Features and Amenities
Features and Amenities:
Wifi ready study area
Gym and Function Room
Features and Amenities:
2 Lap Pools
Ground Floor Commercial Areas
Features and Amenities:
3 Swimming Pools
Gym and Fitness Center
Outdoor Basketball Court
Contact us today for a no obligation quotation:
Copyright © 2018 SMDC :: SM Residences, All Rights Reserved.
Exam Questions Updated On :
250-323 exam Dumps Source : Data Protection Administration for(R) Windows using NBU 5.0
Test Code : 250-323
Test Name : Data Protection Administration for(R) Windows using NBU 5.0
Vendor Name : Symantec
: 201 Real Questions
terrific supply contemporary actual test questions, correct solutions.
I had taken the 250-323 coaching from the killexams.com as that changed into a pleasing platform for the training and that had ultimately given me the satisfactory stage of the training to get the top class scores in the 250-323 check tests. I definitely enjoyed the way I were given the topics finished inside the interesting way and via the assist of the identical; I had eventually have been given the element on the line. It had made my steering plenty less complicated and with the help of the killexams.com I have been able to grow nicely inside the lifestyles.
You just need a weekend to prepare 250-323 exam with these dumps.
killexams.com material are exactly as incredible, and the percent. Spreads all that it need to blanket for an in depth exammaking plans and that i solved 89/a hundred questions using them. I were given every one in each of them by way ofmaking plans for my exams with killexams.com and exam Simulator, so this one wasnt an exemption. I am capable of guarantee you that the 250-323 is a ton tougher than past tests, so get organized to sweat and tension.
Where can I get 250-323 real exam questions and answers?
Word of mouth is a totally robust manner of advertising for a product. I say, while some thing is so desirable, why no longerdo a few excessive nice exposure for it I would really like to spread the phrase approximately this one of a type and absolutely notable killexams.com which helped me in acting outstandingly well in my 250-323 exam and exceeding all expectations. I might say that this killexams.com is one of the most admirable online coaching ventures i have ever come upon and it deserves quite some popularity.
Feeling issue in passing 250-323 exam? you obtain to be kidding!
Every topic and area, every scenario, killexams.com 250-323 materials have been great help for me while preparing for this exam and actually doing it! I was nervous, but going back to this 250-323 and thinking that I know everything because the 250-323 exam was very easy after the killexams.com stuff, I got a good result. Now, doing the next level of Symantec certifications.
i found a exquisite supply for 250-323 dumps
Just cleared 250-323 exam with top score and have to thank killexams.com for making it possible. I used 250-323 exam simulator as my primary information source and got a solid passing score on the 250-323 exam. Very reliable, Im happy I took a leap of faith purchasing this and trusted killexams. Everything is very professional and reliable. Two thumbs up from me.
Surprised to see 250-323 latest questions in little price.
I put together human beings for 250-323 exam problem and refer all for your web site for further evolved making equipped. This is positively the excellent website that offers sturdy exam material. This is the quality asset I recognize of, as i have been going to numerous locales if no longer all, and i have presumed that killexams.com Dumps for 250-323 is virtually up to speed. A whole lot obliged killexams.com and the exam simulator.
real 250-323 test questions! i used to be no longer watching for such shortcut.
I wound up the exam with a satisfying 84% marks in stipulated time. thank you very plenty killexams. via and by, it become tough to do top to bottom test intending with a full-time work. At that factor, I became to the of killexams. Its concise answers helped me to see a few complex topics. I selected to take a seat for the exam 250-323 to reap in addition advancement in my career.
got no trouble! three days schooling trendy 250-323 real exam questions is required.
i have renewed my membership this time for 250-323 exam. I be given my involvement with killexams.com is so vital it isnt always feasible surrender through not having a membership. I am able to simply agree with killexams.com exams for my exam. just this web site can help me obtain my 250-323 accredition and assist me in getting above ninety five% marks inside the exam. You all are certainly making an outstanding displaying. preserve it up!
Unbelieveable! but proper source of 250-323 real take a look at questions.
This exam instruction package covered the questions i was asked at the exam - a few thing I didnt be given as real with might be viable. So the stuff they provide is in fact valid. It appears to be often updated to holdup with the professional updates made to 250-323 exam. Superb first-class, the attempting out engine runs effortlessly and can be very consumer pleasant. there is not anything I dont like approximately it.
Its appropriate to study books for 250-323 exam, however make certain your achievement with those .
It ended up being a frail department of expertise to plot. I required a e-book which could kingdom query and answer and i without a doubt allude it. killexams.com Questions & answers are singularly in charge of every final one in all credits. a whole lot obliged killexams.com for giving nice conclusion. I had endeavored the exam 250-323 exam for 3 years continuously but couldnt make it to passing score. I understood my hole in information the subject of creating a session room.
Apr 05, 2019 (American news Hour by the use of COMTEX) -- Overview:
The cybersecurity industry is among the fastest growing industries, which provide giant economic opportunities but face continuous evolving cyber terrorism and statistics breaches targeting a considerable number of sectors, principally executive, BFSI, energy & utilities, and schooling amongst many others. With the company operations more and more relying on the web and networks, cybersecurity is becoming an enormous challenge. With more and more variety of methods being related, making the lateral circulation and compromising the systems by way of malicious codes have become effortless for attackers, which may cause more harm to the organizations in addition to their shoppers.
APTs are essentially the most prolonged cyberattacks with the purpose of stealing sensitive and private counsel from the focused organization. Combating the APT requires a continuous effort and combination of a considerable number of tools and options for performing tasks extra impulsively and successfully. APT protection solutions, via combining dissimilar tools and strategies, assist the centered organization in responding to threats more rapidly, actively, and conveniently.
Request For sample@https://www.kennethresearch.com/sample-request-10078173
in response to Infoholic research, the world advanced persistent risk protection market is anticipated to develop at a CAGR of 18.1% right through the forecast duration to reach profits of $16.2 billion by 2024. There are large growth opportunities for the APT insurance policy market as a result of a variety of components akin to improving the visibility and control across the organization community, decreasing the company hazards via preventing and responding to APT assaults, and securing the extremely confidential and delicate guidance from being stolen with the aid of the attackers. in response to a number of recent surveys, greater than 65% of the safety breaches worldwide were found months after the incident. hence, detecting the APT assaults on the appropriate time permits agencies to steer clear of fiscal losses and damage to the company identify.
