Sales Tel: +63 945 7983492  |  Email Us    
SMDC Residences

Air Residences

Features and Amenities

Reflective Pool
Function Terrace
Seating Alcoves

Air Residences

Green 2 Residences

Features and Amenities:

Wifi ready study area
Swimming Pool
Gym and Function Room

Green 2 Residences

Bloom Residences

Features and Amenities:

Recreational Area
2 Lap Pools
Ground Floor Commercial Areas

Bloom Residences

Leaf Residences

Features and Amenities:

3 Swimming Pools
Gym and Fitness Center
Outdoor Basketball Court

Leaf Residences

Contact Us

Contact us today for a no obligation quotation:


+63 945 7983492
+63 908 8820391

Copyright © 2018 SMDC :: SM Residences, All Rights Reserved.


































































000-743 dumps with Real exam Questions and Practice Test - smresidences.com.ph

Great Place to download 100% free 000-743 braindumps, real exam questions and practice test with VCE exam simulator to ensure your 100% success in the 000-743 - smresidences.com.ph

Pass4sure 000-743 dumps | Killexams.com 000-743 real questions | http://smresidences.com.ph/

000-743 IBM Storage Sales, Version 7

Study Guide Prepared by Killexams.com IBM Dumps Experts

Exam Questions Updated On :


Killexams.com 000-743 Dumps and Real Questions

100% Real Questions - Exam Pass Guarantee with High Marks - Just Memorize the Answers



000-743 exam Dumps Source : IBM Storage Sales, Version 7

Test Code : 000-743
Test Name : IBM Storage Sales, Version 7
Vendor Name : IBM
: 158 Real Questions

Take a clever pass, reap those 000-743 questions and solutions.
Much obliged to the one and only killexams.com. It is the most straightforward system to pass the exam. I would thank the killexams.com exam result, for my achievement in the 000-743. Exam was only 3 weeks ahead, when I started to study this aide and it worked for me. I scored 89%, figuring out how to finish the exam in due time.


real 000-743 questions and correct answers! It justify the charge.
Ive visible severa topics publicized adage utilize this and score the exceptional however your gadgets have beencompletely exceptional as contrasted with others. I am capable of cross again soon to buy greater test aids. I clearly wanted to mention a debt of gratitude is so as regarding your amazing 000-743 test manual. I took the exam this week and finished soundly. Not anything had taught me the brain the manner killexams.com Questions & answers did. I solved 90 five% questions.


Found an accurate source for real 000-743 Latest dumps.
I never notion i might be the usage of braindumps for serious IT tests (i was continually an honors scholar, lol), however as your profession progresses and you have more duties, which includes your own family, finding time and money to prepare to your tests get tougher and tougher. yet, to provide to your own family, you need to keep your profession and knowledge growing... So, perplexed and a bit responsible, I ordered this killexams.com bundle. It lived as much as my expectancies, as I passed the 000-743 exam with a superbly appropriate marks. The truth is, they do provide you with real 000-743 exam questions and solutions - that is precisely what they promise. but the correct information also is, that this records you cram on your exam stays with you. Dont they all love the question and answer layout due to that So, some months later, once I acquired a large promoting with even larger duties, I regularly locate myself drawing from the understanding I got from Killexams. So it additionally facilitates in the end, so I dont experience that guilty anymore.


Unbelieveable! however right source modern day 000-743 real test questions.
I cleared 000-743 exam with excessive marks. each time I had registered with killexams.com which helped me to attain greatermarks. Its top class to have help of killexams.com questions bank for such kind of test. thanks to all.


it is proper supply to discover 000-743 dumps paper.
Learning for the 000-743 exam has been a tough going. With so many confusing topics to cover, killexams.com induced the confidence for passing the exam by taking me through core questions on the subject. It paid off as I could pass the exam with a good pass percentage of 84%. A few of the questions came twisted, but the answers that matched from killexams.com helped me mark the right answers.


Forget everything! Just forcus on these 000-743 Questions and Answers if you want to pass.
I have been so weak my entire way yet I know now that I needed to get a pass in my 000-743 and this could make me popular possibly and yes I am short of radiance yet passing my exams and solved almost all questions in just 75 minutes with killexams.com dumps. A couple of great men cant bring a change to planets way however they can just let you know whether you have been the main fellow who knew how to do this and I need to be known in this world and make my own particular imprint.


what's simplest manner to prepare and pass 000-743 exam?
Ive renewed my membership this time for 000-743 exam. I accept my involvement with killexams.com is so important it is not feasible surrender thru no longer having a membership. I am capable of in reality accept as true with killexams.com tests for my exam. Simply this net web page can assist me reap my 000-743 accredition and assist me in getting above ninety 5% marks within the exam. You all are truely making an great showing. Preserve it up!


000-743 examination prep got to be this smooth.
It is the place where I sorted and corrected all my mistakes in 000-743 topic. When I searched study material for the exam, I found the killexams.com are the best one which is one among the reputed product. It helps to perform the exam better than anything. I was glad to find that was fully informative material in the learning. It is ever best supporting material for the 000-743 exam.


the ones 000-743 real test questions paintings terrific inside the actual test.
located out this precise source after a long time. everybody here is cooperative and able. team provided me very goodmaterial for 000-743 instruction.


it is extraordinary to have 000-743 real examination questions.
I used to be alluded to the killexams.com dumps as brisk reference for my exam. In fact they finished a excellenttask, i in reality like their overall performance and fashion of running. The short-duration solutions had been tons less worrying to take into account. I dealt with 98% questions scoring 80% marks. The exam 000-743 became a noteworthy challenge for my IT profession. At the same time, I didnt contribute a whole lot time to installation my-self rightly for this exam.


IBM IBM Storage Sales, Version

shielding IBM Object Storage Containers | killexams.com Real Questions and Pass4sure dumps

The SETI@IBMCloud project and the SETI Institute’s Hackathon and Code challenge rely on IBM infrastructure, such as the Cloud Foundry Go runtime, Apache Spark and OpenStack Object Storage, all of which are available in IBM Bluemix.

in the procedure of building out the data administration for the code problem, they labored with a few different organizations within IBM. youngsters, they obligatory a method to provide access to the statistics securely, and never put other researchers in the position of being able to unintentionally delete or overwrite objects or containers.

With most container tech, the reference is to a “delivery container,” but I find food storage containers less demanding to circulate, share, provision, decommission, and so on. picture credit: dollar Tree. come upon protection

In popular, it’s likely a pretty good policy so you might do the identical with any information set you location in Object Storage. as a substitute of getting access to your Object Storage statistics using your “admin” credentials, be sure you create credentials which have confined, examine-most effective entry when performing evaluation or sharing statistics with colleagues.

Sorting throughout the attainable documentation on IBM Bluemix, the IBM knowledge center, and the OpenStack Object Storage pages took some time and testing. so you don’t need to do the identical, this article will reveal you, step-through-step, a way to:

  • create a backup container for your data
  • create new credentials in IBM Bluemix
  • set read-best entry for a container.
  • Archive Container

    In IBM Object Storage, a backup container is referred to as an “archive container.” step one is to create an archive container for every container retaining your statistics. with the aid of growing an archive container, the thing Storage system will automatically create historic types of your objects for those who by accident overwrite them. The instructions in IBM Bluemix are easy for this. from your local workstation, function the following steps:

    1. deploy the python-swiftclient Python package and command-line tool.

    > pip installation python-swiftclient> pip installation python-keystoneclient

    2a. Log in to IBM Bluemix (your information Science adventure credentials may still work) and navigate to your Object Storage example.

    2b. Navigate to your DSX Object Storage example from within Bluemix.

    3. opt for the provider credentials tab.

    4. From the record of credentials displayed, click on View Credentials and locate a collection of credentials that comprise the "role":"admin" key-cost pair.

    5. reproduction the values from this set of credentials into a brand new file to your native computer. These are the ambiance variables which are essential for the python-swiftclient command-line tool. For these instructions, I’ll name the file object_store.config. (I’ve additionally assumed you are using a bash shell.)

    export OS_PROJECT_ID=...export OS_PASSWORD='...'export OS_USER_ID=...export OS_AUTH_URL=https://identification.open.softlayer.com/v3export OS_REGION_NAME=dallasexport OS_IDENTITY_API_VERSION=3export OS_AUTH_VERSION=3

    6. Set the atmosphere variables.

    > supply object_store.config

    7. you'll want to now be able to interact with your Object Storage illustration from you native laptop’s command-line.

    > swift checklist

    For a complete listing of attainable instructions, see the documentation.

    8. Now, which you could create a brand new archive container and assign it to grasp backup models of objects in one of your current containers. for instance, for a container named ATAdata, one would do here:

    > swift submit ATAdata_archive> swift publish ATAdata -H "X-types-location: ATAdata_archive"

    sooner or later, should still any object be overwritten in the ATAdata container, a previous edition might be positioned in ATAdata_archive.

    read-handiest Credentials

    next, in order to create a container it truly is read-only for a specific set of credentials, you first need to create these credentials in IBM Bluemix. suppose you need to supply credentials in your colleague, Jane.

    1. starting from the carrier credentials tab of your Object Storage instance in Bluemix, create a new set of credentials.

    2. This step is critical. in the pane that opens on your browser, you need to now add an not obligatory Parameter: "role":"member"

    three. click on the Add button to save your new credentials for Jane.

    4. discover the project_id and user_id of these newly created credentials.

    5. using the python-swiftclient command-line tool, you’ll now append Jane’s project_id and user_id to the entry manage record (ACL) for the container for which you wish to supply examine access.

    due to the fact there can also already be a lot of configurations set for a container, you need to be careful now not to overwrite those values. First assess the study ACL values and then append Jane’s credentials.

    > swift stat -v ATAdataAccount: AUTH_cdbef69adf7a149c96930e1071f0a46bContainer: ATAdataObjects: 288009Bytes: 310238099808Read ACL: cd35:90feWrite ACL:Sync To:Sync Key:accept-stages: bytesX-Trans-id: tx92f020c8361c48ad81cd3-0079dc276dX-Storage-policy: standardX-Timestamp: 1471903329.98992Content-category: text/plain; charset=utf-8X-models-location: ATAdata_archive

    within the case above, you could see there are already values in the read ACL, which they need to no longer eradicate. If there are values in the examine ACL for your container, be certain to append Jane’s project_id:user_id to those latest values. in any other case, specify most effective Jane’s project_id:user_id.

    > swift post -r "cd35:90fe,<project_id>:<user_id>" ATAdata

    Re-run the swift stat command to make sure your adjustments have been applied. That’s it.

    which you can now send Jane’s credentials to her. With tools similar to python-swiftclient and ibmos2spark, she will be able to study information from the ATAdata container, however is unable to put in writing to that container, nor to examine/write to every other container for your Object Storage account.

    safe Travels!

    You’ll discover alternative routes to prepare entry to your containers. See the OpenStack Object Storage documentation on ACLs. In selected, one positive arrangement can be to enable for examine-simplest or write-best entry to containers for each person with the identical “project_id”.

    in case you loved this article, please ♡ it to recommend it to other Medium readers.


    Microsoft Vs. IBM: One Clear Winner | killexams.com Real Questions and Pass4sure dumps

    (source: imgflip)

    Dividend growth investing is without doubt one of the most powerful ways of compounding both income and wealth over time. however the universe of revenue investing is titanic and not limited to stodgy slow turning out to be organizations and trade.

    Cloud computing is likely one of the most well liked growth industries presently and expected to stay so for the foreseeable future.

    Analyst firm Gartner forecasts that from 2017 to 2021 the world cloud computing market will develop pretty much 18% CAGR, or more than 4 instances as fast because the international financial system.

    Synergy analysis estimates the cloud computing market is already $250 billion in size, and becoming even faster, 32% in 2018, with parts of the trade posting 50% sales increase.

    So it's no surprise that tech giants are racing to lock in market share in this gigantic, excessive margin and rapidly turning out to be company. however unless you're Warren Buffett, you've got confined funds to invest, and most individuals are looking to keep their portfolio to a manageable variety of organizations. This capacity salary increase investors deserve to be selective with what cloud computing shares they purchase.

    (source: ZDNet)

    So let's take a glance at two widely wide-spread dividend cloud agencies, Microsoft (MSFT) and IBM (IBM), who are one of the greatest gamers in cloud computing. certainly, see how they compare within the six most critical categories dividend traders care about.

    most importantly, study why Microsoft has IBM beat, arms down, because the a ways stronger cloud computing dividend increase stock, even in view that valuation. in fact, I are expecting Microsoft to carry about double IBM's complete returns over the coming five years.

