the brain” is a worthy goal, as they believe it is, then it is essential to conceive comparative physiology strategies, which allow us to discriminate between species-specific “bags of tricks” and canonical computations shared by living brains (30, 66, 89–92). Certain forms of computation and algorithms seem to be preserved (i.e., gain control, normalization, exponentiation, association, and coincidence detection), but the detailed mechanistic implementations are often species-specific and structure-dependent (30). Industrial-scale efforts are, by their present design, focused on limited behaviors and species, and thus orthogonal to a broad-enough perspective.

    A second problem is that the human brain is probably among the most complex of nervous systems. This has led, without much strategic planning other than exploiting the availability of a genetically modifiable mammalian system, to the increasing use of the mouse as a model. Because it is a mammal, it must be similar to the human. Although the mouse model has produced important advances in the study of basic sensory-motor integration principles, it may be less appropriate for studying perceptual processes for modalities (vision) less adapted to its behavioral repertoire and, more obviously still, for higher cognitive functions. This is particularly true in species such as humans and other primates where sensory cortical processing involves elaborate reciprocal connectivity patterns linking sets of functionally distinct areas (93, 94), which are mostly absent in the mouse cortex.

    A wiser alternative could be to refine approaches progressively and recursively according to species-specific behavior, and cognition repertory (95). Search for homologies should be validated on the basis of structural, functional, and cognitive similarities between species. The choice of the right species calls for increased efforts in comparative physiology, which have been downplayed since the start of the mouse dominance era. The choice of the right tasks requires new methods of behavior classification. By applying unsupervised learning methods to the largest possible set of coregistered neural data and behavioral observations, one may hope to achieve substantial dimensionality reduction and obtain an objective mapping of possible behavioral repertoires over a restricted ensemble of reproducible brain states, as has been done successfully in invertebrates (81).

    6. Simulating the brain: The cart before the horse—immaturity of paradigms and lack of hypothesis-driven design

    A fundamental issue for large database generalization and validation is to provide universal paradigm or task standards that are optimized for the study of specific cognitive functions. For illustration’s sake, let us concentrate on an apparently “simple” case study, i.e., how to characterize neural processes involved in low-level visual perception.

    In the search for generic sensory integration principles, how can they conceive a “good” stimulus set before they know what the system under study is designed to perceive (96)? The process cannot be formulated without priors, often linked with behavioral observations and hypothesis testing, and should probably be automated only after a progressive, informed, recursive, maybe even “old-fashioned,” phase of investigation. Presenting the largest spectrum of input statistics seems the appropriate way to push the sensory system to its information capacity limits (97) and explore the dependency of the neural code on external input statistics (70, 74, 98, 99). However, in practice, the battery of stimuli used to build large data sets faces unacknowledged technical constraints: Stimulus choices are often guided by the efficiency with which strong firing can be evoked—leading to a prevalence of high firing rates, more easily detectable by calcium fluorescence changes—rather than by information theory concepts (rate code/dense spiking versus spike-timing code/sparseness). The cognitive repertoire should also be used more carefully to constrain the choice of species: There is something odd in applying in the mouse, a nearly blind animal (100), a battery of stimulation paradigms based on decades of work on highly visual species (cat, macaque, and human) without paying attention to ethological differences in the reliance on vision [but see (101)]. Indeed, visual cortex may play different roles in different species; for instance, space coding during navigation—in concert with hippocampus—in rodents, versus primal perceptual sketch elaboration and form or motion extraction—in concert with higher cortical areas—in more visual species. Consequently, testing the responses of mouse primary visual cortex (V1) to a high-contrast classic Hollywood black-and-white movie (102) seems as inappropriate as studying pangolin olfaction with plumes of warm Parisian croissants. Conversely, searching for place or grid cells may be deceiving in nonhuman primate visual cortex when it makes sense in the rodent.

    Choosing the right stimulus and species is not the only issue. Since the shift over the past 20 years from the anesthetized-paralyzed preparation to the behaving animal, the standardization of the global context has become a major concern (103). Visual responsiveness in the awake mouse depends heavily on locomotion and full-body action (83), rendering inseparable the sensory and motor components. However, a similar conditional dependency of visual processing has not been confirmed in higher mammals, where primary sensory and motor cortices are much less—or even not at all in the adult—directly interconnected. Consequently, the generalized use of “running-on-a-ball” paradigms in the rodent may have set a new behavioral standard for studying sensory responses, optimized to increase neural excitability in the rodent only, but reducing the global relevance to vision per se (66).