Market Segmentation evaluation:
The record gives in-depth qualitative insights and validated market forecast or projections in response to certain assumptions and old facts. The projections and tendencies featured within the report have been derived the use of confirmed research methodologies and assumptions based on the carriers' portfolio, blogs, whitepapers, and dealer presentations. as a result, the analysis report represents every aspect of the market and is segmented in accordance with regional markets, solutions, services, and verticals.
The report covers and analyzes the advanced persistent threat coverage market. foremost companies throughout distinctive verticals are planning for prime investments during this market, and in consequence, the market is expected to develop at an magnificent expense in the coming years. the important thing players are adopting quite a lot of biological as well as inorganic growth thoughts akin to mergers & acquisitions, collaborations & partnerships, joint ventures, and few different suggestions to be within the potent place available in the market.The file contains an in-depth analysis of the vendors' profile, which includes fiscal health, company instruments, key business priorities, SWOT, ideas, and views. The renowned vendors covered within the record consist of IBM service provider, Cisco, Palo Alto Networks, trend Micro, Symantec supplier, FireEye, Forcepoint, SecureWorks, McAfee, and Fortinet amongst many others. The companies had been recognized based on the portfolio, geographical presence, advertising and marketing & distribution channels, earnings technology, and significant investments in R&D.
IBM, Cisco, Symantec, and Palo Alto Networks are the important thing avid gamers within the advanced persistent hazard protection market. In 2017, IBM bought Agile 3 solutions, LLC for adding capabilities to the enterprise's protection portfolio. In 2018, Cisco obtained Duo safety to expand its cloud and security capabilities. Symantec, in 2018, bought Javelin Networks for enhancing its endpoint safety company. Palo Alto Networks, in 2017, acquired LightCyber Ltd., for including behavioral analytics within the offerings for reinforcing the functionality of the platform.
The document additionally contains the finished insights of the business and aims to give a chance for the rising and centered players to keep in mind the market trends, existing scenario, initiatives taken by way of the govt, and the newest technologies involving the market. in addition, it helps the challenge capitalists in figuring out the organizations improved and to take informed selections.
North the usa held the largest market share in 2017 and is expected to dominate the advanced persistent danger insurance plan market right through the forecast period. The market in this vicinity is expected to develop because of the increasing number of cyber assaults and stringent government rules. The governments of the U.S. and Canada are witnessing more than 12% of the upward thrust in cybercrimes on a every year foundation. The governments in these international locations are investing heavily in the cybersecurity and making compliance requirements for combating APTs in a proactive method. in the US, the present compliance typical has made it obligatory for corporations to have IT safety options, which contain protection counsel and experience management (SIEM).
The document offers an in-depth analysis of the advanced persistent hazard protection market. APT protection solutions enhance the visibility and manage across the organization IT environment, together with the network and all endpoints, which is essential for fighting APTs. by using conserving against the APTs, the businesses can raise the safety of themselves as well as their consumers. APT insurance plan solutions help in monitoring the community, combating the intrusions, and detecting the ambiguity. APT insurance policy solutions assist corporations across a number of verticals in combating against these superior threats by means of featuring the layered safety method. The report discusses the market in terms of options, capabilities, verticals, and regions. extra, the file provides details concerning the primary challenges impacting the market increase.
examine extra@ https://www.kennethresearch.com/file-details/global-superior-persistent-chance-insurance plan-market/10078173
About Kenneth research
Kenneth research is a reselling agency presenting market analysis options in diverse verticals akin to automobile and Transportation, chemical compounds and substances, Healthcare, food & Beverage and buyer Packaged goods, Semiconductors, Electronics & ICT, Packaging, and Others. Their portfolio contains set of market analysis insights corresponding to market sizing and market forecasting, market share evaluation and key positioning of the avid gamers (producers, deals and distributors, etc), realizing the competitive landscape and their company at a floor level and many greater. Their research specialists carry the offerings effectively and without difficulty within a stipulated time. The market study supplied by way of Kenneth research helps the trade veterans/investors to believe and to behave wisely in their common method formula
electronic mail : email@example.com
telephone:+1 313 462 0609
The put up superior Persistent possibility protection Market forecast up to 2024. Key gamers are IBM, Cisco, Symantec, and Palo Alto Networks. appeared first on the united states news Hour.
Title: C-level/President manager VP team of workers (affiliate/Analyst/etc.) Directorfunction:
position in IT resolution-making process: Align company & IT dreams Create IT method verify IT needs manage supplier Relationships evaluate/Specify brands or vendors other function Authorize Purchases now not worriedWork mobile: business: enterprise size: industry: road handle metropolis: Zip/postal code State/Province: country:
occasionally, they send subscribers special presents from select companions. Would you want to get hold of these special companion presents by means of e mail? sure No
Your registration with Eweek will include here free email publication(s): information & Views
through submitting your instant quantity, you settle that eWEEK, its linked properties, and vendor partners proposing content material you view can also contact you the usage of contact center know-how. Your consent is not required to view content material or use web page aspects.
Registercontinue with out consent
Endpoint security products from CrowdStrike and Symantec each made eSecurity Planet's listing of precise end factor detection and response (EDR) solutions – and while each product has plenty to offer commercial enterprise valued clientele, there are key ameliorations between them. What follows an evaluation of each answer's key points, as well as some strengths and weaknesses.The bottom line
both options are rated tremendously by using users in addition to trade analysts. CrowdStrike's cloud architecture makes deployment unusually short and straightforward, though the indisputable fact that it's far much less valuable offline makes it unsuitable for air-gapped networks. Symantec presents each an on-premises solution and a cloud-based one, offering a much broader range of alternate options for consumers – but it's often considered as being extra complicated to manipulate than its opponents.CrowdStrike EDR Highlights
Overview: CrowdStrike Falcon insight leverages signatureless AI and indicator-of-assault (IOA) primarily based risk prevention to give protection to users from every kind of cyberattacks. Falcon offers contextualized probability intelligence with particulars on the probability, and a 5-second search device allows for teams to discover and investigate current and ancient possibility recreation by means of going lower back one 2d, sooner or later or 12 months of exercise. The solution’s cloud-based structure is designed to give speedy response with out inserting any stress on consumers' endpoints.
