Sales Tel: +63 945 7983492  |  Email Us    
SMDC Residences

Air Residences

Features and Amenities

Reflective Pool
Function Terrace
Seating Alcoves

Air Residences

Green 2 Residences

Features and Amenities:

Wifi ready study area
Swimming Pool
Gym and Function Room

Green 2 Residences

Bloom Residences

Features and Amenities:

Recreational Area
2 Lap Pools
Ground Floor Commercial Areas

Bloom Residences

Leaf Residences

Features and Amenities:

3 Swimming Pools
Gym and Fitness Center
Outdoor Basketball Court

Leaf Residences

Contact Us

Contact us today for a no obligation quotation:

+63 945 7983492
+63 908 8820391

Copyright © 2018 SMDC :: SM Residences, All Rights Reserved.

A2040-405 dumps with Real exam Questions and Practice Test -

Great Place to download 100% free A2040-405 braindumps, real exam questions and practice test with VCE exam simulator to ensure your 100% success in the A2040-405 -

Pass4sure A2040-405 dumps | A2040-405 real questions |

A2040-405 Assessment: IBM Notes and Domino 9.0 Social Edition System Administration U

Study Guide Prepared by IBM Dumps Experts

Exam Questions Updated On : A2040-405 Dumps and Real Questions

100% Real Questions - Exam Pass Guarantee with High Marks - Just Memorize the Answers

A2040-405 exam Dumps Source : Assessment: IBM Notes and Domino 9.0 Social Edition System Administration U

Test Code : A2040-405
Test Name : Assessment: IBM Notes and Domino 9.0 Social Edition System Administration U
Vendor Name : IBM
: 96 Real Questions

simply use these actual question bank and fulfillment is yours.
started out getting ready for the difficult A2040-405 exam the use of the heavy and voluminous study books. but failed tocrack the tough topics and got panicked. i was about to drop the exam whilst any individual stated me the dumpwith the aid of killexams. It was virtually smooth to study and the fact that I may want to memorize all in a brief time, removed all my apprehensions. ought to crack 67 questions in only 76 mins and got a big eighty five marks. Felt indebted to for making my day.

just depend upon this A2040-405 actual question source.
i bought this because of the A2040-405 questions, I idea I ought to do the QAs element just based on my previous experience. yet, the A2040-405 questions supplied by means of have been simply as useful. so you actually need centered prep materials, I passed easily, all way to

preparing A2040-405 exam is rely of some hours now.
Mysteriously I answerered all questions in this exam. lots obliged its miles a incredible asset for passing test. I advise absolutely everyone to virtually use I examine numerous books however not notedto get it. anyhow in the wake of the use of Questions & answers, i discovered the instantly forwardness in making plans question and solutions for the A2040-405 exam. I noticed all of the issues rightly.

These A2040-405 dumps works great in the real test.
Every subject count and area, each state of affairs, A2040-405 materials had been brilliant help for me even asgetting ready for this exam and in reality doing it! I used to be concerned, but going once more to this A2040-405 and questioning that I realize everything due to the truth the A2040-405 exam was very smooth after the stuff, I got an first rate quit result. Now, doing the following degree of IBM certifications.

here are hints & hints with dumps to certify A2040-405 examination with excessive scores.
A2040-405 exam have become truly tough for me as i used to be not getting enough time for the training. Finding no way out, I took help from the sell off. I additionally took help from expert Certification guide. The sell off changed into top notch. It dealt with all of the subjects in an easy and fine manner. Could get thru most of them with little attempt. Spoke back all the question in handiest eighty one minutes and have been given 97 mark. Felt sincerely glad. Thank you a lot to for his or her valuable steering.

Do you need updated dumps for A2040-405 exam? Here it is. questions and answers helped me to recognize what precisely is predicted in the exam A2040-405. I organized rightly inside 10 days of instruction and finished all of the questions of exam in 80 mins. It incorporate the subjects similar to exam factor of view and makes you memorize all of the topics without difficulty and correctly. It also helped me to recognize a way to control the time to complete the exam before time. It is best method.

Can I get latest dumps with real Q & A of A2040-405 exam?
The best preparation I have ever experienced. I took many A2040-405 certification exams, but A2040-405 turned out to be the easiest one thanks to I have recently discovered this website and wish I knew about it a few years ago. Would have saved me a lot of sleepless nights and grey hair! The A2040-405 exam is not an easy one, especially its latest version. But the A2040-405 Q and A includes the latest questions, daily updates, and these are absolutely authentic and valid questions. I am convinced this is true cause I got most of them during my exam. I got an excellent score and thank to making A2040-405 exam stress-free.

What is needed to study for A2040-405 exam?
Determined out this particular source after a long term. All and sundry right here is cooperative and in a position. Crew provided me exquisite dump for A2040-405 schooling.

Where should I register for A2040-405 exam?
This exam instruction package covered the questions i was asked at the exam - a few thing I didnt be given as real with might be viable. So the stuff they provide is in fact valid. It appears to be often updated to holdup with the professional updates made to A2040-405 exam. Superb first-class, the attempting out engine runs effortlessly and can be very consumer pleasant. there is not anything I dont like approximately it.

Start preparing these A2040-405 questions answers and chillout.
I got this p.C. And passed the A2040-405 exam with 97% marks after 10 days. I am extraordinarily fulfilled by using the end result. There can be brilliant stuff for companion level confirmations, yet concerning the expert level, I think that is the principle strong course of action for first-class stuff, mainly with the exam simulator that gives you a danger to exercise with the appearance and experience of a real exam. This is a completely substantial brain dump, authentic examine guide. This is elusive for reducing side test.

IBM Assessment: IBM Notes and

IBM Cloud, Watson: suffering from OS/2 Warp Deja Vu? | Real Questions and Pass4sure dumps

IBM’s newest quarterly monetary consequences strengthen a growing subject: The know-how giant may additionally subsequently turn into an also-ran in the cloud computing and artificial intelligence markets. The present enterprise situation is a little bit akin to IBM in the Nineties — which tried and didn't make OS/2 the favored software platform for client-server computing — subsequently losing out to home windows pcs along with windows NT and Linux servers.

IBM CEO Ginni Rometty

part of IBM’s current issue includes the way it reviews economic consequences. with the aid of lumping collectively cloud and cognitive software revenue into one line item, the company may additionally truly be undermining a comparatively first rate (although far from stellar) cloud story.

For its Q1 of fiscal 2019, IBM the day past mentioned:

  • complete earnings of $18.182 billion, down from $19.072 billion within the corresponding quarter final yr.
  • Cloud and cognitive utility profits of $5.037 billion, down from $5.116 billion. (be aware: reading that one line, some media reports erroneously spoke of cloud revenues had been down. truly, the cloud revenues rose — which implies the cognitive piece of the enterprise is a laggard, even challenging IBM says cognitive functions revenues grew 4 p.c.)
  • internet income of $1.591 billion, down from $1.679 billion.
  • The salary beat Wall road’s expectations, however revenues have been in need of analyst expectations, SeekingAlpha says.

    IBM growth moves: blended consequences

    IBM CEO Ginni Rometty on account that 2012 has been reshaping the enterprise for boom markets equivalent to cloud capabilities, cognitive computing, cell, security and greater. IBM has also been selling off slow-growth or no-boom utility companies.

    The enterprise’s current status, commonly speakme, hasn’t impressed me. among the explanations:

  • Gartner says the global public cloud market will grow 17.three % in 2019. however IBM’s annual as-a-carrier run price grew handiest 10 percent year-over-year in Q1 2019. AWS and Azure are better and are starting to be far more swiftly.
  • The artificial intelligence market is anticipated to exceed $191 billion by means of 2024, representing a compound annual growth price of 37 % from about 2018, in keeping with this record. And yet it’s protected to assert that IBM’s personal cognitive software revenues were enormously flat and even perhaps down in some areas.
  • next Up: purple Hat received’t save IBM

    Amazon web services and Microsoft Azure are working away with the public cloud market, while Google Cloud Platform is as a minimum giving chase with some new and ingenious MSP-oriented moves.

    consequently, many ISVs (impartial application vendors) and MSPs are embracing multi-cloud administration ideas that extend across AWS and Azure — and, more and more, Google. IBM sometimes pops up in that multi-cloud management dialog — however now not generally enough, personally.

    IBM’s answer to the cloud challenge includes purchasing red Hat for hybrid-cloud application. The theory: crimson Hat business Linux (RHEL) is terribly common inside on-premises statistics centers and across public clouds. purchasing purple Hat, for this reason, offers IBM fast credibility as a multi-cloud and hybrid cloud utility provider.

    That’s proper. but there are three complications with the IBM-crimson Hat approach:

    Challenges and alternatives

    a number of bottom-line realities are rather clear:

    In different words, IBM leaders neglected the most critical factor of the cloud period — they didn’t make Watson convenient to devour.