    Dividend Profile: Winner Microsoft

    given that dividend boom investing is all about revenue, let's birth by using looking at how every enterprise's dividend profile stacks up, beginning with long-time period increase records.

    (supply: without difficulty secure Dividends)

    due to the fact that IBM has been paying dividends for an awful lot longer, originally you may feel it has the aspect. after all, it's very close to fitting a dividend aristocrat, whereas Microsoft may not achieve that fame for an extra 16 years.

    And in terms of dividend boom charges, IBM at first appears to measure up neatly to Microsoft, at least over the last two decades. however note that IBM's dividend growth has been slowing down over time, whereas Microsoft's has remained strong (9.5% hike for 2019).

  • 2018 IBM dividend hike: four.7%
  • 2017 dividend hike: 7.1%
  • 2016 dividend hike: 7.7%
  • That fast payout boom from MSFT is courtesy of a vastly advanced company mannequin and increase trajectory (extra on this later). but dividend boom prices and track data are just two elements of the dividend profile, safety is by means of a long way the most crucial.

    agencyYield TTM FCF Payout Ratio

    elementary secure Dividends safeguard ranking (Out Of one hundred)

    Microsoft 1.6% 42% ninety eight (Very safe) IBM four.5% forty nine% sixty five (safe)

    (supply: comfortably secure Dividends)

    while IBM may present thrice the yield, Microsoft has one of the most most secure dividends on Wall road. this is no longer just due to a somewhat decrease payout ratio, but a much sophisticated stability sheet.

    companyNet Debt/EBITDA activity insurance Ratio S&P credit rating

    typical interest charge

    Microsoft -1.0 12.8 AAA 3.6% IBM 1.6 18.3 A 1.7% protected limit 3 Or much less 8 Or extra BBB- Or better NA

    (Sources: Morningstar, with ease secure Dividends, F.A.S.T Graphs, Gurufocus)

    Microsoft in reality has $fifty three.7 billion extra cash than debt and handiest has bigger borrowing charges because it normally sticks to selling US bonds, whereas IBM is greater active in distant places bonds where prices are an awful lot reduce. but observe that Microsoft is just one of two organizations with a AAA credit rating (JNJ is the other) which is better than the U.S. Treasury's.

    And they can not forget that IBM is going to tackle loads of debt to fund its $34 billion acquisition of red Hat (RHT). This buy (the greatest software business acquisition in US history) is a part of IBM's newest efforts to show round its struggling company. here's what Virginia Rometty (CEO due to the fact 2012) observed involving the strategic motive for the buy.

    “The acquisition of purple Hat is a video game-changer. It changes everything concerning the cloud market...IBM will develop into the world’s #1 hybrid cloud company." - Virginia Rometty (emphasis brought)

    but while or not it's true that purple Hat is a doubtlessly smart and bold movement for IBM, in accordance with the Harvard enterprise evaluation about eighty% of M&A fails to convey long-term shareholder value. it is very true if a corporation overpays and IBM is paying a sixty three% top rate for RHT. 10 and 30 instances revenue and free cash flow is a rich expense to pay that potential IBM has little margin of error when it involves executing on its integration and boom plans for its future hybrid cloud business (and its music record on common execution is bad).

    but the huge quantity of debt IBM is taking up is a sure bet, and S&P has already downgraded its credit standing from A+ to A over the far more bloated steadiness sheet.

    Moody's has put IBM's credit rating on wait for a downgrade citing:

    "a substantial boost in leverage... and a departure from IBM's historical acquisition philosophy of creating small, tuck-in acquisitions that limit integration chance." - Moody's (emphasis introduced)

    IBM will effectively be doubling its leverage ratio (debt/EBITDA) inserting it above the three.0 that is regarded protected for most corporations. subsequently, IBM has noted it'll suspend buybacks for 2020 and 2021 to focal point on deleveraging, but so that it will almost definitely mean even slower dividend increase in the years ahead.

    And they can't neglect that doubling leverage this late within the economic cycle also includes its own hazards. Bond yields, even for investment-grade debt, will also be incredibly volatile, spiking throughout instances of fiscal market worry (as occurs in corrections and undergo markets).

    Chart data by way of YCharts

    With a recession maybe coming in 2020 or 2021, IBM might find itself dealing with tighter credit score markets and better refinancing expenses that potential it needs to execute flawlessly on its plan to return to about a 1.7 leverage ratio with the aid of the conclusion of 2021.

    increase Profile: Winner Microsoft

    even more awesome than Microsoft's already gigantic cloud earnings is the proven fact that it continues to grow that enterprise at a breakneck tempo and profit market share.

    it truly is at the cost of IBM, who has steadily been losing market share to larger, enhanced funded, and nimbler giants like Amazon (AMZN), Alphabet (GOOG) and Alibaba (BABA). This explains Microsoft's far more striking increase profile, both in terms of its appropriate and base line.

    Microsoft boom Profile

    (supply: effortlessly secure Dividends)

    on the grounds that Satya Nadella took over as CEO of Microsoft from Steve Ballmer in 2014, the business's cloud and mobile first thoughts have seen it return to solid profits increase.

    That comprises extraordinary increase in its most fresh quarter of

  • 12% profits increase
  • 18% working earnings growth
  • 15% EPS boom
  • Cloud income grew 20%, fueled by using seventy six% boom in Azure (ninety two% full-year boom), Microsoft's cloud platform. much more brilliant is that business cloud (forty eight% YOY growth) gross margins multiplied 5% to sixty two% over the past yr, showing that Microsoft's typical cloud ecosystem is benefitting from ever bigger economies of scale and rising network effects.

    definitely, cloud computing is rarely well-nigh data storage for corporations. The optimum winners in the trade should be corporations that may combine facts storage with superior AI-based mostly application and facts analytics offerings that support purchasers maximize effectivity and profits.

    Microsoft's one-cease store when it comes to productivity utility, which is deeply built-in into Azure (as is LinkedIn now), is the leading rationale Microsoft is in a position to achieve probably the most industry's quickest boom fees whereas carrying on with to get pleasure from amazing pricing vigor (large moat).

    IBM boom Profile

    (source: effectively secure Dividends)

    In distinction, IBM has struggled with declining or flat earnings in view that 2012, when it all started its newest fundamental corporate turnaround effort. That includes promoting declining legacy hardware corporations and focusing on strategic imperatives or SI, which contains analytics, cloud computing, safety, and cell. in fact, SI is the long run tech divisions IBM hopes to fuel its eventual return to high single-digit salary and free money circulation boom.

    (source: IBM investor presentation)

    youngsters, whereas the street may additionally have favored IBM's most recent results (the benefit of very low expectations) the company nevertheless stated a three% decline in salary (-1% in steady foreign money).

    (supply: Motley idiot)

    And none of its business segment posted wonderful increase, including cognitive solutions, which is home to IBM's a whole lot-hyped Watson AI platform. The big decline in programs became caused via the launch of the Z-mainframe rolling off its comps and indicates that IBM's short 2018 return to nice desirable-line increase become not a style reversal, but a short lived occurrence.

    In fairness to IBM, SI did make up 53% of income in this autumn and 50% in 2018, which is a purpose the company has spent years making an attempt to attain. And in absolute terms, SI is transforming into strongly.

  • Quarterly SI revenue boom: 15% YOY
  • TTM SI revenue boom: 22% YOY
  • youngsters, it would be mentioned that IBM has been plagued by ceaselessly falling increase rates in SI and here is the collection of agencies that are imagined to return it to modest suitable-line increase sooner or later. thus far they have been unable to achieve that and with IBM dropping market share in cloud, that slowing growth may continue, causing IBM to bring bottom-line boom it's some distance below what management is guiding for over the lengthy-term.

    basically, in accordance with FactSet research analysts do not believe latest administration can bring any place near excessive single-digit EPS boom, however just 2.3% CAGR over the next five years (with sub 2% boom through 2020). Morningstar's 6.1% revenue boom forecast is the most bullish I've considered for the business, yet additionally has the business falling a long way in need of its assistance.

    and those growth estimates now include Redhat, which is a extremely quickly turning out to be and money-wealthy company (over 30% FCF margins).

    (source: IBM pink Hat Acquisition presentation)

    IBM says that Redhat will accelerate good-line growth 2% over the lengthy-time period, which might be a welcome reduction for investors who have earnings fall or stagnate for seven straight years.

    (supply: IBM red Hat Acquisition presentation)

    IBM claims that the deal might be accretive to cash move within three hundred and sixty five days which is vital given that free money move is what money dividends and pays down debt. despite the fact, as a result of high integration fees, IBM is now guiding for a double-digit reduce in FCF for 2019.

  • 2018 FCF: $13.3 billion
  • 2019 FCF assistance: $12 billion (-9.8%)
  • This continues a decade lengthy fashion of flat FCF/share, which explains why IBM's dividend boom has slowed over time. And given the need to deleverage ASAP to preserve a strong credit standing and decent financial flexibility in the future, income traders can likely expect even slower payout growth via as a minimum 2021 if not longer.

    IBM FCF/Share

    (supply: without problems protected Dividends)

    In contrast, Microsoft's FCF/share growth, whereas far from the premiere within the business, is at the least trending bigger over time.

    Microsoft FCF/Share

    (source: with ease protected Dividends)

    And keep in mind that a huge intent that Microsoft's FCF is up simply 26% on the grounds that Nadella took over is Microsoft's tons bigger spending on R&D and capex to accelerate its cloud boom.

    Chart data by YChartsChart information with the aid of YCharts

    What about IBM? well, it too spends a whole lot on R&D, however a long way less than Microsoft, or its tremendous cloud peers.

    Chart statistics with the aid of YCharts

    And most significantly, IBM's investments over time have failed to convey robust returns on funding, which brings me to essentially the most crucial purpose that Microsoft is a better investment.

    business fine: Winner Microsoft

    The best of a enterprise, including administration's capital allocation competencies, is essentially the most vital driver of long-term total returns. a superb proxy for company and management exceptional is a company's profitability metrics.

    agencyOperating Margin FCF Margin Return On fairness

    Return On Invested Capital

    Microsoft 33% 25% 39% 22% IBM 17% 9% 50% 21% first rate company Benchmark 12% 5% 10% eight%

    (source: effortlessly safe Dividends)

    Microsoft's margins are vastly superior to IBM's and the only cause IBM has greater returns on equity is the a good deal greater leveraged balance sheet. And whereas MSFT and IBM have definitely equal returns on invested capital today, the lengthy-term trend of that management great proxy is what matters most.

    IBM ROIC Over Time

    (source: comfortably safe Dividends)

    on account that Rometty took over in 2012, IBM's ROIC has fallen via over 50%. In equity, it has bounced again somewhat from its 2017 lows, however the very costly RHT acquisition is probably going to ship it plummetting to fresh 10+ yr lows.

    In distinction, Nadella's tenure at MSFT has additionally grew to become around an extended slide in ROIC that became because of Ballmer's complacency and horrific acquisition approach. Nadella is the one who moved Microsoft from a perpetual license mannequin focused on home windows to a subscription-primarily based application as a provider mannequin deeply integrated into the cloud. He additionally give up the particularly competitive and no margin instant handset enterprise that Ballmer failed to compete in. Morningstar's Dan Romanoff considers Nadella an "exemplary" CEO and that i agree wholeheartedly.

    Microsoft ROIC Over Time

    (supply: conveniently secure Dividends)

    it is going to be mentioned that the LinkedIn acquisition is a big motive that MSFT's ROIC dipped in 2017 however's considering bounced back properly, because of the success that deal has proven to be.

    (source: MSFT revenue presentation)

    Microsoft's 2016 $26.2 billion acquisition of LinkedIn turned into totally controversial on the time, with many feeling it harkened returned to Steve Ballmer's noted penchant for lighting shareholder money on fire by using vastly overpaying leading to big write-downs later.

    however as which you can see above, LinkedIn earnings is becoming constantly at 30+% YOY because of similar boom prices in participation. definitely, Nadella bought LinkedIn to enhance the cloud ecosystem by way of bettering productiveness-boosting facets, which is helping to power robust boom in commercial subscribers to workplace 365. really, 89% of Microsoft's commercial utility business is now subscriber based, growing annuity-like recurring monthly earnings.

    essentially the most recent large acquisition Microsoft made turned into the 2018 $7.5 billion inventory-primarily based buy of Github. Github is the "facebook of programmers" with 31 million money owed and one hundred million codes stored in its cloud-primarily based servers. these courses serve over 1.5 million companies and groups all over and Microsoft hopes that these programmers will turn into addicted to the Azure-based mostly platform that Github beneath MSFT ownership will deliver.