    “Industrial-scale efforts are…orthogonal to a broad-enough perspective.”

    The overall consequence is that, by imposing such artificial paradigms as the “standard tests” for brain observatories, each resulting data set will yield predictions restricted to specific contexts, but largely unrelated to “natural” behavior. Big-data initiatives in early vision have not yet put enough effort into defining parameters critical of the “naturalness” of the evoked sensory drive. As summarized by Bruno Olshausen, “the problem is not just that they lack the proper data, but that they do not even have the right conceptual framework for thinking about what is happening” (104). Similarly, however impressive they may be, all-optical “interventionist” paradigms do not signal the end of the quest: New conceptual frameworks are needed that “provide the mapping between large-scale neural data and behavior in an algorithmic sense and not just a correlative or even causal way” (30). The practical message here is that both paradigms and context—in which data are acquired—should be rationalized and justified on purely theoretical grounds, before becoming the norm of the industrialization stage.

    7. Simulating the brain—The cart without a driver: Missing a strong brain theory

    Do they have a clear view of what can be expected from reverse engineering and embodied constructionism? Some of the large-scale initiatives recapitulate earlier constructionist approaches that tried to simulate brain circuits by building models “that are very closely linked to the detailed anatomical and physiological structure” of the brain, in hopes of “generating unanticipated functional insights based on emergent properties of neuronal structure.” The first attempts in the 1990s (105–107) were limited by the lack of prediction of rich enough behavioral repertoires and cognitive functions (108). Conversely, more engineering-oriented and simplified blackbox simulations (109) were criticized for their lack of descriptive depth (110). Even so, some success has been obtained by clever built-in top-down constraints. High-performance computing may change the odds (111), and experts agree that large-scale simulation should provide possible breakthroughs in system identification as has been the case for deep learning (112). Nevertheless, given the analytic intractability of the brain, the challenge of “putting all together” remains wide open. The major obstacle remains the lack of unifying theory and the relative paucity of top-down guidance by high-level knowledge derived from psychological studies of the mind.

    In this section, I will review three correlated issues: (i) Are there theoretical conjectures indicating that a full spike-based brain simulation is not a realistic target? (ii) How do system and computational neurosciences integrate theory so far? and (iii) Are there alternative roadmaps to readdress what may be considered as an ill-posed problem?

    Point 1: Because of their dominant bottom-up drive, the danger of the large-scale neuroscience initiatives is to produce purely descriptive ersatz of brain, sharing some of the internal statistics of the biological counterpart, at best the two first-order moments (mean and variance), but devoid of self-generated cognitive abilities. The numbers will certainly look right, but there is no guarantee that such simulated brains will work. This intuition resonates with theoretical conjectures based on pure logic. As early as the 1980s, a gedanken experiment was proposed by von der Malsburg which considered two brain-like assemblies, built with the exact same connectivity graph and producing the exact same averaged firing patterns. What would happen if a jitter of a few milliseconds was applied in the arrival time of each occurring spike (while keeping mean rate invariant)? Is there a critical jitter value that should not be exceeded, to keep alive the emergent properties of the graph (113, 114)? The same conjecture could be generalized at the second-order statistics level. Let us imagine that big data makes it possible to build a cortex-like digital machine where the variance of the distributions of synaptic weights afferent to (or efferent from) each neuron could be matched to those directly measured (over time) in the same ensembles of real synapses. Would one predict the mean and variance–equalized artificial network to be as operative as the real brain? Because—in real brains— the efficiency of individual synaptic weights and their spatial distribution are stabilized through associative plasticity and normalization processes (if their popular learning theories are right), plugging in simulated synapses mean and variance levels devoid of information content would result in an “averaged connectome” without memory of its past interactions with the outside world. Thus, brain simulations elaborated from static and averaged atlases might be likely useless in simulating brain function. Realistic solutions require that the dynamic entity of the simulated brain “grows” and interacts with the same outside world as the real brain, i.e., that both share the same interactive constraints at any point in time to produce the same behavior or implement the same cognitive process.