    OS/2 Warp Deja Vu?: For me, it’s a case of deja vu. Roughly 25 years in the past, IBM OS/2 may have been the strongest operating device in the marketplace. however the premiere technology didn’t win as a result of (A) it changed into problematic to installation/devour and (B) lacked ISV help. quick ahead to current day, and identical traits are surfacing with IBM Cloud and Watson — principally as ISVs flock to Azure and AWS.

    When OS/2’s restricted alternatives became clear, IBM went out and bought Lotus Notes to circulation into the sooner-increase groupware collaboration market. It become a very good flow for a few decade — unless Microsoft trade Server finally crushed IBM in that sector.

    IBM: the place’s the Killer concept?

    quickly ahead to current day. IBM has practically misplaced the public cloud wars, and may purchase crimson Hat to try and win the hybrid cloud wars. Amid all that, IBM’s overall business is preserving up fairly neatly. overall cloud revenues are becoming.

    IBM CFO James Kavanaugh

    first rate earnings and money move will fund R&D, and there are further opportunities on the horizon. Chief among them: Areas like Blockchain and protection.

    In security, IBM delivered double-digit growth in Q1 2019, and has good traction with possibility administration utility and functions choices, together with QRadar and Resilient, CFO Jim Kavanaugh said all over the day gone by’s income name. additionally, IBM’s security intelligence operations and consulting functions, which notice and respond to security threats for shoppers, are gaining momentum, he added.

    these are promising anecdotes. however usual, it’s clear to me that IBM’s so-called strategic imperatives haven’t absolutely paid off for the enterprise, its customers or its companions.

    Can IBM's World Wire Be The answer To Cryptocurrency funds Or can they need more alternate options? | Real Questions and Pass4sure dumps

    If cryptocurrencies had been the flavour of 2017, and 2019 is all about commercial enterprise blockchain usage, then it is also vital to be aware the quiet amalgamation of these two that has been bubbling below: the institutionalised pass-border blockchain price answer.

    everybody knows that one in all Bitcoin’s most massive assets is its without boundary lines nature and that it can also be used as a go-border price answer. although, the decentralized nature of Bitcoin has hamstrung its frequent adoption somewhat, and several agencies have accordingly spotted a niche in the usual market.

    First, there turned into Ripple, one in every of most effective three blockchain-first agencies that turned into lately named within the Forbes Blockchain 50 checklist, that has made its mandate to companion with large and institutionalised financial institutions and banks. Ripple has, as of January this yr, introduced over 200 partnerships with well general monetary associations to present go-border charge solutions.

    Ripple, as a blockchain-first startup, turned into all the time in hazard of being usurped by way of trendy and strong names coming in to steal its market. Some believe this has already came about. JP Morgan Chase this 12 months also introduced its personal blockchain-primarily based move-border charge solution experiment, the JPM Coin.

    The competitive fight for a potential and doable solution has persevered as blockchain backer IBM has also come forward with their personal solution, the Blockchain World Wire. IBM already has a considerable stake in the burgeoning blockchain market with Hyperledger fabric essentially the most-used in the Forbes Blockchain 50 record, accounting for 26.

    So, the race is on to give a move-border blockchain price solution, but are these enterprise companies lacking the mark a bit of, and even missing their key market wholly? Many organizations and agencies may see the cost in the use of IBM’s answer, whereas the person in the street, who's bored stiff with the normal monetary gadget, might possibly be extra inclined to use decentralised alternatives like Bitcoin.

    however where is the attainable, easy to make use of, person-friendly option that makes cryptocurrencies and their go border competencies purchasable for all?

    professionals and Cons

    looking down the line of Ripple, JPM Coin, and World Wire, they are able to see right away that these cross-border payments are all vying for a similar market. Ripple desires to be the go-to for banks, JPM coin is born of a bank, and even the world Wire answer has purposes predominantly for fiscal and enterprise institutions.

    None of these options are designed for the different facet of the market; the buyers and the people who are looking to be able to profit on the effectivity and affordability of sending money across borders throughout the blockchain.

    Now, many here will say Bitcoin, and other cryptocurrencies, fill this niche; they're equipment for the people and supposed to aid people who are looking to work backyard of the normal financial regime. but, it ought to also be remembered that cryptocurrency adoption is nowhere near broad sufficient to attain essential mass.

    It capacity that on the one conclusion, the place JPM Coin and World Wire locate themselves, there are effective ties to the natural banking programs and the pain aspects that brings - when it comes to paperwork, legacy and shortage of innovation. Then, however, there is the decentralised cryptocurrency sphere which still has a large ‘Wild West’ recognition, this leaves a vast market stranded within the middle.

    “The greatest barrier for anything like World Wire to get off the ground is the normal banking equipment and its resistance to innovation,” explains Elizabeth White of The White company, a company attempting to supply cryptocurrency options that attraction to both patrons and corporations.

    “large intentional banks were using programs like SWIFT for decades and have entire ‘wire departments’ committed to processing transactions. while blockchain would significantly modernize, automate, at ease and speed up the complete method, it would require retraining and reworking a financial institution's complete operations to implement,” White spoke of.

    “IBM is using World Wire to compete with SWIFT for foreign financial institution transfers. whereas the system has loads of skills and has a true chance of supplanting SWIFT; people or organizations can not use World Wire, so that they would nevertheless should go during the standard banking process to ship international payments.”

    “for a lot of banks, moving to XRP, JPM Coin, or World Wire just isn't worth it because their consumers are not yet demanding the pace and competitively priced of blockchain transactions, and basically banks are making loads of revenue on wire charges and so forth.”

    “there's additionally some apprehension amongst many banking gurus about using ‘blockchain’ as a result of lamentably there are somewhat just a few that nonetheless don't bear in mind the technology and may even associate blockchain with money laundering, fully lacking the big anti-fraud prevention benefits of allotted ledger.”

    A hybrid equipment

    The evolution of the cryptocurrency space has been necessitated thanks to its turbulent and tumultuous previous. It began as this magical internet funds that might disrupt every sector imaginable and caught the imagination of swaths of americans, but it additionally opened the doors for fraudsters, scammers, and speculators.

    The backlash has been a an awful lot more controlled, regulated and measured method into 2019. This has opened one more door for the business businesses and important associations to join in, but these polarised aspects have left a large hole open within the middle.

    It is that this center floor of ‘no-coiners’ that continue to be, ready to be roped in... most likely when the appropriate equipment comes alongside, and that system is a doubtlessly mixture of the two facets we've now.

    White, and the White company, agree with they are on the right song to attain this left over goal market as they're proposing stability and safety of most important fiscal associations thanks to providing things like assurance from a massive UK bank Lloyds, as well as applying a blockchain, Stellar, which is additionally backed by means of IBM.

    however, they also feel that the providing of an easy to make use of and user-friendly front conclusion, with a solid coin, and alternatives to trade other cryptos, will aid entice even more clients.

    “Our funds platform, as an example, is developed on Stellar, which is a committed funds protocol supported by using IBM, Deloitte, Stripe and others, and is focused on optimizing pace and effectivity of funds,” provides White.

    if it is to be looked at throughout a spectrum - decentralised cryptocurrencies on one conclusion, enterprise cross-border blockchain solutions on the other - a center ground needs to be constructed and based. clients want the safety of banks and fiscal associations, devoid of the bureaucracy and legacy associated with it.

    A course to the long run

    it's fairly agreeable that blockchain tokens, digital assets, cryptocurrencies, or some thing type of label lands on them, are the longer term. but that future is still being laid out via the financial giants, as neatly because the decentralised communities.

    There does although deserve to be a center-out increase that will aid entice the big majority of clients into this new and mainly misunderstood space. If the corporations are looking for themselves and different massive companies, and the cryptocurrencies are getting used by those in the be aware of, the place is the ‘iPhone second’ that turns cryptos onto the mainstream?

    IBM Shares Down After income omit | Real Questions and Pass4sure dumps

    Shares of IBM had been down sharply in midday buying and selling after the enterprise mentioned mixed revenue outcomes Tuesday.

    The company’s profits became down practically 5% yr-over-yr, with every enterprise phase down or flat, however the company talked about that cloud earnings boom accelerated within the quarter and was up 10% over the ultimate twelve months at $19.5 billion.

    IBM pronounced income of $2.25 per share, compared with $2.22 per share expected by way of analysts, in response to Refinitiv. The company suggested earnings of $18.18 billion, in comparison with $18.forty six billion expected by way of analysts, in response to Refinitiv.

    The enterprise said it returned $2.3 billion to shareholders.

    “within the first quarter, their cloud income growth accelerated, and they once more grew in key, high-price areas in cloud and cognitive software and in consulting,” chairman and CEO Ginni Rometty pointed out in a statement. “IBM’s investments in creative technologies coupled with their industry talents and their commitment to believe and protection position us well to help consumers movement to chapter two of their digital reinvention.”

    IBM reiterated its advice of at least $13.90 in profits per share for 2019. Analysts surveyed by way of Refinitive anticipated $13.91 in earnings per share for the 12 months.

    The enterprise’s stock is up practically 28% because the starting of the year.

    In October, IBM introduced it was acquiring open-supply application and know-how distributor purple Hat in a deal valued at about $34 billion.