recent tendencies: improvements over the last one year consist of:
Analysts' take: Gartner says the aggregate of Falcon OverWatch with Falcon insight EDR is exceptionally compelling for agencies with small or no SOC groups. The Falcon insight EDR agent provides parity across windows, Mac OS and Linux techniques, and purchasers record essential and easy deployments, partly as a result of the solution's cloud architecture. still, the analysis enterprise says Falcon's EDR performance requires expert technical workforce to use, and its offline coverage is vastly more suitable when related to the cloud-primarily based Falcon platform, making it unsuitable for air-gapped (at ease, isolated) networks.Symantec EDR Highlights
Overview: Symantec EDR makes use of behavioral evaluation on the endpoint and AI-based analytics within the cloud to discover advanced attacks. The answer gives a comprehensive set of detection, investigation and remediation capabilities for all ranges of investigators, together with automated investigation playbooks and user behavior analytics. Incident responders can straight away search, determine and comprise impacted endpoints whereas investigating threats using a call of on-premises and cloud-based mostly sandboxing.
contemporary developments: improvements over the remaining one year encompass:
Analysts' take: Gartner says Symantec is the primary supplier to present malware insurance plan, EDR, equipment hardening and deception capabilities in a single agent, and its broad deployment across a extremely massive inhabitants of each client and enterprise endpoints offers it a really vast view into the risk landscape throughout many verticals. still, the analysis firm says Symantec is perceived as greater advanced and aid-intensive to control than its competitors, and its managed protection services are extra high priced than these from more recent suppliers.EDR Product scores
here are eSecurity Planet's ratings of every solution's key elements.
performance: shoppers of both carriers record solid efficiency, with minimal affect on endpoints. the most contemporary Forrester Wave report on EDR solutions gave CrowdStrike the optimum ranking of all EDR carriers validated – four.fifty six out of 5 – and gave Symantec a ranking of two.72 out of 5. The score is in keeping with a number of criteria, together with configurability, agent effectiveness, forensic capabilities, deployment alternate options and response moves.
Detection and response: In recent testing, Forrester rated CrowdStrike's detection capabilities at 4.8 out of 5, and its response capabilities at four.6 out of 5. Symantec's detection capabilities had been rated at 2.0 out of 5, and its response capabilities at four.2 out of 5. Symantec customers file greater chance detection and containment with the addition of machine discovering and other advanced anti-malware aspects, Gartner noted.
cost: whereas CrowdStrike is more high priced than many other solutions, cloud records storage and managed detection and response are included. Symantec offers managed functions, but these services are greater expensive than these from other providers.
Implementation and management: CrowdStrike's cloud architecture makes deployment specifically effortless, whatever thing clients time and again cite in studies. Symantec offers each cloud-primarily based and on-premises alternatives, making it better suited for hybrid environments. each options require knowledgeable technical team of workers to manipulate, although managed detection and response functions can be found.
support: Gartner says Symantec consumers file inconsistent assist experiences, even when huge agencies are supplied with dedicated assist personnel. nevertheless, some reviewers pointed out the identical of CrowdStrike's tech support.
Cloud elements: both agencies present cloud-based solutions, however CrowdStrike's offering is only cloud-based mostly, giving Symantec the facet in hybrid environments.
Gartner Peer Insights users give CrowdStrike Falcon an average ranking of 4.6 out of 5, with Symantec EDR following at a standard of 4.0 stars out of 5. IT critical Station clients supply CrowdStrike 4.0 stars out of 5, and Symantec 4.1 out of 5.
CrowdStrike reviewers repeatedly noted the product’s ease of deployment, calling it "short and easy to deploy" and reporting that "the sensor is in reality lightweight and has no longer been substantial when operating on even useful resource-limited computers." other reviewers wrote that "the movements administration of this solution is manageable," and that CrowdStrike has "a different proposition with their cloud-based approach as neatly as the research crew."
Symantec reviewers pointed out that "implementation was convenient." They stated "brief whitelisting and blacklisting and informative reporting" as key benefits, including that the solution "has supplied visibility insights that they had been not receiving from different items." an extra reviewer noted the product "fits very well with their existing processes and techniques," calling it "an excellent product to give protection to your environment."
examine extra reports written with the aid of clients of CrowdStrike and Symantec.Deployment
The CrowdStrike Falcon platform is fully cloud-primarily based, enabling it to be deployed inside hours, and helps home windows, Mac and Linux techniques.
Symantec EDR presents cloud, on-premises and hybrid deployment models, and supports home windows, Mac and Linux methods.Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon insight is obtainable for an annual subscription charge per endpoint, with a free trial accessible. AWS gives some pricing information.
Symantec EDR is priced per person per yr, with volume discounting. Trials are available. CDW offers some pricing info.
While it is hard errand to pick solid certification questions/answers assets regarding review, reputation and validity since individuals get sham because of picking incorrectly benefit. Killexams.com ensure to serve its customers best to its assets as for exam dumps update and validity. The greater part of other's sham report objection customers come to us for the brain dumps and pass their exams cheerfully and effortlessly. They never bargain on their review, reputation and quality because killexams review, killexams reputation and killexams customer certainty is imperative to us. Extraordinarily they deal with killexams.com review, killexams.com reputation, killexams.com sham report grievance, killexams.com trust, killexams.com validity, killexams.com report and killexams.com scam. On the off chance that you see any false report posted by their rivals with the name killexams sham report grievance web, killexams.com sham report, killexams.com scam, killexams.com protestation or something like this, simply remember there are constantly terrible individuals harming reputation of good administrations because of their advantages. There are a great many fulfilled clients that pass their exams utilizing killexams.com brain dumps, killexams PDF questions, killexams questions, killexams exam simulator. Visit Killexams.com, their example questions and test brain dumps, their exam simulator and you will realize that killexams.com is the best brain dumps site.
501-01 dumps questions | MOFF-EN exam prep | 70-354 free pdf | EC0-349 braindumps | 9L0-007 test prep | 201 questions answers | GB0-363 practice test | A2040-986 real questions | 000-995 pdf download | 312-49v8 practice test | HP0-743 real questions | HP0-876 practice questions | 310-600 mock exam | CAT-020 study guide | 9A0-042 study guide | HP0-J61 free pdf | HP2-N47 exam prep | 000-056 VCE | 1Z0-062 brain dumps | 00M-229 examcollection |
Never miss these 250-323 questions you go for test.