    Point 2: How do system and computational neurosciences integrate theory so far? In a provocative review (103), Carandini assumes the existence of an intermediate level of circuit integration, where canonical operations can be defined as invariant computations repeated and combined in different ways across the brain. To identify them, it becomes necessary to record from a myriad of neurons in multiple brain regions rather than from single neurons. “Understanding computation…provides a language for theories of behavior.” This concept is very close to the algorithmic level of Marr, because it no longer depends on the understanding of the biophysics of the substrate, which may vary from region to region and species to species. However, most consensual canonical principles are not derived from the search of big data but from philosophical or psychological principles arising from past centuries (115). For instance, the current theories of associative synaptic plasticity did not originate with spike-timing–dependent plasticity (STDP) but can be seen as the revival of causality-based rules inherited from psychologists [(116–118), to cite only a few (119)]. Other rules address a more macroscopic level, irrespective of the biological substrate implementation of the underlying mechanisms, such as the psychic laws of the Gestalt school in 1930s (117, 121) or the binding-by-synchrony hypothesis (120). It is only recently that the introduction of top-down constraints satisfying Bayesian optimization (19, 20) seems to provide innovative insights into mesoscopic processing in the brain and the way it adapts to multiple task-driven constraints.

    Point 3: Exploiting biological data obtained at different spatial and temporal scales should benefit from earlier concepts developed in statistical physics. Anderson (122) points out that the field of supraconductivity shows the reductionist fallacy (see section 3: Marr-Poggio conundrum). The ability to reduce everything to simple laws does not imply the ability to start from those laws and reconstruct the whole (the brain in biology, the universe in physics). The constructionist hypothesis breaks down when confronted with scale changes and complexity (123). Anderson summarizes the principle of “symmetry breaking” across scales, as follows: (i) The internal structure of a piece of matter or a living brain need not be symmetrical even if the total state of it is (an argument that mean field theories do not always follow); (ii) the macroscopic state of a large system has less symmetry than that obeyed by the microscopic laws which govern it. “In the so-called N→infinity limit…matter will undergo mathematically sharp, singular ‘phase transitions’ to states in which the microscopic symmetries…are in a sense violated.…Functional structure in a teleogical sense, as opposed to mere crystalline shape, must also be considered a stage, possibly intermediate between crystallinity and information strings, in the hierarchy of broken symmetries.” A rare echo of this principle can be found in a pioneer multiscale model of emergence of local and global features in the early visual system (75, 124, 125).

    Progress should be expected by building novel descriptive frameworks which extract—from zillions of measurements—mesoscopic variables, analogous to the concept of quasiparticles in statistical physics. Solid-state physicists successfully developed “middle way” theories (126) that overcome the limitation that equations for particle interactions become impossible to solve or simulate for more than 10 particles. The introduction of a formalism based on virtual quasiparticles may simplify the analytical treatment of long-distance interactions between numerous elementary bound particles, by an equivalent free quasiparticle with shorter interaction. The search for such macroscopic variables could offer an analytic way of treating neural network dynamics and enrich the present mean-field equation formalism. This would allow the building of new kinds of “stereological” models of gray matter, combining the local-range connectivity of columnar ensembles, the extrasynaptic volume diffusion of second messengers and modulators, and the oscillatory coupling due to physical distance in the three-dimensional (3D) brain [a factor unaccounted for by classical ring (1D) or layered (2D) networks]. Quasiparticles have dual corpuscular and wave counterparts, which may apply to information diffusion and propagation across cortical networks, for which evidence can be monitored by fast voltage-sensitive dye imaging. Use of such models may reconcile the physics of interacting particles and waves with the functional physiology of long-distance interconnected cortical columns.