    That deal, after which red Hat would turn into a unit of IBM’s Hybrid Cloud division, is expected to close in the 2d half of the yr.

    “IBM is profitable new, even cloud-native, customers before pink Hat,” analysts at Nomura Instinet wrote in a observe to purchasers on April 9. “OpenShift [a Red Hat product] should support IBM win new customers and new workloads as organisations start to usher mission-essential functions from on-premise to public or deepest clouds.”


    Obviously it is hard assignment to pick solid certification questions/answers assets concerning review, reputation and validity since individuals get sham because of picking incorrectly benefit. ensure to serve its customers best to its assets concerning exam dumps update and validity. The vast majority of other's sham report objection customers come to us for the brain dumps and pass their exams cheerfully and effectively. They never trade off on their review, reputation and quality because killexams review, killexams reputation and killexams customer certainty is vital to us. Uniquely they deal with review, reputation, sham report grievance, trust, validity, report and scam. In the event that you see any false report posted by their rivals with the name killexams sham report grievance web, sham report, scam, dissension or something like this, simply remember there are constantly terrible individuals harming reputation of good administrations because of their advantages. There are a great many fulfilled clients that pass their exams utilizing brain dumps, killexams PDF questions, killexams hone questions, killexams exam simulator. Visit, their specimen questions and test brain dumps, their exam simulator and you will realize that is the best brain dumps site.

    Back to Braindumps Menu

    000-602 practice questions | 000-854 dump | 102-400 real questions | C2010-655 free pdf | 000-975 study guide | P9530-039 cram | LOT-409 real questions | LOT-986 questions and answers | HPE6-A47 test prep | HP0-850 braindumps | CPIM-BSP practice test | 70-339 free pdf | CCB-400 test prep | LE0-583 brain dumps | M2040-669 free pdf | 70-348 real questions | A2180-271 bootcamp | 310-560 test questions | C2150-612 mock exam | SQ0-101 examcollection |

    Get high marks in A2040-405 exam with these dumps
    We have Tested and Approved A2040-405 Exams think about aides and brain dumps. gives the correct and latest real questions with braindumps which basically contain all data that you have to pass the A2040-405 exam. With the guide of their A2040-405 exam materials, you dont need to misuse your chance on scrutinizing reference books however just need to consume 10-20 hours to retain their A2040-405 real questions and answers.

    As the most issue that's in any capability vital here is passing the A2040-405 - Assessment: IBM Notes and Domino 9.0 Social Edition System Administration U test. As all that you just need will be a high score of IBM A2040-405 exam. the solesolitary issue you wish to try to is downloading braindumps of A2040-405 exam. they are not letting you down and they will do every help to you pass your A2040-405 exam. The specialists in like manner keep step with the foremost best at school test to relinquish most of updated dumps. 3 Months free access to possess the power to them through the date of purchase. each candidate will bear the price of the A2040-405 exam dumps through requiring very little to no effort. there's no risk concerned the least bit. Inside seeing the existent braindumps of the brain dumps at you will be able to feel confident about the A2040-405 topics. For the IT specialists, It is basic to reinforce their capacities as showed by their work capabilities. they have an approach to build it basic for their customers to hold certification test with the assistance of confirmed and honest to goodness braindumps. For AN awing future in its domain, their brain dumps are the most effective call. Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under; WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for all exams on website PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders larger than $69 DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders larger than $99 SEPSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for All Orders A best dumps making will be a basic section that creates it simple for you to require IBM certifications. In any case, A2040-405 braindumps PDF offers settlement for candidates. The IT assertion will be a vital hard try if one does not realize real course as obvious practice test. Thus, they have got real and updated dumps for the composition of certification test.

    We have their professionals operating consistently for the gathering of actual exam questions of A2040-405. All the pass4sure questions and answers of A2040-405 collected by means of their organization are inspected and updated by means of their A2040-405 ensured group. They stay related to the competition showed up in the A2040-405 test to get their reviews about the A2040-405 exam, they acquire A2040-405 exam hints and traps, their revel in approximately the techniques utilized as a part of the actual A2040-405 exam, the mix-usathey completed inside the real test and after that enhance their material appropriately. When you enjoy their pass4sure questions and answers, you'll feel positive approximately every one of the topics of test and feel that your perception has been enormously progressed. These pass4sure questions and answers are not surely hone questions, those are actual exam questions and answers which will be sufficient to pass the A2040-405 exam in the beginning attempt.

    IBM certifications are very required crosswise over IT institutions. HR directors lean in the direction of applicants who've a comprehension of the subject matter, in addition to having finished certification exams in the situation. All the IBM certification help supplied on are recounted round the arena.

    It is actual to mention that you are attempting to find real exams questions and answers for the Assessment: IBM Notes and Domino 9.0 Social Edition System Administration U exam? They are right here to offer you one most up to date and first-class assets that is, They have amassed a database of questions from actual test with a purpose to provide you with a risk free plan and pass A2040-405 exam on the major undertaking. All training materials at the web site are innovative and checked via certified professionals.

    Why is the Ultimate choice for affirmation planning?

    1. A satisfactory object that Help You Prepare for Your Exam: is a definitive making plans hotspot for passing the IBM A2040-405 exam. They have deliberately consented and collected real exam questions and answers, which are up to date with an indistinguishable recurrence from actual exam is up to date, and investigated through enterprise specialists. Their IBM licensed experts from severa associations are capable and certified/confirmed humans who have investigated every inquiry and answer and explanation segment maintaining in mind the cease aim to allow you to comprehend the idea and pass the IBM exam. The maximum perfect approach to plan A2040-405 exam isnt perusing a route reading, however taking exercise actual questions and information the proper answers. Practice questions help set you up for the thoughts, as well as the approach in which questions and answer picks are introduced amid the real exam.

    2. Easy to recognize Mobile Device Access:

    killexams provide to a splendid diploma smooth to apply get right of entry to items. The concentration of the site is to present genuine, updated, and to the direct material toward enable you to have a look at and pass the A2040-405 exam. You can rapidly find the actual questions and answer database. The website is flexible amicable to allow prep anywhere, so long as you've got internet affiliation. You can really stack the PDF in portable and concentrate wherever.

    three. Access the Most Recent Assessment: IBM Notes and Domino 9.0 Social Edition System Administration U Real Questions and Answers:

    Our Exam databases are often updated for the duration of the time to include the maximum current real questions and answers from the IBM A2040-405 exam. Having Accurate, actual and modern-day actual exam questions, you may pass your exam on the main try!

    4. Their Materials is Verified through Industry Experts:

    We are doing struggle to giving you actual Assessment: IBM Notes and Domino 9.0 Social Edition System Administration U exam questions and answers, alongside explanations. Each on has been showed by IBM certified professionals. They are rather qualified and confirmed humans, who've severa times of professional revel in identified with the IBM exams.

    5. They Provide all Exam Questions and Include Detailed Answers with Explanations:

    Not at all like numerous other exam prep web sites, gives updated actual IBM A2040-405 exam questions, in addition to nitty gritty answers, explanations and charts. This is important to help the hopeful understand the proper answer, in addition to knowledges approximately the options that were incorrect. Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as beneath;
    WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for all exams on internet site
    PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders more than $69
    DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
    DECSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for All Orders

    A2040-405 | A2040-405 | A2040-405 | A2040-405 | A2040-405 | A2040-405

    Killexams SPS-202 sample test | Killexams 98-375 practice questions | Killexams 9A0-054 VCE | Killexams HP0-S23 study guide | Killexams M9510-664 braindumps | Killexams DAT free pdf | Killexams 132-S-916-2 braindumps | Killexams A2090-463 study guide | Killexams 000-052 free pdf download | Killexams 000-771 practice questions | Killexams 500-051 pdf download | Killexams C2180-279 brain dumps | Killexams NS0-320 questions and answers | Killexams 644-066 practice exam | Killexams 250-402 practice test | Killexams 70-516-VB exam prep | Killexams 000-533 test prep | Killexams C2140-842 questions and answers | Killexams HP2-K24 braindumps | Killexams 920-340 mock exam | huge List of Exam Braindumps

    View Complete list of Brain dumps

    Killexams 1Z0-858 exam prep | Killexams 000-M11 braindumps | Killexams 000-540 real questions | Killexams E20-350 test prep | Killexams HH0-220 questions and answers | Killexams 922-099 free pdf | Killexams QQ0-401 braindumps | Killexams 310-019 exam prep | Killexams 000-371 dump | Killexams 000-130 braindumps | Killexams 000-280 study guide | Killexams 000-842 practice questions | Killexams HP2-N35 practice test | Killexams NS0-156 real questions | Killexams C2050-219 free pdf download | Killexams 200-047 practice test | Killexams 250-308 Practice Test | Killexams CSSLP exam questions | Killexams M2150-756 brain dumps | Killexams 1Z1-052 real questions |

    Assessment: IBM Notes and Domino 9.0 Social Edition System Administration U

    Pass 4 sure A2040-405 dumps | A2040-405 real questions |

    IBM Drops Lotus Brand, Takes Notes and Domino Forward | real questions and Pass4sure dumps

    First Name: Last Name: E-mail Address: Password: Confirm Password: Username:

    Title: C-Level/President Manager VP Staff (Associate/Analyst/etc.) Director


    Role in IT decision-making process: Align Business & IT Goals Create IT Strategy Determine IT Needs Manage Vendor Relationships Evaluate/Specify Brands or Vendors Other Role Authorize Purchases Not Involved

    Work Phone: Company: Company Size: Industry: Street Address City: Zip/postal code State/Province: Country:

    Occasionally, they send subscribers special offers from select partners. Would you like to receive these special partner offers via e-mail? Yes No

    Your registration with Eweek will include the following free email newsletter(s): News & Views

    By submitting your wireless number, you agree that eWEEK, its related properties, and vendor partners providing content you view may contact you using contact center technology. Your consent is not required to view content or use site features.