    And while IBM is making what's likely a determined and overpriced and debt-funded acquisition to support its cloud place, Microsoft is making some distance less dangerous strikes such as partnering with VMWare (VMW), Accenture (ACN), and Mastercard (MA) to present ever more desirable features to its purchasers. Which is why it keeps touchdown big consumers like Exxon (XOM) to host its cloud wants. really, Microsoft's cloud business, which at 48% is growing to be more than twice as quickly as IBM's, is now internet hosting over 420,000 international companies and agencies. That comprises 89% of the Fortune a hundred.

    What about IBM's massive investments? well, the change between IBM and Microsoft's universal funding strategy will also be summed up like this. IBM mints patents, while Microsoft mints cash.

    Watson is a good instance of this, with IBM having spent billions on the AI platform over the years and hyping it to the moon by means of noted appearances on Jeopardy, and Superbowl classified ads touting it as "one of the most most powerful equipment their species has created."

    Virginia Rometty has also spent years proclaiming that Watson was a online game-changing differentiator for IBM that's "touching a billion americans... and be capable of address, diagnose, and treat eighty percent of melanoma on the planet."

    definitely, Rometty is noted for overpromising and below offering. When she took over in 2012 and commenced IBM's now seven-year turnaround effort she guided for $20 per share in Adjusted EPS in 2015. IBM overlooked that goal through 26% ($14.ninety) and adjusted EPS fell to $13.eight in 2017 and 2018 and now management is guiding for "as a minimum $13.8" in 2019 (but with 10% less FCF).

    pretty much Watson has, like most of IBM's large R&D efforts and Rometty's promises, failed to bring top or base line boom over time. for instance, IBM's Cognitive options segment, home of Watson, saw very little increase during the past quarter, regardless of the supposed world-changing energy of that AI platform.

    (source: IBM profits presentation)

    What's extra, margins actually fell, displaying that Watson based mostly SI and cloud offerings won't have potent pricing power, in contrast to Microsoft, where cloud margins are soaring 12 months after 12 months.

    This highlights my biggest challenge with IBM in general, which is that management likes to make use of the hottest buzzwords, and file a lot of patents for promising future tech, yet buyers on no account seem to improvement.

    In 2018 IBM's military of eight,500 researchers, engineers, scientists, and designers in 47 different U.S. states and 48 countries were granted a listing 9,a hundred patents, the 26th consecutive 12 months in which IBM acquired essentially the most corporate patents in the united states.

    (supply: IBM)

    Over 5,000 of those patents have been in "hot" industries like AI, cloud, and cybersecurity. The company is also getting patents for quantum computing, healthcare, and blockchain. From 1993 to 2018 IBM obtained over a hundred and ten,000 patents which should still make it a dominant identify in each trade during which it operates and set it up for an excellent celebrity Trek-like future.

    Yet one of the most largest collections of patents on this planet hasn't stopped IBM traders from dropping cash throughout Rometty's tenure, even factoring in dividends.

    Chart information by means of YCharts

    while the market can, and infrequently is wrong about a corporation's price within the brief-time period, over the lengthy-time period complete returns are at all times a characteristic of first rate administration offering solid increase in fundamentals like earnings, cash movement, and dividends.

    When it comes to the best of the business, and its management, Microsoft below Nadella is unquestionably a ways sophisticated to IBM below Rometty.

    complete Return expertise: Winner Microsoft

    finally i'm not just attracted to dividend stocks for the salary, however because they're a confirmed supply of incredible total returns over time. total returns are a characteristic of three things: yield + long-time period earnings/money movement increase (which dividends music) + valuation alternate.

    agencyYield 5 yr expected income growth (Analyst Consensus) complete Return expected

    Valuation-Adjusted complete Return expertise

    Microsoft 1.6% 12.three% 13.9% 15.0% IBM four.5% 2.three% 6.eight% eight.0% S&P 500 1.9% 6.four% 8.3% 3% to eight.2%

    (Sources: readily secure Dividends, Multipl.com, Morningstar, analyst estimates, Gordon Dividend boom model, Moneychimp)

    IBM definitely presents the advanced yield, well-nigh triple that of Microsoft. And regardless of overpaying for Redhat and blowing up its steadiness sheet, the dividend continues to be relatively protected. besides the fact that children, while Microsoft's current yield may be paltry, it be anticipated to develop revenue and money movement essentially six times as quick as massive Blue. Morningstar in fact expects 15% EPS growth from MSFT in comparison to 6.1% from IBM and they're constantly conservative in their increase assumptions.

    whereas all long-term growth forecasts ought to be focused on a grain of salt (expert guesstimates) in this case Microsoft's powerful execution on cloud makes me think that 12% to fifteen% long-term revenue growth is an affordable expectation. In distinction even that 2.three% consensus on IBM might possibly be tough to achieve given the enterprise's ongoing struggles with its legacy hardware corporations and slowing SI income growth.

    it really is no longer to claim that I believe IBM a "sell" necessarily. in spite of everything, that alluring dividend may still enable IBM to convey close to the market's forward complete returns within the coming years, so long as management can bring on those VERY conservative growth estimates.

    however in comparison to Microsoft's return capabilities, which is about three times that of the market and about double that of IBM, the stronger lengthy-time period investment from a complete return point of view is glaring.

    risk Profile: Winner Microsoft

    All companies face hazards to their increase plans, and IBM and Microsoft aren't any diverse. The largest risks investors should be aware about is the cutthroat and quick pace of exchange in an industry it truly is on the heart of disrupting so many sectors of the global economic climate.

    Cloud is an enormous, speedy starting to be and high margin business with tech giants like Amazon, Alphabet, and Alibaba investing billions every yr to enrich their offerings and making an attempt to steal market share. And there are dozens of smaller gamers, who are attempting to out-innovate and or compete on cost, which probably could disrupt Microsoft's dominant industry position.

    Now or not it's authentic that community results are potent in cloud, which is why the trade's suitable names (aside from IBM) have been ceaselessly gaining market share. despite the fact, rising margins in cloud are mostly because of huge economies of scale and not rising costs. for instance, Amazon has cut its AWS costs sixty seven times over the last 12 years (yet AWS margins hold rising).

    Microsoft's robust R&D efforts could be able to retain margins rising for a number of greater years however at last, they will seemingly height and gradual earnings and cash flow boom from the cloud (at the least from margin expansion).

    still, that's a ways superior to IBM's position which is weak and getting weaker, as seen via its declining margins in all segments, including SI and cloud.

    The different massive chance to trust is that in an effort to compete with a number of big and neatly-funded opponents Microsoft goes to once in a while make huge acquisitions, as considered under Nadella with LinkedIn and Github.

    whereas LinkedIn looks to have been a success, or not it's nevertheless too early to claim no matter if $7.5 billion for Gitbub will show a wise movement. The strategic reason for that deal is terribly ephemeral, while IBM's buying Redhat is an awful lot less complicated to take note (if now not more likely to truly restore it to mighty growth).

    here's why or not it's important for investors in tech dividend shares to observe ROIC tendencies over time to be sure that management is allocating capital accurately, and not simply empire constructing.

    at last, they can't neglect that excessive R&D spending is the lifeblood of tech (you cannot develop your method to splendid success handiest on acquisitions). Microsoft's rapidly rising R&D price range and cloud-based mostly capex have thus far paid off, but with complex and large enterprises, there isn't any sure bet that such investments will at all times come out profitably.

    this is why FCF/share is one other important first-rate metric to monitor over time. whereas tech agencies will also be applauded for pouring billions into expanding their agencies, ultimately FCF/share is what dollars dividends and if that doesn't grow over the lengthy-time period then I cannot recommend even a quick turning out to be and business-main business.

    but again, these risks are shared by means of all dividend-paying cloud companies, and at the end of the day, Microsoft is much more desirable placed to navigate these quick-changing waters than floundering and soon to be hyper-leveraged IBM.

    Valuation: Tie

    Chart statistics by way of YCharts

    a huge purpose so many revenue buyers like IBM is as a result of its low valuation, which is never marvelous given how poorly shares have performed during the last 12 months (or 5). And with Microsoft having beaten the market during the last one year many understandably consider MSFT richly priced.

    agencyForward PE 5 yr normal PE boom price Baked In

    anticipated increase price

    Microsoft 24.three 19.nine9.1% 12.three% IBM 10.0 10.five1.three% 2.three% normal Tech agency17.6 NA 5.four% NA

    (Sources: easily secure Dividends, F.A.S.T Graphs, Benjamin Graham)

    From a ahead PE viewpoint that makes feel because Microsoft is buying and selling at a top class to both its historical forward PE and that of most tech agencies. IBM is buying and selling at a moderate discount to its historic ahead PE which bakes in even slower boom than analysts predict. but word that Microsoft's PE isn't really that excessive for a company that is expected to grow at low to mid-double-digits.

    And after I study both groups by way of my favourite valuation tool for profits stocks, dividend yield concept, then IBM too appears just like the obvious valuation winner.

    (source: investment fine tendencies)

    DYT is what asset supervisor/publication publisher funding first-class traits has been completely the use of since 1966 to convey a long time of market-beating returns from blue-chip income shares. This valuation formula compares an organization's yield to its ancient yield because, assuming fundamental conditions (like increase fees) are equivalent, yields are mean reverting over time and historical yields approximate fair price.

    companyYield 5 12 months commonplace Yield

    expertise bargain To reasonable value

    Microsoft 1.6% 2.5% -27% IBM four.5% three.6% 19%

    (Sources: comfortably protected Dividends, Dividend Yield theory)

    DYT (which is what I officially use to buy companies for my portfolios) says Microsoft is ready 27% hyped up while IBM is 19% undervalued. although, I don't really agree with huge Blue's margin of security that high as a result of its negative nice administration crew continues to underdeliver on ever weakening boom assistance.

    In different words, if IBM cannot return to constant earnings and cash movement growth then I do not predict its yield to basically return to that three.6% normal yield, however rather the regular yield to upward push over time to in shape the existing yield (IBM could be a worth lure).

    however how am i able to claim that MSFT is tied with IBM when it comes to valuation when two general valuation methods show IBM because the apparent winner? that might be using the closing valuation method I consider, Morningstar's three-stage discounted cash circulate model.

    agencyMorningstar fair cost Estimate bargain To fair price Upside To reasonable value long-term Valuation raise

    Valuation-Adjusted total Return advantage

    Microsoft $one hundred twenty five 10% eleven% 1.1% 15.0% IBM $158 12% 13% 1.2% 8.0%

    (source: Morningstar)

    while no DCF model may also be taken as gospel (all encompass a large number of growth assumptions and discount fees which are basically diverse for all buyers) I trust Morningstar's reasonable cost estimates to be the gold typical so far as Wall street analysts go.

    Morningstar is somewhat extra bullish on both corporations in comparison to the analyst consensus but considers both cloud agencies to be roughly equally undervalued. whereas i'm not always as bullish on IBM as Morningstar is, in this case, i'm inclined to give IBM the improvement of the doubt regardless of its lengthy-time period growth possibilities being a ways less definite than Microsoft's.

    however the aspect is that given Microsoft's significant superiority in all other essential classes, I agree with it an honest purchase at trendy costs for most salary traders. individually, I believe IBM a "hang" until I see them in fact submit steady bottom line growth and prove that Redhat is rarely a expensive mistake.

    if in case you have more self assurance in Rometty than I do, then IBM is an honest buy but just make certain to dimension your place as it should be in case administration continues its smartly-based music record of overpromising and below offering.

    base line: Microsoft Is a far better Cloud Computing Dividend boom investment at this time

    do not get me wrong, I have in mind why excessive-yield income buyers might select IBM over Microsoft. after all, the exceptionally protected 4.5% yield is triple what Microsoft presents, and if you're retired and need dividend to pay the expenses, enhanced long-term increase is less of a concern.

    but from a fundamental and valuation viewpoint, I need to still recommend Microsoft over IBM for most lengthy-term buyers. it's because on every vital metric that matters, together with administration quality, profitability, increase outlook, and even valuation, Microsoft fits or beats IBM with the aid of a wide margin.