We are doing great struggle to provide you actual Data Protection Administration for(R) Windows using NBU 5.0 exam questions and answers, alongside explanations. Each question on killexams.com has been confirmed by Symantec certified specialists. They are exceptionally qualified and confirmed people, who have numerous times of expert experience identified with the Data Protection Administration for(R) Windows using NBU 5.0 exam. Memorizing their real questions is enough to pass 250-323 exam with high marks.
Symantec 250-323 is ubiquitous all round the international, and also the business and package program answers are being embraced with the help of nearly all the organizations. Comprehensive power of Symantec test prep products are taken into prepation a very crucial qualification, and also the specialists certified through them are quite valued in the IT Industry. killexams.com Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as below; WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for all exam on web site PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders additional than $69 DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders over $99 SEPSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for All Orders At killexams.com, they have an approach to provide Symantec 250-323 actual Questions and Answers that are recently needed for Passing 250-323 exam. they have an approach to really guide people to reinforce their information to recollect the and guarantee. It is a best call to hurry up your position as a professional within the business. Click http://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/250-323
The most ideal approach to get achievement in the Symantec 250-323 exam is that you should procure tried and true braindumps. They guarantee that killexams.com is the most direct pathway toward ensuring Symantec Data Protection Administration for(R) Windows using NBU 5.0 exam. You will be triumphant with full surety. You can see free questions at killexams.com before you buy the 250-323 exam items. Their impersonated tests are in various choice the same As the real exam plan. The questions and answers collected by the guaranteed experts. They give you the experience of stepping through the real exam. 100% certification to pass the 250-323 real test.
killexams.com Symantec Certification consider guides are setup by IT specialists. Packs of understudies have been crying that unreasonably various questions in such enormous quantities of preparing exams and study associates, and they are as of late tired to deal with the cost of any more. Seeing killexams.com masters work out this broad shape while still certification that all the data is anchored after significant research and 250-323 exam. Everything is to make comfort for contenders on their road to 250-323 accreditation.
We have Tested and Approved 250-323 Exams. killexams.com gives the correct and latest IT exam materials which basically contain all data centers. With the guide of their 250-323 brain dumps, you don't need to waste your chance on scrutinizing reference books and just need to consume 10-20 hours to expert their 250-323 real questions and answers. Likewise, they outfit you with PDF Version and Software Version exam questions and answers. For Software Version materials, Its offered to give indistinguishable experience from the Symantec 250-323 exam in a real situation.
We give free updates. Inside authenticity period, if 250-323 brain dumps that you have purchased updated, they will suggest you by email to download latest form of . If you don't pass your Symantec Data Protection Administration for(R) Windows using NBU 5.0 exam, They will give you full refund. You need to send the verified copy of your 250-323 exam report card to us. Consequent to confirming, they will quickly give you FULL REFUND.
If you prepare for the Symantec 250-323 exam using their testing programming. It is definitely not hard to win for all certifications in the primary attempt. You don't need to deal with all dumps or any free deluge/rapidshare all stuff. They offer free demo of each IT Certification Dumps. You can take a gander at the interface, question quality and accommodation of their preparation exams before you buy.
killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
WC2017: 60% Discount Coupon for all exams on website
PROF17: 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
DEAL17: 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
DECSPECIAL: 10% Special Discount Coupon for All Orders
250-323 | 250-323 | 250-323 | 250-323 | 250-323 | 250-323
Killexams CN0-201 practice questions | Killexams A01-250 exam prep | Killexams 212-055 study guide | Killexams CGFNS Practice Test | Killexams 000-784 brain dumps | Killexams LOT-841 mock exam | Killexams 000-M234 cram | Killexams I10-002 study guide | Killexams SCNP-EN bootcamp | Killexams C2040-958 pdf download | Killexams 3302 free pdf | Killexams 250-309 exam questions | Killexams 300-165 practice test | Killexams DP-023X braindumps | Killexams VCS-409 examcollection | Killexams BCBA real questions | Killexams HP0-M54 cheat sheets | Killexams 1Z1-456 sample test | Killexams 1Z0-864 exam prep | Killexams ST0-074 test questions |
Killexams 000-580 test prep | Killexams HP2-Z16 braindumps | Killexams 1Z0-348 brain dumps | Killexams 9L0-612 free pdf | Killexams 300-206 questions and answers | Killexams 000-448 test questions | Killexams HP0-S26 Practice Test | Killexams EUCOC exam questions | Killexams HP0-Y46 examcollection | Killexams CFR-210 real questions | Killexams PgMP exam prep | Killexams 650-153 braindumps | Killexams 1T6-510 cheat sheets | Killexams 9L0-403 exam prep | Killexams MSC-121 mock exam | Killexams 050-650 practice test | Killexams BCP-710 real questions | Killexams C9060-521 VCE | Killexams CCD-333 study guide | Killexams AngularJS pdf download |
From July to August 2001, 2000 healthy subjects (99.6% of whom were men), with a mean (±SD) age of 25.2±6.25 years (range, 18 to 62) were randomly assigned to receive either rHEV vaccine or placebo (Figure 1). Follow-up ended in January 2004. The study groups (with 1000 subjects in each) were similar with respect to mean age, sex, and rates of withdrawal from the study. A total of 1566 subjects were followed for a median of 804 days.Vaccine Efficacy
The data and safety monitoring board reviewed 111 episodes of acute hepatitis and certified 87 definite cases of hepatitis E (see the Supplementary Appendix, available with the full text of this article at www.nejm.org, for details regarding the 24 subjects who were deemed not to have hepatitis E). Of the 87 subjects with definite hepatitis E, 84 were icteric and 3 were anicteric (all in the placebo group). The median duration of illness for the 87 subjects was 29 days (interquartile range, 23 to 39); the median maximum serum alanine aminotransferase level was 1248 U per liter (interquartile range, 756 to 1995), and the median maximum total bilirubin level was 9.0 mg per deciliter (154 μmol per liter) (interquartile range, 6.6 to 13.1 mg per deciliter [113 to 224 μmol per liter]).Table 1. Table 1. Efficacy of the rHEV Vaccine against HEV.
The primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy of a three-dose vaccination course. During the period from 14 days after the administration of the third dose until the end of the study, hepatitis E developed in 69 subjects: 3 in the vaccine group (0.3%) and 66 in the placebo group (7.4%) (P<0.001 by Fisher's exact test). The efficacy of the vaccine was 95.5% (95% CI, 85.6 to 98.6) (Table 1). By logistic regression, neither age (<25 years in 1117 subjects and ≥25 years in 677 subjects) nor the level of prevaccination antibody to rHEV (≤10 WR U per milliliter in 1692 subjects and >10 WR U per milliliter in 102 subjects) had an effect on vaccine efficacy (see the Supplementary Appendix).
A secondary objective was to evaluate the efficacy of a two-dose vaccination course. During the period from 14 days after the administration of the second dose until the time of administration of the third dose, hepatitis E developed in eight subjects: one in the vaccine group (0.1%) and seven in the placebo group (0.7%) (P=0.07 by Fisher's exact test). Among these subjects, the vaccine efficacy was 85.7% (95% CI, −16.0 to 98.2) (Table 1).Figure 2. Figure 2. Cumulative Hazard of Hepatitis E.
The cumulative hazard of a first hepatitis E episode (i.e., the incidence rate) was estimated as a minus-log transformation (log data to nonlog data) of the Kaplan–Meier survival curve during the period after the administration of the first dose of study drug until the end of the study among all subjects who received at least one dose of either vaccine or placebo. The numbers below the graph are the numbers of patients in each group remaining under surveillance at 100-day intervals. The difference between subjects who received placebo and those who received vaccine was significant (P<0.001 by the log-rank test). Vaccine efficacy from the first dose, calculated with the Cox regression model, was 89.9% (95% CI, 77.9 to 94.5%).
An intention-to-treat analysis was performed to estimate the vaccine's efficacy when administered during ongoing disease transmission. From randomization, HEV infection developed in 87 subjects: 9 in the vaccine group (0.9%) and 78 in the placebo group (7.8%) (P<0.001 by Fisher's exact test). Among these subjects, the efficacy of the vaccine, on the basis of the relative risk, was 88.5% (95% CI, 77.1 to 94.2) (Table 1). The cumulative incidence of HEV infection as a hazard-ratio curve, plotted for the vaccine group and the placebo group to analyze the time until infection, differed between groups; efficacy as calculated by the Cox-regression model was 89.9% (95% CI, 77.9 to 94.5) (P<0.001 by the log-rank test) (Figure 2).
In nine subjects in the vaccine group, hepatitis E developed after the following intervals after the administration of the first vaccine dose: 1, 13, 13, 30, 194, 665, 694, 706, and 767 days. Hepatitis E developed in the first four subjects before they received the second dose; all had an acute-illness antibody pattern that was consistent with a primary response (ratio of anti-rHEV IgM to anti-rHEV immunoglobulin, >0.1), suggesting that HEV infection occurred before they received the first dose of vaccine. Infection developed in the remaining five subjects months after they had been vaccinated with the first dose; all had an acute-illness antibody pattern that was consistent with an anamnestic response (ratio of anti-rHEV IgM to anti-rHEV immunoglobulin, <0.1, with a markedly elevated level of anti-rHEV immunoglobulin), suggesting that infection occurred despite vaccination. The subject with an illness onset on day 194 had received one vaccine dose; the subject with an illness onset on day 706 had received two vaccine doses 223 days apart, and the subjects with an illness onset on days 665, 694, and 767 had received a third vaccine dose 187, 180, and 182 days, respectively, after the first dose.Vaccine Safety Table 2. Table 2. Rates of Symptoms Reported to Investigators (Reactogenicity Subgroup) during the 8-Day Period after the Administration of Any of Three Doses of Study Drug.
The two study groups had a similar rate of loss to follow-up (21.8% in the vaccine group and 20.7% in the placebo group), implying similar overall tolerability of the study treatment. The rates of reporting of symptoms in the reactogenicity subgroup when subjects were questioned by investigators were similar between groups, except for subjects who had pain at the injection site (Table 2). The proportions of subjects spontaneously reporting any adverse event were similar in the two study groups (in the reactogenicity subgroup, 28.0% in the vaccine group and 27.0% in the placebo group; in the total vaccinated cohort minus the reactogenicity subgroup, 25.2% in the vaccine group and 24.9% in the placebo group). Likewise, the proportions of subjects who spontaneously reported any adverse event that prevented them from engaging in normal activities were similar in the two groups (in the total vaccinated cohort minus the reactogenicity subgroup, 3.3% in the vaccine group and 3.0% in the placebo group).
The proportions of subjects reporting any serious adverse event, excluding acute hepatitis E, were similar in the two groups: 13.5% in the vaccine group and 13.7% in the placebo group. Subjects in the placebo group had 5.7% more serious adverse events owing to acute hepatitis E than did those in the vaccine group. The most common category of adverse events was infections (excluding hepatitis E), which accounted for 73 of 135 events in the vaccine group and 73 of 137 events in the placebo group. The most frequent diagnosis, excluding hepatitis E, was enteric fever (in 2.0% of subjects in the vaccine group and 2.4% in the placebo group). Among all serious adverse events, which were stratified according to body system and diagnosis, rates of events were similar in the two groups except for leptospirosis (0.2% in the vaccine group and 1.2% in the placebo group). However, the difference probably resulted from differential testing, since only subjects with a clinical diagnosis of hepatitis were tested for leptospirosis (see the Supplementary Appendix). Seven subjects died during the study, six in the vaccine group (four in combat, one from cholangiocarcinoma, and one from an undetermined cause 130 days after a second vaccination) and one in the placebo group (after a vehicle accident). The data and safety monitoring board did not consider any of the deaths to be related to vaccination.Antibody Response Figure 3. Figure 3. Antibody Response to rHEV Vaccine.
Panel A shows the proportion of subjects who had a level of antibody to rHEV of at least 20 WR U per milliliter in each study group. Panel B shows the geometric mean concentration of antibody to rHEV. In the calculation of the geometric mean concentration, values below the assay cutoff of 20 WR U per milliliter were coded as 10 WR U per milliliter. In both panels, I bars indicate 95% CIs.