    By clicking on the "Register" button below, I agree that I have carefully read the Terms of Service and the Privacy Policy and I agree to be legally bound by all such terms.


    Continue without consent      

    App development tools ease move to the Web | real questions and Pass4sure dumps

    App development tools ease move to the Web
  • By Barbara Depompa Reimers
  • Apr 19, 1998
  • Organizations such as Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, Calif., have found that one tool won't fill all their needs. As a result, vendors have begun to assemble groups of tools, such as Microsoft Corp.'s Visual Studio, IBM Corp.'s Visual Age and Sybase Inc.'s PowerStudio.

    "The best tools enable users to share information and components, not just a common look and feel," said Steve Clark, vice president of enterprise application development tools at Sybase, Emeryville, Calif.

    Los Alamos runs a broad mix of systems, databases and desktop client systems. For several years Los Alamos has turned to PowerBuilder, from Sybase's Powersoft Division, to build client/server applications.

    One of these applications, a procurement program called Procurement Desktop, developed by American Management Systems Inc. (AMS), Fairfax, Va., was renovated extensively so the requisitioning, workflow and reporting components could be migrated to the Web.

    The contracting module was not converted because only 100 users write contracts. Instead, all 7,000 users at Los Alamos wanted to order supplies, check on the status of orders or monitor their supply expenses.

    "They needed access to subsets of the function in [the] procurement application to gain better insights into their procurement needs," said Jeff Modell, Los Alamos' AMS project manager.

    Because the users had a variety of client systems with Windows, Unix and Macintosh operating systems, a new solution had to be found. "We moved the key pieces of the PowerBuilder code to a middle tier and then developed a front end in Java," Modell said. That way, all the users could run the application through their browsers and access the procurement application functions, which now reside as PowerBuilder components, on an application server. Meanwhile, the rest of the procurement application remains on a back-end relational database.

    Los Alamos renovated its procurement application with the help of at least three PowerBuilder tools that have since evolved into Sybase PowerStudio. The Sybase PowerJ Java tool, for example, enabled Los Alamos to "write once and debug everywhere, which is still simpler than writing the code over and over for each client platform," Modell said.

    And Los Alamos also incorporated a middle-tier transaction server, Sybase's Jaguar, to handle business transactions of the system.

    The Flexibility Factor

    The advantages of the Internet and intranets in terms of cost, speed and flexibility have led to an explosion of their use. International Data Corp., a Framingham, Mass.-based market research firm, predicts there will be 133 million intranet users worldwide by 2001. Also, 59 percent of U.S. organizations have an intranet, and by year's end that is expected to increase to 77 percent.

    Web deployment of former client/server-based applications is beneficial because it makes an application accessible to multiple client platforms, eliminating the need to worry about Windows 95 vs. Windows NT or Unix clients. This cross-platform functionality enables users to access functions from anywhere, unlike a traditional client/server environment.

    Also in contrast to client/server applications, all changes to an application on the Web can be done on the Web server, which saves time and resources because newly coded programs don't need to be loaded on each desktop system. Instead, the browser on each client system allows applications to be run over any Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol network from the Web server. This feature is what has enabled the Department of Housing and Urban Development to develop and maintain a Web-based list of lead assessment and abatement contractors in the last two years.

    The information on certified contractors in all 50 states is compiled daily from data collected in a variety of formats— including client/server databases and even Microsoft Word documents— from each state. HUD provides this critical information to the public via the Web, and there is also special phone and fax access to update the public about new contractors and regulations regarding lead levels.

    When the project was started more than two years ago, Lotus Development Corp.'s Notes and its Domino development environment "provided the only reliable means to compile the information from each state and translate that into [Hypertext Markup Language]-readable pages on their Web site," said Matthew Ammon, technical assistance specialist for HUD's Office of Lead Hazard Control.

    Several vendors said there is almost no difference in programming when a user deploys an application on the Web vs. on a standard client/server platform.

    Oracle Corp.'s Designer/2000, for example, was built for developing client/server and Web applications, said Abinash Tripathy, technologist at Oracle Government, Education and Health, Bethesda, Md. Programmers do not need to write additional code to deploy a client/server application on the Web. Of course, this means Web applications do not support any platform-specific standards, such as Microsoft's Object Linking and Embedding technology.

    "Oracle's goal is to be able to run on any hardware/OS platform that supports Java," Tripathy said.

    Depending on an agency's needs, Web-enabling a mainframe-based application may take place even before the application can be re-engineered for client/server deployment. The Government Printing Office, for example, has taken a legacy requisition system and deployed it on the Web, replacing the mainframe-based, green-screen technology with a new graphical user interface.

    "This way, they can leverage their mainframe systems investment and replace older applications in an orderly fashion while at the same time extending their life and usefulness via Web deployment," said Pat Gardner, director of GPO's Office of Information Resources Management.

    TransCanada Reports Strong Second Quarter 2017 Financial Results; Performance Highlights Diversified, Low Risk Business Strategy | real questions and Pass4sure dumps

    CALGARY, ALBERTA--(Marketwired - Jul 28, 2017) - TransCanada Corporation (TRP)(TRP) (TransCanada or the Company) today announced net income attributable to common shares for second quarter 2017 of $881 million or $1.01 per share compared to net income of $365 million or $0.52 per share for the same period in 2016. Comparable earnings for second quarter 2017 were $659 million or $0.76 per share compared to $366 million or $0.52 per share for the same period in 2016. TransCanada's Board of Directors also declared a quarterly dividend of $0.625 per common share for the quarter ending September 30, 2017, equivalent to $2.50 per common share on an annualized basis.

    "Our diversified portfolio of high-quality, low risk energy infrastructure assets continued to perform very well in the second quarter of 2017," said Russ Girling, TransCanada's president and chief executive officer. "Comparable earnings per share increased 46 per cent compared to second quarter 2016 primarily due to the Columbia acquisition in July 2016 and the realization of associated synergies, strong performance across their Natural Gas and Liquids Pipelines businesses and higher earnings from Bruce Power following a major planned outage in second quarter 2016. The growth in earnings was accompanied by a significant increase in net cash provided by operations which rose to $1.4 billion from $1.1 billion in the same period last year."

    "In the quarter, they added $2 billion of additional expansion projects on the NGTL System and today announced a $0.2 billion expansion on the Canadian Mainline, highlighting the organic growth opportunities that continue to emanate from their broad, strategically located asset base. They are now advancing a $24 billion near-term capital program that is expected to generate significant growth in earnings and cash flow and support an expected annual dividend growth rate at the upper end of an eight to 10 per cent range through 2020," added Girling. "To date they have invested $9.0 billion in these projects and are well positioned to both execute and fund the remainder of the program over the next few years. In addition, they concluded the sale of their U.S. Northeast merchant generation facilities, with proceeds used to fully retire the Columbia acquisition bridge facilities. With those sales complete, over 95 per cent of their future EBITDA is expected to be derived from regulated or long-term contracted assets."

    "We also continue to progress a number of additional medium to longer-term organic growth opportunities in their three core businesses of natural gas pipelines, liquids pipelines and energy in Canada, the United States and Mexico. Success in advancing Keystone XL or other growth initiatives, including the Bruce Power life extension, could further augment or extend the Company's dividend growth outlook," concluded Girling.

    (All financial figures are unaudited and in Canadian dollars unless noted otherwise)

    Net income attributable to common shares increased by $516 million to $881 million or $1.01 per share for the three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the same period last year. Net income per common share in 2017 includes the dilutive effect of issuing 161 million common shares in 2016. Second quarter 2017 results included a $265 million after-tax net gain on the monetization of the U.S. Northeast power assets which was comprised of a $441 million after-tax gain on the sale of TC Hydro and an incremental loss of $176 million after-tax on the sale of the thermal and wind package, an after-tax charge of $15 million for integration-related costs associated with the acquisition of Columbia and a $4 million after-tax charge related to the maintenance of Keystone XL assets. Second quarter 2016 included a charge of $113 million related to costs associated with the Columbia acquisition which were primarily related to the dividend equivalent payments on the subscription receipts issued as part of the permanent financing of the transaction, an after-tax $10 million restructuring charge related to expected future losses under lease commitments and $9 million after-tax related to Keystone XL maintenance and liquidation costs. All of these specific items as well as unrealized gains and losses from changes in risk management activities are excluded from comparable earnings.