    IBM's bullish thesis is completely in accordance with a low valuation and long-promised turnaround that management keeps failing to convey, and that analysts (and i) have basically misplaced confidence in. even so, Microsoft's sizeable cloud empire continues to grow like a weed below the expert assistance of Satya Nadella.

    When it comes to selecting lessen pleasant deep cost over superb boom, i'm with Buffett on this one "or not it's a ways better to purchase a beautiful business at a good fee than a good company at a beautiful expense."

    smartly, today I've proven that Microsoft is not just a stupendous enterprise, however arguably slightly undervalued. in the meantime, IBM, a good business at most reliable, might also now not be as undervalued because the PE ratio and high-yield may firstly indicate.

    The final analysis is that after it comes to cloud computing dividend increase stocks, Microsoft is a much better buy than IBM.

    Disclosure: I/we haven't any positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to provoke any positions within the subsequent 72 hours. I wrote this text myself, and it expresses my very own opinions. i am not receiving compensation for it (other than from in quest of Alpha). I haven't any business relationship with any business whose inventory is mentioned listed here.


    IBM (IBM) Up three.9% on account that last income document: Can It proceed? | killexams.com Real Questions and Pass4sure dumps

    A month has passed by due to the fact the final earnings report for IBM (IBM). Shares have introduced about 3.9% in that time body, underperforming the S&P 500.

    Will the contemporary fine trend continue main up to its subsequent profits liberate, or is IBM due for a pullback? earlier than they dive into how buyers and analysts have reacted as of late, let's take a brief seem to be on the most recent salary report as a way to get a more robust handle on the critical drivers.

    IBM this autumn revenue Beat Estimates, Revenues Decline Y/Y

    overseas company Machines Corp delivered fourth-quarter 2018 non-GAAP revenue of $four.87 per share, which beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $4.81 per share. although, salary per share (EPS) reduced 5.9% from the year-in the past quarter. The 12 months-over-12 months decline in EPS may also be attributed to greater tax fee.

    Revenues of $21.76 billion were almost in keeping with the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $21.seventy four billion and declined 3.5% on a yr-over-12 months groundwork. At constant forex (cc), revenues dipped 1%. The 12 months-over-yr decline can basically be attributed to foreign money fluctuation and headwinds from IBM Z product cycle.

    specifically, IBM stated that signings surged 21% on cc basis to $15.eight billion. functions backlog declined 1% year over 12 months and got here in at $116 billion.

    Geographic salary details

    Revenues from Americas were down 4%, reflecting the headwind from the IBM Z product cycle. although, endured boom in Latin the us was a positive.

    Europe, core-East and Africa accelerated 2% from the 12 months-ago quarter mainly as a result of growth in Spain, Germany, Italy and the U.okay.

    Asia-Pacific revenues declined 1% on a 12 months-over-yr foundation with modest increase in Japan.

    Strategic Imperatives growth Continues

    Strategic Imperatives (cloud, analytics, mobility and protection) grew 5% at cc from the year-ago quarter to $eleven.5 billion. excluding IBM Z product cycle impact Strategic Imperatives grew eleven% year over 12 months.

    safety revenues surged 17% (with the exception of IBM Z product cycle impact) and declined three% on cc groundwork. On a trailing 12-month basis, Strategic Imperatives revenues have been $40 billion, up 9%.

    Cloud revenues surged 6% from the yr-ago quarter to $5.7 billion and 19% (aside from IBM Z product cycle impact). The annual run price for cloud as-a-provider revenues accelerated 21% at cc on a 12 months-over-yr foundation to $12.2 billion.

    Cloud revenues of $19.2 billion on a trailing 12-month basis elevated 12% yr over 12 months.

    Cognitive Revenues Surge

    Cognitive solutions’ revenues-exterior elevated 2% 12 months over year (on cc basis) to $5.5 billion. Revenues from Cognitive options (including options application and transaction processing) accelerated essentially because of growth in options application, including analytics and artificial intelligence (AI).

    Segmental revenues relating Strategic Imperatives and Cloud improved 9% and 5%, respectively. Cloud as-a-provider earnings annual run fee turned into $2 billion.

    options software includes choices in strategic verticals like health, area-selected capabilities like analytics and protection, and IBM’s rising applied sciences of AI and blockchain. The phase also includes offerings that address horizontal domains like collaboration, commerce and skill. within the stated quarter, options utility revenues improved 3% year over yr.

    IBM stated that the mixing of AI into choices like customer journey analytics in commerce area helped SaaS signings to develop in double digit within the reported quarter.

    Transaction Processing utility comprises utility that runs mission-essential workloads, leveraging IBM’s hardware systems. Revenues have been up 1% on a 12 months-over-12 months basis.

    IBM witnessed growth in trade verticals like fitness, key areas of analytics and protection within the quarter. Watson fitness witnessed wide-based increase in Payer, company, Imaging and life Sciences domains.

    all through the fourth quarter, IBM elevated partnership with Vodafone group. Per the deal, IBM’s advanced hybrid cloud platform, AI, information superhighway of issues (“IoT”) capabilities will support Vodafone enterprise with digital transformation initiatives.

    IBM pointed out that analytics performed smartly within the quarter, pushed by facts science choices and IBM Cloud deepest for records offering.

    safety increase was pushed with the aid of choices in orchestration, records security and endpoint management.

    Story continues

    In blockchain, IBM announced addition of a couple of new consumers throughout the quarter, which contains “work with wise Dubai on the core East’s first executive-counseled blockchain platform.” The company additionally unveiled an on-prem offering all the way through the mentioned quarter, the IBM Blockchain Platform for IBM Cloud inner most. a couple of new deal wins is additionally aiding IBM to make stronger its foothold in blockchain know-how.

    international business functions Revenues enhance

    Revenues from world company capabilities-exterior phase had been $4.3 billion, up four% from the yr-ago quarter (up 6% at cc). The year-over-year increase turned into essentially as a result of increase across all three business areas particularly consulting, utility management and international procedure features.

    Segmental revenues referring to Strategic Imperatives grew 14%. Cloud practice surged 34%. Cloud as-a-service earnings annual run fee was $2.1 billion.

    utility administration revenues multiplied 4% from the yr-in the past quarter. global manner functions revenues climbed 5%. moreover, Consulting revenues elevated 10% year over yr, pushed through amazing performance from IBM’s digital company.

    technology services & Cloud systems: Revenues Dip

    Revenues from know-how functions & Cloud platforms-external decreased three% from the 12 months-in the past quarter (flat at cc) to $eight.9 billion. Segmental revenues touching on Strategic Imperatives advanced 13%, driven by using hybrid cloud functions. Cloud surged 22% from the yr-in the past quarter. Cloud as-a-carrier earnings annual run price changed into $eight billion.

    Integration application increased four% from the year-in the past quarter. right through the pronounced quarter, greater than a hundred businesses worldwide selected IBM Cloud deepest offering. Infrastructure functions revenues were flat on a 12 months-over-yr foundation.

    Technical guide services revenues diminished 3% from the year-in the past quarter.

    vigor & z14 power systems Revenues

    methods revenues diminished 21% on a yr-over-12 months basis (down 20% at cc) to $2.6 billion, basically because of impact of the IBM Z product cycle. Segmental revenues referring to Strategic Imperatives plunged 22%, whereas Cloud revenues declined 31%.

    IBM Z revenues diminished forty four% yr over yr. despite the fact, MIPS means has accelerated around 20%, pushed by means of vast-based mostly adoption of the z14 mainframe.

    energy revenues extended 10% from the yr-in the past quarter. The upside changed into primarily due to Linux and mighty adoption throughout the newest POWER9-primarily based structure.

    all over the fourth quarter, IBM accomplished the launch of its subsequent technology POWER9 processors for midrange and excessive-end systems which are designed for dealing with advanced analytics, cloud environments and data-intensive workloads in AI, HANA, and UNIX markets.

    IBM additionally brought new choices optimizing each hardware and utility for AI. administration believes that products like PowerAI vision and PowerAI business will help force new customer adoption.

    however, storage hardware revenues declined owing to weak performance within the mid-range end, partly offset through mighty increase in All Flash Arrays. IBM pointed out that pricing power in the immensely aggressive storage market is hurting revenues. The company introduced its new FlashSystems with next technology NVMe technology throughout the suggested quarter.

    working systems software revenues declined 3%, whereas methods Hardware slumped 23% from the yr-in the past quarter.

    eventually, international Financing (contains financing and used device sales) revenues reduced eleven% 12 months over 12 months and 9% at cc to $402 million.

    working particulars

    Non-GAAP gross margin remained unchanged from the year-in the past quarter at forty nine.5%. The gross margin benefited essentially with the aid of a hundred ninety groundwork points (bps) expansion in capabilities margin. besides the fact that children, destructive combine in IBM Z product cycle completely offset this expansion.

    operating rate declined 5.three% 12 months over yr, as a result of realization of acquisition synergies and improving operational efficiencies. IBM continues to put money into unexpectedly becoming fields like hybrid cloud, artificial intelligence (AI), security and blockchain.

    Pre-tax margin from carrying on with operations improved 50 bps on a year-over-yr groundwork to 23.1%.

    Cognitive solutions and global business services phase pre-tax margins elevated 290 bps and 520 bps, respectively, on a 12 months-over-yr basis. besides the fact that children, expertise capabilities & Cloud systems segment pre-tax margin shrunk 20 bps.

    Non-GAAP working margins from continuing operations contracted 90 bps and came in at 20.3%.

    stability Sheet & cash stream details

    IBM ended fourth-quarter 2018 with $eleven.99 billion in complete money and marketable securities in comparison with $14.70 billion on the end of third-quarter 2018. total debt (including existing component) was $45.eight billion, down from $46.9 million from the previous quarter.

    IBM suggested money movement from operations (excluding world Financing receivables) of $7.three billion and generated free money circulate of $6.5 billion in the quarter beneath assessment.

    in the said quarter, the business again $three.5 billion to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases. The business returned more than $10 billion to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases for the total fiscal 12 months.

    on the end of the yr, the enterprise had $3.three billion remaining beneath current buyback authorization.

    Fiscal 2018 Highlights

    IBM said fiscal 2018 non-GAAP earnings of $13.81 per share, where as revenues got here in at $seventy nine.6 billion, up 1% each and every 12 months over 12 months.

    Revenues from Cognitive options, global company features, expertise features & Cloud systems, techniques and global Financing got here in at $18.48 billion, $16.82 billion, $34.46 billion, $eight.03 billion and $1.fifty nine billion, respectively.

    assistance

    IBM expects non-GAAP EPS forecast for 2019 to be at least $13.ninety.

    IBM still anticipates 2019 free money flow of $12 billion.

    How Have Estimates Been moving because Then?

    It seems, sparkling estimates flatlined throughout the previous month.

    VGM scores

    at this time, IBM has a subpar growth ranking of D, although its Momentum score is doing lots greater with a B. Charting a somewhat identical route, the stock changed into allocated a grade of A on the price aspect, inserting it in the precise quintile for this funding approach.

    average, the stock has an aggregate VGM ranking of B. if you aren't concentrated on one method, this ranking is the one be sure you be drawn to.

    Outlook

    IBM has a Zacks Rank #3 (hang). They expect an in-line return from the stock within the following few months.

    want the newest recommendations from Zacks funding research? these days, that you may down load 7 most advantageous stocks for the subsequent 30 Days. click on to get this free file international company Machines organisation (IBM) : Free inventory evaluation record To study this article on Zacks.com click right here. Zacks funding analysis


    While it is hard errand to pick solid certification questions/answers assets regarding review, reputation and validity since individuals get sham because of picking incorrectly benefit. Killexams.com ensure to serve its customers best to its assets as for exam dumps update and validity. The greater part of other's sham report objection customers come to us for the brain dumps and pass their exams cheerfully and effortlessly. They never bargain on their review, reputation and quality because killexams review, killexams reputation and killexams customer certainty is imperative to us. Extraordinarily they deal with killexams.com review, killexams.com reputation, killexams.com sham report grievance, killexams.com trust, killexams.com validity, killexams.com report and killexams.com scam. On the off chance that you see any false report posted by their rivals with the name killexams sham report grievance web, killexams.com sham report, killexams.com scam, killexams.com protestation or something like this, simply remember there are constantly terrible individuals harming reputation of good administrations because of their advantages. There are a great many fulfilled clients that pass their exams utilizing killexams.com brain dumps, killexams PDF questions, killexams questions, killexams exam simulator. Visit Killexams.com, their example questions and test brain dumps, their exam simulator and you will realize that killexams.com is the best brain dumps site.