    The search for a unified theory, as in particle physics, remains at a rudimentary stage for the brain sciences. When changing scales, symmetry breaks introduce major nonlinearities that they cannot account for at present. Thus, the validity of theories and the choice of the relevant explanatory variables remain restricted to certain levels of integration, resulting in simulation attempts that are essentially local and species- and task-dependent. The hope is that understanding mesoscale organization and full network dynamics might reveal a simpler formalism than the microscale level, similar to general laws in statistical thermodynamics (127). The limitation for reverse engineering is that mean-field-like approaches, because of their underlying simplifications, will lose important generative mechanisms of low-level nonlinearities. A more empirical and modest alternative could be to multiply the diversity of proposed multiscale models, selecting those that most efficiently reduce complexity: “A good theoretical model of a complex system should be like a good caricature: It should emphasize those features which are most important and should downplay the inessential details.… Since one does not really know which are the inessential details until one has understood the phenomena under study…one should investigate a wide range of models and not stake one’s life (or one’s theoretical insight) on one particular model only” (128). Hence, again, the definition of multiscale data integration and the convergence to a theoretical understanding must be progressive and recursive.

    8. The risks, for basic research, of dominant strategies based on “economics of promises”

    Let us leave theory and move to the economics and policy of science. International think-tank meetings for defining a worldwide unified strategy (129, 130) attract public attention and feed the buzz of wide-audience science chronicles. Large-scale brain initiatives are often presented to the public as unselfish but costly science, generating state-of-the-art infrastructures and large data resources open to the community. They are advertised as opening the door for brain-derived information technology (IT) and, in the minds of some high profile IT leaders, paving the way to transhumanism (131, 132).

    Part of the original motivation for big data comes from its success in studying simple organisms: for instance, the complete lineage and full reconstruction using electron microscopy of C. elegans, initiated in the 1980s, were shared by the entire field, leading to faster progress. However, the justification for the full human brain simulation is more questionable: The metaphor of “mind observatory,” used rhetorically to link it with physics exploratory platforms such as CERN, is misleading. Megascience infrastructures in physics take immediate advantage of shared “unique” instruments, which have been cooperatively designed to collect new experimental data and test explicit hypotheses through an overarching theory. In the brain sciences, however, building massive database architecture without theoretical guidance may turn into a waste of time and money (133, 134).

    The “observatory” function itself, i.e., yielding new data that were formerly out of reach because of technical limitations, is not even central to some of the large-scale brain initiatives. For instance, the flagship project (HBP) transformed its original drive (for a better understanding of brain) into a “viewing neuroscope” IT platform built largely on preexisting data. Progress is expected mostly from an alliance of deep learning, neuroinformatics, and neuromorphic computation, and promised to be quantitative enough to sustain virtual medicine applications (135).

    This strategic drift illustrates the impact of “megascience,” considered by sociologists of emergent technologies as a new form of societo-scientific culture (131, 132, 136–139). “Economics of promise” are built around a scientific or industrial process (or even a theoretical law) whose justification is primarily based not on scientific or technological arguments but on the promises themselves (as if these were guaranteed to be fulfilled). This trend, which has deep roots linked to what modern society expects from biology in the large sense, has been repeatedly observed in different scientific subfields such as large-scale brain simulation, nanotechnology, stem cells, and synthesis biology (138). It even applies to the myth of Moore’s law that perpetuates itself because of the marketing of chip designers in neuromorphic computing (132, 140).

    Plausible reasons have been identified to justify such drastic changes in scientific conduct: rarefaction of funding for basic research in brain science, the necessary requirement of a major translational impact at the societal level, “hype” purposely designed to reach the largest public audience as well as political decision-makers, overselling promises in the public health domain and possible blue-sky industrial outcomes. The attractiveness to politicians, administrators, and funders (whether public or private) of massive and visible one-track programs is obvious (141), but one may consider that high-level “deciders” are not always entirely aware of —or possibly interested in— the downsides of these mammoth programs, or of the obvious weaknesses of their scientific underpinnings. Promises are no longer an extrapolation of the “possible future” (Fig. 2), but become the scientific justifications of purely economic and political “bubble” strategies engineered to capture funding on the basis of competitive supranational calls (139, 142).

    “The present trend prefigures a radical societal change in scientific conduct…”

    Fig. 2 Building brain sciences through “economics of promises”?

    Promises based on data-driven exploration and modeling of the human brain share similarities and even inspiration with the imagery of science fiction. They become the scientific justification for the capture of large-scale funding.

    CREDIT: ZAP ART/GETTY IMAGES

    A side effect is that governmental institutions in Europe and the United States suggest that enough data may be already available on the laboratory shelves, constituting a pile of “siloed” dormant sources that need to be curated (143, 144). Will this become a cheap pretense used to justify budget reduction in experimental basic neuroscience? It seems indeed easier in terms of budget control to turn scientists into high-tech engineers rather than to fund basic research on a wider spectrum with reduced short-term impact.