    Comparable earnings for second quarter 2017 were $659 million or $0.76 per share compared to $366 million or $0.52 per share for the same period in 2016, an increase of $293 million or $0.24 per share and includes the dilutive effect of issuing 161 million common shares in 2016. The increase in second quarter comparable earnings was primarily due to higher contributions from U.S. Natural Gas Pipelines reflecting incremental earnings from Columbia following the July 1, 2016 acquisition and higher ANR transportation revenues resulting from higher rates effective August 1, 2016, higher earnings from Bruce Power mainly due to higher volumes resulting from fewer planned outage days, a higher contribution from Mexican Natural Gas Pipelines due to earnings from the Mazatlán and Topolobampo pipelines and higher earnings from Liquids Pipelines mainly due to higher volumes. These increases were partially offset by higher interest expense mainly as a result of debt assumed in the acquisition of Columbia and long-term debt issuances.

    Notable recent developments include:

    Natural Gas Pipelines:

  • NGTL System: In June, they announced an additional $2 billion expansion program, subject to regulatory approvals, supported by new contracted customer demand for approximately 3 Bcf/d of incremental firm receipt and delivery services. The expansion will also increase delivery capacity at the Alberta/British Columbia export delivery point by 381 MMcf/d to serve markets in the Pacific Northwest, California and Nevada. NGTL now has a $7.1 billion near-term capital program targeted for completion by 2021.
  • Canadian Mainline Tolling Option Open Season: In April, an application was filed with the National Energy Board (NEB) for approval of the long-term fixed-price service from the Empress receipt point in Alberta to the Dawn hub in Southern Ontario. The NEB is following a modified Streamlined Application Process with adjudication expected to follow after oral arguments are presented on September 11, 2017. The new service is requested to begin November 1, 2017.
  • Canadian Mainline Maple Compressor Expansion Project: The Canadian Mainline has received requests for expansion capacity to the southern Ontario market plus delivery to Atlantic Canada via the TQM and PNGTS systems. The requests for approximately 80 MMcf/d of firm service underpin the need for new compression at the existing Maple compressor site. Customers have executed 15-year precedent agreements to proceed with the estimated $160 million project. Once they have completed their tariff process for this capacity addition, an application to the NEB for approval to proceed with the project is planned for early 2018 to meet a November 1, 2019 in-service date.
  • Coastal GasLink: The continuing delay in the Final Investment Decision (FID) for the LNG Canada project has triggered a restructuring of provisions in the Coastal GasLink project agreement with LNG Canada that will result in the payment of certain amounts to TransCanada with respect to carrying charges on costs incurred since inception of the project. An approximate $80 million payment will be received in September 2017, followed by quarterly payments of approximately $7 million until further notice. They continue to work with LNG Canada under the agreement towards a FID.
  • Prince Rupert Gas Transmission: On July 25, 2017, they were notified that PNW LNG would not be proceeding with their proposed LNG project. As part of their PRGT agreement, following receipt of a termination notice, they would be reimbursed for the full costs and carrying charges incurred to advance the PRGT project. They expect to receive this payment later in 2017.
  • Sale of Iroquois and PNGTS to TC PipeLines, LP: On June 1, 2017, they sold a 49.34 per cent interest in Iroquois, together with their remaining 11.81 per cent interest in PNGTS, to their master limited partnership, TC PipeLines, LP for a value of US$765 million.
  • Leach XPress and Rayne XPress: They continue to advance construction on the US$1.5 billion Leach XPress and the US$0.4 billion Rayne XPress projects. Both projects are expected to enter service in November 2017.
  • Liquids Pipelines:

  • Keystone XL: On July 27, 2017, they launched an open season to solicit additional binding commitments from interested parties for transportation of crude oil on the Keystone Pipeline and for the Keystone XL Pipeline project from Hardisty, Alberta to markets in Cushing, Oklahoma and the U.S. Gulf Coast. The open season will close on September 28, 2017.
  • Grand Rapids: In June, the Grand Rapids pipeline commenced line fill activities with anticipated in-service in third quarter 2017.
  • Energy:

  • Monetization of U.S. Northeast power business: On April 19, 2017, they closed the sale of TC Hydro to Great River Hydro, LLC for US$1.07 billion resulting in a gain of $717 million ($441 million after-tax) recorded in second quarter 2017. On June 2, 2017, they completed the sale of Ravenswood, Ironwood, Ocean State Power and Kibby Wind to Helix Generation, LLC for US$2.029 billion. An additional loss of approximately $219 million ($176 million after-tax) was recorded in second quarter 2017, primarily related to an adjustment to the purchase price and repair costs for an unplanned outage at Ravenswood prior to close. Insurance recoveries for a portion of the repair costs are expected to be received by the end of 2017 which will partially reduce this loss. Proceeds from the sale transactions were used to fully retire the remaining bridge facilities that partially funded the acquisition of Columbia. They also initiated the monetization of their TransCanada Power Marketing Ltd. (TCPM) operations and will realize the value of the remaining marketing contracts and working capital over time.
  • Corporate:

  • Common Share Dividend: Their Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.625 per share for the quarter ending September 30, 2017 on TransCanada's outstanding common shares. The quarterly amount is equivalent to $2.50 per common share on an annualized basis.
  • Junior Subordinated Debt Issuance: In May 2017, TransCanada Trust issued $1.5 billion of 60-year Junior Subordinated Notes in Canada to third party investors with a fixed interest rate of 4.65 per cent for the first ten years converting to a floating rate thereafter. The notes are callable at par beginning ten years following their issuance. All of the proceeds of the issuance by the Trust were loaned to TransCanada PipeLines Limited (TCPL) in $1.5 billion of subordinated notes at a rate of 4.90 per cent which includes a 0.25 per cent administration charge.
  • Financing at TC PipeLines, LP: In May 2017, TC PipeLines, LP raised US$500 million from issuance of 10-year senior unsecured notes bearing an interest rate of 3.90 per cent.
  • Dividend Reinvestment Plan (DRP): Based on the most recent quarter, approximately 35 per cent of the common share dividends declared are being reinvested in TransCanada common shares through their DRP.
  • ATM Equity Issuance Program: In June 2017, they established an ATM program that allows us to issue common shares from treasury having an aggregate gross sales price of up to $1.0 billion or their U.S. dollar equivalent, from time to time, at their discretion, at the prevailing market price when sold through the Toronto Stock Exchange or the New York Stock Exchange. The ATM program, which is effective for a 25-month period, will be activated at their discretion, if and as required, based on the spend profile of TransCanada's capital program and relative cost of other funding options. At June 30, 2017, no common shares were issued under the program.
  • Teleconference and Webcast:

    We will hold a teleconference and webcast on Friday, July 28, 2017 to discuss their second quarter 2017 financial results. Russ Girling, TransCanada President and Chief Executive Officer, and Don Marchand, Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer, along with other members of the TransCanada executive leadership team, will discuss the financial results and Company developments at 9 a.m. (MT) / 11 a.m. (ET).

    Members of the investment community and other interested parties are invited to participate by calling 800.377.0758 or 416.340.2218 (Toronto area). Please dial in 10 minutes prior to the start of the call. No pass code is required. A live webcast of the teleconference will be available at

    A replay of the teleconference will be available two hours after the conclusion of the call until midnight (ET) on August 4, 2017. Please call 800.408.3053 or 905.694.9451 (Toronto area) and enter pass code 9154252.

    The unaudited interim condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Management's Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) are available under TransCanada's profile on SEDAR at, with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on EDGAR at and on the TransCanada website at

    With more than 65 years' experience, TransCanada is a leader in the responsible development and reliable operation of North American energy infrastructure including natural gas and liquids pipelines, power generation and gas storage facilities. TransCanada operates a network of natural gas pipelines that extends more than 91,500 kilometres (56,900 miles), tapping into virtually all major gas supply basins in North America. TransCanada is the continent's largest provider of gas storage and related services with 653 billion cubic feet of storage capacity. A large independent power producer, TransCanada owns or has interests in approximately 6,200 megawatts of power generation in Canada and the United States. TransCanada is also the developer and operator of one of North America's leading liquids pipeline systems that extends over 4,300 kilometres (2,700 miles) connecting growing continental oil supplies to key markets and refineries. TransCanada's common shares trade on the Toronto and New York stock exchanges under the symbol TRP. Visit and their blog to learn more, or connect with us on social media and 3BL Media.