    Back to Braindumps Menu


    000-863 braindumps | MB2-186 study guide | E20-533 cram | LRP-614 practice questions | 1Z0-854 study guide | 9L0-408 brain dumps | C9010-022 real questions | HP0-780 braindumps | GPHR sample test | 000-241 examcollection | 000-736 practice test | HP0-J10 practice test | 920-174 dump | 000-870 questions and answers | MSC-235 Practice Test | RH302 dumps | 9A0-043 free pdf | C2010-509 free pdf download | 1Z0-493 practice exam | NCMA-CMA real questions |


    Looking for 000-743 exam dumps that works in real exam?
    killexams.com pleased with their recognition of helping people pass the 000-743 test of their very first attempt. Their achievements inside the past two years have been absolutely superb, way to their glad customers who are now able to boost their career within the speedy lane. killexams.com is the number one choice amongst IT professionals, especially the ones who are looking to climb up the hierarchy ranges faster of their respective corporations.

    If you are inquisitive about success passing the IBM 000-743 exam to begin earning? killexams.com has forefront developed IBM Storage Sales, Version 7 test questions that will make sure you pass this 000-743 exam! killexams.com delivers you the foremost correct, current and latest updated 000-743 exam questions and out there with a 100 percent refund guarantee. There are several firms that offer 000-743 brain dumps however those are not correct and latest ones. Preparation with killexams.com 000-743 new questions will be a best thing to pass this certification test in straightforward means. killexams.com Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under; WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for all exams on website PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders larger than $69 DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders larger than $99 SEPSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for All Orders We are all cognizant that a significant drawback within the IT business is there's an absence of quality study dumps. Their test preparation dumps provides you everything you will have to be compelled to take a certification test. Their IBM 000-743 exam offers you with test questions with verified answers that replicate the actual test. These Questions and Answers offer you with the expertise of taking the particular exam. prime quality and worth for the 000-743 exam. 100% guarantee to pass your IBM 000-743 exam and acquire your IBM certification. they have a tendency at killexams.com are committed to assist you pass your 000-743 exam with high scores. the probabilities of you failing your 000-743 exam, once memorizing their comprehensive test dumps are little.

    Astounding 000-743 items: they have their specialists Team to guarantee their IBM 000-743 exam questions are dependably the most recent. They are on the whole exceptionally acquainted with the exams and testing focus.

    How they keep IBM 000-743 exams updated?: they have their unique approaches to know the most recent exams data on IBM 000-743. Now and then they contact their accomplices extremely comfortable with the testing focus or in some cases their clients will email us the latest criticism, or they got the most recent input from their dumps advertise. When they discover the IBM 000-743 exams changed then they update them ASAP.

    Unconditional promise?: if you truly come up short this 000-743 IBM Storage Sales, Version 7 and don't need to sit tight for the update then they can give you full refund. Yet, you ought to send your score answer to us with the goal that they can have a check. They will give you full refund promptly amid their working time after they get the IBM 000-743 score report from you.

    IBM 000-743 IBM Storage Sales, Version 7 Product Demo?: they have both PDF variant and Software adaptation. You can check their product page to perceive what it like.

    killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
    WC2017: 60% Discount Coupon for all exams on website
    PROF17: 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
    DEAL17: 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
    DECSPECIAL: 10% Special Discount Coupon for All Orders


    At the point when will I get my 000-743 material after I pay?: Generally, After effective installment your username/secret key are sent at your email address inside 5 min. In any case, if any deferral in bank side for installment approval, at that point it takes minimal longer.

    000-743 | 000-743 | 000-743 | 000-743 | 000-743 | 000-743


    Killexams 7120X questions answers | Killexams IC3-1 questions and answers | Killexams 000-556 practice test | Killexams HP2-B104 VCE | Killexams 00M-670 study guide | Killexams 300-465 real questions | Killexams 000-340 free pdf | Killexams 000-M35 dump | Killexams 9A0-395 brain dumps | Killexams C2010-657 Practice test | Killexams HP0-D08 test prep | Killexams 310-620 exam questions | Killexams 1D0-571 dumps | Killexams ADM-201 examcollection | Killexams 1Z0-050 study guide | Killexams LOT-406 exam prep | Killexams HP0-A02 questions and answers | Killexams 1Z0-430 braindumps | Killexams 642-457 real questions | Killexams C2150-630 dumps questions |


    killexams.com huge List of Exam Braindumps

    View Complete list of Killexams.com Brain dumps


    Killexams 1Z1-574 study guide | Killexams 1Z0-402 mock exam | Killexams 000-228 dumps questions | Killexams Adwords-Display practice test | Killexams 1Z0-878 test prep | Killexams C9560-517 cheat sheets | Killexams C2180-274 real questions | Killexams FCBA pdf download | Killexams EX0-008 questions answers | Killexams 700-001 practice test | Killexams HP2-K29 dump | Killexams 9A0-096 exam prep | Killexams 4A0-106 cram | Killexams EE0-515 brain dumps | Killexams 000-R09 questions and answers | Killexams HP0-A20 real questions | Killexams ST0-100 study guide | Killexams 000-170 braindumps | Killexams 050-895 Practice Test | Killexams 000-560 test questions |


    IBM Storage Sales, Version 7

    Pass 4 sure 000-743 dumps | Killexams.com 000-743 real questions | http://smresidences.com.ph/

    Defensive IBM Object Storage Containers | killexams.com real questions and Pass4sure dumps

    The SETI@IBMCloud project and the SETI Institute’s Hackathon and Code Challenge rely on IBM infrastructure, such as the Cloud Foundry Go runtime, Apache Spark and OpenStack Object Storage, all of which are available in IBM Bluemix.

    In the process of building out the data management for the code challenge, they worked with a few other groups within IBM. However, they needed a way to provide access to the data securely, and not put other researchers in the position of being able to accidentally delete or overwrite objects or containers.

    With most container tech, the reference is to a “shipping container,” but I find food storage containers easier to move, share, provision, decommission, etc. Image credit: Dollar Tree. Encounter Safety

    In general, it’s probably a good policy for you to do the same with any data set you place in Object Storage. Instead of accessing your Object Storage data using your “admin” credentials, you should create credentials that have restricted, read-only access when performing analysis or sharing data with colleagues.

    Sorting through the available documentation on IBM Bluemix, the IBM Knowledge Center, and the OpenStack Object Storage pages took some time and testing. So you don’t have to do the same, this article will show you, step-by-step, how to:

  • create a backup container for your data
  • create new credentials in IBM Bluemix
  • set read-only access for a container.
  • Archive Container

    In IBM Object Storage, a backup container is called an “archive container.” The first step is to create an archive container for each container holding your data. By creating an archive container, the Object Storage system will automatically create old versions of your objects should you accidentally overwrite them. The instructions in IBM Bluemix are straightforward for this. From your local workstation, perform the following steps:

    1. Install the python-swiftclient Python package and command-line tool.

    > pip install python-swiftclient> pip install python-keystoneclient

    2a. Log in to IBM Bluemix (your Data Science Experience credentials should work) and navigate to your Object Storage instance.

    2b. Navigate to your DSX Object Storage instance from within Bluemix.

    3. Select the Service credentials tab.

    4. From the list of credentials displayed, click View Credentials and find a set of credentials that contain the "role":"admin" key-value pair.

    5. Copy the values from this set of credentials into a new file on your local machine. These are the environment variables that are necessary for the python-swiftclient command-line tool. For these instructions, I’ll name the file object_store.config. (I’ve also assumed you are using a bash shell.)

    export OS_PROJECT_ID=...export OS_PASSWORD='...'export OS_USER_ID=...export OS_AUTH_URL=https://identity.open.softlayer.com/v3export OS_REGION_NAME=dallasexport OS_IDENTITY_API_VERSION=3export OS_AUTH_VERSION=3

    6. Set the environment variables.

    > source object_store.config

    7. You should now be able to interact with your Object Storage instance from you local workstation’s command-line.

    > swift list

    For a complete list of available commands, see the documentation.

    8. Now, you can create a new archive container and assign it to hold backup versions of objects in one of your existing containers. For example, for a container named ATAdata, one would do the following:

    > swift post ATAdata_archive> swift post ATAdata -H "X-Versions-Location: ATAdata_archive"

    In the future, should any object be overwritten in the ATAdata container, a previous version will be placed in ATAdata_archive.

    Read-Only Credentials

    Next, in order to create a container that is read-only for a particular set of credentials, you first need to create those credentials in IBM Bluemix. Suppose you want to provide credentials for your colleague, Jane.

    1. Starting from the Service credentials tab of your Object Storage instance in Bluemix, create a new set of credentials.

    2. This step is critical. In the pane that opens in your browser, you must now add an Optional Parameter: {"role":"member"}

    3. Click the Add button to save your new credentials for Jane.

    4. Find the project_id and user_id of those newly created credentials.

    5. Using the python-swiftclient command-line tool, you’ll now append Jane’s project_id and user_id to the Access Control List (ACL) for the container for which you wish to provide read access.

    Since there may already be various configurations set for a container, you must be careful not to overwrite those values. First check the Read ACL values and then append Jane’s credentials.

    > swift stat -v ATAdataAccount: AUTH_cdbef69adf7a149c96930e1071f0a46bContainer: ATAdataObjects: 288009Bytes: 310238099808Read ACL: cd35:90feWrite ACL:Sync To:Sync Key:Accept-Ranges: bytesX-Trans-Id: tx92f020c8361c48ad81cd3-0079dc276dX-Storage-Policy: standardX-Timestamp: 1471903329.98992Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8X-Versions-Location: ATAdata_archive

    In the case above, you can see there are already values in the Read ACL, which they must not remove. If there are values in the Read ACL for your container, be sure to append Jane’s project_id:user_id to those existing values. Otherwise, specify only Jane’s project_id:user_id.

    > swift post -r "cd35:90fe,<project_id>:<user_id>" ATAdata

    Re-run the swift stat command to make sure your changes have been applied. That’s it.

    You can now send Jane’s credentials to her. With tools such as python-swiftclient and ibmos2spark, she can read data from the ATAdata container, but is unable to write to that container, nor to read/write to any other container in your Object Storage account.

    Safe Travels!

    You’ll find other ways to organize access to your containers. See the OpenStack Object Storage documentation on ACLs. In particular, one useful arrangement would be to allow for read-only or write-only access to containers for everybody with the same “project_id”.

    If you enjoyed this article, please ♡ it to recommend it to other Medium readers.


    Microsoft Vs. IBM: One Clear Winner | killexams.com real questions and Pass4sure dumps

    (Source: imgflip)

    Dividend growth investing is one of the most powerful ways of compounding both income and wealth over time. But the universe of income investing is vast and not limited to stodgy slow growing companies and industry.

    Cloud computing is one of the hottest growth industries right now and expected to remain so for the foreseeable future.

    Analyst firm Gartner forecasts that from 2017 to 2021 the global cloud computing market will grow nearly 18% CAGR, or more than four times as fast as the global economy.

    Synergy Research estimates the cloud computing market is already $250 billion in size, and growing even faster, 32% in 2018, with parts of the industry posting 50% sales growth.

    So it's no surprise that tech giants are racing to lock in market share in this large, high margin and rapidly growing business. But unless you're Warren Buffett, you have limited funds to invest, and most people want to keep their portfolio to a manageable number of companies. This means income growth investors need to be selective with what cloud computing stocks they buy.

    (Source: ZDNet)

    So let's take a look at two popular dividend cloud companies, Microsoft (MSFT) and IBM (IBM), who are some of the biggest players in cloud computing. Specifically, see how they compare in the six most important categories dividend investors care about.

    Most importantly, learn why Microsoft has IBM beat, hands down, as the far better cloud computing dividend growth stock, even considering valuation. In fact, I expect Microsoft to deliver about double IBM's total returns over the coming five years.

    Dividend Profile: Winner Microsoft

    Since dividend growth investing is all about income, let's start by looking at how each company's dividend profile stacks up, starting with long-term growth records.

    (Source: Simply Safe Dividends)

    Since IBM has been paying dividends for much longer, initially you might think it has the edge. After all, it's very close to becoming a dividend aristocrat, while Microsoft won't achieve that status for another 16 years.