Among subjects in the immunogenicity subgroup who received vaccine, 81.3% had a level of anti-rHEV immunoglobulin of at least 20 WR U per milliliter 1 month after the second vaccine dose, and 100% had this level 1 month after the third vaccine dose; by the end of the study, the proportion had declined to 56.3%. In contrast, the proportion of such subjects in the placebo group rose to 10.6%, reflecting the rate of HEV infection (Figure 3A). Vaccination elicited antibody responses that differed with respect to the geometric mean concentration between the groups from 1 month after the administration of the second dose until the end of the study (Figure 3B).
Synopsis: Contributing editor Michael Maines takes a detailed look at closed-cell spray foam, which is growing in popularity as an insulation material. Maines identifies its advantages—a high R-value per inch, a capacity for air-sealing and for blocking water-vapor movement, and its enhancement of the framing-to-sheathing connection. He then discusses its disadvantages—including high cost, messiness and potential health risks, and the fact that it can’t be used in many transitional areas where air leakage is high. But Maines focuses primarily on closed-cell foam as a contributor to global warming because of the blowing agent that is used in most closed-cell foams, which is over a thousand times worse than carbon dioxide.
Closed-cell polyurethane spray foam is amazing stuff. It’s a great insulator, with a higher R-value per inch than almost any other commonly available material. (Polyisocyanurate foam can be equivalent, but it varies with product and temperature.) When installed at least an inch or two thick, it essentially blocks water vapor and air movement. It even has some structural benefits: It’s good at adhering sheathing to framing, and it also enhances racking resistance. Thanks to these qualities and more, including strong marketing from the industry, foam is only getting more popular. Unfortunately, it also has some serious issues that aren’t typically discussed outside of greenbuilding circles. Understanding these drawbacks may convince you to limit its use to those special situations in which it makes the most sense, or even to avoid it entirely.
Polyurethane foam starts as two containers of liquid chemicals, referred to as the “A” side (isocyanates, the primary component of the solid foam) and the “B” side (a blend of resins, catalysts, a blowing agent, a flame retardant, and other compounds). When combined at installation, the chemicals react to create a polymer filled with tiny bubbles. The bubbles, or cells, are filled with a blowing agent and provide the insulating value, while the polymer forms the cell walls.
The ingredient that makes closed-cell foam special is the blowing agent—typically HFC245fa—but that’s also its biggest drawback.
HFC245fa is a hydrofluorocarbon refrigerant and a persistent greenhouse gas; it goes up into the atmosphere and stays there, preventing heat from escaping the earth. Carbon dioxide is commonly used as a measure of the damage a greenhouse gas can do, and HFC245fa is considered 1030 times worse than CO2. The only common building product more potent is the blowing agent in conventional XPS rigid foam. According to the Environmental Protection Agency, “Although [HFCs] represent a small fraction of the current total volume of [greenhouse gas] emissions, their warming impact is very strong. HFC emissions are projected to increase substantially over the next several decades if left unregulated” (from EPA Rule 21 Fact Sheet).
A couple of representatives from the spray-foam industry offered two corrections to my article.
Also, my wording for the section about the quantity of foam in an average house wasn’t clear. An average-size house of about 2400 sq. ft.—either a single-story home on a slab with an insulated cathedral ceiling, or a two-story home with an insulated attic and a spray-foamed full basement insulated to meet code in one of the colder climate zones—requires between 4000 and 5000 lb. of foam. That’s using the LTTR (aged R-value) for foam.
To view the entire article, please click the View PDF button below.More about spray-foam insulation:
Get home building tips, offers, and expert advice in your inbox× View PDF
Chiaramonte F, Greenberg P, Johnson WL, Weislogel M. Strange behavior: the odd effects of microgravity help nasa and its partners advance physical science and innovative technologiesIn NASA’s Magazine for Business & Technology vol 15. NASA: Washington, DC, USAWashington, DC, USA, 2011.
Drehman AJ, Greer AL, Turnbull D. Bulk formation of a metallic glass: Pd40Ni40P20. Appl Phy Lett 1982; 41: 716–717.
Kui HW, Greer AL, Turbull D. Formation of a bulk metallic glass by fluxing. Appl Phy Lett 1984; 45: 615–616.
Johnson WL. Bulk glass-forming metallic alloys: science and technology. MRS Bull 1999; 24: 42–56.
Telford M. The case for bulk metallic glass. Mater Today 2004; 7: 36–43.
Hays CC, Kim CP, Johnson WL. Microstructure controlled shear band pattern formation and enhanced plasticity of bulk metallic glasses containing in situ formed ductile phase dendrite dispersions. Phy Rev Lett 2000; 84: 2901–2904.
Szuecs F, Kim CP, Johnson WL. Mechanical properties of Zr56.2Ti13.8Nb5.0Cu6.9Ni5.6Be12.5 ductile phase reinforced bulk metallic glass composite. Acta Mater 2001; 49: 1507–1513.
Hofmann DC, Suh JY, Wiest A, Duan G, Lind ML, Demetriou MD et al. Designing metallic glass matrix composites with high toughness and tensile ductility. Nature 2008; 415: 1085–1089.
Hofmann DC, Suh JY, Wiest A, Lind ML, Demetriou MD, Johnson WL. Development of tough, low-density titanium-based bulk metallic glass matrix composites with tensile ductility. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008; 105: 20136–20140.
Hofmann DC. Bulk metallic glasses and their composites: a brief history of diverging fields. J Mater 2013; 2013: 1–8.
Klement W, Willens RH, Duwez P. Non-crystalline structure in solidified gold-silicon alloys. Nature 1960; 187: 869–870.
Lee MC, Kendall JM, Johnson WL. Spheres of the metallic glass Au55Pb22.5Sb22.5 and their surface characteristics. Appl Phy Lett 1982; 40: 382–384.
Fecht HJ, Johnson WL. A conceptual approach for noncontact calorimetry in space. Rev Sci Instrum 1991; 62: 1299–1303.
Wunderlich RK, Lee DS, Johnson WL, Fecht HJ. Noncontact modulation calorimetry of metallic liquids in low Earth orbit. Phys Rev B 1997; 55: 26–29.
Fecht HJ, Wunderlich RK, Glade SC, Johnson WL. Thermophysical properties of bulk metallic glasses in the stable undercooled liquid—a microgravity investigation. MRS Proceedings 2001; 644, L4.5.1–L4.5.6.