    Forward Looking Information

    This release contains certain information that is forward-looking and is subject to important risks and uncertainties (such statements are usually accompanied by words such as "anticipate", "expect", "believe", "may", "will", "should", "estimate", "intend" or other similar words). Forward-looking statements in this document are intended to provide TransCanada security holders and potential investors with information regarding TransCanada and its subsidiaries, including management's assessment of TransCanada's and its subsidiaries' future plans and financial outlook. All forward-looking statements reflect TransCanada's beliefs and assumptions based on information available at the time the statements were made and as such are not guarantees of future performance. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on this forward-looking information, which is given as of the date it is expressed in this news release, and not to use future-oriented information or financial outlooks for anything other than their intended purpose. TransCanada undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking information except as required by law. For additional information on the assumptions made, and the risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ from the anticipated results, refer to the Quarterly Report to Shareholders dated July 27, 2017 and 2016 Annual Report filed under TransCanada's profile on SEDAR at and with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission at

    Non-GAAP Measures

    This news release contains references to non-GAAP measures, including comparable earnings, comparable EBITDA, comparable distributable cash flow, comparable funds generated from operations, comparable earnings per share and comparable distributable cash flow per share, that do not have any standardized meaning as prescribed by U.S. GAAP and therefore are unlikely to be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. These non-GAAP measures are calculated on a consistent basis from period to period and are adjusted for specific items in each period, as applicable. For more information on non-GAAP measures, refer to TransCanada's Quarterly Report to Shareholders dated July 27, 2017.

    Quarterly report to shareholders

    Second quarter 2017

    Financial highlights

    three months endedJune 30 six months endedJune 30 (unaudited - millions of $, except per share amounts) 2017 2016 2017 2016 Income Revenues 3,217 2,751 6,608 5,254 Net income attributable to common shares 881 365 1,524 617 per common share - basic $1.01 $0.52 $1.76 $0.88 - diluted $1.01 $0.52 $1.75 $0.88 Comparable EBITDA1 1,830 1,369 3,807 2,871 Comparable earnings1 659 366 1,357 860 per common share1 $0.76 $0.52 $1.56 $1.22 Cash flows Net cash provided by operations 1,353 1,148 2,655 2,229 Comparable funds generated from operations1 1,408 1,056 2,916 2,305 Comparable distributable cash flow1 936 702 2,158 1,676 per common share1 $1.08 $1.00 $2.49 $2.38 Capital spending - capital expenditures 1,792 982 3,352 1,818 - projects in development 56 90 98 157 - contributions to equity investments 473 114 665 284 Acquisitions, net of cash acquired - 4 - 999 Proceeds from sales of assets, net of transaction costs 4,147 - 4,147 6 Dividends declared Per common share $0.625 $0.565 $1.25 $1.13 Basic common shares outstanding (millions) Average for the period 870 703 868 703 End of period 871 703 871 703 (1) Comparable EBITDA, comparable earnings, comparable earnings per common share, comparable funds generated from operations, comparable distributable cash flow and comparable distributable cash flow per common share are all non-GAAP measures. See the non-GAAP measures section for more information.

    Management's discussion and analysis

    July 27, 2017

    This management's discussion and analysis (MD&A) contains information to help the reader make investment decisions about TransCanada Corporation. It discusses their business, operations, financial position, risks and other factors for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, and should be read with the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

    This MD&A should also be read in conjunction with their December 31, 2016 audited consolidated financial statements and notes and the MD&A in their 2016 Annual Report.


    We disclose forward-looking information to help current and potential investors understand management's assessment of their future plans and financial outlook, and their future prospects overall.

    Statements that are forward-looking are based on certain assumptions and on what they know and expect today and generally include words like anticipate, expect, believe, may, will, should, estimate or other similar words.

    Forward-looking statements in this MD&A include information about the following, among other things:

  • planned changes in their business
  • our financial and operational performance, including the performance of their subsidiaries
  • expectations or projections about strategies and goals for growth and expansion
  • expected cash flows and future financing options available to us
  • expected dividend growth
  • expected costs for planned projects, including projects under construction, permitting and in development
  • expected schedules for planned projects (including anticipated construction and completion dates)
  • expected regulatory processes and outcomes
  • expected impact of regulatory outcomes
  • expected outcomes with respect to legal proceedings, including arbitration and insurance claims
  • expected capital expenditures and contractual obligations
  • expected operating and financial results
  • expected impact of future accounting changes, commitments and contingent liabilities
  • expected industry, market and economic conditions.
  • Forward-looking statements do not guarantee future performance. Actual events and results could be significantly different because of assumptions, risks or uncertainties related to their business or events that happen after the date of this MD&A.

    Our forward-looking information is based on the following key assumptions, and subject to the following risks and uncertainties:


  • inflation rates, commodity prices and capacity prices
  • nature and scope of hedging
  • regulatory decisions and outcomes
  • foreign exchange rates
  • interest rates
  • tax rates
  • planned and unplanned outages and the use of their pipeline and energy assets
  • integrity and reliability of their assets
  • access to capital markets
  • anticipated construction costs, schedules and completion dates.
  • Risks and uncertainties

  • our ability to realize the anticipated benefits from the acquisition of Columbia
  • our ability to successfully implement their strategic initiatives
  • whether their strategic initiatives will yield the expected benefits
  • the operating performance of their pipeline and energy assets
  • amount of capacity sold and rates achieved in their pipeline businesses
  • the availability and price of energy commodities
  • the amount of capacity payments and revenues they receive from their energy business
  • regulatory decisions and outcomes
  • outcomes of legal proceedings, including arbitration and insurance claims
  • performance and credit risk of their counterparties
  • changes in market commodity prices
  • changes in the political environment
  • changes in environmental and other laws and regulations
  • competitive factors in the pipeline and energy sectors
  • construction and completion of capital projects
  • costs for labour, equipment and materials
  • access to capital markets
  • interest, tax and foreign exchange rates
  • weather
  • cyber security
  • technological developments
  • economic conditions in North America as well as globally.
  • You can read more about these factors and others in reports they have filed with Canadian securities regulators and the SEC, including the MD&A in their 2016 Annual Report.

    As actual results could vary significantly from the forward-looking information, you should not put undue reliance on forward-looking information and should not use future-oriented information or financial outlooks for anything other than their intended purpose. They do not update their forward-looking statements due to new information or future events, unless they are required to by law.


    You can find more information about TransCanada in their annual information form and other disclosure documents, which are available on SEDAR (


    This MD&A references the following non-GAAP measures:

  • comparable earnings
  • comparable earnings per common share
  • comparable EBITDA
  • comparable EBIT
  • funds generated from operations
  • comparable funds generated from operations
  • comparable distributable cash flow
  • comparable distributable cash flow per common share.
  • These measures do not have any standardized meaning as prescribed by U.S. GAAP and therefore may not be similar to measures presented by other entities.

    Comparable measures

    We calculate comparable measures by adjusting certain GAAP and non-GAAP measures for specific items they believe are significant but not reflective of their underlying operations in the period. These comparable measures are calculated on a consistent basis from period to period and are adjusted for specific items in each period, as applicable.

    Our decision not to adjust for a specific item is subjective and made after careful consideration. Specific items may include:

  • certain fair value adjustments relating to risk management activities
  • income tax refunds and adjustments and changes to enacted tax rates
  • gains or losses on sales of assets
  • legal, contractual and bankruptcy settlements
  • impact of regulatory or arbitration decisions relating to prior year earnings
  • restructuring costs
  • impairment of goodwill, investments and other assets including certain ongoing maintenance and liquidation costs
  • acquisition costs.
  • We exclude the unrealized gains and losses from changes in the fair value of derivatives used to reduce their exposure to certain financial and commodity price risks. These derivatives generally provide effective economic hedges, but do not meet the criteria for hedge accounting. As a result, the changes in fair value are recorded in net income. As these amounts do not accurately reflect the gains and losses that will be realized at settlement, they do not consider them reflective of their underlying operations.

    The following table identifies their non-GAAP measures against their equivalent GAAP measures.

    Comparable measure Original measure comparable earnings net income attributable to common shares comparable earnings per common share net income per common share comparable EBITDA segmented earnings comparable EBIT segmented earnings comparable funds generated from operations net cash provided by operations comparable distributable cash flow net cash provided by operations

    Comparable earnings and comparable earnings per share

    Comparable earnings represent earnings or loss attributable to common shareholders on a consolidated basis adjusted for specific items. Comparable earnings is comprised of segmented earnings, interest expense, AFUDC, interest income and other, income taxes and non-controlling interests adjusted for the specific items. See the Consolidated results section for a reconciliation to net income attributable to common shares.

    Comparable EBIT and comparable EBITDA

    Comparable EBIT represents segmented earnings adjusted for the specific items described above. They use comparable EBIT as a measure of their earnings from ongoing operations as it is a useful measure of their performance and an effective tool for evaluating trends in each segment. Comparable EBITDA is calculated the same way as comparable EBIT but excludes the non-cash charges for depreciation and amortization. See the Reconciliation of non-GAAP measures section for a reconciliation to segmented earnings.

    Funds generated from operations and comparable funds generated from operations

    Funds generated from operations reflects net cash provided by operations before changes in operating working capital. They believe it is a useful measure of their consolidated operating cash flow because it does not include fluctuations from working capital balances, which do not necessarily reflect underlying operations in the same period, and is used to provide a consistent measure of the cash generating performance of their assets. Comparable funds generated from operations is adjusted for the cash impact of specific items noted above. See the Financial condition section for a reconciliation to net cash provided by operations.