    And in terms of dividend growth rates, IBM at first seems to measure up well to Microsoft, at least over the past 20 years. But note that IBM's dividend growth has been slowing down over time, while Microsoft's has remained stable (9.5% hike for 2019).

  • 2018 IBM dividend hike: 4.7%
  • 2017 dividend hike: 7.1%
  • 2016 dividend hike: 7.7%
  • That fast payout growth from MSFT is courtesy of a vastly superior business model and growth trajectory (more on this later). But dividend growth rates and track records are just two parts of the dividend profile, safety is by far the most important.

    Company Yield TTM FCF Payout Ratio

    Simple Safe Dividends Safety Score (Out Of 100)

    Microsoft 1.6% 42% 98 (Very Safe) IBM 4.5% 49% 65 (Safe)

    (Source: Simply Safe Dividends)

    While IBM may offer three times the yield, Microsoft has one of the safest dividends on Wall Street. That's not just due to a slightly lower payout ratio, but a far superior balance sheet.

    Company Net Debt/EBITDA Interest Coverage Ratio S&P Credit Rating

    Average Interest Cost

    Microsoft -1.0 12.8 AAA 3.6% IBM 1.6 18.3 A 1.7% Safe Limit 3 Or Less 8 Or More BBB- Or Better NA

    (Sources: Morningstar, Simply Safe Dividends, F.A.S.T Graphs, Gurufocus)

    Microsoft actually has $53.7 billion more cash than debt and only has higher borrowing costs because it mostly sticks to selling US bonds, while IBM is more active in overseas bonds where rates are much lower. But note that Microsoft is just one of two companies with a AAA credit rating (JNJ is the other) which is higher than the US Treasury's.

    And they can't forget that IBM is going to take on a lot of debt to fund its $34 billion acquisition of Red Hat (RHT). This purchase (the largest software company acquisition in US history) is part of IBM's latest efforts to turn around its struggling business. Here's what Virginia Rometty (CEO since 2012) said regarding the strategic rationale for the purchase.

    “The acquisition of Red Hat is a game-changer. It changes everything about the cloud market...IBM will become the world’s #1 hybrid cloud provider." - Virginia Rometty (emphasis added)

    But while it's true that Red Hat is a potentially smart and bold move for IBM, according to the Harvard Business Review about 80% of M&A fails to deliver long-term shareholder value. That's especially true if a company overpays and IBM is paying a 63% premium for RHT. 10 and 30 times sales and free cash flow is a rich price to pay that means IBM has little margin of error when it comes to executing on its integration and growth plans for its future hybrid cloud business (and its track record on overall execution is poor).

    But the large amount of debt IBM is taking on is a certainty, and S&P has already downgraded its credit rating from A+ to A over the far more bloated balance sheet.

    Moody's has put IBM's credit rating on watch for a downgrade citing:

    "a substantial increase in leverage... and a departure from IBM's historical acquisition philosophy of making small, tuck-in acquisitions that limit integration risk." - Moody's (emphasis added)

    IBM will effectively be doubling its leverage ratio (debt/EBITDA) putting it above the 3.0 that's considered safe for most companies. As a result, IBM has said it will suspend buybacks for 2020 and 2021 to focus on deleveraging, but that will almost certainly mean even slower dividend growth in the years ahead.

    And they can't forget that doubling leverage this late in the economic cycle also carries its own risks. Bond yields, even for investment-grade debt, can be highly volatile, spiking during times of financial market fear (as occurs in corrections and bear markets).

    Chart Data by YCharts

    With a recession possibly coming in 2020 or 2021, IBM might find itself facing tighter credit markets and higher refinancing costs that means it needs to execute flawlessly on its plan to return to about a 1.7 leverage ratio by the end of 2021.

    Growth Profile: Winner Microsoft

    Even more impressive than Microsoft's already large cloud revenue is the fact that it continues to grow that business at a breakneck pace and gain market share.

    That's at the expense of IBM, who has steadily been losing market share to larger, better funded, and nimbler giants like Amazon (AMZN), Alphabet (GOOG) and Alibaba (BABA). This explains Microsoft's far more impressive growth profile, both in terms of its top and bottom line.

    Microsoft Growth Profile

    (Source: Simply Safe Dividends)

    Since Satya Nadella took over as CEO of Microsoft from Steve Ballmer in 2014, the company's cloud and mobile first strategies have seen it return to solid revenue growth.

    That includes impressive growth in its most recent quarter of

  • 12% revenue growth
  • 18% operating income growth
  • 15% EPS growth
  • Cloud revenue grew 20%, fueled by 76% growth in Azure (92% full-year growth), Microsoft's cloud platform. Even more impressive is that commercial cloud (48% YOY growth) gross margins increased 5% to 62% over the past year, showing that Microsoft's overall cloud ecosystem is benefitting from ever larger economies of scale and rising network effects.

    Basically, cloud computing isn't just about data storage for companies. The ultimate winners in the industry will be companies that can combine data storage with advanced AI-based software and data analytics offerings that help customers maximize efficiency and profits.

    Microsoft's one-stop shop in terms of productivity software, which is deeply integrated into Azure (as is LinkedIn now), is the main reason Microsoft is able to achieve some of the industry's fastest growth rates while continuing to enjoy strong pricing power (wide moat).

    IBM Growth Profile

    (Source: Simply Safe Dividends)

    In contrast, IBM has struggled with declining or flat sales since 2012, when it began its latest major corporate turnaround effort. That involves selling declining legacy hardware businesses and focusing on strategic imperatives or SI, which includes analytics, cloud computing, security, and mobile. Basically, SI is the future tech divisions IBM hopes to fuel its eventual return to high single-digit earnings and free cash flow growth.

    (Source: IBM investor presentation)

    However, while the street may have liked IBM's most recent results (the benefit of very low expectations) the company still reported a 3% decline in revenue (-1% in constant currency).

    (Source: Motley Fool)

    And none of its business segment posted impressive growth, including cognitive solutions, which is home to IBM's much-hyped Watson AI platform. The huge decline in systems was caused by the launch of the Z-mainframe rolling off its comps and shows that IBM's brief 2018 return to positive top-line growth was not a trend reversal, but a temporary occurrence.

    In fairness to IBM, SI did make up 53% of revenue in Q4 and 50% in 2018, which is a goal the company has spent years trying to reach. And in absolute terms, SI is growing strongly.

  • Quarterly SI sales growth: 15% YOY
  • TTM SI sales growth: 22% YOY
  • However, it should be pointed out that IBM has been suffering from steadily falling growth rates in SI and this is the collection of businesses that are supposed to return it to modest top-line growth in the future. Thus far they've been unable to accomplish that and with IBM losing market share in cloud, that slowing growth could continue, causing IBM to deliver bottom-line growth that's far below what management is guiding for over the long-term.

    In fact, according to FactSet Research analysts don't think current management can deliver anywhere close to high single-digit EPS growth, but just 2.3% CAGR over the next five years (with sub 2% growth through 2020). Morningstar's 6.1% earnings growth forecast is the most bullish I've seen for the company, yet also has the company falling far short of its guidance.

    And those growth estimates now include Redhat, which is a very fast growing and cash-rich company (over 30% FCF margins).

    (Source: IBM Red Hat Acquisition presentation)

    IBM says that Redhat will accelerate top-line growth 2% over the long-term, which would be a welcome relief for investors who have sales fall or stagnate for seven straight years.

    (Source: IBM Red Hat Acquisition presentation)

    IBM claims that the deal will be accretive to cash flow within one year which is important since free cash flow is what funds dividends and pays down debt. However, due to high integration expenses, IBM is now guiding for a double-digit decrease in FCF for 2019.

  • 2018 FCF: $13.3 billion
  • 2019 FCF guidance: $12 billion (-9.8%)
  • This continues a decade long trend of flat FCF/share, which explains why IBM's dividend growth has slowed over time. And given the need to deleverage ASAP to retain a strong credit rating and good financial flexibility in the future, income investors can likely expect even slower payout growth through at least 2021 if not longer.

    IBM FCF/Share

    (Source: Simply Safe Dividends)

    In contrast, Microsoft's FCF/share growth, while far from the best in the industry, is at least trending higher over time.

    Microsoft FCF/Share

    (Source: Simply Safe Dividends)

    And keep in mind that a big reason that Microsoft's FCF is up just 26% since Nadella took over is Microsoft's much higher spending on R&D and capex to accelerate its cloud growth.

    Chart Data by YChartsChart Data by YCharts

    What about IBM? Well, it too spends a lot on R&D, but far less than Microsoft, or its large cloud peers.

    Chart Data by YCharts

    And most importantly, IBM's investments over time have failed to deliver strong returns on investment, which brings me to the most important reason that Microsoft is a far better investment.

    Business Quality: Winner Microsoft

    The quality of a business, including management's capital allocation skills, is the most important driver of long-term total returns. A good proxy for business and management quality is a company's profitability metrics.

    Company Operating Margin FCF Margin Return On Equity

    Return On Invested Capital

    Microsoft 33% 25% 39% 22% IBM 17% 9% 50% 21% Good Company Benchmark 12% 5% 10% 8%

    (Source: Simply Safe Dividends)

    Microsoft's margins are vastly superior to IBM's and the only reason IBM has higher returns on equity is the much more leveraged balance sheet. And while MSFT and IBM have basically equal returns on invested capital today, the long-term trend of that management quality proxy is what matters most.

    IBM ROIC Over Time

    (Source: Simply Safe Dividends)

    Since Rometty took over in 2012, IBM's ROIC has fallen by over 50%. In fairness, it has bounced back a bit from its 2017 lows, BUT the very expensive RHT acquisition is likely to send it plummetting to fresh 10+ year lows.

    In contrast, Nadella's tenure at MSFT has also turned around a long slide in ROIC that was due to Ballmer's complacency and horrific acquisition strategy. Nadella is the one who moved Microsoft from a perpetual license model focused on Windows to a subscription-based software as a service model deeply integrated into the cloud. He also quit the incredibly competitive and no margin wireless handset business that Ballmer failed to compete in. Morningstar's Dan Romanoff considers Nadella an "exemplary" CEO and I agree wholeheartedly.

    Microsoft ROIC Over Time

    (Source: Simply Safe Dividends)

    It should be noted that the LinkedIn acquisition is a big reason that MSFT's ROIC dipped in 2017 but it's since bounced back nicely, due to the success that deal has proven to be.

    (Source: MSFT earnings presentation)

    Microsoft's 2016 $26.2 billion acquisition of LinkedIn was highly controversial at the time, with many feeling it harkened back to Steve Ballmer's famous penchant for lighting shareholder money on fire by vastly overpaying resulting in huge write-downs later.

    But as you can see above, LinkedIn revenue is growing consistently at 30+% YOY thanks to similar growth rates in participation. Basically, Nadella bought LinkedIn to strengthen the cloud ecosystem by enhancing productivity-boosting features, which is helping to drive strong growth in commercial subscribers to Office 365. In fact, 89% of Microsoft's commercial software business is now subscriber based, creating annuity-like recurring monthly revenue.

    The most recent big acquisition Microsoft made was the 2018 $7.5 billion stock-based purchase of Github. Github is the "Facebook of programmers" with 31 million accounts and 100 million codes stored in its cloud-based servers. Those programs serve over 1.5 million companies and organizations around the world and Microsoft hopes that those programmers will become addicted to the Azure-based platform that Github under MSFT ownership will provide.

    And while IBM is making what's likely a desperate and overpriced and debt-funded acquisition to strengthen its cloud position, Microsoft is making far less risky moves such as partnering with VMWare (VMW), Accenture (ACN), and Mastercard (MA) to offer ever improved services to its customers. Which is why it keeps landing big clients like Exxon (XOM) to host its cloud needs. In fact, Microsoft's cloud business, which at 48% is growing more than twice as fast as IBM's, is now hosting over 420,000 global companies and organizations. That includes 89% of the Fortune 100.

    What about IBM's big investments? Well, the difference between IBM and Microsoft's overall investment approach can be summed up like this. IBM mints patents, while Microsoft mints money.

    Watson is a great example of this, with IBM having spent billions on the AI platform over the years and hyping it to the moon via famous appearances on Jeopardy, and Superbowl commercials touting it as "one of the most powerful tools their species has created."

    Virginia Rometty has also spent years proclaiming that Watson was a game-changing differentiator for IBM that is "touching a billion people... and be able to address, diagnose, and treat 80 percent of cancer in the world."