    There exists a real danger that a few large-scale international projects building the foundations of virtual or in silico neuroscience will massively engage the funds available in basic neurosciences to the detriment of small and medium-size basic research initiatives focusing on integrative, cognitive, or computational neuroscience. One gets the impression that the future of acquisition and exploitation of brain-related data will be shared between a few large-scale continental initiatives or strong industrial-like ventures. The possibility of conflicts of interest (which grows with the size of the consortia), of attempts to self-appropriate knowledge and eventually make a profitable business of it (145, 146), all remind us that it is urgent to define worldwide accepted standards of transparent macro-management and access to data and technologies.

    Conclusion

    In this Review, I have tried to point out that, although big-data and technological advances undeniably have immense value for future developments, the expedient industrialization of neuroscience and the potential long-term importance of the personal, political, and commercial incentives driving it are causes for concern. Systematic and streamlined approaches are not appropriate for all facets of brain research, and the interpretation of massive data sets collected without appropriate forethought may turn out to be impossible. Given the exponentially increasing rate at which big data are being collected, exabyte information will be accumulated before the end of the next decade. Out of this magma, it may be difficult to tease out of the hypothetical key principles that might help resolve the main questions that should have been at the root of their design and made explicit all along.

    Megascience dominance, if improperly managed, may lead to the drying up of traditional funding channels and the disappearance of smaller-scale and rationally designed research programs, which are still the major source of breaking discoveries. To master megascience development and reduce negative side effects, current strategies could be greatly improved by the following:

    1) rationalizing the codesign of the choice of experimental models (choice of species, precise targeting of behavioral specificity) and the justification of appropriate techniques (sensitivity range of the instrumentation, spatial and temporal scale ranges to be explored);

    2) clarifying the hidden scientific assumptions associated with each instrumentation type and interrelating explanatory variables (i.e., conductance, spike rate, calcium fluorescence, metabolic or hemodynamic signals) despite their biophysical diversity;

    3) clarifying the hidden impact of preprocessing steps and statistical methods to reduce across-study heterogeneity;

    4) developing more efficient recursive loops between experiments and theory-driven top-down predictions, to confront a larger diversity of brain models and compare their predictive power;

    5) building innovative theoretical frameworks not only inspired by computational neuroscience, mathematics, and psychology, but also enriched by complementary fields used to deal with complex systems of high dimensionality (statistical physics, thermodynamics, astrophysics);

    6) vetting the most relevant experimental paradigms, to define in an unbiased way the parametric features and the reproducibility of the stimulation context necessary to the constitution of large–data set repositories;

    7) allowing open access—to scientists and modelers—to the entire data reservoir and its data sharing, devoid of selective control by the ownership claims of grant funders.

    These changes in scientific planning will undoubtedly require the generalized practice of interdisciplinarity between physics and biology, focusing on the major bottlenecks (129, 130). Only in this way, can they hope to improve their critical skills and collectively optimize their capacity to better anticipate the challenges they face in exploring uncharted levels of complexity.

    Conceptual illustration: The Mind-Body Problem.CREDIT: ARTWORK: EBERHARDT E. FETZ, COURTESY WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY References and Notes
  • D. Le Bihan, Looking Inside the Brain: The Power of Neuroimaging (Princeton Univ. Press, NJ, 2014).

  • F. Dyson, Imagined worlds. The Jerusalem-Harvard Lectures (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1997).

  • C. Lange, in Nobel Lectures, Peace, 1901-1925, F. Haberman, Ed. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1972).

  • D. Marr, Vision (MIT Press, Cambridge, 1982).

  • T. Poggio, Visual Algorithms (MIT, Cambridge, 1982).

  • J. A. Bednar, C. K. I. Williams, in From Neuron to Cognition via Computational Neuroscience, M. A. Arbib, J. J. Bonaiuto, Eds. (MIT Press, Cambridge, 2016), pp. 409–432.

  • P. Dayan, L. Abbott, Theoretical Neuroscience: Computational and Mathematical Modeling of Neural Systems (MIT Press, Cambridge, 2002).