    Comparable distributable cash flow and comparable distributable cash flow per share

    We believe comparable distributable cash flow is a useful supplemental measure of performance that defines cash available to common shareholders before capital allocation. Comparable distributable cash flow is defined as comparable funds generated from operations less preferred share dividends, distributions to non-controlling interests and maintenance capital expenditures. Maintenance capital expenditures are expenditures incurred to maintain their operating capacity, asset integrity and reliability, and include amounts attributable to their proportionate share of maintenance capital expenditures on their equity investments. Although they deduct maintenance capital expenditures in determining comparable distributable cash flow, in certain of their rate-regulated businesses, maintenance capital expenditures are included in their respective rate bases, on which they earn a regulated return and recover depreciation through future tolls. See the Financial condition section for a reconciliation to net cash provided by operations.

    Consolidated results - second quarter 2017

    Certain costs previously reported in their Corporate segment are now being reported within the business segments to better align with how they measure their financial performance. 2016 results have been adjusted to reflect this change.

    three months endedJune 30 six months endedJune 30 (unaudited - millions of $, except per share amounts) 2017 2016 2017 2016 Canadian Natural Gas Pipelines 305 342 587 614 U.S. Natural Gas Pipelines 401 188 962 455 Mexico Natural Gas Pipelines 120 41 238 86 Liquids Pipelines 251 198 478 410 Energy 645 371 843 245 Corporate (40 ) (24 ) (73 ) (51 ) Total segmented earnings 1,682 1,116 3,035 1,759 Interest expense (524 ) (514 ) (1,024 ) (934 ) Allowance for funds used during construction 121 111 222 212 Interest income and other 89 6 109 106 Income before income taxes 1,368 719 2,342 1,143 Income tax expense (393 ) (274 ) (593 ) (344 ) Net income 975 445 1,749 799 Net income attributable to non-controlling interests (55 ) (52 ) (145 ) (132 ) Net income attributable to controlling interests 920 393 1,604 667 Preferred share dividends (39 ) (28 ) (80 ) (50 ) Net income attributable to common shares 881 365 1,524 617 Net income per common share - basic $1.01 $0.52 $1.76 $0.88 - diluted $1.01 $0.52 $1.75 $0.88

    Net income attributable to common shares increased by $516 million and $907 million or $0.49 and $0.88 per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the same periods in 2016. Net income per common share in 2017 included the dilutive effect of issuing 161 million common shares in 2016.

    The 2017 results included:

  • a $255 million after-tax net gain related to the monetization of their U.S. Northeast power business, which included a $441 million after-tax gain on the sale of TC Hydro in second quarter, an incremental loss of $176 million after tax recorded in second quarter on the sale of the thermal and wind package and $10 million year-to-date of after-tax disposition costs
  • an after-tax charge of $15 million in second quarter and $39 million year-to-date for integration-related costs associated with the acquisition of Columbia
  • an after-tax charge of $4 million in second quarter and $11 million year-to-date related to the maintenance of Keystone XL assets which is being expensed pending further advancement of the project
  • a $7 million income tax recovery in first quarter related to the realized loss on a third party sale of Keystone XL project assets. A provision for the expected pre-tax loss on these assets was included in their 2015 impairment charge, but the related income tax recoveries could not be recorded until realized.
  • The 2016 results included:

  • a $176 million after-tax impairment charge in first quarter on the carrying value of their Alberta PPAs as a result of their decision to terminate the PPAs
  • a charge of $113 million in second quarter and $139 million year-to-date related to costs associated with the acquisition of Columbia. In second quarter, $109 million related to the dividend equivalent payments on the subscription receipts issued as part of the permanent financing of the transaction, $10 million ($36 million year-to-date) related to acquisition costs and $6 million related to interest earned on the subscription receipt funds held in escrow
  • an after-tax charge of $9 million in second quarter and $15 million year-to-date related to Keystone XL costs for the maintenance and liquidation of project assets which are being expensed pending further advancement of the project
  • an after-tax charge of $10 million in second quarter for restructuring charges mainly related to expected future losses under lease commitments. These charges formed part of a restructuring initiative, which commenced in 2015, to maximize the effectiveness and efficiency of their existing operations and reduce overall costs
  • an additional $3 million after-tax loss on the sale of TC Offshore which closed on March 31, 2016.
  • Net income in all periods included unrealized gains and losses from changes in risk management activities which they exclude, along with the above-noted items, to arrive at comparable earnings.

    Comparable earnings increased by $293 million and $497 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the same periods in 2016 as discussed below in the reconciliation of net income to comparable earnings.


    three months endedJune 30 six months endedJune 30 (unaudited - millions of $, except per share amounts) 2017 2016 2017 2016 Net income attributable to common shares 881 365 1,524 617 Specific items (net of tax): Net gain on sales of U.S. Northeast power assets (265 ) - (255 ) - Integration and acquisition related costs - Columbia 15 113 39 139 Keystone XL asset costs 4 9 11 15 Keystone XL income tax recoveries - - (7 ) - Alberta PPA terminations - - - 176 Restructuring costs - 10 - 10 TC Offshore loss on sale - - - 3 Risk management activities1 24 (131 ) 45 (100 ) Comparable earnings 659 366 1,357 860 Net income per common share $1.01 $0.52 $1.76 $0.88 Specific items (net of tax): Net gain on sales of U.S. Northeast power assets (0.30 ) - (0.29 ) - Integration and acquisition related costs - Columbia 0.02 0.16 0.04 0.20 Keystone XL asset costs - 0.01 0.01 0.02 Keystone XL income tax recoveries - - (0.01 ) - Alberta PPA terminations - - - 0.25 Restructuring costs - 0.01 - 0.01 Risk management activities 0.03 (0.18 ) 0.05 (0.14 ) Comparable earnings per common share $0.76 $0.52 $1.56 $1.22 (1) Risk management activities three months endedJune 30 six months endedJune 30 (unaudited - millions of $) 2017 2016 2017 2016 Canadian Power 3 20 4 7 U.S. Power (94 ) 204 (156 ) 89 Liquids marketing 4 4 4 2 Natural Gas Storage (4 ) - 1 5 Foreign exchange 41 (4 ) 56 49 Income tax attributable to risk management activities 26 (93 ) 46 (52 ) Total unrealized (losses)/gains from risk management activities (24 ) 131 (45 ) 100

    Comparable earnings increased by $293 million or $0.24 per share for the three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016. This was primarily the net effect of:

  • higher contribution from U.S. Natural Gas Pipelines due to incremental earnings from Columbia following the July 1, 2016 acquisition and higher ANR transportation revenues resulting from a FERC-approved rate settlement effective August 1, 2016
  • higher earnings from Bruce Power mainly due to higher volumes resulting from fewer planned outage days
  • higher interest expense mainly as a result of debt assumed in the acquisition of Columbia on July 1, 2016 and long-term debt issuances
  • higher contribution from Mexico Natural Gas Pipelines due to earnings from Topolobampo beginning in July 2016 and Mazatlán beginning in December 2016
  • higher earnings from Liquids Pipelines mainly due to higher volumes.
  • Comparable earnings increased by $497 million or $0.34 per share for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016. This was primarily the net effect of:

  • higher contribution from U.S. Natural Gas Pipelines due to incremental earnings from Columbia following the July 1, 2016 acquisition and higher ANR transportation revenues resulting from a FERC-approved rate settlement effective August 1, 2016
  • higher interest expense as a result of debt assumed in the acquisition of Columbia on July 1, 2016 and long-term debt issuances
  • higher contribution from Mexico Natural Gas Pipelines due to earnings from Topolobampo beginning in July 2016 and Mazatlán beginning in December 2016
  • higher earnings from Bruce Power mainly due to higher volumes resulting from fewer planned outage days partially offset by higher interest expense
  • higher earnings from Liquids Pipelines mainly due to higher volumes
  • higher earnings from Western Power following the termination of the Alberta PPAs in March 2016.
  • Comparable earnings per share in 2017 included the dilutive effect of issuing 161 million common shares in 2016.

    Capital Program

    We are developing quality projects under their capital program. These long-life infrastructure assets are supported by long-term commercial arrangements with creditworthy counterparties or regulated business models and are expected to generate significant growth in earnings and cash flow.

    Our capital program consists of approximately $24 billion of near-term projects and approximately $43 billion of medium to longer-term projects. Amounts presented exclude maintenance capital expenditures, capitalized interest and AFUDC. All projects are subject to cost adjustments due to market conditions, route refinement, permitting conditions, scheduling and timing of regulatory permits.