    In fact, Rometty is famous for overpromising and under delivering. When she took over in 2012 and began IBM's now seven-year turnaround effort she guided for $20 per share in Adjusted EPS in 2015. IBM missed that target by 26% ($14.90) and adjusted EPS fell to $13.8 in 2017 and 2018 and now management is guiding for "at least $13.8" in 2019 (but with 10% less FCF).

    Essentially Watson has, like most of IBM's big R&D efforts and Rometty's promises, failed to deliver top or bottom line growth over time. For example, IBM's Cognitive Solutions segment, home of Watson, saw very little growth in the past quarter, despite the supposed world-changing power of that AI platform.

    (Source: IBM earnings presentation)

    What's more, margins actually fell, showing that Watson based SI and cloud offerings don't have strong pricing power, unlike Microsoft, where cloud margins are soaring year after year.

    This highlights my biggest issue with IBM in general, which is that management likes to use the hottest buzzwords, and file lots of patents for promising future tech, yet investors never seem to benefit.

    In 2018 IBM's army of 8,500 researchers, engineers, scientists, and designers in 47 different U.S. states and 48 countries were granted a record 9,100 patents, the 26th consecutive year in which IBM received the most corporate patents in America.

    (Source: IBM)

    Over 5,000 of those patents were in "hot" industries like AI, cloud, and cybersecurity. The company is also getting patents for quantum computing, healthcare, and blockchain. From 1993 to 2018 IBM obtained over 110,000 patents which should make it a dominant name in every industry in which it operates and set it up for a glorious Star Trek-like future.

    Yet one of the largest collections of patents on earth hasn't stopped IBM investors from losing money during Rometty's tenure, even factoring in dividends.

    Chart Data by YCharts

    While the market can, and often is wrong about a company's value in the short-term, over the long-term total returns are always a function of good management delivering solid growth in fundamentals like sales, cash flow, and dividends.

    When it comes to the quality of the business, and its management, Microsoft under Nadella is unquestionably far superior to IBM under Rometty.

    Total Return Potential: Winner Microsoft

    Ultimately I'm not just interested in dividend stocks for the income, but because they are a proven source of great total returns over time. Total returns are a function of three things: yield + long-term earnings/cash flow growth (which dividends track) + valuation change.

    Company Yield 5 Year Expected Earnings Growth (Analyst Consensus) Total Return Expected

    Valuation-Adjusted Total Return Potential

    Microsoft 1.6% 12.3% 13.9% 15.0% IBM 4.5% 2.3% 6.8% 8.0% S&P 500 1.9% 6.4% 8.3% 3% to 8.2%

    (Sources: Simply Safe Dividends, Multipl.com, Morningstar, analyst estimates, Gordon Dividend Growth Model, Moneychimp)

    IBM certainly offers the superior yield, nearly triple that of Microsoft. And despite overpaying for Redhat and blowing up its balance sheet, the dividend is still relatively safe. However, while Microsoft's current yield may be paltry, it's expected to grow earnings and cash flow nearly six times as fast as Big Blue. Morningstar actually expects 15% EPS growth from MSFT compared to 6.1% from IBM and they are usually conservative in their growth assumptions.

    While all long-term growth forecasts must be taken with a grain of salt (educated guesstimates) in this case Microsoft's strong execution on cloud makes me think that 12% to 15% long-term earnings growth is a reasonable expectation. In contrast even that 2.3% consensus on IBM might be hard to achieve given the company's ongoing struggles with its legacy hardware businesses and slowing SI sales growth.

    That's not to say that I consider IBM a "sell" necessarily. After all, that attractive dividend should allow IBM to deliver close to the market's forward total returns in the coming years, as long as management can deliver on those VERY conservative growth estimates.

    But compared to Microsoft's return potential, which is about three times that of the market and about double that of IBM, the better long-term investment from a total return perspective is obvious.

    Risk Profile: Winner Microsoft

    All companies face risks to their growth plans, and IBM and Microsoft are no different. The biggest risks investors need to be aware of is the cutthroat and fast pace of change in an industry that is at the heart of disrupting so many sectors of the global economy.

    Cloud is an enormous, fast growing and high margin industry with tech giants like Amazon, Alphabet, and Alibaba investing billions each year to improve their offerings and trying to steal market share. And there are dozens of smaller players, who are trying to out-innovate and or compete on price, which potentially could disrupt Microsoft's dominant industry position.

    Now it's true that network effects are strong in cloud, which is why the industry's top names (other than IBM) have been steadily gaining market share. However, rising margins in cloud are largely due to enormous economies of scale and not rising prices. For example, Amazon has cut its AWS prices 67 times over the past 12 years (yet AWS margins keep rising).

    Microsoft's strong R&D efforts might be able to keep margins rising for several more years but eventually, they will likely peak and slow earnings and cash flow growth from the cloud (at least from margin expansion).

    Still, that's far superior to IBM's position which is weak and getting weaker, as seen by its declining margins in all segments, including SI and cloud.

    The other big risk to consider is that in order to compete with several giant and well-funded rivals Microsoft is going to occasionally make big acquisitions, as seen under Nadella with LinkedIn and Github.

    While LinkedIn appears to have been a success, it's still too early to say whether $7.5 billion for Gitbub will prove a wise move. The strategic rationale for that deal is very ephemeral, while IBM's buying Redhat is much easier to understand (if not likely to actually restore it to strong growth).

    This is why it's important for investors in tech dividend stocks to watch ROIC trends over time to make sure that management is allocating capital wisely, and not merely empire building.

    Finally, they can't forget that high R&D spending is the lifeblood of tech (you can't grow your way to great success only on acquisitions). Microsoft's rapidly rising R&D budget and cloud-based capex have thus far paid off, but with complex and large corporations, there is no certainty that such investments will always come out profitably.

    This is why FCF/share is another critical quality metric to watch over time. While tech companies can be applauded for pouring billions into expanding their businesses, ultimately FCF/share is what funds dividends and if that doesn't grow over the long-term then I can't recommend even a fast growing and industry-leading company.

    But again, these risks are shared by all dividend-paying cloud companies, and at the end of the day, Microsoft is far better positioned to navigate these fast-changing waters than floundering and soon to be hyper-leveraged IBM.

    Valuation: Tie

    Chart Data by YCharts

    A big reason so many income investors like IBM is due to its low valuation, which isn't surprising given how poorly shares have done over the past year (or five). And with Microsoft having crushed the market over the past 12 months many understandably consider MSFT richly priced.

    Company Forward PE 5 Year Average PE Growth Rate Baked In

    Expected Growth Rate

    Microsoft 24.3 19.9 9.1% 12.3% IBM 10.0 10.5 1.3% 2.3% Average Tech Company 17.6 NA 5.4% NA

    (Sources: Simply Safe Dividends, F.A.S.T Graphs, Benjamin Graham)

    From a forward PE perspective that makes sense given that Microsoft is trading at a premium to both its historical forward PE and that of most tech companies. IBM is trading at a slight discount to its historical forward PE which bakes in even slower growth than analysts expect. But note that Microsoft's PE isn't actually that high for a company that's expected to grow at low to mid-double-digits.

    And when I look at both companies via my favorite valuation tool for income stocks, dividend yield theory, then IBM too seems like the obvious valuation winner.

    (Source: Investment Quality Trends)

    DYT is what asset manager/newsletter publisher Investment Quality Trends has been exclusively using since 1966 to deliver decades of market-beating returns from blue-chip income stocks. This valuation method compares a company's yield to its historical yield because, assuming fundamental conditions (like growth rates) are similar, yields are mean reverting over time and historical yields approximate fair value.

    Company Yield 5 Year Average Yield

    Potential Discount To Fair Value

    Microsoft 1.6% 2.5% -27% IBM 4.5% 3.6% 19%

    (Sources: Simply Safe Dividends, Dividend Yield Theory)

    DYT (which is what I officially use to buy companies for my portfolios) says Microsoft is about 27% overvalued while IBM is 19% undervalued. However, I don't actually consider Big Blue's margin of safety that high because its poor quality management team continues to underdeliver on ever weakening growth guidance.

    In other words, if IBM can't return to consistent earnings and cash flow growth then I don't expect its yield to actually return to that 3.6% average yield, but rather the average yield to rise over time to match the current yield (IBM could be a value trap).

    But how can I claim that MSFT is tied with IBM in terms of valuation when two popular valuation methods show IBM as the apparent winner? That would be using the final valuation approach I consider, Morningstar's three-stage discounted cash flow model.

    Company Morningstar Fair Value Estimate Discount To Fair Value Upside To Fair Value Long-Term Valuation Boost

    Valuation-Adjusted Total Return Potential

    Microsoft $125 10% 11% 1.1% 15.0% IBM $158 12% 13% 1.2% 8.0%

    (Source: Morningstar)

    While no DCF model can be taken as gospel (all include numerous growth assumptions and discount rates that are actually different for all investors) I consider Morningstar's fair value estimates to be the gold standard as far as Wall Street analysts go.

    Morningstar is slightly more bullish on both companies compared to the analyst consensus but considers both cloud companies to be roughly equally undervalued. While I'm not necessarily as bullish on IBM as Morningstar is, in this case, I'm willing to give IBM the benefit of the doubt despite its long-term growth prospects being far less certain than Microsoft's.

    But the point is that given Microsoft's vast superiority in all other important categories, I consider it a decent buy at today's prices for most income investors. Personally, I consider IBM a "hold" until I see them actually post steady bottom line growth and prove that Redhat isn't a costly mistake.

    If you have more confidence in Rometty than I do, then IBM is a decent buy BUT just make sure to size your position appropriately in case management continues its well-established track record of overpromising and under delivering.

    Bottom Line: Microsoft Is A Far Better Cloud Computing Dividend Growth Investment Right Now

    Don't get me wrong, I understand why high-yield income investors might choose IBM over Microsoft. After all, the relatively safe 4.5% yield is triple what Microsoft offers, and if you're retired and need dividend to pay the bills, stronger long-term growth is less of a concern.

    But from a fundamental and valuation perspective, I have to still recommend Microsoft over IBM for most long-term investors. That's because on every important metric that matters, including management quality, profitability, growth outlook, and even valuation, Microsoft matches or beats IBM by a wide margin.

    IBM's bullish thesis is entirely based on a low valuation and long-promised turnaround that management keeps failing to deliver, and that analysts (and I) have basically lost confidence in. On the other hand, Microsoft's vast cloud empire continues to grow like a weed under the expert guidance of Satya Nadella.

    When it comes to choosing lower quality deep value over high-quality growth, I'm with Buffett on this one "it's far better to buy a wonderful company at a fair price than a fair company at a wonderful price."

    Well, today I've shown that Microsoft is not just a wonderful company, but arguably somewhat undervalued. Meanwhile, IBM, a fair company at best, may not be as undervalued as the PE ratio and high-yield might initially indicate.

    The bottom line is that when it comes to cloud computing dividend growth stocks, Microsoft is a far better buy than IBM.

    Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.


    Bare Metal Cloud Market: 2019 Global Sales, Size, Share, Competitive Analysis, Upcoming Opportunities And Forecast To 2023 | killexams.com real questions and Pass4sure dumps

    Feb 28, 2019 (MarketersMedia via COMTEX) -- Bare Metal Cloud Market Report By Service Type (Computing Services, Networking Services, Database Services, Identity and Access Management Services, Volume and Object Storage Services, Others), Organization Type (Small and Medium Enterprises, Large Enterprises), Vertical - Global Industry Forecast To 2023

    Pune, India - February 28, 2019 /MarketersMedia/ --

    Key playersThe prominent players in the bare metal cloud market are major vendors such as IBM Corporation (U.S.), Oracle Corporation (U.S.), CenturyLink, Inc. (U.S.), Internap Corporation (U.S.), and Rackspace Hosting, Inc. (U.S.). The other key innovators in the market are Dell Technologies, Inc., Scaleway Inc., Spotinst, Joyent, Inc., Bigstep, and Strom.