Wunderlich RK, Fecht HJ. Thermophysical properties of bulk metallic glass forming alloys in the stable and undercooled liquid—a microgravity investigation. Mater Trans 2001; 42: 565–578.
Lee DS, Hoffmeister W, Bayuzick R, Johnson WL. Noncontact AC calorimetry: specific heat of liquid Nb40Ni60 and Ni24Zr76 as measured on IML-2. Thermophysical Joint Conferences. Proceedings Of the 4th Asian Thermophysical Properties 1995, 884–888.
Robinson MB. Microgravity Science Laboratory (MSL-1) Final Report. Proceedings of the Microgravity Science Laboratory 1998, Report no. NASA/CP-1998-208868.
Egry I, Lohöfer G, Seyhan I, Schneider S, Feuerbacher B. Viscosity of eutectic Pd78Cu6Si16 measured by the oscillating drop technique in microgravity. Appl Phy Lett 1998; 73: 462–464.
Egry I, Lohöfer G, Seyhan I, Schneider S, Feuerbacher B. Viscosity and surface tension measurements in microgravity. Int J of Thermophysics 1999; 20: 1005–1015.
Peker A, Johnson WL. A highly processable metallic glass: Zr41.2Ti13.8Cu12.5Ni10.0Be22.5. Appl Phy Lett 1993; 63: 2342–2344.
Lin XH. Bulk glass formation and crystallization of Zr-Ti-based alloys. PhD Dissertation, California Institute of Technology, 1997.
Lin XH, Johnson WL. Formation of Ti-Zr-Cu-Ni bulk metallic glass. J Appl Phys 1995; 78: 6514–6519.
Jurewicz AJG et al. The Genesis solar-wind collector materials. Space Sci Rev 2003; 105: 535–560.
Hays CC, Schroers J, Johnson WL, Rathz TJ, Hyers RW, Rogers JR et al. Vitrication and determination of the crystalline time scales of the bulk-metallic-glass-forming liquid Zr58.5 Nb2.8 Cu15.6 Ni12.8 Al10.3. Appl Phy Lett 2001; 79: 1605–1607.
Grimberg A, Burnett DS, Bochsler P, Baur H, Wieler R. Composition of light solar wind noble gasses in the bulk metallic glass flown on the Genesis mission. Space Sci Rev 2007; 130: 293–300.
Wiens RC, Burnett DS, Hohenberg CM, Meshik A, Heber V, Grimberg A et al. Solar and solar-wind composition results from the Genesis mission. Space Sci Rev 2007; 130: 161–171.
Burnett DSGenesis Science TeamGS. Solar composition from the Genesis mission. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011; 108: 19130–19134.
Grimberg A, Baur H, Bühler F, Bochsler P, Wieler R. Solar wind helium, neon, and argon isotopic and elemental composition: Data from the metallic glass flown on NASA’s Genesis mission. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 2008; 72: 626–645.
Grimbers A, Baur H, Bochsler P, Bühler F, Burnett DS, Hays CC et al. Solar wind from Genesis: Implications for the lunar noble gas record. Science 2006; 314: 1133–1135.
Veazey C, Demetriou MD, Schroers J, Hanan JC, Dunning LA, Kaukler WF et al. Foaming of amorphous metals approaches the limit of microgravity forming. J Adv Mater 2008; 40: 7–11.
Schroers J, Veazey C, Johnson WL. Amorphous metallic foam. Appl Phy Lett 2003; 82: 370–373.
Schroers J, Veazey C, Demetriou MD, Johnson WL. Synthesis method for amorphous metallic foam. J of Appl Phy 2004; 96: 7723–7730.
Davidson M, Roberts S, Castro G, Dillon RP, Kunz A, Kozachkov H et al. Investigating amorphous metal composite architectures as spacecraft shielding. Adv Eng Mater 2013; 15: 27–33.
Hamill L, Roberts S, Davidson M, Johnson WL, Nutt S, Hofmann DC. Hypervelocity impact phenomenon in bulk metallic glasses and composites. Adv Eng Mater 2014; 16: 85–93.
Rhim WK, Chung SK, Barber D, Man KF, Gutt G, Rulison A et al. An electrostatic levitator for high temperature containerless materials processing in 1g. Rev Sci Instrum 1993; 64: 2961–2970.
Kim YJ, Busch R, Johnson WL. Metallic glass formation in highly undercooled Zr41.2Ti13.8Cu12.5Ni10.0Be22.5 during containerless electrostatic levitation processing. Appl Phy Lett 1994; 65: 2136–2138.
Ohsaka K, Chung SK, Rhim WK, Peker A, Scruggs D, Johnson WL. Specific volumes of the Zr41.2Ti13.8Cu12.5Ni10.0Be22.5 alloy in the liquid, glass and crystalline states. Appl Phy Lett 1997; 70: 726–728.
Schroers J, Johnson WL. History dependent crystallization of Zr41Ti14Cu12Ni10Be23 melts. J Appl Phy 2000; 88: 44–48.
Schroers J, Johnson WL. Repeated crystallization in undercooled Zr41Ti14Cu12Ni10Be23 liquids. Appl Phy Lett 2000; 74: 2343–2345.
Busch R, Kim YJ, Schneider S, Johnson WL. Atom probe field ion microscope and levitation studies of the decomposition and crystallization of undercooled Zr-Ti-Cu-Ni-Be melts. Mat Sci Forum 1996; 225–227: 77–82.
Schroers J, Johnson WL. Crystallization kinetics of the bulk-glas-forming Pd43Ni10Cu27P20 melt. Appl Phy Lett 2000; 77: 1158–1160.
Kozachkov H, Kolodziejska JA, Roberts S, Li JJZ, Johnson WL, Hofmann DC. Study of mushy-zone development in dendritic microstructures with glass-forming eutectic matrices using electrostatic levitation. ISRN Mater Sci 2013; 108363: 1–7.
Inoue A, Takeuchi A. Recent development and application products of bulk glassy alloys. Acta Materialia 2011; 59: 2243–2267.
Nishiyama N, Amiya K, Inoue A. Novel applications for bulk metallic glass for industrial products. J Noncryst Sol 2007; 353: 3615–3621.