    Near-term projects

    at June 30, 2017 Expected in-service date Estimated project cost Carrying value (unaudited - billions of $) Canadian Natural Gas Pipelines Canadian Mainline 2017-2019 0.5 0.2 NGTL System1 2017 2.3 1.2 2018 0.3 - 2019 2.2 0.3 2020 1.9 0.1 2021+ 0.4 - U.S. Natural Gas Pipelines Columbia Gas Leach XPress 2017 US 1.5 US 0.9 Modernization I 2017 US 0.2 US 0.1 WB XPress 2018 US 0.8 US 0.3 Mountaineer XPress 2018 US 2.0 US 0.2 Modernization II 2018-2020 US 1.1 - Columbia Gulf Rayne XPress 2017 US 0.4 US 0.3 Cameron Access 2018 US 0.3 US 0.2 Gulf XPress 2018 US 0.6 US 0.1 Midstream - Gibraltar 2017 US 0.3 US 0.2 Mexico Natural Gas Pipelines Tula 2018 US 0.6 US 0.4 Villa de Reyes 2018 US 0.6 US 0.3 Sur de Texas2 2018 US 1.3 US 0.4 Liquids Pipelines Grand Rapids2 2017 0.9 0.8 Northern Courier 2017 1.0 1.0 White Spruce 2018 0.2 - Energy Napanee 2018 1.1 0.8 Bruce Power - life extension3 up to 2020+ 1.0 0.2 21.5 8.0 Foreign exchange impact on near-term projects4 2.9 1.0 Total near-term projects (billions of Cdn$) 24.4 9.0 (1) As of June 30, 2017, near-term NGTL System capital projects are being reported by expected in-service dates. (2) Our proportionate share. (3) Amounts reflect their proportionate share of the remaining capital costs that Bruce Power expects to incur on its life extension investment programs in advance of major refurbishment outages which are expected to begin in 2020. (4) Reflects U.S./Canada foreign exchange rate of $1.30 at June 30, 2017.

    Medium to longer-term projects

    The medium to longer-term projects have greater uncertainty with respect to timing and estimated project costs. The expected in-service dates of these projects are post-2020, and costs provided in the schedule below reflect the most recent costs for each project as filed with the various regulatory authorities or otherwise determined. These projects have all been commercially secured or, in the case of Keystone XL, commercial support is expected to be achieved. All these projects are subject to approvals that include sponsor FID and/or complex regulatory processes.

    at June 30, 2017 Segment Estimated project cost Carrying value (unaudited - billions of $) Heartland and TC Terminals Liquids Pipelines 0.9 0.1 Upland Liquids Pipelines US 0.6 - Grand Rapids Phase 21 Liquids Pipelines 0.7 - Bruce Power - life extension1 Energy 5.3 - Keystone projects Keystone XL2 Liquids Pipelines US 8.0 US 0.3 Keystone Hardisty Terminal2 Liquids Pipelines 0.3 0.1 Energy East projects Energy East3 Liquids Pipelines 15.7 0.8 Eastern Mainline Canadian Natural Gas Pipelines 2.0 0.1 BC west coast LNG-related projects Coastal GasLink Canadian Natural Gas Pipelines 4.8 0.4 NGTL System - Merrick Canadian Natural Gas Pipelines 1.9 - 40.2 1.8 Foreign exchange impact on medium to longer-term projects4 2.6 0.1 Total medium to longer-term projects (billions of Cdn$) 42.8 1.9 (1) Our proportionate share. (2) Carrying value reflects amount remaining after impairment charge recorded in fourth quarter 2015. (3) Excludes transfer of Canadian Mainline natural gas assets. (4) Reflects U.S./Canada foreign exchange rate of $1.30 at June 30, 2017.


    Our overall comparable earnings outlook for 2017 is expected to be higher than what was previously included in the 2016 Annual Report as a result of stronger performance across their business segments, including from the U.S. Northeast power business in first half 2017, as detailed in the MD&A.

    Consolidated capital spending

    Our expected total capital expenditures, projects in development and contributions to equity investments for 2017 as outlined in the 2016 Annual Report, remain unchanged.

    Canadian Natural Gas Pipelines

    The following is a reconciliation of comparable EBITDA and comparable EBIT (our non-GAAP measures) to segmented earnings (the equivalent GAAP measure). Certain costs previously reported in their Corporate segment are now being reported within the business segments to better align with how they measure their financial performance. 2016 results have been adjusted to reflect this change.

    ... three months endedJune 30 six months endedJune 30

    Direct Download of over 5500 Certification Exams

    3COM [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AccessData [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACFE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Acme-Packet [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACSM [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Admission-Tests [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ADOBE [93 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AFP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AICPA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AIIM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Alcatel-Lucent [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Alfresco [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Altiris [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Amazon [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    American-College [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Android [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APICS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Apple [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AppSense [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APTUSC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Arizona-Education [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ARM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Aruba [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASIS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASQ [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASTQB [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Autodesk [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Avaya [101 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AXELOS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Axis [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Banking [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BEA [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BICSI [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BlackBerry [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BlueCoat [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Brocade [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Business-Objects [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Business-Tests [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CA-Technologies [20 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Certification-Board [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Certiport [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CheckPoint [43 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIPS [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cisco [318 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Citrix [48 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIW [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cloudera [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cognos [19 Certification Exam(s) ]
    College-Board [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CompTIA [76 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ComputerAssociates [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Consultant [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Counselor [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CPP-Institute [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CSP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CWNA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CWNP [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CyberArk [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Dassault [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DELL [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DMI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DRI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ECCouncil [22 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ECDL [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    EMC [128 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Enterasys [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Ericsson [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ESPA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Esri [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ExamExpress [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Exin [40 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ExtremeNetworks [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    F5-Networks [20 Certification Exam(s) ]
    FCTC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Filemaker [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Financial [36 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Food [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Fortinet [14 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Foundry [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    FSMTB [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Fujitsu [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GAQM [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Genesys [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GIAC [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Google [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GuidanceSoftware [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    H3C [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HDI [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Healthcare [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HIPAA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hitachi [30 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hortonworks [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hospitality [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HP [752 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HR [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HRCI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Huawei [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hyperion [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IAAP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IAHCSMM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IBM [1533 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IBQH [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ICAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ICDL [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IEEE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IELTS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IFPUG [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IIBA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IISFA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Intel [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IQN [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IRS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISACA [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISC2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISEB [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Isilon [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISM [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    iSQI [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ITEC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Juniper [65 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LEED [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Legato [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Liferay [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Logical-Operations [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Lotus [66 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LPI [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LSI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Magento [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Maintenance [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    McAfee [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    McData [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Medical [68 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Microsoft [375 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Mile2 [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Military [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Misc [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Motorola [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    mySQL [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NBSTSA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCEES [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCLEX [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Network-General [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NetworkAppliance [39 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NIELIT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Nokia [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Nortel [130 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Novell [37 Certification Exam(s) ]
    OMG [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Oracle [282 Certification Exam(s) ]
    P&C [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Palo-Alto [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PARCC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PayPal [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Pegasystems [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PEOPLECERT [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PMI [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Polycom [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PostgreSQL-CE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Prince2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PRMIA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PsychCorp [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PTCB [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    QAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    QlikView [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Quality-Assurance [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RACC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Real Estate [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Real-Estate [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RedHat [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RES [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Riverbed [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RSA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Sair [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Salesforce [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SANS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SAP [98 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SASInstitute [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SAT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SCO [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SCP [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SDI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    See-Beyond [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Siemens [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Snia [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SOA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Social-Work-Board [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SpringSource [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SUN [63 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SUSE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Sybase [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Symantec [135 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Teacher-Certification [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    The-Open-Group [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    TIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Tibco [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Trainers [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Trend [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    TruSecure [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    USMLE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    VCE [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Veeam [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Veritas [33 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Vmware [58 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Wonderlic [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Worldatwork [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    XML-Master [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Zend [6 Certification Exam(s) ]

    References :

    Vimeo :
    Issu :
    Dropmark :
    Wordpress :
    weSRCH :
    Scribd :
    Dropmark-Text :
    Youtube :
    Blogspot :
    RSS Feed : :
    Google+ :
    Calameo : : : : "Excle"

    Back to Main Page

    Killexams exams | Killexams certification | Pass4Sure questions and answers | Pass4sure | pass-guaratee | best test preparation | best training guides | examcollection | killexams | killexams review | killexams legit | kill example | kill example journalism | kill exams reviews | kill exam ripoff report | review | review quizlet | review login | review archives | review sheet | legitimate | legit | legitimacy | legitimation | legit check | legitimate program | legitimize | legitimate business | legitimate definition | legit site | legit online banking | legit website | legitimacy definition | pass 4 sure | pass for sure | p4s | pass4sure certification | pass4sure exam | IT certification | IT Exam | certification material provider | pass4sure login | pass4sure exams | pass4sure reviews | pass4sure aws | pass4sure security | pass4sure cisco | pass4sure coupon | pass4sure dumps | pass4sure cissp | pass4sure braindumps | pass4sure test | pass4sure torrent | pass4sure download | pass4surekey | pass4sure cap | pass4sure free | examsoft | examsoft login | exams | exams free | examsolutions | exams4pilots | examsoft download | exams questions | examslocal | exams practice | | | |