    Get Sample Report @ https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/sample_request/7032

    Market synopsisGlobal bare metal cloud market is expected to grow from USD 1.52 billion in 2017 to USD 7.73 billion by 2023, at a CAGR of 31.12% during the forecast period.Bare metal cloud is a public cloud service alternative that is installed directly on hardware without need for virtualization setup. It is majorly deployed to enhance the storage capacity, conduct data-intensive computing operations, and to efficiently deliver latency sensitive high-performance workloads across multiple platforms.A bare metal cloud server is delivered through Metal-as-a-Service (MaaS) model that is dedicated to a single tenant. In this cloud type, workloads are deployed onto servers that are pre-configured with requirements specified by the client and in accordance with performance capacity. The bare metal cloud servers provide high performance, high availability, and cost-effective infrastructure services.Bare metal cloud is segregated into five different service types, namely, computing services, networking services, database services, Identity and Access Management (IAM) services, and volume & object storage services. Computing services are the most popular bare metal cloud service among enterprises adopting cloud ensure the proper functioning of its data center operation. Computing services include mission-critical applications, data-intensive computing operations, large Random-Access Memory (RAM) & Non-Volatile Memory express (NVMe), and Solid State Drives (SSDs).Growing use of data intensive applications that are latency sensitive, growing demand for flexible, efficient, and on-demand billing of application in cloud service and need for greater processing power and input/output operations per second are some of the factors boosting the growth of bare metal cloud market. However, stringent cloud regulations and premium pricing model are some of the factors hindering the growth of this market.The key players operating in the bare metal cloud market are IBM Corporation (U.S.), Oracle Corporation (U.S.), CenturyLink, Inc. (U.S.), Internap Corporation (U.S.), and Rackspace Hosting, Inc. (U.S.). These players are largely investing in organic growth startegies to diversify their product offering. In 2018, Oracle Corporation launched a new bare metal Oracle Cloud Infrastructure compute offering for enterprises running high performance latency sensitive computing workload such as artificial intelligence and engineering simulations, in cloud. This new bare metal cloud offering by oracle will provide customers access to a low latency and high bandwidth remote direct memory access network.

    SegmentationBare Metal Cloud Market is segmented based on service type, organization type, vertical and region.Based on the service type, the market is segmented into computing services, networking services, database services, identity and access management services, volume and object storage services, and others.By organization type, the market is segmented into small and medium enterprises and large enterprises.On the basis of vertical, the market is segmented into BFSI, government, healthcare, IT and telecommunication, manufacturing, retail, and others.By region, the market is segmented into North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific and the rest of the world.

    Regional analysisThe global market for bare metal cloud is estimated to grow at a significant rate during the forecast period from 2018 to 2023. The geographical analysis of bare metal cloud market is done for North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and the rest of the world.North America followed by Europe is expected to dominate the bare metal cloud market from 2018 to 2023 as these regions are sustainable and well-established economies that are investing heavily in new technologies such as Internet of Things (IoT), big data, DevOps, mobility, and social media. Furthermore, public sector cloud initiatives such as CloudFirst and trusted cloud will drive the growth in these regions during the forecast period.Asia-Pacific is estimated to grow at the highest CAGR during the forecast period owing to major cloud initiatives taken by various countries such as Australia, China and Singapore (G-Cloud)

    Competitive AnalysisThe bare metal cloud market has witnessed the trend of service enhancement across the world. Key players to further strenghten their market position have opted for partnerships, agreements, and collaborations as their key inorganic growth strategy. XX% of the total company developments were a part of partnership & collaboration whereas, merger & acquisition accounted for XX% of the total strategic developments adopted by the key players in the market.

    Intended AudienceCloud services providersSolution vendorsNetworking and communication services providersOriginal Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs)Government AssociationsManaged Service Providers (MSPs)System integratorsTechnology standards organizations, forums, alliances, and associationsUniversities and research organizationsGovernment bodies

    Get More Information @ https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/press-release/bare-metal-cloud-market

    TABLE OF CONTENTS1 Executive Summary2 Scope Of The Report2.1 Market Definition2.2 Scope Of The Study2.2.1 Research Objectives2.2.2 Assumptions & Limitations2.3 Markets Structure3 Market Research Methodology3.1 Research Process3.2 Secondary Research3.3 Primary Research3.4 Forecast Model4 Market LandscapeContinued

    About Market Research Future:At Market Research Future (MRFR), they enable their customers to unravel the complexity of various industries through their Cooked Research Report (CRR), Half-Cooked Research Reports (HCRR), Raw Research Reports (3R), Continuous-Feed Research (CFR), and Market Research & Consulting Services.MRFR team have supreme objective to provide the optimum quality market research and intelligence services to their clients. Their market research studies by Components, Application, Logistics and market players for global, regional, and country level market segments, enable their clients to see more, know more, and do more, which help to answer all their most important questions.In order to stay updated with technology and work process of the industry, MRFR often plans & conducts meet with the industry experts and industrial visits for its research analyst members

    Contact Info:Name: Market Research FutureOrganization: Market Research FutureWebsite: https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/bare-metal-cloud-market-7032

    Source URL: https://marketersmedia.com/bare-metal-cloud-market-2019-global-sales-size-share-competitive-analysis-upcoming-opportunities-and-forecast-to-2023/486955

    Source: MarketersMedia

    Release ID: 486955



    Direct Download of over 5500 Certification Exams

    3COM [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AccessData [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACFE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Acme-Packet [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACSM [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Admission-Tests [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ADOBE [93 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AFP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AICPA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AIIM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Alcatel-Lucent [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Alfresco [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Altiris [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Amazon [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    American-College [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Android [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APICS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Apple [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AppSense [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APTUSC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Arizona-Education [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ARM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Aruba [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASIS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASQ [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASTQB [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Autodesk [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Avaya [96 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AXELOS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Axis [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Banking [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BEA [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BICSI [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BlackBerry [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BlueCoat [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Brocade [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Business-Objects [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Business-Tests [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CA-Technologies [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Certification-Board [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Certiport [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CheckPoint [41 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIPS [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cisco [318 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Citrix [48 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIW [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cloudera [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cognos [19 Certification Exam(s) ]
    College-Board [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CompTIA [76 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ComputerAssociates [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Consultant [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Counselor [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CPP-Institue [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CPP-Institute [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CSP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CWNA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CWNP [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Dassault [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DELL [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DMI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DRI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ECCouncil [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ECDL [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    EMC [129 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Enterasys [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Ericsson [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ESPA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Esri [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ExamExpress [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Exin [40 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ExtremeNetworks [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    F5-Networks [20 Certification Exam(s) ]
    FCTC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Filemaker [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Financial [36 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Food [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Fortinet [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Foundry [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    FSMTB [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Fujitsu [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GAQM [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Genesys [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GIAC [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Google [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GuidanceSoftware [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    H3C [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HDI [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Healthcare [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HIPAA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hitachi [30 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hortonworks [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hospitality [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HP [750 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HR [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HRCI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Huawei [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hyperion [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IAAP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IAHCSMM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IBM [1532 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IBQH [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ICAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ICDL [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IEEE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IELTS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IFPUG [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IIBA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IISFA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Intel [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IQN [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IRS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISACA [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISC2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISEB [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Isilon [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISM [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    iSQI [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ITEC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Juniper [64 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LEED [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Legato [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Liferay [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Logical-Operations [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Lotus [66 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LPI [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LSI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Magento [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Maintenance [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    McAfee [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    McData [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Medical [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Microsoft [374 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Mile2 [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Military [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Misc [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Motorola [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    mySQL [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NBSTSA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCEES [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCLEX [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Network-General [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NetworkAppliance [39 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NIELIT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Nokia [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Nortel [130 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Novell [37 Certification Exam(s) ]
    OMG [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Oracle [279 Certification Exam(s) ]
    P&C [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Palo-Alto [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PARCC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PayPal [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Pegasystems [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PEOPLECERT [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PMI [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Polycom [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PostgreSQL-CE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Prince2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PRMIA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PsychCorp [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PTCB [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    QAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    QlikView [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Quality-Assurance [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RACC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Real-Estate [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RedHat [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RES [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Riverbed [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RSA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Sair [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Salesforce [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SANS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SAP [98 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SASInstitute [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SAT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SCO [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SCP [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SDI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    See-Beyond [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Siemens [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Snia [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SOA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Social-Work-Board [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SpringSource [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SUN [63 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SUSE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Sybase [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Symantec [134 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Teacher-Certification [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    The-Open-Group [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    TIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Tibco [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Trainers [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Trend [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    TruSecure [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    USMLE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    VCE [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Veeam [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Veritas [33 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Vmware [58 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Wonderlic [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Worldatwork [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    XML-Master [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Zend [6 Certification Exam(s) ]





    References :


    Dropmark : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/11734889
    Wordpress : Questions and Answers IBM 000-743 IBM Storage Sales, Version 7 Questions and Answers : 158 Update On : October 3, 2017 File Format : PDF Windows Compatibility : Windows 10/8/7/Vista/2000/XP/98 Mac Compatibility : All Versions including iOS 4/5/6/7 Android : All Android Versions Linux : All Linux Versions Download Free 000-743 PDF If you are looking for 000-743 Practice Test containing Real Test Questions, you are at right place. They have compiled database of questions from Actual Exams in order to help you prepare and pass your exam on the first attempt. All training materials on the site are Up To Date and verified by their experts. Killexams provide latest and updated Practice Test with Actual Exam Questions and Answers for new syllabus of IBM 000-743 Exam. Practice their Real Questions and Answers to Improve your knowledge and pass your exam with High Marks. They ensure your success in the Test Center, covering all the topics of exam and build your Knowledge of the 000-743 exam. Pass 4 sure with their accurate questions. 100% Pass Guarantee Their 000-743 Exam PDF contains Complete Pool of Questions and Answers and Braindumps checked and verified including references and explanations (where applicable). Their target to assemble the Questions and Answers is not only to pass the exam at first attempt but Really Improve Your Knowledge about the 000-743 exam topics. 000-743 exam Questions and Answers are Printable in High Quality Study Guide that you can download in your Computer or any other device and start preparing your 000-743 exam. Print Complete 000-743 Study Guide, carry with you when you are at Vacations or Traveling and Enjoy your Exam Prep. You can access updated 000-743 Exam from your online account anytime. Download your 000-743 Study Guide immediately after buying and Start Preparing Your Exam Prep Right Now! Certification Tracks IBM 000-743 is part of following Certification Paths. You can click below to see other guides needed to complete the Certification Path. Certified Specialist IBM Certifications Main features Instant download Access - Allowing you to start study as soon as you complete your purchase High Success Rate - 98% Success rate with money back guarantee Updated on regular basis - are updated as soon as any change in actual exams is done Latest Test Experience - Questions as you will experience in real exam Secure shopping experience - Your information will never be shared (Privacy Statment) Versatile File Format - PDF Viewable at Windows/MAC/iPhone/iPad/Android/Sambian/ etc. Printable / Movable - Printable in High Quality, Portable, Transferable, Movable
    Issu : https://issuu.com/trutrainers/docs/000-743
    Dropmark-Text : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/12296273
    Blogspot : http://killexamsbraindump.blogspot.com/2017/11/pass4sure-000-743-practice-tests-with.html
    RSS Feed : http://feeds.feedburner.com/Pass4sure000-743DumpsAndPracticeTestsWithRealQuestions
    Box.net : https://app.box.com/s/10sgxn8bkh9x6zic2td80k9hv7uz6n10
    publitas.com : https://view.publitas.com/trutrainers-inc/ibm-000-743-dumps-and-practice-tests-with-real-questions
    zoho.com : https://docs.zoho.com/file/60eu6610360761010447ba47e3c30150e4ee5






    Back to Main Page





    Killexams exams | Killexams certification | Pass4Sure questions and answers | Pass4sure | pass-guaratee | best test preparation | best training guides | examcollection | killexams | killexams review | killexams legit | kill example | kill example journalism | kill exams reviews | kill exam ripoff report | review | review quizlet | review login | review archives | review sheet | legitimate | legit | legitimacy | legitimation | legit check | legitimate program | legitimize | legitimate business | legitimate definition | legit site | legit online banking | legit website | legitimacy definition | pass 4 sure | pass for sure | p4s | pass4sure certification | pass4sure exam | IT certification | IT Exam | certification material provider | pass4sure login | pass4sure exams | pass4sure reviews | pass4sure aws | pass4sure security | pass4sure cisco | pass4sure coupon | pass4sure dumps | pass4sure cissp | pass4sure braindumps | pass4sure test | pass4sure torrent | pass4sure download | pass4surekey | pass4sure cap | pass4sure free | examsoft | examsoft login | exams | exams free | examsolutions | exams4pilots | examsoft download | exams questions | examslocal | exams practice |

    www.pass4surez.com | www.killcerts.com | www.search4exams.com | http://smresidences.com.ph/