  • B. Olshausen, in 20 Years of Computational Neuroscience, J. M. Bower, D. Beeman, Eds. (Springer, New York, 2013).

  • J. M. Bower, D. Beeman, The Book of GENESIS: Exploring Realistic Neural Models with the GEneral NEural SImulation System (Telos, New York, 1998).

  • C. von der Malsburg, in Brain Theory, G. Palm, A. Aertsen, Eds. (Springer, Berlin, 1986), pp. 161–176.

  • Y. Fregnac, Big science needs big concepts, in “Voices”: BRAIN Initiative and Human Brain Project: Hopes and reservations. Cell 155, 265–266 (2013).10.1016/j.cell.2013.09.037

  • W. James, Psychology: Briefer Course (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1890).

  • Y. Delage, Le Rève: Etude Psychologique, Philosophique et Litteraire [The Dream: A Psychological, Philosophical and Literary Study (in French)] (Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, 1919).

  • D. Hebb, The Organization of Behavior (Wiley, New York, 1949).

  • V. Y. Frenkel, Yakov Ilich Frenkel: His Work, Life, and Letters (Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel/Boston, 1996).

  • L. Ferry, La révolution transhumaniste [The Revolution of “Transhumanism”]. (Plon, Paris, 2016).

  • J.-G. Ganascia, Le mythe de la singularité [The Myth of Singularity (in French)]. Science Ouverte (Seuil, Paris, 2017).

  • U. Felt, B. Wyne, “Taking European knowledge society seriously,” Report of the Expert Group on Science and Governance to the Science, Economy and Society Directorate, Directorate-General for Research (European Commission, Brussels, 2007).

  • Sciences et Technologies émergentes: pourquoi tant de promesses? M. Audetat, Ed., Emerging Sciences and Technologies (Hermann, 2015).

  • F. Panese, in Sciences et Technologies émergentes: pourquoi tant de promesses, M. Audétat, Ed. (Hermann, Paris, 2015), pp. 165–193.

  • S. Loeve, in Sciences et Technologies émergentes: pourquoi tant de promesses? M. Audetat, Ed. (Hermann, Paris, 2015), pp. 91–113.

  • Acknowledgments: I thank G. Laurent and F. Engert for their supportive scientific interaction in an early draft of this text. I thank M. Yartsev, K. Grant, K. Petersen, F. Frégnac-Clave, and the two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments in the final steps of this manuscript.


  • Direct Download of over 5500 Certification Exams

    3COM [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AccessData [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACFE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Acme-Packet [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACSM [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Admission-Tests [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ADOBE [93 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AFP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AICPA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AIIM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Alcatel-Lucent [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Alfresco [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Altiris [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Amazon [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    American-College [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Android [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APICS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Apple [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AppSense [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APTUSC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Arizona-Education [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ARM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Aruba [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASIS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASQ [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASTQB [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Autodesk [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Avaya [96 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AXELOS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Axis [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Banking [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BEA [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BICSI [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BlackBerry [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BlueCoat [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Brocade [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Business-Objects [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Business-Tests [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CA-Technologies [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Certification-Board [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Certiport [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CheckPoint [41 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIPS [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cisco [318 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Citrix [48 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIW [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cloudera [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cognos [19 Certification Exam(s) ]
    College-Board [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CompTIA [76 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ComputerAssociates [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Consultant [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Counselor [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CPP-Institue [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CPP-Institute [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CSP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CWNA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CWNP [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Dassault [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DELL [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DMI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DRI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ECCouncil [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ECDL [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    EMC [129 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Enterasys [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Ericsson [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ESPA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Esri [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ExamExpress [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Exin [40 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ExtremeNetworks [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    F5-Networks [20 Certification Exam(s) ]
    FCTC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Filemaker [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Financial [36 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Food [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Fortinet [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Foundry [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    FSMTB [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Fujitsu [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GAQM [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Genesys [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GIAC [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Google [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GuidanceSoftware [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    H3C [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HDI [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Healthcare [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HIPAA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hitachi [30 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hortonworks [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hospitality [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HP [750 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HR [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HRCI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Huawei [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hyperion [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IAAP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IAHCSMM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IBM [1532 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IBQH [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ICAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ICDL [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IEEE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IELTS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IFPUG [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IIBA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IISFA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Intel [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IQN [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IRS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISACA [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISC2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISEB [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Isilon [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISM [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    iSQI [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ITEC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Juniper [64 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LEED [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Legato [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Liferay [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Logical-Operations [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Lotus [66 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LPI [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LSI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Magento [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Maintenance [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    McAfee [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    McData [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Medical [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Microsoft [374 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Mile2 [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Military [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Misc [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Motorola [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    mySQL [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NBSTSA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCEES [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCLEX [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Network-General [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NetworkAppliance [39 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NIELIT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Nokia [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Nortel [130 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Novell [37 Certification Exam(s) ]
    OMG [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Oracle [279 Certification Exam(s) ]
    P&C [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Palo-Alto [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PARCC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PayPal [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Pegasystems [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PEOPLECERT [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PMI [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Polycom [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PostgreSQL-CE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Prince2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PRMIA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PsychCorp [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PTCB [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    QAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    QlikView [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Quality-Assurance [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RACC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Real-Estate [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RedHat [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RES [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Riverbed [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RSA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Sair [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Salesforce [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SANS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SAP [98 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SASInstitute [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SAT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SCO [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SCP [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SDI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    See-Beyond [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Siemens [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Snia [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SOA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Social-Work-Board [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SpringSource [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SUN [63 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SUSE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Sybase [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Symantec [134 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Teacher-Certification [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    The-Open-Group [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    TIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Tibco [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Trainers [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Trend [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    TruSecure [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    USMLE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    VCE [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Veeam [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Veritas [33 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Vmware [58 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Wonderlic [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Worldatwork [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    XML-Master [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Zend [6 Certification Exam(s) ]