Homer ER, Harris MB, Zirbel SA, Kolodziejska JA, Kozachkov H, Trease BP et al. New methods for developing and manufacturing compliant mechanisms utilizing bulk metallic glass. Adv Eng Mater 2014.
Duan G, Wiest A, Lind M-L, Li J, Rhim WK, Johnson WL. Bulk metallic glass with benchmark thermoplastic processability. Adv Mater 2007; 19: 4272–4275.
Schroers J. Processing of bulk metallic glass. Adv Mater 2010; 22: 1566–1597.
Liu YH, Wang G, Wang RJ, Zhao DQ, Pan MX, Wang WH. Super plastic bulk metallic glasses at room temperature. Science 2007; 315: 1385–1388.
Schroers J, Hodges TM, Kumar G, Raman H, Barnes AJ, Pham Q et al. Thermoplastic blow molding of metals. Mater Today 2011; 14: 14–19.
Johnson WL, Kaltenboech G, Demetriou MD, Schramm JP, Liu X, Samwer K et al. Beating crystallization in glass-forming metals by millisecond heating and processing. Science 2011; 13: 828–833.
Kumar G, Tang HX, Schroers J. Nanomoulding with amorphous metals. Nature 2009; 457: 868–871.
3COM [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
AccessData [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACFE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Acme-Packet [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACSM [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Admission-Tests [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
ADOBE [93 Certification Exam(s) ]
AFP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
AICPA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
AIIM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Alcatel-Lucent [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Alfresco [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Altiris [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Amazon [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
American-College [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Android [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
APA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
APC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
APICS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Apple [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
AppSense [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
APTUSC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Arizona-Education [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ARM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Aruba [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASIS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASQ [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASTQB [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
Autodesk [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Avaya [101 Certification Exam(s) ]
AXELOS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Axis [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Banking [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
BEA [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
BICSI [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
BlackBerry [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
BlueCoat [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Brocade [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Business-Objects [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
Business-Tests [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
CA-Technologies [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
Certification-Board [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Certiport [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
CheckPoint [43 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIPS [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cisco [318 Certification Exam(s) ]
Citrix [48 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIW [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cloudera [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cognos [19 Certification Exam(s) ]
College-Board [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
CompTIA [76 Certification Exam(s) ]
ComputerAssociates [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Consultant [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Counselor [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
CPP-Institue [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
CPP-Institute [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
CSP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CWNA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CWNP [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
CyberArk [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Dassault [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
DELL [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
DMI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
DRI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ECCouncil [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
ECDL [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
EMC [129 Certification Exam(s) ]
Enterasys [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Ericsson [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
ESPA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Esri [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
ExamExpress [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Exin [40 Certification Exam(s) ]
ExtremeNetworks [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
F5-Networks [20 Certification Exam(s) ]
FCTC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Filemaker [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Financial [36 Certification Exam(s) ]
Food [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Fortinet [14 Certification Exam(s) ]
Foundry [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
FSMTB [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Fujitsu [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
GAQM [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Genesys [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
GIAC [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Google [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
GuidanceSoftware [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
H3C [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
HDI [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Healthcare [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
HIPAA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hitachi [30 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hortonworks [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hospitality [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
HP [752 Certification Exam(s) ]
HR [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
HRCI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Huawei [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hyperion [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
IAAP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IAHCSMM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IBM [1533 Certification Exam(s) ]
IBQH [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ICAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ICDL [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
IEEE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IELTS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IFPUG [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
IIBA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
IISFA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Intel [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
IQN [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IRS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISACA [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISC2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISEB [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
Isilon [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISM [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
iSQI [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
ITEC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Juniper [65 Certification Exam(s) ]
LEED [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Legato [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
Liferay [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Logical-Operations [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Lotus [66 Certification Exam(s) ]
LPI [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
LSI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Magento [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Maintenance [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
McAfee [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
McData [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Medical [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
Microsoft [375 Certification Exam(s) ]
Mile2 [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Military [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Misc [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Motorola [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
mySQL [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
NBSTSA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCEES [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCLEX [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Network-General [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
NetworkAppliance [39 Certification Exam(s) ]
NI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NIELIT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Nokia [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Nortel [130 Certification Exam(s) ]
Novell [37 Certification Exam(s) ]
OMG [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Oracle [282 Certification Exam(s) ]
P&C [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Palo-Alto [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
PARCC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PayPal [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Pegasystems [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
PEOPLECERT [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
PMI [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Polycom [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
PostgreSQL-CE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Prince2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
PRMIA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PsychCorp [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PTCB [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
QAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
QlikView [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Quality-Assurance [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
RACC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Real-Estate [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
RedHat [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
RES [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
Riverbed [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
RSA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Sair [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
Salesforce [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
SANS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SAP [98 Certification Exam(s) ]
SASInstitute [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
SAT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SCO [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
SCP [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
SDI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
See-Beyond [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Siemens [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Snia [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
SOA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Social-Work-Board [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
SpringSource [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SUN [63 Certification Exam(s) ]
SUSE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Sybase [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
Symantec [135 Certification Exam(s) ]
Teacher-Certification [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
The-Open-Group [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
TIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Tibco [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
Trainers [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Trend [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
TruSecure [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
USMLE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
VCE [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Veeam [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Veritas [33 Certification Exam(s) ]
Vmware [58 Certification Exam(s) ]
Wonderlic [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Worldatwork [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
XML-Master [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Zend [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Dropmark : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/11587775
Wordpress : http://wp.me/p7SJ6L-VM
Issu : https://issuu.com/trutrainers/docs/250-323
Dropmark-Text : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/12129117
Blogspot : http://killexamsbraindump.blogspot.com/2017/11/just-memorize-these-250-323-questions.html
RSS Feed : http://feeds.feedburner.com/WhereCanIGetHelpToPass250-323Exam
weSRCH : https://www.wesrch.com/business/prpdfBU1HWO000QYAG
publitas.com : https://view.publitas.com/trutrainers-inc/exactly-same-250-323-questions-as-in-real-test-wtf
Calameo : http://en.calameo.com/books/00492352673839f65e3ef
Box.net : https://app.box.com/s/wq3hankli10g7d4lf7rm6hde76rl814b
zoho.com : https://docs.zoho.com/file/5ptno47a2e25a0cc74fe6b1e7f8ba802b1579