    References :


    Issu : https://issuu.com/trutrainers/docs/p2050-007
    Dropmark : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/11445797
    Wordpress : http://wp.me/p7SJ6L-hp
    Scribd : https://www.scribd.com/document/356951909/Pass4sure-P2050-007-Practice-Tests-with-Real-Questions
    weSRCH : https://www.wesrch.com/business/prpdfBU1HWO000KLEV
    Dropmark-Text : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/12025407
    Youtube : https://youtu.be/SKT_hKnbOPQ
    Blogspot : http://killexams-braindumps.blogspot.com/2017/10/exactly-same-p2050-007-questions-as-in.html
    RSS Feed : http://feeds.feedburner.com/JustStudyTheseIbmP2050-007QuestionsAndPassTheRealTest
    Vimeo : https://vimeo.com/241758902
    publitas.com : https://view.publitas.com/trutrainers-inc/get-high-marks-in-p2050-007-exam-with-these-dumps
    Google+ : https://plus.google.com/112153555852933435691/posts/QEgHiHQznAy?hl=en
    Calameo : http://en.calameo.com/books/0049235262bb13cadab37
    Box.net : https://app.box.com/s/yjj1waf9i30p77tp0qrkxzcdre4hwomj
    zoho.com : https://docs.zoho.com/file/5ce0z815fcfac48964b7cb575c7217c6d20b0
    coursehero.com : "Excle"






    Back to Main Page





    Killexams exams | Killexams certification | Pass4Sure questions and answers | Pass4sure | pass-guaratee | best test preparation | best training guides | examcollection | killexams | killexams review | killexams legit | kill example | kill example journalism | kill exams reviews | kill exam ripoff report | review | review quizlet | review login | review archives | review sheet | legitimate | legit | legitimacy | legitimation | legit check | legitimate program | legitimize | legitimate business | legitimate definition | legit site | legit online banking | legit website | legitimacy definition | pass 4 sure | pass for sure | p4s | pass4sure certification | pass4sure exam | IT certification | IT Exam | certification material provider | pass4sure login | pass4sure exams | pass4sure reviews | pass4sure aws | pass4sure security | pass4sure cisco | pass4sure coupon | pass4sure dumps | pass4sure cissp | pass4sure braindumps | pass4sure test | pass4sure torrent | pass4sure download | pass4surekey | pass4sure cap | pass4sure free | examsoft | examsoft login | exams | exams free | examsolutions | exams4pilots | examsoft download | exams questions | examslocal | exams practice |

    www.pass4surez.com | www.killcerts.com | www.search4exams.com | http://smresidences.com.ph/